1h Free Analyst Time
The Nursing Home Monitoring System Market grew from USD 1.13 billion in 2025 to USD 1.17 billion in 2026. It is expected to continue growing at a CAGR of 5.24%, reaching USD 1.61 billion by 2032. Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.
Modern nursing home monitoring is becoming core care infrastructure as safety expectations rise, staffing tightens, and accountability intensifies
Nursing home monitoring systems have moved from “nice-to-have” tools into foundational infrastructure for modern long-term care. Facilities are under pressure to elevate resident safety, reduce avoidable incidents, and respond faster to changes in condition while also contending with staffing constraints and rising expectations from families. In this environment, monitoring is no longer limited to emergency call buttons; it increasingly encompasses passive sensing, fall risk identification, location awareness, and workflow orchestration that supports caregivers without adding documentation burden.At the same time, the definition of monitoring is expanding. Solutions now blend resident-worn devices, room-based sensors, connected beds, and software that translates signals into prioritized actions. The most impactful programs link monitoring alerts to clear escalation paths, measurable response-time improvements, and auditable records that support quality initiatives. As adoption grows, decision-makers are evaluating how monitoring aligns with privacy and consent, infection prevention protocols, and the realities of older buildings where connectivity and power constraints can undermine deployment.
This executive summary frames the market through operational outcomes rather than technology alone. It highlights how providers and solution partners are recalibrating product strategies around clinical relevance, interoperability, and long-term total cost of ownership, setting the stage for a more mature and accountable era of nursing home monitoring.
From reactive alarms to predictive, workflow-integrated platforms, the monitoring landscape is transforming around usability, outcomes, and interoperability
The landscape is shifting from reactive alerting toward predictive, workflow-aware monitoring that aims to prevent incidents before they escalate. Instead of generating high volumes of alarms, newer systems focus on signal quality, context, and resident-specific baselines. This change is driven by lessons learned from alarm fatigue in acute care and by the recognition that long-term care requires different thresholds, calmer interfaces, and stronger emphasis on caregiver usability.Another transformative shift is the move from isolated point solutions to platform thinking. Providers increasingly expect monitoring to integrate with nurse call, electronic health records, facility communication tools, and incident management processes. Vendors are responding by offering open APIs, standardized integration pathways, and consolidated dashboards that support centralized visibility across units or even across multi-facility groups. As a result, procurement teams are scrutinizing not just device capabilities but also data governance, identity management, and role-based access controls.
Hardware strategy is evolving as well. Facilities want flexible combinations of wearables and non-wearables so they can respect resident preferences and clinical suitability. Passive sensing is gaining traction where adherence to wearables is low, while hybrid approaches are used to balance privacy with safety for residents at higher risk. Additionally, advancements in edge processing and battery efficiency are improving reliability in environments where Wi‑Fi coverage and maintenance resources vary.
Finally, the buyer conversation is shifting toward measurable outcomes and implementation realism. Providers are demanding evidence of reduced falls, faster response times, and improved staff productivity, but they are also asking for change management support. Training, alert tuning, escalation design, and ongoing optimization are now viewed as essential components of successful deployments rather than optional services.
Potential 2025 U.S. tariffs could reshape device costs and supply resilience, pushing buyers toward lifecycle contracts and flexible architectures
United States tariffs anticipated for 2025 introduce a material planning variable for nursing home monitoring systems, particularly where supply chains depend on imported components and contract manufacturing. Many monitoring solutions rely on sensors, chipsets, radios, batteries, and enclosures that can be exposed to tariff adjustments depending on country of origin and product classification. As providers and vendors finalize budgets and implementation schedules, the prospect of price volatility is influencing both procurement timing and vendor selection.The cumulative impact is likely to be felt in several operational ways. Vendors may adjust pricing structures, shift toward configuration-based packaging, or introduce alternative hardware tiers to preserve margins while remaining competitive. Some providers may accelerate purchases ahead of tariff implementation to lock in costs, while others may delay upgrades if capital budgets are constrained. In parallel, service-heavy models-where value is delivered through software, analytics, and managed optimization-can become comparatively more attractive because they reduce dependence on frequent hardware refreshes.
Tariffs can also reshape vendor strategies around manufacturing and sourcing. We are seeing stronger incentives to diversify suppliers, qualify alternate components, and expand assembly options closer to end markets. While these moves can improve resilience, they can introduce temporary complexity such as re-certification cycles, longer lead times during transition, and the need for stricter quality assurance to maintain device reliability in care-critical settings.
For nursing homes and long-term care operators, the practical takeaway is to treat tariffs as a risk factor to be managed rather than a one-time event. Contract language around price holds, spare parts availability, warranty coverage, and device lifecycle commitments becomes more important. Likewise, standardizing on interoperable architectures can prevent lock-in and make it easier to pivot between hardware variants without disrupting workflows or retraining staff.
Segmentation signals show buyers prioritizing workflow-integrated systems, software differentiation, service-led deployments, and flexible cloud-to-hybrid models
Key segmentation patterns reveal that purchasing decisions differ most sharply by how facilities define clinical risk, staffing coverage, and the level of integration required. Across product type distinctions, the strongest momentum favors systems that blend resident monitoring with staff communication and escalation workflows, because facilities want fewer consoles and clearer accountability. Where organizations prioritize simplicity and rapid installation, they often choose streamlined monitoring packages that deliver high-confidence alerts with minimal configuration, while more complex environments lean toward configurable systems that support nuanced rules and resident-specific thresholds.When the market is viewed through components, the software layer increasingly serves as the differentiator. Hardware innovation remains important, yet buyers are scrutinizing how analytics reduce false alarms, how dashboards support shift handoffs, and how reporting aligns with quality and compliance needs. Services also play a decisive role; implementation support, site surveys, and post-go-live optimization can determine whether monitoring becomes a trusted workflow or an ignored stream of noise. As a result, vendors that pair strong devices with structured clinical onboarding and continuous tuning are positioned to win larger, multi-site deployments.
Deployment preferences vary by facility IT maturity and risk tolerance. Cloud-forward strategies are gaining ground because they simplify updates, enable centralized management, and support cross-facility benchmarking. However, some operators continue to require on-premises or hybrid approaches due to internal governance, connectivity concerns, or a desire for tighter local control of sensitive data. Consequently, solutions that offer flexible deployment options-without fragmenting features-tend to align best with diverse portfolios.
End-user segmentation underscores that the same monitoring signal must be valuable to different roles. Nursing staff need actionable alerts and fast acknowledgement loops, administrators need operational reporting and audit trails, and families increasingly expect transparent communication that respects privacy. Systems that can route the right information to the right stakeholder, with role-based controls and configurable notification pathways, are better able to support adoption without overwhelming caregivers or exposing sensitive resident details.
Regional adoption patterns reflect differences in regulation, labor pressures, infrastructure readiness, and privacy norms shaping monitoring priorities worldwide
Regional dynamics demonstrate that adoption intensity often correlates with regulatory emphasis, labor availability, and digital infrastructure readiness. In the Americas, many operators are balancing quality-of-care imperatives with persistent staffing constraints, which elevates demand for monitoring that can reduce manual rounding burdens while documenting response performance. Procurement teams in this region also tend to emphasize cybersecurity assurance and integration with existing clinical and communication systems, reflecting heightened scrutiny on data protection and operational continuity.Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, diversity in reimbursement structures, privacy expectations, and facility modernization creates uneven demand patterns. In markets with stronger digital health strategies and aging population pressures, monitoring investments are framed around resident independence and proactive care pathways. In other areas, constrained budgets and older building infrastructure can push buyers toward cost-effective retrofits, phased rollouts, and solutions that function reliably under variable network conditions.
In Asia-Pacific, the mix of rapid eldercare expansion, urbanization, and technology openness is accelerating interest in scalable monitoring architectures. Operators frequently look for solutions that can be deployed across new builds and high-density facilities, often with a strong preference for mobile-first workflows and centralized command visibility. At the same time, localization requirements-language support, regional hosting considerations, and device certifications-shape vendor selection and partnership strategies.
Across all regions, the common thread is the shift from technology trials to operational programs. Successful regional strategies account for training models, local support coverage, and the ability to adapt alert policies to cultural expectations around privacy, family involvement, and autonomy.
Vendor competition is intensifying around interoperability, cybersecurity, and service depth as buyers demand dependable outcomes beyond feature checklists
Competition is increasingly defined by end-to-end reliability: sensor accuracy, connectivity resilience, alert relevance, and operational support. Established clinical communication and nurse call providers are extending into resident monitoring to protect platform share, while monitoring-first innovators are building broader ecosystems through partnerships and integrations. This results in a market where clinical credibility and the ability to demonstrate real-world performance matter as much as feature breadth.Vendors are differentiating through interoperability and implementation maturity. Buyers want proof that systems can integrate with existing workflows rather than forcing staff into parallel processes. Companies that offer validated integration pathways, strong device management, and configurable escalation policies are gaining credibility with multi-facility operators. Additionally, cybersecurity posture-secure provisioning, encryption, patch cadence, and transparent vulnerability handling-has become a decisive factor in vendor shortlists.
Service capability is emerging as a competitive moat. Facilities increasingly expect vendors to help tune alerts, train staff, and sustain adoption beyond initial installation. As monitoring programs scale, providers also value analytics that translate activity data into operational insights, such as peak alert periods, unit-level response patterns, and opportunities to refine rounding schedules.
Finally, partnership ecosystems are shaping enterprise wins. Collaborations with EHR providers, wireless infrastructure partners, and system integrators can reduce deployment friction. Vendors that can coordinate across these stakeholders-while offering clear accountability for outcomes-are better positioned to support complex care environments and multi-site standardization efforts.
Leaders can win with workflow-first design, lifecycle-centric contracting, phased rollouts, and adoption programs that reduce alarm fatigue and friction
Industry leaders can strengthen ROI and adoption by starting with a workflow-first design. Before selecting devices, define what constitutes an actionable event, who owns the response, and how escalation should occur when staff are busy. Facilities that map alert pathways to real staffing patterns tend to reduce alarm fatigue and improve trust in the system. In parallel, create a governance model that includes clinical leadership, IT, facilities management, and compliance so policy decisions-such as privacy thresholds and notification rules-are made consistently.Procurement should prioritize lifecycle assurance over lowest unit price. Build contracts around uptime expectations, replacement timelines, spare parts access, and software update rights. Given the possibility of tariff-driven price shifts and component substitutions, require transparency on sourcing changes and re-certification impacts. Also insist on interoperability commitments, including API availability and integration support, to protect flexibility if technology stacks evolve.
Implementation strategy should emphasize phased scaling with measurable milestones. Begin with targeted units where risk is highest or staffing strain is most acute, then expand once alert tuning and training materials are validated. Capture baseline metrics such as response time distribution, incident patterns, and staff workload proxies so performance improvements can be demonstrated credibly. Continuous optimization should be treated as an operational practice, not a one-time project, with scheduled reviews that refine thresholds and notification routing.
Finally, invest in adoption enablement that respects caregiver reality. Short, role-specific training, in-the-moment coaching, and clear “what to do next” guidance inside the application can increase adherence. Pair this with communication strategies for residents and families that explain what is monitored, what is not monitored, and how privacy is protected, thereby building trust and reducing resistance.
A decision-oriented methodology triangulates product evidence, implementation realities, and compliance needs to reflect how long-term care adopts monitoring
The research methodology applies a structured approach to understanding how nursing home monitoring systems are evaluated, procured, implemented, and operationalized. It begins with defining the solution boundary-covering resident monitoring devices, room-based sensing, software platforms, analytics, and services-then mapping stakeholder requirements across clinical, operational, and IT functions. This framing ensures the analysis reflects how decisions are made in long-term care settings rather than importing assumptions from acute care.The study synthesizes insights from multiple evidence streams, including vendor product documentation, regulatory and standards considerations relevant to healthcare technology, public cybersecurity disclosures where available, and implementation narratives shared by providers and solution partners. These inputs are triangulated to identify recurring themes such as integration readiness, alert governance, privacy-by-design practices, and service models that sustain performance over time.
A comparative analysis lens is used to evaluate how solutions differ across device modalities, deployment architectures, and operational support. Attention is paid to practical constraints-connectivity variability, building retrofits, staff turnover, and mixed-acuity resident populations-because these factors often determine whether technology delivers durable outcomes. The methodology also examines procurement and contracting patterns, emphasizing lifecycle factors such as update cadence, support coverage, and component availability.
Quality control is maintained through consistency checks across sources, normalization of terminology, and validation of directional trends against observable market behavior such as partnership activity, product roadmaps, and compliance-driven feature development. The result is a decision-oriented view designed to support strategy, vendor selection, and implementation planning.
Monitoring success now depends on operational reliability, privacy-respecting design, and continuous optimization rather than isolated technology pilots
Nursing home monitoring systems are entering a more accountable phase where success is measured by operational reliability and clinical relevance, not by the volume of alerts generated. Providers are looking for solutions that respect resident dignity while enabling faster interventions, clearer communication, and better documentation of care processes. As monitoring becomes embedded into daily routines, the highest-value systems are those that align technology with the way caregivers actually work.The market’s evolution is being shaped by interoperability expectations, cybersecurity scrutiny, and the growing recognition that services and change management are essential. Meanwhile, supply chain uncertainty and tariff considerations heighten the importance of lifecycle contracts and architectural flexibility. Across regions, differences in policy, infrastructure, and cultural norms influence deployment choices, yet the common objective remains consistent: reduce risk while supporting staff.
Decision-makers who approach monitoring as a program-governed, tuned, and continuously improved-are better positioned to achieve sustained outcomes. With clear workflows, measurable milestones, and vendor partners committed to integration and support, nursing home operators can move from isolated pilots to scalable, enterprise-ready monitoring capabilities.
Table of Contents
1. Preface
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Nursing Home Monitoring System Market, by Type
9. Nursing Home Monitoring System Market, by Component
10. Nursing Home Monitoring System Market, by Delivery Mode
11. Nursing Home Monitoring System Market, by Connectivity
12. Nursing Home Monitoring System Market, by Monitoring Type
13. Nursing Home Monitoring System Market, by End User
14. Nursing Home Monitoring System Market, by Application
15. Nursing Home Monitoring System Market, by Region
16. Nursing Home Monitoring System Market, by Group
17. Nursing Home Monitoring System Market, by Country
19. China Nursing Home Monitoring System Market
20. Competitive Landscape
List of Figures
List of Tables
Companies Mentioned
The key companies profiled in this Nursing Home Monitoring System market report include:- Abbott Laboratories
- Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
- Ascom Holding AG
- Baxter International Inc.
- Brightree, LLC
- Cadi Scientific Pte Ltd
- CareSimple, Inc.
- CareVue Software, Inc.
- Cerner Corporation
- Dozee Health Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
- Epic Systems Corporation
- General Electric Company
- Honeywell International Inc.
- Koninklijke Philips N.V.
- MatrixCare, Inc.
- Medtronic plc
- Netsmart Technologies, Inc.
- PointClickCare Technologies Inc.
- Resideo Technologies, Inc.
- Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
- TELUS Corporation
- Tunstall Group
- WellSky LLC
Table Information
| Report Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| No. of Pages | 197 |
| Published | January 2026 |
| Forecast Period | 2026 - 2032 |
| Estimated Market Value ( USD | $ 1.17 Billion |
| Forecasted Market Value ( USD | $ 1.61 Billion |
| Compound Annual Growth Rate | 5.2% |
| Regions Covered | Global |
| No. of Companies Mentioned | 24 |
