1h Free Analyst Time
The GF & GFRP Composites Market grew from USD 57.96 billion in 2024 to USD 61.31 billion in 2025. It is expected to continue growing at a CAGR of 6.17%, reaching USD 93.62 billion by 2032. Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.
Positioning GF and GFRP composites at the core of next generation performance, sustainability, and design imperatives
Glass fiber and glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites have evolved from niche engineering materials into foundational enablers of modern industrial design. They now sit at the intersection of high-performance structural engineering, lightweighting imperatives, and the global shift toward more durable, corrosion-resistant solutions. From transportation and construction to electrical, marine, wind energy, and consumer applications, these composites underpin critical infrastructure and products that must perform reliably in demanding environments.In recent years, the conversation around GF and GFRP composites has broadened beyond mechanical strength and cost competitiveness. Stakeholders are increasingly focused on sustainability, recyclability, energy efficiency, and regulatory compliance, particularly as environmental and safety standards tighten worldwide. This has amplified the importance of resin and fiber innovations, process optimization, and more transparent value chains.
At the same time, the competitive landscape is becoming more complex. Material suppliers face rising expectations from OEMs for tailored formulations, faster development cycles, and integrated technical support. End users are comparing GF and GFRP solutions not only against traditional metals and concrete, but also against carbon fiber composites and advanced hybrid materials. This is reshaping how performance is defined and valued, with lifecycle cost, reparability, and environmental footprint emerging as decisive criteria.
Against this backdrop, decision-makers need more than basic market awareness. They require a nuanced understanding of how resin chemistries, fiber forms, and manufacturing processes are aligning with specific application and industry needs, as well as how regional policy and trade dynamics are influencing investment and sourcing choices. This executive summary provides a structured view of those dynamics, highlighting transformative shifts, regulatory and tariff impacts, key segmentation insights, regional contrasts, and strategic implications for companies operating across the GF and GFRP composites value chain.
By synthesizing technology, application, and regional perspectives, the following sections aim to equip senior leaders and technical stakeholders with the clarity needed to recalibrate strategies, reposition portfolios, and capture emerging opportunities in an increasingly performance-driven and sustainability-conscious market environment.
Unpacking the structural transformations redefining technology choices, application priorities, and value creation in GF and GFRP
The landscape for glass fiber and GFRP composites is undergoing structural change, driven by converging forces of regulation, sustainability expectations, and technology maturation. Where the industry once competed primarily on tensile strength, modulus, and price, it is now being reshaped by a broader set of value drivers that span lifecycle performance, recyclability pathways, and compatibility with advanced manufacturing ecosystems.One major shift is the rebalancing between thermoset and thermoplastic resin systems. Traditional thermoset matrices such as polyester, vinyl ester, epoxy, phenolic, and polyurethane remain deeply entrenched in applications that demand robust chemical resistance, dimensional stability, and structural reliability. However, thermoplastic platforms including polypropylene, polyamide, polycarbonate, polyethylene terephthalate, and polybutylene terephthalate are gaining ground, particularly in transportation and consumer sectors where recyclability, reprocessability, and compatibility with high-speed molding methods are emphasized. This has encouraged OEMs to evaluate material choices not only on initial performance, but also on end-of-life strategies and circularity potential.
Concurrently, the role of fiber architecture is being reconsidered as design engineers seek to optimize stiffness, impact performance, and cost within tighter weight and space constraints. Continuous rovings continue to anchor high-load and filament-wound solutions, while chopped strands enable efficient molding of complex geometries. Woven fabrics and mats provide a balance of drapeability, in-plane strength, and process flexibility, allowing designers to tailor layups for specific load cases and durability requirements. The move toward more simulation-driven design is accelerating the use of engineered fabric and mat configurations, with digital tools increasingly used to validate performance before tooling investments are committed.
On the process side, there is a clear move from labor-intensive, open-mold techniques toward more automated, closed-mold and high-throughput methods. Compression molding, resin transfer molding, pultrusion, filament winding, injection molding, and vacuum infusion are benefiting from advances in process control, in-mold sensing, and digital monitoring. These improvements are enabling more consistent quality, tighter tolerances, and better resin utilization, which in turn support the cost and performance requirements of automotive, wind energy, and building components. While lay-up processes remain important, particularly for large custom structures and marine applications, they are increasingly complemented by more automated alternatives where volumes and design complexity justify the investment.
Another transformative shift is the reframing of applications from a simple structural versus nonstructural perspective to a more nuanced functional taxonomy. Structural uses now extend beyond classical load-bearing structures and pressure systems to encompass advanced structural panels that integrate insulation, fire performance, and aesthetic features. Nonstructural roles for GF and GFRP materials, including exterior body parts, interior components, and decorative profiles, are being enriched by improved surface finish, coloring, and compatibility with coatings. Meanwhile, functional applications such as electrical insulation components, corrosion-resistant linings, thermal barrier elements, and acoustic and vibration damping solutions are attracting heightened attention as electrification, process intensification, and comfort expectations rise.
Industry verticals are absorbing these shifts at different speeds. Transportation and construction are leading adopters of lightweight and corrosion-resistant GFRP solutions, particularly as stricter emission targets, extended asset lifetimes, and infrastructure resilience concerns take center stage. Electrical and electronics applications are becoming more sophisticated with the spread of high-voltage and high-frequency systems, while marine and wind energy sectors continue to rely on glass fiber composites for durable, low-maintenance structures exposed to harsh environments. Consumer goods, sports equipment, and industrial and chemical processing equipment are also diversifying their use of GF and GFRP as designers seek distinctive aesthetics, ergonomic forms, and long-lasting performance.
Finally, distribution channels are adapting to reflect a more digitally informed buyer base and increasingly globalized supply chains. Direct sales relationships remain essential where large volumes and intensive technical support are required, particularly for OEMs integrating composites into critical systems. Indirect channels play a significant role in fragmented, regional markets and for smaller converters, while online and digital platforms are beginning to support more efficient product discovery, technical data access, and transactional purchasing, especially for standard grades and smaller batch requirements. Together, these shifts are redefining competitive advantage, favoring companies that can integrate material innovation, processing expertise, application knowledge, and responsive supply models into a coherent value proposition.
Assessing how United States tariff policies through 2025 are reshaping sourcing, localization, and competitiveness in GF and GFRP
Tariff policy in the United States is exerting a multi-layered influence on the GF and GFRP composites ecosystem, with implications that extend beyond simple cost increases on imported materials. As existing and anticipated duties are applied to glass fiber intermediates, resins, and downstream composite products, supply chains are being reconfigured, sourcing strategies revisited, and capital deployment decisions recalibrated.A key dimension of the cumulative impact lies in raw material procurement. Tariffs on imported glass fiber rovings, fabrics, and mats, as well as on certain thermoset and thermoplastic resin feedstocks, can raise input costs for domestic processors and compounders. This may compress margins for manufacturers of polyester, vinyl ester, epoxy, phenolic, and polyurethane-based GFRP, as well as for converters using polypropylene, polyamide, polycarbonate, polyethylene terephthalate, and polybutylene terephthalate matrices. In response, many U.S.-based producers are exploring alternative sourcing from regions not subject to the same tariff regimes, renegotiating contracts, or redesigning formulations to reduce dependence on specific high-tariff components.
Downstream, tariffs affecting semi-finished and finished composite goods influence the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturers in domestic and export markets. For sectors such as transportation, construction, and industrial and chemical processing, higher costs on imported structural components, panels, and pressure systems may create opportunities for domestic GFRP fabricators, provided they can scale production and meet performance specifications at acceptable cost. Conversely, if tariffs trigger retaliatory measures in other countries, U.S. exports of composite parts for marine, wind energy, or high-value electrical and electronics applications could face additional barriers.
Over time, these dynamics encourage localized investment in manufacturing capacity, particularly in processes like compression molding, resin transfer molding, pultrusion, filament winding, injection molding, and vacuum infusion. Domestic producers may accelerate automation and process optimization to offset higher material costs, focusing on tighter scrap control, shorter cycle times, and improved yields. Additionally, the relative attractiveness of thermoplastic GFRP may increase where recyclability and potential reuse of scrap streams can partially mitigate cost pressures.
Tariffs also interact with the distribution landscape. Direct sales arrangements may become more prevalent as large buyers seek to work closely with domestic suppliers to stabilize pricing and secure reliable access to rovings, chopped strands, woven fabrics, mats, and formulated resin systems. Indirect channels and distributors may face increased complexity in managing inventory and pricing across multiple tariff classifications. Meanwhile, online and digital channels can help buyers compare options and identify alternative local sources, but they cannot fully substitute for strategic supply partnerships in critical applications.
At the application level, the cumulative effect of tariffs can subtly reshape design choices. Engineering teams in transportation and construction may favor configurations that maximize the structural efficiency of GFRP, seeking to reduce overall material usage without compromising performance. In nonstructural and decorative profiles, designers might shift toward formulations that rely more heavily on locally available fibers or resins. For functional applications such as corrosion-resistant linings, thermal barrier components, and electrical insulation, the cost of materials must be balanced against the high cost of failure and maintenance; here, tariffs may spur greater emphasis on long-term durability and lifecycle cost justification.
Strategically, U.S.-based stakeholders need to view tariffs not as a temporary anomaly but as one of several enduring variables in risk planning. Scenario analysis that incorporates different tariff levels, potential shifts in trade alliances, and the emergence of new regional supply hubs is becoming an essential tool for capital planning. Organizations that proactively diversify supply, build regional redundancy, and align product portfolios with domestic strengths will be better positioned to weather future policy adjustments and capitalize on opportunities created by shifting cost structures.
Decoding resin, fiber, process, application, industry, and channel segments to reveal where GF and GFRP value truly resides
Understanding the GF and GFRP composites landscape requires more than a high-level view of materials and end markets; it demands attention to the nuanced interplay of resin systems, fiber architectures, manufacturing technologies, application classes, industry verticals, and distribution models. Each segmentation lens highlights different levers of performance and profitability, and together they reveal where differentiation and value capture are most attainable.At the resin level, thermoset and thermoplastic chemistries underpin distinctly different value propositions. Thermoset formulations based on polyester, vinyl ester, epoxy, phenolic, and polyurethane continue to dominate many structural, large-part, and corrosion-prone environments because they deliver robust mechanical properties and chemical resistance with well-established processing windows. Polyester and vinyl ester remain workhorses in construction, marine, and infrastructure, while epoxy and phenolic resins are often favored where higher temperature stability or stringent fire performance is required. Polyurethane matrices are increasingly important in applications that demand toughness and impact resistance, including some transportation and industrial components.
By contrast, thermoplastic resin systems such as polypropylene, polyamide, polycarbonate, polyethylene terephthalate, and polybutylene terephthalate align well with markets prioritizing high-volume production, rapid cycle times, and recyclability. Polypropylene-based composites, for example, are attractive in automotive interior and semi-structural parts, while polyamide and polycarbonate formulations support higher temperature and mechanical performance in more demanding transportation and electrical applications. Polyethylene terephthalate and polybutylene terephthalate contribute to improved dimensional stability and durability in electrical and electronic housings, connectors, and precision components.
Fiber form segmentation sheds light on how load paths, manufacturability, and cost intersect. Rovings are central to filament winding and pultrusion, enabling high unidirectional strength in pipes, pressure vessels, and profiles. Chopped strands are the backbone of many molding compounds and injection-molded GFRP parts, particularly where complex geometries and short cycle times are crucial. Woven fabrics provide controlled orientation and drape, allowing structural panels and load-bearing structures to achieve tailored performance characteristics. Mats, including continuous filament and chopped strand variants, balance ease of handling with isotropic properties, making them highly relevant in marine hulls, construction panels, and corrosion-resistant laminates.
Manufacturing process segmentation reveals where efficiency, automation, and capital intensity converge. Compression molding and injection molding are closely associated with thermoplastic and bulk molding compound approaches in high-volume parts, especially for transportation and consumer products. Filament winding is tightly linked to high-pressure systems and storage vessels, while pultrusion enables continuous production of profiles and structural elements with consistent quality. Resin transfer molding and vacuum infusion provide closed-mold routes to complex structural components and large parts, aligning with stricter environmental and emissions regulations. Lay-up processes maintain their role in customized, lower-volume structures and repair, though pressure for improved repeatability is encouraging hybrid approaches and partial automation.
Application segmentation provides a functional lens that clarifies the diversity of roles GFRP can play. Within structural applications, load-bearing structures and structural panels serve as critical elements in buildings, bridges, transportation frames, and wind turbine blades, where mechanical reliability and fatigue performance dominate design decisions. Pressure systems, including pipes and tanks, rely heavily on filament-wound and pultruded configurations to withstand internal loads and corrosive media. Nonstructural applications such as exterior body parts, interior components, and decorative profiles highlight the importance of surface quality, paintability, and integration with other materials, especially in automotive and architectural settings.
Functional applications are emerging as a growth frontier. Electrical insulation components leverage the dielectric strength of GFRP in switchgear, transformers, and high-voltage environments. Corrosion-resistant linings support aggressive chemical processing, water treatment, and offshore infrastructure, where maintenance windows are limited and failure costs are high. Thermal barrier components help manage heat in transportation, industrial, and building applications, while acoustic and vibration damping roles enhance comfort and user experience in vehicles, trains, and machinery. These functional roles often justify premium formulations and more advanced process controls.
End-use industry segmentation reveals distinct adoption patterns and performance drivers. Transportation sectors focus on lightweight structures, crash performance, and integration with metals and polymers, using GFRP in both structural and nonstructural roles. Construction and infrastructure emphasize durability, corrosion resistance, and speed of installation, particularly in challenging environments such as coastal regions and chemical plants. Electrical and electronics applications concentrate on dielectric performance, flame retardancy, and dimensional stability, while marine deployments prioritize resistance to moisture, UV exposure, and impact. Wind energy applications demand long, fatigue-resistant blades, and industrial and chemical sectors require reliable performance under mechanical, thermal, and chemical stress. Consumer goods and sports use GFRP to achieve distinctive aesthetics, ergonomics, and weight reduction.
Finally, distribution channel segmentation clarifies how these diverse needs reach the marketplace. Direct sales pathways dominate where engineered solutions, co-development, and long-term supply agreements are necessary, especially for transportation, wind energy, and major infrastructure projects. Indirect channels through distributors and intermediaries support smaller converters, regional fabricators, and maintenance markets by providing stock availability and technical assistance across a broad portfolio. Online and digital channels, though still emerging in this space, are becoming more relevant for standardized materials, technical data dissemination, and streamlined procurement, particularly as younger engineering and purchasing teams expect digital-first interactions.
Taken together, these segmentation insights underscore that success in GF and GFRP composites hinges on precise alignment: matching resin chemistries and fiber forms with the right processes, tailoring each combination to the specific functional demands of applications and industries, and delivering it through the channels best suited to each customer profile.
Illuminating regional contrasts across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia Pacific that shape GF and GFRP adoption and innovation
Regional dynamics exert a profound influence on how glass fiber and GFRP composites are specified, manufactured, and adopted, with each major geography demonstrating distinct regulatory, industrial, and technological profiles. Appreciating these differences is critical for organizations that must coordinate global strategies while executing effectively at a local level.In the Americas, demand for GFRP is closely tied to transportation, oil and gas, construction, and wind energy, with the United States and Canada acting as key innovation and consumption hubs. Regulatory pressures around emissions, fuel economy, and infrastructure resilience are driving greater use of lightweight and corrosion-resistant composites in vehicles, bridges, pipelines, and storage systems. Latin American markets, led by Brazil and Mexico, are expanding their use of GFRP in construction, marine, and industrial segments, although investment cycles can be influenced by macroeconomic volatility. Across the region, there is rising interest in localized manufacturing of rovings, fabrics, and molded components to mitigate currency risks, tariff exposure, and logistics bottlenecks.
Europe, the Middle East, and Africa present a highly heterogeneous but strategically important landscape. European countries are at the forefront of integrating sustainability criteria into material selection, with stringent environmental and safety regulations guiding choices of resin chemistry, additives, and manufacturing practices. The region hosts a sophisticated base of composite manufacturers serving wind energy, transportation, building, and industrial markets, and it is particularly active in adopting closed-mold and automated processes such as resin transfer molding, pultrusion, and advanced infusion techniques. In the Middle East, large-scale infrastructure, water, and energy projects drive demand for corrosion-resistant pipes, tanks, and structural components, often leveraging filament winding and pultrusion. Africa’s adoption is more gradual but increasing, particularly in construction, water distribution, and power sectors, where GFRP offers compelling lifecycle cost advantages over traditional materials.
Asia-Pacific has become the central engine of volume growth for GF and GFRP composites, underpinned by large-scale manufacturing bases and expansive infrastructure programs. China is a dominant producer and consumer of glass fibers, mats, fabrics, and composite components, supplying a wide array of applications from transportation and construction to wind energy and consumer goods. The region’s ability to integrate high-volume processes like compression molding, injection molding, and pultrusion with competitive cost structures has reshaped global trade patterns in intermediate and finished composite products. Japan and South Korea contribute advanced technology, particularly in automotive, electronics, and industrial applications, often emphasizing precision, quality, and high-performance formulations.
At the same time, Southeast Asian economies are emerging as important nodes in the composite value chain, attracting investment in both manufacturing and assembly operations. Their role is expanding beyond low-cost production, as local demand for higher-quality infrastructure, transportation, and energy systems grows. Across Asia-Pacific, the diversity of regulatory frameworks and development stages creates both complexity and opportunity, inviting tailored go-to-market strategies and region-specific alliances.
Comparing these regions, several cross-cutting themes emerge. The Americas are leaning into localization and resilience in the face of tariff and supply chain uncertainties. Europe, the Middle East, and Africa are pushing the boundaries of sustainability, regulatory compliance, and advanced processing methods, while also addressing demanding environmental conditions in infrastructure and energy projects. Asia-Pacific is consolidating its status as a global manufacturing powerhouse and increasingly as an innovation center, particularly in high-volume applications and integrated composite systems.
For stakeholders, this regional mosaic implies that strategies must account for different adoption curves of thermoset and thermoplastic resin systems, varying levels of automation in processes such as filament winding, resin transfer molding, and vacuum infusion, and distinct priorities in structural, nonstructural, and functional applications. Those able to align product portfolios, technical support, and supply models with the specific requirements of each region will be best positioned to capture growth and manage risk in an evolving global composites landscape.
How leading GF and GFRP companies are realigning portfolios, capabilities, and footprints to secure long term competitive advantage
Corporate strategies in the GF and GFRP composites sector are increasingly characterized by a blend of specialization and integration. Leading companies are reconfiguring their portfolios to capture value across multiple points of the chain, from glass fiber production and resin formulation to intermediate textiles, semi-finished forms, and fully engineered components. This trend reflects a recognition that customers expect not only materials, but also design support, process expertise, and reliable, globally coordinated supply.On the materials front, key players are investing in advanced glass formulations, surface treatments, and sizings that enhance fiber-matrix adhesion and improve durability under mechanical, thermal, and environmental stress. Development efforts often target compatibility with specific resin families such as polyester, vinyl ester, epoxy, phenolic, and polyurethane on the thermoset side, as well as polypropylene, polyamide, polycarbonate, polyethylene terephthalate, and polybutylene terephthalate in thermoplastic systems. This chemistry-focused innovation aims to deliver higher specific strength and stiffness, improved fatigue performance, and better retention of properties under moisture and elevated temperatures.
At the same time, many companies are expanding their offerings in rovings, chopped strands, woven fabrics, and mats, recognizing that fiber form is a critical differentiator for both processability and end-use performance. Investments in weaving, texturizing, and mat production lines enable tailored areal weights, orientations, and drape behaviors that match the needs of filament winding, pultrusion, resin transfer molding, vacuum infusion, and compression molding operations. Suppliers capable of providing consistent, high-quality reinforcements while collaborating closely on process optimization secure a strategic position within customer programs.
Process technology and application engineering are also becoming central to corporate strategies. Some companies traditionally focused on raw materials are moving downstream, acquiring or partnering with converters specializing in compression molding, injection molding, or lay-up processes. Others are deepening their expertise in niche technologies such as high-pressure resin transfer molding or automated fiber placement for complex structural panels. This expansion allows them to offer turnkey solutions encompassing material selection, part design, tooling guidelines, and validation testing, particularly for structural and functional applications in transportation, wind energy, electrical infrastructure, and industrial equipment.
Another prominent theme is sustainability and regulatory alignment. Major participants are actively researching lower-emission resins, bio-based or recycled feedstocks, and processes that reduce styrene and VOC emissions, in response to tightening environmental standards. Attention is also turning to end-of-life strategies, with initiatives focused on mechanical recycling of thermoplastic composites, recovery of fibers from thermoset waste, and development of design-for-recyclability guidelines. Companies that can credibly demonstrate progress on these fronts enhance their appeal to OEMs facing corporate sustainability targets and regulatory scrutiny.
Geographically, leading firms are recalibrating their manufacturing footprints to balance cost efficiency with resilience. This includes building or expanding plants in North America and Europe to support regionalization and shorter supply chains, while maintaining substantial capacity in Asia-Pacific for global supply and regional demand. Many are exploring dual or multi-sourcing strategies for critical inputs to mitigate geopolitical risk and tariff exposure. Simultaneously, digitalization initiatives-such as advanced planning systems, quality monitoring, and customer portals-aim to improve transparency, forecasting accuracy, and service responsiveness.
Competition is no longer defined solely by price and catalog breadth. Instead, differentiation increasingly rests on the ability to co-innovate with customers, deliver consistent quality across global programs, and provide technical support that reduces time to market. Companies that can align resin and fiber innovations with the realities of manufacturing processes and the specific needs of structural, nonstructural, and functional applications are better positioned to secure long-term supply agreements and participate in high-value projects.
In this environment, smaller and mid-sized participants find opportunity in specialization. By focusing on particular end-use sectors such as marine, industrial and chemical, or consumer goods and sports, or by mastering specific processes like filament winding or pultrusion, they can carve out defensible niches. Strategic partnerships, licensing agreements, and joint development programs are becoming common pathways for these firms to access advanced materials while contributing application-specific knowledge and agile manufacturing capabilities.
Translating composite market complexity into clear strategic moves and operational priorities for industry decision makers
Industry leaders navigating the GF and GFRP composites space face a complex mix of technological options, regulatory demands, and evolving customer expectations. To convert this complexity into opportunity, they need a structured set of actions that spans product strategy, operations, partnerships, and market engagement.A first priority is to sharpen portfolio focus based on clear segmentation logic. Organizations should systematically map their offerings against thermoset and thermoplastic resin systems, identifying where polyester, vinyl ester, epoxy, phenolic, and polyurethane formulations are best positioned to compete, and where polypropylene, polyamide, polycarbonate, polyethylene terephthalate, and polybutylene terephthalate composites offer strategic advantage. This mapping should be cross-referenced with target applications and industries, from structural load-bearing elements and pressure systems to functional electrical insulation, thermal barrier, and corrosion-resistant components, ensuring resources are allocated to segments with defensible differentiation and sustainable demand.
In parallel, leaders should invest in deepening their understanding of fiber form and process interactions. By building or strengthening internal expertise in rovings, chopped strands, woven fabrics, and mats, and how each behaves in compression molding, filament winding, lay-up, pultrusion, resin transfer molding, injection molding, and vacuum infusion, companies can provide more precise technical guidance to customers. This capability becomes particularly valuable in sectors where design cycles are accelerating and simulation-based development is standard, as it allows for earlier, more influential engagement in material selection.
Operationally, there is a clear case for expanding automation, process control, and digitalization across composite manufacturing lines. Implementing advanced quality monitoring, data-driven process optimization, and predictive maintenance can reduce scrap, increase thro
Table of Contents
1. Preface
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. GF & GFRP Composites Market, by Resin Type
9. GF & GFRP Composites Market, by Fiber Form
10. GF & GFRP Composites Market, by Manufacturing Process
11. GF & GFRP Composites Market, by Application Type
12. GF & GFRP Composites Market, by End Use Industry
13. GF & GFRP Composites Market, by Distribution Channel
14. GF & GFRP Composites Market, by Region
15. GF & GFRP Composites Market, by Group
16. GF & GFRP Composites Market, by Country
18. China GF & GFRP Composites Market
19. Competitive Landscape
List of Figures
List of Tables
Companies Mentioned
The key companies profiled in this GF & GFRP Composites market report include:- AGY Holding Corp.
- ARC Insulations & Insulator Ltd.
- China Jushi Co., Ltd.
- Chongqing Dujiang Composites Co., Ltd.
- Chongqing Polycomp International Corporation
- Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A.
- Dongguan Juli Composite Technology Co.Ltd.
- Exel Composites Plc
- Gurit Services AG
- Hexcel Corporation
- Hyosung Corporation
- ISOVOLTA AG
- Johns Manville Corporation
- Mitsubishi Chemical Group
- Nippon Electric Glass Co., Ltd.
- Owens Corning
- Röchling SE & Co. KG
- SABIC
- SAERTEX GmbH & Co. KG
- Schunk Group
- Scott Bader Company Ltd.
- SFTec Inc.
- Sika AG
- Strongwell Corporation
- Syensqo SA
- Taishan Fiberglass Inc.
- Teijin Limited
- Tencom Limited
- TIP composite Co., Ltd.
- Zhejiang Yuanda Fiberglass Mesh Co.,ltd.
Table Information
| Report Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| No. of Pages | 191 |
| Published | January 2026 |
| Forecast Period | 2025 - 2032 |
| Estimated Market Value ( USD | $ 61.31 Billion |
| Forecasted Market Value ( USD | $ 93.62 Billion |
| Compound Annual Growth Rate | 6.1% |
| Regions Covered | Global |
| No. of Companies Mentioned | 31 |
