+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Offshore Wind Power Jacket Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 190 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 6146481
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

Senior executives in the offshore wind sector face rapidly shifting regulatory and technological landscapes. The Offshore Wind Power Jacket Market is evolving as new engineering solutions, supply chain collaboration, and sustainability directives shape future growth and competitive positioning.

Market Snapshot: Offshore Wind Power Jacket Market

The Offshore Wind Power Jacket Market grew from USD 8.59 billion in 2024 to USD 9.32 billion in 2025 and is expected to continue expanding at a CAGR of 8.93%, reaching USD 17.04 billion by 2032. This market’s momentum reflects increasing investments in renewable infrastructure and robust policy support globally.

Scope & Segmentation

This report offers comprehensive coverage of the offshore wind power jacket ecosystem, with detailed segmentation and broad regional analysis.

  • Jacket Type: Monopile Jackets, Multi Leg Jackets, Quadripod Jackets, Tripod Jackets
  • Component: Bracings, Legs, Piles, Transition Piece
  • Material: Composite, Concrete, Steel
  • Water Depth: Deep Water (>60 meters), Shallow Water (< 30 meters), Transitional Water (30-60 meters)
  • Installation Type: Bottom Fixed Installation, Float In Installation, Jack Up Installation, Self Elevating Platforms
  • Application: Commercial Offshore Wind Farms, Hybrid Energy Systems
  • End User: Government Bodies, Independent Power Producer
  • Regions: Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, Asia-Pacific
  • Countries/Key Markets: United States, Germany, China, India, Japan, United Kingdom, Brazil, South Korea, and select others
  • Key Companies: Siemens AG, ArcelorMittal SA, CRIST S.A., Century Wind Power Co., Ltd., CS Wind Corporation, DiScho Vermögensverwaltung GmbH & Co. KG, Eversendai Corporation Berhad, Harland & Wolff Holdings plc, Jan De Nul Group NV, Koninklijke Boskalis B.V., Lamprell plc, Mammoet Holding BV, MENCK GmbH by Acteon Group, SeAH Steel Holdings Corporation, Sif Group, Sing Da Marine Structure Corporation by China Steel Corporation, SK Oceanplant Co., Ltd., Smulders N.V. by Eiffage, Tetra Tech Inc., Van Oord N.V., Aker Solutions ASA, Jiangsu Haili Wind Power Equipment Technology Co., Ltd., Windar Renovables S.A.U.

Key Takeaways for Senior Decision-Makers

  • Offshore wind jacket designs are rapidly advancing, with engineering firms leveraging digital twin technologies and real-time monitoring for improved maintenance and operational efficiency.
  • Collaboration across the value chain, including strategic alliances and joint ventures, is enabling stakeholders to secure raw materials and optimize logistics, supporting reliable project delivery.
  • Sustainability mandates are influencing material selection and lifecycle assessments, resulting in innovations such as corrosion-resistant coatings and recyclable material usage.
  • Design optimization is driven by both cost and regulatory drivers, prompting manufacturers to explore new geometries, fatigue management solutions, and modular fabrication techniques.
  • Geopolitical uncertainty and regional policy incentives are affecting procurement and fabrication strategies, driving localization efforts and the diversification of sourcing.
  • Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards are affecting investment decisions and supplier evaluation criteria across major markets.

Tariff Impact: Strategic Shifts in North America and Beyond

Recent changes in United States tariff policy have triggered the creation of localized fabrication hubs, altered sourcing strategies, and encouraged partnerships between European and North American fabricators. Project teams are increasingly adopting inventory buffering and supply chain hedging to withstand tariff-induced cost fluctuations and delivery disruptions.

Methodology & Data Sources

Findings in this report are based on structured interviews with senior executives from foundation fabricators, OEM partnerships, and regulatory agencies. Secondary data has been extracted from government regulations, corporate disclosures, white papers, and academic journals. Validation is performed through triangulation with documented case studies and industry presentations, under the supervision of an expert panel.

Why This Report Matters

  • Benchmark your organization’s strategies against leading players in the offshore wind power jacket market.
  • Identify actionable opportunities in technology adoption, procurement optimization, and regional expansion for sustainable growth.
  • Mitigate project risk by understanding regulatory impacts, market segmentation, and evolving tariff dynamics.

Conclusion

The offshore wind power jacket sector is defined by ongoing innovation, responsive supply chains, and an increasing alignment with global sustainability priorities. Emerging opportunities span technology, materials, regional markets, and strategic collaboration, enabling industry leaders to position for resilient future growth.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Expansion of deepwater jacket foundations enabled by high-capacity levelling technology
5.2. Integration of digital twin monitoring systems to optimize offshore jacket performance
5.3. Growing adoption of modular jacket components for accelerated installation and reduced downtime
5.4. Development of low-carbon concrete and high-strength steel for sustainable jacket structures
5.5. Utilization of real-time structural health monitoring for predictive maintenance of jackets
5.6. Emergence of hybrid monopile and jacket foundation designs to lower capital expenditures
5.7. Increased use of 3D printing for complex jacket components to drive supply chain agility
5.8. Design of multipurpose jacket platforms incorporating artificial reef habitats for marine ecology
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Offshore Wind Power Jacket Market, by Jacket Type
8.1. Monopile Jackets
8.2. Multi Leg Jackets
8.3. Quadripod Jackets
8.4. Tripod Jackets
9. Offshore Wind Power Jacket Market, by Component
9.1. Bracings
9.2. Legs
9.3. Piles
9.4. Transition Piece
10. Offshore Wind Power Jacket Market, by Material
10.1. Composite
10.2. Concrete
10.3. Steel
11. Offshore Wind Power Jacket Market, by Water Depth
11.1. Deep Water (>60 meters)
11.2. Shallow Water (< 30 meters)
11.3. Transitional Water (30-60 meters)
12. Offshore Wind Power Jacket Market, by Installation Type
12.1. Bottom Fixed Installation
12.2. Float In Installation
12.3. Jack Up Installation
12.4. Self Elevating Platforms
13. Offshore Wind Power Jacket Market, by Application
13.1. Commercial Offshore Wind Farms
13.2. Hybrid Energy Systems
14. Offshore Wind Power Jacket Market, by End User
14.1. Government Bodies
14.2. Independent Power Producer
15. Offshore Wind Power Jacket Market, by Region
15.1. Americas
15.1.1. North America
15.1.2. Latin America
15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
15.2.1. Europe
15.2.2. Middle East
15.2.3. Africa
15.3. Asia-Pacific
16. Offshore Wind Power Jacket Market, by Group
16.1. ASEAN
16.2. GCC
16.3. European Union
16.4. BRICS
16.5. G7
16.6. NATO
17. Offshore Wind Power Jacket Market, by Country
17.1. United States
17.2. Canada
17.3. Mexico
17.4. Brazil
17.5. United Kingdom
17.6. Germany
17.7. France
17.8. Russia
17.9. Italy
17.10. Spain
17.11. China
17.12. India
17.13. Japan
17.14. Australia
17.15. South Korea
18. Competitive Landscape
18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
18.3. Competitive Analysis
18.3.1. Siemens AG
18.3.2. ArcelorMittal SA
18.3.3. CRIST S.A.
18.3.4. Century Wind Power Co., Ltd.
18.3.5. CS Wind Corporation
18.3.6. DiScho Vermögensverwaltung GmbH & Co. KG
18.3.7. Eversendai Corporation Berhad
18.3.8. Harland & Wolff Holdings plc
18.3.9. Jan De Nul Group NV
18.3.10. Koninklijke Boskalis B.V.
18.3.11. Lamprell plc
18.3.12. Mammoet Holding BV
18.3.13. MENCK GmbH by Acteon Group
18.3.14. SeAH Steel Holdings Corporation
18.3.15. Sif Group
18.3.16. Sing Da Marine Structure Corporation by China Steel Corporation
18.3.17. SK Oceanplant Co., Ltd.
18.3.18. Smulders N.V. by Eiffage
18.3.19. Tetra Tech Inc.
18.3.20. Van Oord N.V.
18.3.21. Aker Solutions ASA
18.3.22. Jiangsu Haili Wind Power Equipment Technology Co., Ltd.
18.3.23. Windar Renovables S.A.U.

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this Offshore Wind Power Jacket market report include:
  • Siemens AG
  • ArcelorMittal SA
  • CRIST S.A.
  • Century Wind Power Co., Ltd.
  • CS Wind Corporation
  • DiScho Vermögensverwaltung GmbH & Co. KG
  • Eversendai Corporation Berhad
  • Harland & Wolff Holdings plc
  • Jan De Nul Group NV
  • Koninklijke Boskalis B.V.
  • Lamprell plc
  • Mammoet Holding BV
  • MENCK GmbH by Acteon Group
  • SeAH Steel Holdings Corporation
  • Sif Group
  • Sing Da Marine Structure Corporation by China Steel Corporation
  • SK Oceanplant Co., Ltd.
  • Smulders N.V. by Eiffage
  • Tetra Tech Inc.
  • Van Oord N.V.
  • Aker Solutions ASA
  • Jiangsu Haili Wind Power Equipment Technology Co., Ltd.
  • Windar Renovables S.A.U.

Table Information