+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Polycarbodiimides Market - Global Forecast 2026-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 180 Pages
  • January 2026
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 6127007
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The Polycarbodiimides Market grew from USD 312.45 million in 2025 to USD 352.79 million in 2026. It is expected to continue growing at a CAGR of 11.72%, reaching USD 678.91 million by 2032.

Polycarbodiimides are evolving from niche stabilizers to system-critical performance enablers as durability, compliance, and reliability demands intensify

Polycarbodiimides sit at a practical intersection of polymer chemistry and durability engineering. As reactive stabilizers and crosslinking agents, they are widely used to improve hydrolysis resistance, extend service life, and preserve mechanical properties in moisture-challenged environments. Their value is most visible when coatings, adhesives, sealants, elastomers, and thermoplastic systems are expected to perform under heat, humidity, and aggressive chemical exposure while maintaining appearance and strength.

In recent years, the conversation around polycarbodiimides has moved beyond a narrow additive function toward whole-system performance optimization. Formulators increasingly evaluate these materials as part of a broader approach to reliability, warranty risk management, and lifecycle cost reduction. This shift matters because it reframes polycarbodiimides from “nice-to-have” insurance to a strategic component in meeting demanding specifications in automotive, construction, industrial maintenance, and specialty consumer goods.

At the same time, the market environment has become more complex. Sustainability expectations, regulatory scrutiny of hazardous monomers and residuals, and the need for low-VOC and waterborne-compatible solutions are shaping how polycarbodiimides are selected and how they are designed. Consequently, both suppliers and end users are investing in application development, compatibility work, and quality consistency to ensure performance gains translate reliably from lab to production.

This executive summary synthesizes the key forces reshaping the polycarbodiimides landscape, the implications of evolving trade measures, and the strategic considerations for segmentation, regions, and competitive positioning. The goal is to provide decision-makers with a clear, action-oriented view of what is changing, why it matters, and how to respond with confidence.

Performance thresholds, waterborne formulation realities, and regulatory stewardship are redefining how polycarbodiimides are designed, validated, and adopted

The polycarbodiimides landscape is being reshaped by a more demanding performance baseline across end-use sectors. Customers increasingly expect long-term hydrolysis resistance and stability without compromising flexibility, clarity, pot life, or downstream adhesion. As a result, product development is shifting toward tuned reactivity profiles and improved compatibility with modern resin backbones, especially in formulations that must withstand mixed stressors such as humidity, thermal cycling, and intermittent chemical exposure.

In parallel, the broader shift toward waterborne and high-solids systems has redefined what “easy to formulate” means. Polycarbodiimide selection now depends not only on functional performance but also on how the additive behaves in dispersion, how it affects viscosity and storage stability, and how it interacts with co-additives such as catalysts, defoamers, and rheology modifiers. This has encouraged suppliers to differentiate through application guidance, pre-dispersed offerings, and product forms that reduce handling risks and improve repeatability.

Regulatory and stewardship pressures are also transforming the competitive landscape. Formulators are scrutinizing trace components, potential sensitizers, and the overall hazard profile of additives. Even when a polycarbodiimide solution meets technical requirements, a less favorable classification can restrict adoption in consumer-facing goods, indoor applications, or projects with strict environmental declarations. Consequently, the pace of substitution and reformulation has accelerated, with qualification programs becoming more rigorous and documentation requirements becoming a meaningful barrier to entry.

Supply chain expectations have shifted as well. Customers increasingly prioritize consistent supply, redundant manufacturing, and transparent quality systems. This is particularly relevant for industries that cannot afford production interruptions, such as automotive component manufacturing or infrastructure maintenance coatings. In response, suppliers are investing in multi-site strategies, tightening raw material sourcing control, and expanding technical service footprints to support rapid troubleshooting and scale-up.

Finally, digitalization and advanced testing are influencing how value is communicated. Instead of relying solely on standard accelerated aging metrics, suppliers and customers increasingly use more application-relevant protocols, multi-variable aging, and analytics that correlate early indicators to long-term performance. This improves confidence in selection decisions and elevates the role of technical credibility, creating an environment where product consistency, data transparency, and application-specific validation define market leadership.

United States tariffs in 2025 are amplifying landed-cost volatility and accelerating dual-sourcing and reformulation programs across polycarbodiimide value chains

The introduction and escalation of United States tariffs in 2025 has created an additional layer of cost and risk management for polycarbodiimide supply chains. While tariff specifics vary by classification and origin, the practical effect for many buyers is an increase in landed cost volatility and a renewed focus on contract structure, inventory strategy, and supplier diversification. For procurement teams, the impact is less about a single price move and more about the ongoing uncertainty that disrupts budgeting and complicates long-term sourcing decisions.

One of the most immediate outcomes is a reassessment of supplier footprints. Import-dependent channels face heightened exposure, particularly when polycarbodiimides are sourced as part of formulated packages or specialty intermediates embedded in broader chemical imports. This can lead to indirect cost increases even when the additive itself represents a small fraction of a formulation’s total bill of materials. As a result, formulators are mapping origin, trade status, and substitution options more carefully, often requiring suppliers to disclose upstream sourcing to a greater degree than before.

Tariffs also tend to accelerate qualification of alternative grades and regional suppliers. However, switching is rarely frictionless in polycarbodiimide applications. Differences in functionality, molecular structure, or carrier systems can influence pot life, cure response, and final film or bond properties. Therefore, the tariff-driven push toward alternatives places greater burden on R&D and application engineering teams, who must validate that performance and compliance remain intact.

Over time, tariffs can reshape negotiation dynamics. Buyers may prefer index-linked or pass-through mechanisms, while suppliers may seek protections against abrupt trade-policy changes. In industries with strict validation requirements, long-term supply agreements can become more attractive, but only if they include clear language for cost adjustments, quality expectations, and contingency planning.

Operationally, companies are adapting through a mix of safety stock adjustments, dual sourcing, and localized blending or finishing steps where feasible. Some organizations are also redesigning formulations to reduce sensitivity to specific additive grades, improving resilience without sacrificing performance. Taken together, the 2025 tariff environment reinforces a central takeaway: polycarbodiimide strategy must integrate technical qualification with trade-aware supply chain design to avoid costly disruptions.

Segmentation reveals that polycarbodiimide selection is increasingly dictated by formulation architecture, handling form, and validation economics across distinct use cases

Segmentation patterns in polycarbodiimides are becoming more nuanced as buyers align chemistry choices with formulation architectures and end-use validation pathways. Across type-based differentiation, the market increasingly distinguishes between aromatic and aliphatic polycarbodiimides not only for performance outcomes but also for how each option interacts with color stability, weathering requirements, and the broader additive package. In demanding appearance-sensitive coatings or clear systems, selection decisions frequently prioritize long-term aesthetics alongside hydrolysis resistance.

From a form perspective, liquid and solid offerings often map to distinct operational priorities. Liquid products can simplify metering and dispersion in many production environments, yet they raise considerations around storage stability, moisture control, and compatibility with waterborne or high-solids systems. Solid grades, meanwhile, can offer handling or packaging advantages in certain plants but may require additional steps for incorporation and may be chosen when processors want tighter control over dosing into melt or compound operations.

Application segmentation highlights where polycarbodiimides deliver the most visible return on performance risk reduction. In polyurethane systems, hydrolysis resistance and retention of mechanical properties remain central, particularly in humid operating environments. In coatings, the focus extends to film integrity, adhesion retention, and resistance to blistering or softening. Adhesives and sealants frequently evaluate polycarbodiimides through the lens of bond durability and long-term service performance, especially when exposed to moisture cycling. In thermoplastics and elastomers, processors look for stability benefits that persist through processing and end-use, often balancing additive efficiency against effects on rheology and final mechanical behavior.

End-use industry segmentation further shapes qualification rigor and documentation expectations. Automotive and transportation stakeholders often require tightly controlled validation and change management, which can slow substitution but rewards suppliers with strong technical support and consistent quality. Construction and infrastructure applications tend to emphasize durability across varied climates and substrates, with contractors and specifiers favoring proven performance and compatibility with common application conditions. Industrial manufacturing and maintenance users frequently prioritize uptime and predictable cure or dry performance, while consumer-oriented segments may apply stricter requirements around labeling, odor, and perceived safety.

Sales channel and customer-type segmentation also influence how value is captured. Direct relationships are often critical when application engineering support is needed, whereas distributor-led models may succeed when products are standardized and logistics reliability is the main differentiator. Across these segmentation lenses, the key insight is that polycarbodiimide adoption is increasingly driven by fit-for-purpose formulation design and validation economics, not by generic additive performance alone.

Regional adoption of polycarbodiimides diverges by regulatory intensity, industrial clustering, and supply-chain resilience needs across major global manufacturing corridors

Regional dynamics in polycarbodiimides are shaped by differences in manufacturing concentration, regulatory posture, and downstream demand from coatings, adhesives, and polymer processing hubs. In the Americas, customers often combine strong performance expectations with heightened attention to supply assurance and trade exposure, especially in the context of evolving tariff measures and nearshoring efforts. This environment rewards suppliers that can provide consistent quality, responsive technical service, and clear documentation for industrial and transportation-linked applications.

Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, regulatory frameworks and sustainability initiatives play an outsized role in shaping adoption criteria. Formulators frequently prioritize materials that align with stringent chemical management requirements and support environmental declarations for construction and industrial projects. Additionally, European end users often emphasize long-term durability performance tied to lifecycle considerations, reinforcing demand for well-validated solutions and robust technical data packages.

In Asia-Pacific, broad industrial expansion, manufacturing scale, and strong downstream demand for polyurethane, coatings, and thermoplastics underpin significant consumption. Competitive intensity is typically higher, with a mix of multinational suppliers and regional producers. Customers often pursue performance improvements at scale, making consistency and cost-performance balance decisive. Moreover, rapid product development cycles in key manufacturing economies encourage suppliers to maintain agile technical support and localized application development capabilities.

Cross-region trade flows remain important because upstream intermediates and specialty additives may traverse multiple borders before reaching formulators. This interdependence heightens sensitivity to logistics disruptions, geopolitical shifts, and changing compliance requirements. Consequently, many companies are building regionally resilient supply strategies, including multi-origin qualification and localized inventory planning.

Overall, the regional picture underscores that while polycarbodiimide performance requirements are globally converging, adoption pathways remain locally determined by compliance expectations, supply chain structure, and the strength of downstream industries. Companies that tailor product positioning and support models to these regional realities are better positioned to sustain growth and mitigate disruption.

Company differentiation is shifting toward application engineering depth, documentation readiness, and resilient supply models that reduce qualification friction for customers

Competitive positioning in polycarbodiimides increasingly hinges on more than chemistry portfolios; it is defined by technical credibility, supply reliability, and the ability to support customers through qualification and change control. Leading companies differentiate by offering application-specific guidance, robust quality systems, and documentation that eases customer audits and regulatory reviews. As customers scrutinize compatibility with waterborne systems and complex additive packages, supplier technical service becomes a decisive factor in winning and retaining programs.

Another differentiator is how companies manage product forms and deployment flexibility. Suppliers that provide multiple formats, consistent batch-to-batch behavior, and practical handling guidance reduce implementation friction. This matters for high-throughput plants where small variability can cascade into defects, rework, or lost production time. In parallel, companies that can support rapid scale-up-through pilot support, troubleshooting, and co-development-tend to embed more deeply within customer formulation roadmaps.

Strategic partnerships across the value chain are also becoming more visible. Additive suppliers often collaborate with resin producers, formulators, and distributors to validate performance in realistic conditions and ensure the polycarbodiimide integrates smoothly into commercial recipes. These collaborations can shorten adoption timelines and create defensible positions when customers face time pressure from compliance changes or tariff-driven sourcing shifts.

Finally, competitive strength increasingly depends on transparency and responsiveness. Customers want clarity on origin, quality controls, and continuity plans, especially where tariffs, logistics disruptions, or upstream constraints can affect availability. Companies that can provide credible contingency plans and maintain consistent supply, while still investing in product stewardship and innovation, are best positioned to meet evolving expectations across coatings, adhesives, elastomers, and engineering polymers.

Industry leaders can reduce risk and accelerate adoption by linking polycarbodiimides to failure-mode targets, dual-sourcing playbooks, and documentation-first commercialization

Industry leaders should treat polycarbodiimides as part of an integrated durability and risk-management strategy rather than a single-line additive decision. A practical first step is to align technical targets with measurable failure modes-such as hydrolysis-driven softening, adhesion loss, or property drift-then confirm that the selected polycarbodiimide grade is validated under application-relevant aging conditions. This reduces the chance of passing simplified lab tests while underperforming in real environments.

To navigate tariff-driven volatility, procurement and technical teams should jointly develop dual-sourcing playbooks that include pre-approved alternates and clear acceptance criteria. Because switching can affect pot life, viscosity, cure, and long-term properties, qualification should be structured to minimize rework, with defined test matrices and decision gates. Where feasible, leaders can also negotiate supply agreements that balance cost transparency with continuity protections, including contingencies for trade-policy changes.

Formulators can strengthen resilience by designing recipes that are less sensitive to small variability in additive quality or carrier system. This may involve tightening incoming quality controls, specifying critical-to-quality parameters more precisely, and ensuring production sites maintain moisture control and storage best practices. Operational discipline matters because polycarbodiimide performance can be undermined by poor handling, incompatible co-additives, or uncontrolled water exposure.

Commercially, leaders should refine value communication around avoided warranty risk, service-life extension, and reduced maintenance cycles. These outcomes resonate with specifiers and asset owners, especially in infrastructure and industrial contexts. In parallel, investing in documentation readiness-such as compliance statements, traceability, and consistent technical data-can accelerate approvals and reduce customer friction.

Finally, organizations should maintain an active innovation pipeline that anticipates regulation and sustainability expectations. Prioritizing compatibility with waterborne and low-VOC systems, improving ease of incorporation, and supporting safer handling profiles can future-proof portfolios and strengthen long-term customer relationships.

A triangulated methodology combining technical literature review, primary stakeholder validation, and consistency checks supports decision-ready polycarbodiimide insights

The research methodology integrates structured secondary research with primary validation to develop a coherent view of the polycarbodiimides landscape. Secondary research begins with a review of publicly available technical literature, regulatory and standards information, patent activity where relevant, and company disclosures such as product documentation and technical brochures. This foundation supports an understanding of product positioning, application fit, and the broader trends influencing formulation priorities.

Primary research complements this work through interviews and consultations with industry participants across the value chain, including raw material suppliers, additive manufacturers, formulators, distributors, and end-use stakeholders. These discussions are used to validate practical considerations such as qualification timelines, performance expectations in specific applications, and shifting demand drivers related to waterborne adoption, compliance requirements, and supply chain resilience.

Data triangulation is applied throughout the process to reconcile differences across inputs. Where perspectives diverge-such as on substitution feasibility or the real-world impact of tariffs-additional follow-ups are conducted to clarify assumptions and ensure conclusions reflect operational reality. Emphasis is placed on consistency checks, terminology alignment, and separating confirmed practices from emerging preferences.

Finally, insights are synthesized into a decision-oriented narrative that connects technical selection criteria, supply chain constraints, and regional adoption differences. This ensures the final output is practical for both technical and commercial leaders who need to make informed choices on qualification, sourcing, and product strategy.

Polycarbodiimides are becoming a durability strategy cornerstone, and success now depends on technical-validation discipline plus resilient, trade-aware sourcing

Polycarbodiimides are gaining strategic importance as industries demand longer service life and more reliable performance in moisture-stressed environments. Their role is expanding from a narrowly defined additive function to a broader lever for durability engineering, especially as formulation systems become more complex and regulatory expectations become more stringent.

The landscape is being transformed by the shift toward waterborne and high-solids formulations, heightened stewardship requirements, and rising expectations for documentation and quality consistency. At the same time, the 2025 United States tariff environment has reinforced the need for trade-aware sourcing strategies and disciplined qualification of alternatives.

Segmentation and regional dynamics show that adoption is not uniform; it is shaped by application-specific validation economics, operational handling realities, and locally determined compliance and supply chain constraints. Competitive advantage increasingly accrues to companies that pair strong technical performance with application engineering depth, transparent documentation, and resilient supply models.

Ultimately, organizations that integrate technical selection with procurement resilience and customer-focused value communication will be best positioned to capture the durability benefits of polycarbodiimides while minimizing disruption and qualification risk.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.4. Years Considered for the Study
1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
1.6. Language Considered for the Study
1.7. Key Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Research Design
2.2.1. Primary Research
2.2.2. Secondary Research
2.3. Research Framework
2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
2.4. Market Size Estimation
2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
2.5. Data Triangulation
2.6. Research Outcomes
2.7. Research Assumptions
2.8. Research Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Introduction
3.2. CXO Perspective
3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
3.8. Industry Roadmap
4. Market Overview
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.4. PESTLE Analysis
4.5. Market Outlook
4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
5. Market Insights
5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
5.3. Opportunity Mapping
5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Polycarbodiimides Market, by Product Type
8.1. Aliphatic
8.2. Aromatic
9. Polycarbodiimides Market, by Form
9.1. Granules
9.2. Liquid
9.3. Powder
10. Polycarbodiimides Market, by Application
10.1. Adhesives
10.1.1. Hot Melt Adhesives
10.1.2. Solvent Based Adhesives
10.1.3. Water Based Adhesives
10.2. Coatings
10.2.1. Liquid Coatings
10.2.2. Powder Coatings
10.2.3. UV Curable Coatings
10.3. Elastomers
10.4. Sealants
11. Polycarbodiimides Market, by End User Industry
11.1. Automotive
11.2. Construction
11.3. Electronics
11.4. Packaging
12. Polycarbodiimides Market, by Region
12.1. Americas
12.1.1. North America
12.1.2. Latin America
12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
12.2.1. Europe
12.2.2. Middle East
12.2.3. Africa
12.3. Asia-Pacific
13. Polycarbodiimides Market, by Group
13.1. ASEAN
13.2. GCC
13.3. European Union
13.4. BRICS
13.5. G7
13.6. NATO
14. Polycarbodiimides Market, by Country
14.1. United States
14.2. Canada
14.3. Mexico
14.4. Brazil
14.5. United Kingdom
14.6. Germany
14.7. France
14.8. Russia
14.9. Italy
14.10. Spain
14.11. China
14.12. India
14.13. Japan
14.14. Australia
14.15. South Korea
15. United States Polycarbodiimides Market
16. China Polycarbodiimides Market
17. Competitive Landscape
17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
17.5. Allnex Group GmbH
17.6. Altana AG
17.7. BASF SE
17.8. Covestro AG
17.9. Dow Inc.
17.10. Evonik Industries AG
17.11. Huntsman Corporation
17.12. Kumho Mitsui Chemicals Inc.
17.13. LANXESS AG
17.14. Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings Corporation
17.15. Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.
17.16. Nagase & Co., Ltd.
17.17. Nisshinbo Holdings Inc.
17.18. Perstorp Holding AB
17.19. Shandong Wanhe Chemical Co., Ltd.
17.20. Solvay S.A.
17.21. STAUBER Performance Ingredients
17.22. The Lubrizol Corporation
17.23. UBE Industries, Ltd.
17.24. Wanhua Chemical Group Co., Ltd.
17.25. Zhejiang Boju New Material Co., Ltd.
List of Figures
FIGURE 1. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 2. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
FIGURE 3. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
FIGURE 4. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 5. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 6. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 7. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 8. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 9. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 10. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 12. CHINA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
List of Tables
TABLE 1. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 2. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 3. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 4. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 5. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ALIPHATIC, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 6. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY AROMATIC, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 7. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY AROMATIC, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 8. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY AROMATIC, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 9. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 10. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 11. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 12. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 13. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 14. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 15. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 16. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 17. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 18. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 19. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 20. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 21. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 22. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 23. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 24. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY HOT MELT ADHESIVES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 25. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY HOT MELT ADHESIVES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 26. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY HOT MELT ADHESIVES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 27. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY SOLVENT BASED ADHESIVES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 28. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY SOLVENT BASED ADHESIVES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 29. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY SOLVENT BASED ADHESIVES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 30. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY WATER BASED ADHESIVES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 31. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY WATER BASED ADHESIVES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 32. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY WATER BASED ADHESIVES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 33. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 34. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 35. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 36. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 37. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 38. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 39. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 40. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 41. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 42. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 43. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY UV CURABLE COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 44. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY UV CURABLE COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 45. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY UV CURABLE COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 46. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ELASTOMERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 47. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ELASTOMERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 48. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ELASTOMERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 49. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY SEALANTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 50. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY SEALANTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 51. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY SEALANTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 52. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 53. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 54. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 55. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 56. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY CONSTRUCTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 57. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY CONSTRUCTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 58. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY CONSTRUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 59. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 60. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 61. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 62. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 63. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 64. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PACKAGING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 65. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 66. AMERICAS POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 67. AMERICAS POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 68. AMERICAS POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 69. AMERICAS POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 70. AMERICAS POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 71. AMERICAS POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 72. AMERICAS POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 73. NORTH AMERICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 74. NORTH AMERICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 75. NORTH AMERICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 76. NORTH AMERICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 77. NORTH AMERICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 78. NORTH AMERICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 79. NORTH AMERICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 80. LATIN AMERICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 81. LATIN AMERICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 82. LATIN AMERICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 83. LATIN AMERICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 84. LATIN AMERICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 85. LATIN AMERICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 86. LATIN AMERICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 87. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 88. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 89. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 90. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 91. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 92. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 93. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 94. EUROPE POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 95. EUROPE POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 96. EUROPE POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 97. EUROPE POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 98. EUROPE POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 99. EUROPE POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 100. EUROPE POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 101. MIDDLE EAST POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 102. MIDDLE EAST POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 103. MIDDLE EAST POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 104. MIDDLE EAST POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 105. MIDDLE EAST POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 106. MIDDLE EAST POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 107. MIDDLE EAST POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 108. AFRICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 109. AFRICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 110. AFRICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 111. AFRICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 112. AFRICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 113. AFRICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 114. AFRICA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 115. ASIA-PACIFIC POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 116. ASIA-PACIFIC POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 117. ASIA-PACIFIC POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 118. ASIA-PACIFIC POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 119. ASIA-PACIFIC POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 120. ASIA-PACIFIC POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 121. ASIA-PACIFIC POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 122. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 123. ASEAN POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 124. ASEAN POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 125. ASEAN POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 126. ASEAN POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 127. ASEAN POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 128. ASEAN POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 129. ASEAN POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 130. GCC POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 131. GCC POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 132. GCC POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 133. GCC POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 134. GCC POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 135. GCC POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 136. GCC POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 137. EUROPEAN UNION POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 138. EUROPEAN UNION POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 139. EUROPEAN UNION POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 140. EUROPEAN UNION POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 141. EUROPEAN UNION POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 142. EUROPEAN UNION POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 143. EUROPEAN UNION POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 144. BRICS POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 145. BRICS POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 146. BRICS POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 147. BRICS POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 148. BRICS POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 149. BRICS POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 150. BRICS POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 151. G7 POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 152. G7 POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 153. G7 POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 154. G7 POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 155. G7 POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 156. G7 POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 157. G7 POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 158. NATO POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 159. NATO POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 160. NATO POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 161. NATO POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 162. NATO POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 163. NATO POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 164. NATO POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 165. GLOBAL POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 166. UNITED STATES POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 167. UNITED STATES POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 168. UNITED STATES POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 169. UNITED STATES POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 170. UNITED STATES POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 171. UNITED STATES POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 172. UNITED STATES POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 173. CHINA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 174. CHINA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 175. CHINA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 176. CHINA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 177. CHINA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY ADHESIVES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 178. CHINA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 179. CHINA POLYCARBODIIMIDES MARKET SIZE, BY END USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

Companies Mentioned

The key companies profiled in this Polycarbodiimides market report include:
  • Allnex Group GmbH
  • Altana AG
  • BASF SE
  • Covestro AG
  • Dow Inc.
  • Evonik Industries AG
  • Huntsman Corporation
  • Kumho Mitsui Chemicals Inc.
  • LANXESS AG
  • Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings Corporation
  • Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.
  • Nagase & Co., Ltd.
  • Nisshinbo Holdings Inc.
  • Perstorp Holding AB
  • Shandong Wanhe Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • Solvay S.A.
  • STAUBER Performance Ingredients
  • The Lubrizol Corporation
  • UBE Industries, Ltd.
  • Wanhua Chemical Group Co., Ltd.
  • Zhejiang Boju New Material Co., Ltd.

Table Information