+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Biorationals Market Overview, 2025-30

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 115 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • Bonafide Research
  • ID: 6175114
10% Free customization
1h Free Analyst Time
10% Free customization

This report comes with 10% free customization, enabling you to add data that meets your specific business needs.

1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The global landscape for biologically based crop inputs has transformed from small scale reliance on botanicals such as neem and pyrethrum into a scientifically regulated sector supported by international frameworks and national policies that emphasize residue free and sustainable agriculture. Codex Alimentarius and FAO guidelines provide the foundation for harmonizing standards, but implementation varies as the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Biopesticides Division, the European Food Safety Authority’s low risk category, India’s Central Insecticide Board, Brazil’s MAPA, and China’s Ministry of Agriculture each define distinct approval pathways.

This regulatory diversity has encouraged multinational firms to develop portfolios that comply across markets while certification bodies including EcoCert, GlobalGAP, IFOAM, and OMRI ensure access to premium organic and export supply chains. Residue limits enforced by the European Union have accelerated global adoption of microbial fungicides, pheromones, and plant growth regulators, especially for fruits, vegetables, and vineyards that dominate export earnings in regions such as Latin America and Africa.

Government initiatives have created favorable conditions with India’s organic missions supporting biorational registration, Brazil’s subsidy programs promoting bioinputs, China’s tax incentives for green inputs, and Australia’s Biosecurity 2030 embedding biologicals in long term sustainability strategies. Alongside regulatory and financial support, global collaborations such as Horizon Europe, USDA funded research, EMBRAPA in Brazil, and ICIPE in Africa are advancing microbial discovery, RNAi based biocontrols, and nano encapsulation to enhance stability and delivery of products.

The sector has also expanded beyond agriculture into forestry, turf, post-harvest treatments, and even public health as microbial larvicides such as Bacillus thuringiensis formulations are deployed against vector borne diseases. Governments have also fueled adoption with the USDA allocating one hundred twenty one million dollars in 2024 to support research and extension for specialty crops, Japan setting a target to reach one quarter organic agriculture by 2050 under its Organic Village initiative, and the European Union driving global alignment through its Farm to Fork strategy.

According to the research report, “Global Biorationals Market Overview, 2030”, the Global Biorationals market is expected to cross USD 8.25 Billion market size by 2030, with 5.87% CAGR by 2025-30.In September 2023 Bayer announced a two hundred thirty six million dollar investment in a German research facility dedicated to sustainable crop protection and later secured a license from AlphaBio Control for a biological insecticide intended for broadacre crops. Syngenta strengthened its biologicals portfolio through the acquisition of Valagro, while UPL deepened its partnership with Koppert Biological Systems to expand biocontrol offerings in emerging markets.

Marrone Bio Innovations joined forces with Bioceres to enhance biological seed treatments in Latin America, and Valent BioSciences expanded its reach through the acquisition of FBSciences to integrate plant, soil, and climate health solutions. At the product level, Certis Biologicals launched MeloCon LC, a microbial nematicide designed for flexible application in both organic and conventional systems, while Marrone Bio reported successful field trials of a plant extract based fungicide for vineyards that matched the performance of chemical standards while qualifying for organic certification.

Koppert Biological Systems documented a thirty percent sales increase in beneficial insects during 2023, driven by demand from greenhouse vegetable and floriculture sectors worldwide. Digital farming integration has accelerated with precision application systems and IoT enabled monitoring, and universities alongside startups are experimenting with encapsulation and RNAi to increase efficacy. Compared to the synthetic pesticide market, which still dominates in cereals and row crops, biologicals are capturing ground in high value horticulture, export crops, and residue sensitive sectors where compliance and consumer preference outweigh cost considerations.

Market Drivers

  • Rising global demand for residue-free and organic produce: Consumers worldwide are increasingly concerned about food safety and sustainability, pushing supermarkets and retailers to demand produce with little or no chemical residues. This global pressure encourages farmers in both developed and emerging economies to adopt biorationals like microbial fungicides, botanicals, and pheromone-based products. The growing organic farming sector, supported by international certification standards such as OMRI, EcoCert, and GlobalG.A.P., further strengthens the need for biological alternatives across continents.
  • International policy and sustainability commitments: Global agreements on biodiversity, climate change, and sustainable food production are influencing national governments to reduce chemical pesticide reliance. Initiatives such as the EU Green Deal, UN Sustainable Development Goals, and national organic farming missions across Asia and Latin America promote biologicals as safer tools. Multinational corporations and large food processors also commit to sustainability targets that prioritize biocontrols in their supply chains, driving worldwide adoption of biorationals.

Market Challenges

  • Variability in regulatory frameworks: While some regions like the US and Brazil have streamlined approvals for biopesticides, others maintain slow or inconsistent processes, making it hard for companies to launch products globally. The lack of harmonized regulations across continents creates high costs and long delays for international players, reducing the speed of innovation and restricting product access for farmers in certain regions.
  • Limited infrastructure and farmer awareness in developing regions: In many parts of Africa, Asia, and Latin America, infrastructure for proper storage, handling, and distribution of microbial products is weak. Smallholder farmers often lack awareness of correct application techniques, leading to mixed results in the field. These adoption barriers slow the global scaling of biorationals despite strong potential demand.

Market Trends

  • Consolidation and partnerships among agrochemical majors: Globally, big agrochemical companies such as Bayer, BASF, Corteva, Syngenta, and UPL are expanding their biologicals divisions through acquisitions of specialized biocontrol firms and partnerships with biotech startups. This trend integrates biorationals into mainstream crop protection portfolios and ensures broader availability worldwide, making biological solutions less niche and more accessible to farmers globally.
  • Advances in formulation and delivery technologies: Research worldwide is focused on improving the stability, shelf life, and application efficiency of biorationals. Innovations like nano-encapsulation, controlled-release pheromone dispensers, and sprayable microbial formulations are making products easier to use across diverse climates. These advances address farmer concerns about reliability and are helping biologicals transition from supplemental tools to core components of global pest management strategies.Semiochemicals are growing fastest because they offer precise, species-specific pest control without harming non-target organisms or leaving residues.
Semiochemicals stand out in the biorational market because they change the way pest control is approached, focusing not on killing pests with toxic substances but on manipulating their behavior. These compounds, which include pheromones, kairomones, and allomones, are already naturally involved in insect communication, and when deployed strategically they can disrupt mating cycles, lure pests into traps, or repel them from crops altogether. This method has proven especially useful in orchard and vineyard crops such as apples, grapes, and citrus, where traditional pesticides face strict residue restrictions for exports to Europe and North America.

Farmers in these sectors have embraced pheromone-based mating disruption to manage codling moths, grapevine moths, and fruit borers because it allows them to reduce or sometimes even eliminate conventional pesticide sprays. Unlike many chemical insecticides, semiochemicals are highly species-specific, meaning they target one pest without harming beneficial insects like pollinators or predators, which is critical for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem balance. Their application also aligns well with integrated pest management programs that combine cultural, biological, and limited chemical measures, and this compatibility makes them easier to integrate into existing farm systems.

Regulatory agencies support their use because they present minimal risks to human health and the environment, which translates into faster approval times compared with traditional pesticides. Moreover, retailers and consumers increasingly demand residue-free produce, and semiochemicals help farmers meet these expectations while avoiding rejection of shipments.

Commercial innovations such as controlled-release dispensers, aerosol puffers, and sprayable pheromone formulations have improved their ease of use and cost-effectiveness, encouraging more widespread adoption. Their success in high-value crops has also inspired trials in staple crops and storage systems, where semiochemicals are being tested to prevent insect infestations without chemical residues in grain silos.

Nematode control agents and plant growth regulators are growing fast because they address problems and opportunities that conventional pesticides and fertilizers often cannot solve effectively.

The rise of nematode control agents and plant growth regulators within the biorational category reflects the urgent need for solutions to agricultural challenges that have been poorly served by traditional chemical inputs. Plant parasitic nematodes such as root-knot nematodes and cyst nematodes cause billions of dollars in crop losses every year, particularly in vegetables, tobacco, and plantation crops, yet conventional nematicides are often highly toxic and have been phased out or restricted in many countries due to environmental and human health concerns.

Biological nematicides, which include microbial agents like Paecilomyces lilacinus, Purpureocillium lilacinum, and Bacillus firmus, provide a safer alternative that is effective in suppressing nematode populations in the soil while maintaining soil health. These products are being increasingly adopted in crops grown for export, such as bananas, tomatoes, and cucumbers, where nematode infestations can devastate yields and reduce market quality. In parallel, plant growth regulators of biological origin, such as seaweed extracts, humic substances, and microbial metabolites, are gaining popularity because they enhance stress tolerance, root growth, and nutrient uptake in crops exposed to drought, salinity, or poor soils.

These inputs blur the line between pest management and plant nutrition, creating multifunctional solutions that farmers value. They are especially relevant in climate-affected regions where farmers face unpredictable weather patterns and need crops that can withstand stress while still producing high yields. Moreover, regulatory support and consumer demand for low-toxicity, eco-friendly products reinforce their market position, as these inputs are often approved in organic systems and can be combined with microbial inoculants for integrated soil health management.

Fruits and vegetables drive growth because they are high-value, export-oriented crops with the strictest residue and quality requirements.

The dominance of fruits and vegetables in biorational adoption comes from the fact that these crops are more sensitive than cereals or bulk commodities to both pest pressure and market quality standards. Unlike grains, which can tolerate some damage, fruits and vegetables must meet stringent cosmetic and safety standards because consumers judge them by appearance, freshness, and residue levels. Export markets in Europe, North America, and Japan enforce maximum residue limits that are stricter than domestic rules, meaning growers of grapes, berries, tomatoes, peppers, cucumbers, and citrus must carefully manage pests while keeping residues low.

Biorationals such as microbial fungicides, pheromone-based traps, and neem-derived insecticides are particularly suited here because they degrade quickly, leave minimal residues, and can be applied close to harvest without fear of rejection. Farmers also face more frequent pest cycles in fruits and vegetables due to their shorter growth duration and intensive cultivation practices, so they need diverse pest management tools to avoid resistance and crop loss. The economic value of these crops is high enough to justify the cost of specialized inputs like semiochemicals or biofungicides, which may be less feasible for staple grains.

Another factor is consumer demand for fresh produce marketed as organic or residue-free, which has grown steadily across supermarkets worldwide and reinforces adoption of biological alternatives. Greenhouse vegetable systems, common in Europe, North America, and parts of Asia, also rely heavily on biocontrol agents because enclosed environments are highly sensitive to chemical residues that can harm beneficial insects like pollinators and predators. In tropical regions, where pests and diseases are constant, biologicals provide safer long-term control strategies that do not disrupt ecosystems.

Dry formulations are growing fastest because they are more stable, easier to transport, and suitable for multiple application methods in diverse climates.

Dry formulations of biorationals, whether in the form of wettable powders, granules, or dusts, have gained favor because they solve practical challenges that farmers face in using biological products. Liquids often have limited shelf lives, require careful storage to maintain microbial viability, and can be difficult to transport in regions with inadequate cold chain infrastructure. Dry forms, on the other hand, are more stable under ambient conditions, often lasting months or even years without significant loss of efficacy. This makes them especially useful in developing countries where smallholder farmers lack refrigerated storage facilities.

They are also lighter and cheaper to transport, a critical factor in large agricultural economies such as India, Brazil, and parts of Africa where distribution systems are stretched. Farmers can apply dry formulations in multiple ways: seed coating, soil incorporation, or mixing with water for sprays, giving them flexibility across cropping systems. For example, Trichoderma and Bacillus products in powder form are widely used in seed treatments and soil amendment programs, helping protect seedlings from damping-off and root diseases. Granular formulations of entomopathogenic fungi are used in sugarcane and rice to target soil pests. These dry forms are easier to handle, reducing risks for workers and simplifying dosing.

Moreover, their compatibility with mechanized seed treatment equipment has expanded their use in large-scale farming operations. The robustness of dry products in varied climates, from humid tropics to arid regions, ensures that they remain effective even when cold storage is not available. For companies, producing dry formulations is cost-effective and simplifies logistics, further driving their market growth.

Soil treatments are expanding fastest because they protect plants from the root zone upwards, improving both pest control and crop health simultaneously.

Many plant problems begin in the soil, whether from nematodes, pathogenic fungi, or poor nutrient uptake, and treating the soil with biologicals creates a protective environment for roots while also improving plant health. Microbes such as Trichoderma, Bacillus, and Pseudomonas are applied directly into soil or as seed coatings, where they colonize root surfaces and create a barrier against pathogens like Fusarium, Rhizoctonia, and Pythium. These microbes also stimulate root growth, improve nutrient solubility, and help plants withstand abiotic stresses such as drought or salinity. Farmers find this dual benefit attractive because it means they are not just controlling pests but also improving yields and resilience.

Soil-applied entomopathogenic fungi like Metarhizium and Beauveria have proven effective against root-feeding insects and soil-dwelling stages of pests, offering control that foliar sprays cannot reach. Nematode biocontrol agents applied to soil directly target one of agriculture’s most persistent hidden enemies, reducing losses in crops like tomatoes, bananas, and cucumbers. Another reason soil treatment is growing is that it fits well into integrated farming practices such as drip irrigation and fertigation, where bioinputs can be delivered alongside water and nutrients. This compatibility with modern irrigation systems makes it easier for large farms to adopt without major changes in infrastructure.

Soil treatments are also favored in organic systems where maintaining soil fertility and microbial activity is central, so these products become part of a holistic soil health approach. Beyond agronomic benefits, soil treatments also help reduce the frequency of foliar pesticide sprays, lowering labor and application costs while minimizing residues on edible parts of the crop.

In regions facing soil degradation and overuse of chemicals, soil-applied biorationals offer a sustainable path to restoring productivity and protecting crops at the foundation level.Asia Pacific leads because it combines vast agricultural diversity, government support for sustainable practices, and farmer reliance on biological alternatives that fit local farming structures.

Asia Pacific’s dominance in the biorational market stems from the simple reality that farming here is both massive in scale and highly fragmented, covering everything from vast rice paddies in Southeast Asia to smallholder vegetable farms in India and high-tech greenhouses in Japan. This mix creates a natural demand for pest management solutions that can work under different production systems without creating residue issues that threaten exports. Countries like India have long traditions of using natural inputs such as neem, cow-based preparations, and microbial cultures, so the transition to modern biorationals is culturally and technically smoother.

China, with its heavy policy push to reduce reliance on synthetic pesticides under its zero-growth policy for agrochemicals, has invested in research and mass production of microbial biopesticides and nano-formulated inputs, making them widely available to farmers. Governments across the region back these moves with subsidies, registration support, and direct distribution of biological agents through extension services, as seen with India’s farmer field schools and state-run bio-input labs. Export pressures also play a strong role, since crops such as Indian grapes, Thai mangoes, and Vietnamese dragon fruit must meet strict residue standards in the EU and US, forcing producers to switch to biorationals.

Large agribusinesses like UPL in India and a growing network of Chinese bio-companies are scaling production quickly, while global players such as Bayer, Syngenta, and BASF run joint ventures and R&D hubs in Asia to tap into the demand. The region’s biodiversity is another asset, as researchers are discovering new microbial strains and botanicals suited to tropical and subtropical pests, which become commercialized with local and international support. In addition, consumer awareness within APAC is rising as middle-class populations grow more conscious of food safety, encouraging retailers to prefer residue-free produce and indirectly boosting adoption.
  • In July 2025, ICL completed the acquisition of Lavie Bio’s computational biology activities from Evogene, integrating predictive design capabilities into its biological crop-protection research and development.
  • In March 2025, Syngenta launched NETURE, a biological insecticide designed to protect soybean and corn crops against pests such as corn leafhopper, stink bugs, whiteflies, and sugarcane leafhopper, offering both effective and residual control.
  • In December 2024, SOLASTA Bio secured USD 14 million in Series A funding to accelerate the development of its peptide-based bioinsecticides, the first globally developed bioinsecticides inspired by natural peptides.
  • In November 2024, Kapsera completed a USD 4.4 million Series A funding round to advance its biodegradable microfluidic encapsulation technology for biological inputs.
  • In March 2023, Koppert Biological Systems reported a 30% increase in sales of beneficial insect products for the first half of 2024 compared to the same period in the prior year, driven by rising demand for sustainable pest control in greenhouse and field crops.
  • In January 2023, Marrone Bio Innovations announced successful field trials of a new organic fungicide derived from plant extracts, demonstrating efficacy against powdery mildew in vineyards comparable to chemical fungicides while maintaining organic certification standards.
***Please Note: It will take 48 hours (2 Business days) for delivery of the report upon order confirmation.

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary
2. Market Dynamics
2.1. Market Drivers & Opportunities
2.2. Market Restraints & Challenges
2.3. Market Trends
2.4. Supply chain Analysis
2.5. Policy & Regulatory Framework
2.6. Industry Experts Views
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Secondary Research
3.2. Primary Data Collection
3.3. Market Formation & Validation
3.4. Report Writing, Quality Check & Delivery
4. Market Structure
4.1. Market Considerate
4.2. Assumptions
4.3. Limitations
4.4. Abbreviations
4.5. Sources
4.6. Definitions
5. Economic /Demographic Snapshot
6. Middle East & Africa Biorationals Market Outlook
6.1. Market Size By Value
6.2. Market Share By Country
6.3. Market Size and Forecast, By Source
6.4. Market Size and Forecast, By Types
6.5. Market Size and Forecast, By Crop types
6.6. Market Size and Forecast, By Forms
6.7. Market Size and Forecast, By Applications
6.8. United Arab Emirates (UAE) Biorationals Market Outlook
6.8.1. Market Size by Value
6.8.2. Market Size and Forecast By Source
6.8.3. Market Size and Forecast By Crop types
6.8.4. Market Size and Forecast By Forms
6.8.5. Market Size and Forecast By Applications
6.9. Saudi Arabia Biorationals Market Outlook
6.9.1. Market Size by Value
6.9.2. Market Size and Forecast By Source
6.9.3. Market Size and Forecast By Crop types
6.9.4. Market Size and Forecast By Forms
6.9.5. Market Size and Forecast By Applications
6.10. South Africa Biorationals Market Outlook
6.10.1. Market Size by Value
6.10.2. Market Size and Forecast By Source
6.10.3. Market Size and Forecast By Crop types
6.10.4. Market Size and Forecast By Forms
6.10.5. Market Size and Forecast By Applications
7. Competitive Landscape
7.1. Competitive Dashboard
7.2. Business Strategies Adopted by Key Players
7.3. Key Players Market Positioning Matrix
7.4. Porter's Five Forces
7.5. Company Profile
7.5.1. BASF SE
7.5.1.1. Company Snapshot
7.5.1.2. Company Overview
7.5.1.3. Financial Highlights
7.5.1.4. Geographic Insights
7.5.1.5. Business Segment & Performance
7.5.1.6. Product Portfolio
7.5.1.7. Key Executives
7.5.1.8. Strategic Moves & Developments
7.5.2. Koppert B.V.
7.5.3. Bayer AG
7.5.4. Syngenta Global AG
7.5.5. Biobest Group N.V.
8. Strategic Recommendations
9. Annexure
9.1. FAQ`s
9.2. Notes
9.3. Related Reports
10. Disclaimer
List of Figures
Figure 1: Global Biorationals Market Size (USD Billion) By Region, 2024 & 2030
Figure 2: Market attractiveness Index, By Region 2030
Figure 3: Market attractiveness Index, By Segment 2030
Figure 4: Middle East & Africa Biorationals Market Size By Value (2019, 2024 & 2030F) (in USD Billion)
Figure 5: Middle East & Africa Biorationals Market Share By Country (2024)
Figure 6: United Arab Emirates (UAE) Biorationals Market Size By Value (2019, 2024 & 2030F) (in USD Billion)
Figure 7: Saudi Arabia Biorationals Market Size By Value (2019, 2024 & 2030F) (in USD Billion)
Figure 8: South Africa Biorationals Market Size By Value (2019, 2024 & 2030F) (in USD Billion)
Figure 9: Porter's Five Forces of Global Biorationals Market
List of Tables
Table 1: Global Biorationals Market Snapshot, By Segmentation (2024 & 2030) (in USD Billion)
Table 2: Influencing Factors for Biorationals Market, 2024
Table 3: Top 10 Counties Economic Snapshot 2022
Table 4: Economic Snapshot of Other Prominent Countries 2022
Table 5: Average Exchange Rates for Converting Foreign Currencies into U.S. Dollars
Table 6: Middle East & Africa Biorationals Market Size and Forecast, By Source (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 7: Middle East & Africa Biorationals Market Size and Forecast, By Types (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 8: Middle East & Africa Biorationals Market Size and Forecast, By Crop types (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 9: Middle East & Africa Biorationals Market Size and Forecast, By Forms (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 10: Middle East & Africa Biorationals Market Size and Forecast, By Applications (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 11: United Arab Emirates (UAE) Biorationals Market Size and Forecast By Source (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 12: United Arab Emirates (UAE) Biorationals Market Size and Forecast By Crop types (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 13: United Arab Emirates (UAE) Biorationals Market Size and Forecast By Forms (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 14: United Arab Emirates (UAE) Biorationals Market Size and Forecast By Applications (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 15: Saudi Arabia Biorationals Market Size and Forecast By Source (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 16: Saudi Arabia Biorationals Market Size and Forecast By Crop types (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 17: Saudi Arabia Biorationals Market Size and Forecast By Forms (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 18: Saudi Arabia Biorationals Market Size and Forecast By Applications (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 19: South Africa Biorationals Market Size and Forecast By Source (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 20: South Africa Biorationals Market Size and Forecast By Crop types (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 21: South Africa Biorationals Market Size and Forecast By Forms (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 22: South Africa Biorationals Market Size and Forecast By Applications (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Billion)
Table 23: Competitive Dashboard of top 5 players, 2024

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • BASF SE
  • Koppert B.V.
  • Bayer AG
  • Syngenta Global AG
  • Biobest Group N.V.