+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

U.S. Trifluralin Market: by Product Type; Grade Type; Application; Method; End Use; Distribution Channel; Market Size, Industry Dynamics, Opportunity Analysis and Forecast for 2025-2033

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 169 Pages
  • May 2025
  • Region: United States
  • Astute Analytica
  • ID: 6216826
The U.S. trifluralin market is maintaining steady expansion, reinforced by sustained demand from major crop-producing regions and ongoing weed resistance pressures that underscore the continued importance of pre-emergent Group 3 herbicides. With a valuation of US$ 143.59 million in 2024, the market is forecast to reach US$ 224.08 million by 2033, registering a CAGR of 5.14% during the forecast period. Trifluralin remains a widely relied-upon soil-incorporated herbicide for cereals, pulses, and oilseeds, particularly in dryland farming systems where post-emergence alternatives struggle to deliver consistent control against resistant broadleaf weeds.

In acreage terms, more than 9.4 million acres had received trifluralin treatments by May 2024, with the highest adoption levels recorded in North Dakota, Montana, Washington, Minnesota, and California. Year-to-date demand has exceeded 3,300 metric tons of active ingredient, while distributor pre-orders for the 2025 season signal robust forward momentum - especially within canola and pulse crop programs. Although competition from newer chemistries, including FMC’s acetochlor-flufenacet combination products, continues to intensify, trifluralin retains a strong economic advantage. Per-acre treatment costs consistently undercut newer alternatives, reinforcing its position as a cost-efficient and agronomically reliable solution.

Noteworthy Market Developments:

Domestic production capacity within the U.S. trifluralin market remains stable at approximately 6,500 metric tons of active ingredient, with Albaugh’s St. Joseph facility recently expanding output to meet seasonal demand. Imports remain a critical supply component, with more than 4,200 tons of technical-grade trifluralin entering through Gulf ports during Q1 2024. Major suppliers including ADAMA, Drexel, and UPL continue to depend on Chinese intermediates, although sourcing diversification efforts - particularly toward Indian manufacturers - are gaining traction.

Pricing dynamics shifted modestly in spring 2024, as delivered prices declined from US$ 5.20/kg to US$ 4.80/kg, reflecting easing feedstock costs and proactive early-season stockpiling. Despite this softening, overall market sentiment remains positive. EPA’s anticipated 2024 ecological review is expected to emphasize application stewardship rather than regulatory restriction, supporting long-term confidence. With strong agronomic performance and compelling return-on-investment profiles in crops such as canola and yellow peas, trifluralin continues to anchor pre-emergence weed control strategies.

Core Growth Drivers:

One of the primary drivers underpinning market growth is the expansion of canola and pulse acreage across key U.S. production regions. USDA’s 2024 Prospective Plantings report indicates that canola acreage increased by more than 190,000 acres, while pulses continue to be cultivated across over 2.7 million acres nationwide. The bulk of this expansion is occurring in non-irrigated systems across the Dakotas, Montana, and Idaho - regions where affordable and reliable pre-emergence weed control is essential. Trifluralin’s competitive cost-per-acre structure and proven weed suppression capabilities enable growers to protect margins in high-value crops.

Forward purchasing patterns further validate this trend, with more than 2,400 metric tons already committed under early-buy agreements for the upcoming cycle, largely supporting canola and pulse programs. Ongoing field trials continue to demonstrate trifluralin’s agronomic value, delivering yield improvements of 3.2 bushels per acre in spring canola and nearly 5 hundredweight per acre in yellow peas - performance metrics that reinforce its economic attractiveness across multiple geographies.

Emerging Technology Trends:

A notable transformation shaping the U.S. trifluralin market is the accelerating shift toward fall applications. As farm sizes increase and spring labor availability tightens, growers are increasingly applying trifluralin in autumn to enhance scheduling flexibility and mitigate early-season weed pressure. Fall-applied acreage reached 4.18 million acres in 2024, marking a 38% year-over-year increase, driven by adoption in rotation-intensive systems such as canola-wheat-pea.

The deployment of GPS-enabled vertical tillage equipment has further supported this trend by enabling precise incorporation at optimal depth ranges, minimizing volatilization losses and improving overall herbicide efficiency. Operational benefits - including fewer sprayer passes and higher application throughput - are particularly attractive to large-acreage operations. Custom applicators report that fall application windows allow them to cover nearly double the acreage per machine per week compared to spring, a productivity gain that is increasingly critical as cooperatives scale operations.

Barriers to Optimization:

Despite strong demand fundamentals, the U.S. trifluralin market remains exposed to supply chain vulnerabilities stemming from reliance on Chinese technical-grade inputs. More than 4,200 tons of technical material were imported from China in Q1 2024, primarily sourced from Jiangsu Yangnong, Rainbow Agro, and Zhengbang Agro. Ongoing logistics disruptions - driven by shipping reroutes and elevated container rates - have increased landed costs by approximately US$ 0.13 per pound, prompting several national distributors to pursue alternative sourcing strategies with Indian suppliers, albeit at higher cost.

Inventory levels across major distribution hubs remain elevated as a risk mitigation strategy, while trade policy uncertainty, including pending Section 301 tariff reviews, continues to complicate procurement planning. Market analysts caution that even a short-term disruption at a major Chinese port or manufacturing facility could restrict U.S. supply by up to 1,400 tons within a 60-day period. Consequently, inventory preloading and supplier diversification have become central strategic priorities for manufacturers and dealers alike.

Detailed Market Segmentation:

Market Segment Analysis

By Product Type, liquid trifluralin accounts for more than 55% of total market share, driven by logistical efficiencies and economic advantages. Liquid formulations facilitate bulk transport, integrate seamlessly with UAN carrier streams, and reduce warehouse handling requirements. In field conditions, liquid concentrates demonstrate superior incorporation and volatilization control compared to granular forms, particularly in high-temperature regions such as California’s Central Valley.

By Grade Type, formulated trifluralin represents over 76% of total consumption. Pre-formulated products simplify handling, lower regulatory compliance burdens, and enhance application safety and efficiency. The widespread adoption of closed-loop transfer systems and tighter regulations governing technical-grade storage further reinforce the dominance of formulated products.

By Application, crop production captures more than 63% of market share, led by wheat, canola, pulses, and cotton. Pre-emergence incorporation remains a critical strategy for managing herbicide-resistant weed populations, especially in the Northern Plains where resistance to Group 2 and Group 9 herbicides is prevalent. Specialty uses in orchards and ornamental crops represent a smaller but stable niche.

By Method, ground broadcast application dominates with over 61% revenue share. Modern high-clearance sprayers offer improved efficiency, reduced drift risk, and compatibility with nutrient application passes, making them the preferred choice for large-scale farms. Aerial application and chemigation maintain limited adoption due to higher costs, weather constraints, and reduced suitability for volatile chemistries.

Segment Breakdown:

By Product Type

  • Solid
  • Liquid
  • Granular

By Grade Type

  • Technical Grade
  • Formulated
  • Hybrid

By Application

  • Crops
  • Fruits
  • Flowers
  • Broadleaf Weeds
  • Annual Grasses
  • Others

By Method

  • Ground Broadcast Application
  • Aerial Broadcast Application
  • Dry Bulk Fertilizer

By End Use

  • Residential (HOBBY/ GARDEN /TURF and ORNAMENTAL)
  • Commercial

By Distribution Channel

  • Direct
  • Distributer

Geographic Insights:

The U.S. trifluralin market is highly concentrated across the Northern Plains and Western regions, where dryland cereal and pulse rotations dominate production systems. North Dakota, Montana, and Washington collectively account for more than 4.5 million treated acres, followed closely by California and Minnesota. These states also lead in early-season shipments and forward bookings, reflecting strong confidence in trifluralin’s performance consistency and cost structure.

Although spring 2024 planting was delayed in several regions, application volumes remained resilient, with distributors reporting record shipments by mid-May. Regulatory stability - particularly the absence of anticipated rate adjustments following EPA’s 2024 ecological review - continues to support sustained adoption across core production zones.

Leading Market Participants:

Key companies shaping the U.S. trifluralin market span both manufacturing and distribution, with a strong focus on supply reliability and agronomic support. Major participants include:

Manufacturers

  • King Quenson
  • ADAMA
  • Drexel Chemical
  • Loveland Products, Inc.
  • Nufarm
  • Gowan Company
  • WinField United
  • Albaugh, LLC
  • Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC
  • Aceto Agricultural Chemicals Corp
  • Other Prominent Companies

Distributors

  • Parchem
  • Redox
  • Van Diest Supply Company
  • Alfa Chemistry
  • Intermountain Turf Supply
  • Tenkoz

Table of Contents

Chapter 1. Research Framework
1.1 Research Objective
1.2 Product Overview
1.3 Market Segmentation
Chapter 2. Research Methodology
2.1 Qualitative Research
2.1.1 Primary & Secondary Sourcesa
2.2 Quantitative Research
2.2.1 Primary & Secondary Sources
2.3 Breakdown of Primary Research Respondents, by Region
2.4 Assumption for the Study
2.5 Market Size Estimation
2.6. Data Triangulation
Chapter 3. Executive Summary: USA Trifluralin Market
Executive Summary: USA Trifluralin Market
Chapter 4. USA Trifluralin Market Overview
4.1. Industry Value Chain Analysis
4.1.1. Raw Material Provider
4.1.2. Manufacturer
4.1.3. Distributor
4.1.3.1. U.S. distribution of Trifluralin Formulated (Liquid)
4.1.4. End User
4.2. Industry Outlook
4.2.1. Overview of EXIM of Herbicides
4.2.1.1. Trifluralin Imports to US (2022-204) - Source, Price, Value & Volume
4.2.1.1.1. Tech
4.2.1.1.2. Formulated
4.2.2. Overview of Regulatory Framework
4.2.3. Overview of EXIM of Technical Grade and Formulated Trifluralin- 2022, 2023, 2024
4.2.4. Overview of Potential trifluralin substitutes (Formulated Herbicides)
4.2.4.1. Trade Name
4.2.4.2. Active Ingredient & Others
4.3. PESTLE Analysis
4.4. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4.4.1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.2. Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.4.3. Threat of Substitutes
4.4.4. Threat of New Entrants
4.4.5. Degree of Competition
4.5. Market Dynamics and Trends
4.5.1. Growth Drivers
4.5.2. Restraints
4.5.3. Challenges
4.5.4. Key Trends
4.6. Market Growth and Outlook
4.6.1. Market Revenue Estimates and Forecast (US$ Mn), 2020-2033
4.6.2. Market Volume Estimates and Forecast (Tons), 2020-2033
4.6.3. Top Selling Product
4.6.4. Price Trend Analysis
4.6.4.1. by Product Type
4.6.4.2. Formulated (Liquid) Trifluralin Price Margin - by Distribution Channel
4.7. Competition Dashboard
4.7.1. Market Concentration Rate
4.7.2. Company (Manufacturer) Market Share Analysis (Value %), 2024
4.7.3. Distributor Market Share
4.7.3.1. Formulated (Liquid) - Turf & Ornamental (2024, 2025-2030)
4.7.3.2. Formulated (Liquid) - Hobby & Garden (2024, 2025-2030)
4.7.4. Competitor Mapping
4.8. Actionable Insights (Analyst Recommendation's)
Chapter 5. USA Trifluralin Market Analysis, by Product Type
5.1. Key Insights
5.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020-2033 (US$ Mn and Tons)
5.2.1. Solid
5.2.2. Liquid
5.2.3. Granular
Chapter 6. USA Trifluralin Market Analysis, by Grade Type
6.1. Key Insights
6.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020-2033 (US$ Mn and Tons)
6.2.1. Technical Grade
6.2.2. Formulated
6.2.3. Hybrid
Chapter 7. USA Trifluralin Market Analysis, by Application
7.1. Key Insights
7.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020-2033 (US$ Mn and Tons)
7.2.1. Crops
7.2.2. Fruits
7.2.3. Flowers
7.2.4. Broadleaf Weeds
7.2.5. Annual Grasses
7.2.6. Others
Chapter 8. USA Trifluralin Market Analysis, by Method
8.1. Key Insights
8.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020-2033 (US$ Mn and Tons)
8.2.1. Ground Broadcast Application
8.2.2. Aerial Broadcast Application
8.2.3. Dry Bulk Fertilizer
Chapter 9. USA Trifluralin Market Analysis, by End Use
9.1. Key Insights
9.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020-2033 (US$ Mn and Tons)
9.2.1. Residential (HOBBY/ GARDEN /TURF and ORNAMENTAL)
9.2.2. Commercial
Chapter 10. USA Trifluralin Market Analysis, by Distribution Channel
10.1. Key Insights
10.2. Market Size and Forecast, 2020-2033 (US$ Mn and Tons)
10.2.1. Direct
10.2.2. Distributor
Chapter 11. Company Profiles (Company Overview, Financial Matrix, Key Product landscape, Key Personnel, Key Competitors, Contact Address, Business Strategy Outlook, Production Plants)
11.1. Manufacturers
11.1.1. King Quenson
11.1.2. ADAMA
11.1.3. Drexel Chemical
11.1.4. Loveland Products, Inc.
11.1.5. Nufarm
11.1.6. Gowan Company
11.1.7. WinField United
11.1.8. Albaugh, LLC
11.1.9. Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC
11.1.10. Aceto Agricultural Chemicals Corp
11.1.11 Other Prominent Companies
11.2. Distributors
11.2.1. Parchem
11.2.2. Redox
11.2.3. Van Diest Supply Company
11.2.4. Alfa Chemistry
11.2.5. Intermountain Turf Supply
11.2.6. Tenkoz
Chapter 12. Annexure
12.1. List of Secondary Sources
12.2. Key Country Markets- Macro Economic Outlook/Indicators

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Manufacturers
  • King Quenson
  • ADAMA
  • Drexel Chemical
  • Loveland Products, Inc.
  • Nufarm
  • Gowan Company
  • WinField United
  • Albaugh, LLC
  • Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC
  • Aceto Agricultural Chemicals Corp
  • Parchem
  • Redox
  • Van Diest Supply Company
  • Alfa Chemistry
  • Intermountain Turf Supply
  • Tenkoz

Table Information