+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Infrastructure Monitoring Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, 2021-2031

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 185 Pages
  • January 2026
  • Region: Global
  • TechSci Research
  • ID: 6217125
Free Webex Call
10% Free customization
Free Webex Call

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

10% Free customization

This report comes with 10% free customization, enabling you to add data that meets your specific business needs.

The Global Infrastructure Monitoring Market is projected to experience substantial growth, expanding from a value of USD 5.14 Billion in 2025 to USD 10.17 Billion by 2031, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 12.05%. This market encompasses a range of services and technologies aimed at observing the structural integrity, health, and performance of vital physical assets, including tunnels, dams, and bridges.

Through the utilization of data acquisition systems, sensors, and analytics software, these solutions enable real-time anomaly detection and condition assessment. The market's expansion is largely fueled by the pressing need to maintain aging public works, adherence to stringent safety regulations, and an economic transition toward predictive maintenance to avert catastrophic failures. Notably, the American Road & Transportation Builders Association reported in 2024 that 36 percent of all bridges in the United States necessitated major repairs or replacement, underscoring the urgent demand for these oversight technologies.

Despite the evident necessity for improved safety protocols, the market encounters significant obstacles due to the high capital investment required to implement comprehensive monitoring systems. The substantial costs associated with installing high-precision instrumentation, along with the technical difficulties of integrating modern sensors with legacy structures, can be prohibitive for municipalities with limited budgets. These financial constraints frequently postpone the adoption of advanced monitoring solutions, especially in developing regions or within smaller-scale infrastructure projects where immediate funding is allocated to visible repairs rather than digital oversight initiatives.

Market Drivers

The progressive deterioration of aging public infrastructure, combined with rigorous regulatory mandates for structural safety, serves as a primary catalyst for the widespread implementation of monitoring systems. As essential assets like bridges, dams, and tunnels near the end of their design lifecycles, the costs associated with full rehabilitation become increasingly unsustainable, requiring real-time oversight to prioritize repairs and prolong asset utility.

The magnitude of this maintenance backlog emphasizes the critical role of the market in asset management; for instance, the Association of State Dam Safety Officials estimated in 2024 that rehabilitating the nation's non-federal dams would cost $165.2 billion, a figure that encourages owners to utilize sensing technologies for precise condition assessment instead of expensive immediate reconstruction. This urgency is further heightened by the rising economic impact of infrastructure failures and environmental risks, as evidenced by the Swiss Re Institute's December 2024 estimate that total economic losses from natural catastrophes reached USD 310 billion, prompting a strategic move toward resilience-focused monitoring strategies.

Concurrently, the market is being propelled by growing investments in smart city initiatives and the incorporation of IoT technologies and Digital Twins. Both government bodies and private developers are aggressively funding digital transformation projects that embed sophisticated sensors and data analytics into the built environment to optimize performance.

This influx of capital lowers the financial barrier for deploying comprehensive monitoring networks and supports the transition from reactive to predictive maintenance. Highlighting this trend, the U.S. Department of Transportation announced in December 2024 that $54 million was awarded to 34 projects under the 'SMART Grants Program' to utilize advanced smart community technologies for improved transportation efficiency and safety. Such financial backing validates the commercial viability of infrastructure monitoring solutions, fostering an environment where physical assets are continuously synchronized with virtual models to ensure operational continuity.

Market Challenges

The substantial initial capital investment required for installing extensive monitoring systems presents a significant barrier to the expansion of the Global Infrastructure Monitoring Market. Deploying high-precision sensors and integrating them into existing data platforms entails considerable upfront costs that many asset owners find difficult to justify. For public agencies and municipalities operating under strict budget limitations, these expenses are often prohibitive. Consequently, decision-makers frequently prioritize visible, immediate repairs over the adoption of preventative digital oversight tools, delaying the market's penetration into critical public works sectors where funding is already scarce.

This financial strain is illustrated by the growing disparity between available funds and necessary maintenance. The American Society of Civil Engineers reported in 2025 that the United States faces an estimated infrastructure investment gap of $3.7 trillion. This profound shortfall indicates that a vast amount of critical infrastructure remains underfunded, compelling agencies to divert scarce capital solely toward preventing imminent failure rather than investing in advanced monitoring technologies. Such economic pressures directly impede the market's ability to scale, as the adoption of monitoring solutions remains financially out of reach for many budget-conscious operators.

Market Trends

The integration of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning is transforming infrastructure monitoring by automating the interpretation of massive datasets to forecast structural failures. Instead of relying on manual inspections or basic threshold alerts, operators are increasingly utilizing advanced algorithms that identify subtle deterioration patterns, such as micro-cracks or strain anomalies, with high precision. This technological shift allows for a transition from reactive repairs to genuine predictive maintenance strategies, ensuring asset longevity while minimizing operational downtime. According to Bentley Systems' October 2025 'Year in Infrastructure 2025' press release, one-third of the Going Digital Awards submissions incorporated AI, a sharp increase that underscores the rapid integration of intelligent analytics into critical asset management workflows.

Simultaneously, the widespread adoption of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) is addressing the financial and technical hurdles of retrofitting aging public works with continuous monitoring capabilities. By utilizing Low-Power Wide-Area Network (LPWAN) protocols, asset owners can deploy battery-operated sensors across extensive linear assets like pipelines and bridges without the prohibitive costs of trenching for wired power or data connectivity. This wireless scalability enables the creation of dense, real-time observation grids that were previously economically unfeasible for budget-constrained municipalities. According to the LoRa Alliance's February 2025 '2024 End of Year Report', over 350 million end nodes and 6.9 million gateways with LoRa ICs had been deployed worldwide as of June 2024, demonstrating the massive scale at which decentralized connectivity is enhancing global infrastructure oversight.

Key Players Profiled in the Infrastructure Monitoring Market

  • Siemens AG
  • Honeywell International Inc.
  • ABB Group
  • National Instruments Corporation
  • Acellent Technologies, Inc.
  • Pure Technologies Ltd.
  • Structural Monitoring Systems PLC
  • Emerson Electric Co.
  • Campbell Scientific, Inc.
  • Rockwell Automation

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Infrastructure Monitoring Market has been segmented into the following categories:

Infrastructure Monitoring Market, by Component:

  • Hardware
  • Software
  • Services

Infrastructure Monitoring Market, by Technology:

  • Wired
  • Wireless

Infrastructure Monitoring Market, by Application:

  • Corrosion Monitoring
  • Crack Detection
  • Damage Detection
  • Vibration Monitoring
  • Thermal Monitoring
  • Multimodal Sensing
  • Strain Monitoring
  • Others

Infrastructure Monitoring Market, by Vertical:

  • Oil & Gas
  • Manufacturing
  • Aerospace and Defense
  • Construction
  • Automotive
  • Power Generation
  • Others

Infrastructure Monitoring Market, by Region:

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • South America
  • Middle East & Africa

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Infrastructure Monitoring Market.

Available Customization

The analyst offers customization according to your specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:
  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

This product will be delivered within 1-3 business days.

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview
1.1. Market Definition
1.2. Scope of the Market
1.2.1. Markets Covered
1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Objective of the Study
2.2. Baseline Methodology
2.3. Key Industry Partners
2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
2.5. Forecasting Methodology
2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
2.7. Assumptions and Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Overview of the Market
3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends
4. Voice of Customer
5. Global Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
5.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.1.1. By Value
5.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.2.1. By Component (Hardware, Software, Services)
5.2.2. By Technology (Wired, Wireless)
5.2.3. By Application (Corrosion Monitoring, Crack Detection, Damage Detection, Vibration Monitoring, Thermal Monitoring, Multimodal Sensing, Strain Monitoring, Others)
5.2.4. By Vertical (Oil & Gas, Manufacturing, Aerospace and Defense, Construction, Automotive, Power Generation, Others)
5.2.5. By Region
5.2.6. By Company (2025)
5.3. Market Map
6. North America Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
6.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.1.1. By Value
6.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.2.1. By Component
6.2.2. By Technology
6.2.3. By Application
6.2.4. By Vertical
6.2.5. By Country
6.3. North America: Country Analysis
6.3.1. United States Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
6.3.2. Canada Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
6.3.3. Mexico Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
7. Europe Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
7.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.1.1. By Value
7.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.2.1. By Component
7.2.2. By Technology
7.2.3. By Application
7.2.4. By Vertical
7.2.5. By Country
7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
7.3.1. Germany Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
7.3.2. France Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
7.3.3. United Kingdom Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
7.3.4. Italy Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
7.3.5. Spain Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
8. Asia-Pacific Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
8.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.1.1. By Value
8.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.2.1. By Component
8.2.2. By Technology
8.2.3. By Application
8.2.4. By Vertical
8.2.5. By Country
8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
8.3.1. China Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
8.3.2. India Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
8.3.3. Japan Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
8.3.4. South Korea Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
8.3.5. Australia Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
9. Middle East & Africa Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
9.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.1.1. By Value
9.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.2.1. By Component
9.2.2. By Technology
9.2.3. By Application
9.2.4. By Vertical
9.2.5. By Country
9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
9.3.2. UAE Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
9.3.3. South Africa Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
10. South America Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
10.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.1.1. By Value
10.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.2.1. By Component
10.2.2. By Technology
10.2.3. By Application
10.2.4. By Vertical
10.2.5. By Country
10.3. South America: Country Analysis
10.3.1. Brazil Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
10.3.2. Colombia Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
10.3.3. Argentina Infrastructure Monitoring Market Outlook
11. Market Dynamics
11.1. Drivers
11.2. Challenges
12. Market Trends & Developments
12.1. Mergers & Acquisitions (If Any)
12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
12.3. Recent Developments
13. Global Infrastructure Monitoring Market: SWOT Analysis
14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
14.1. Competition in the Industry
14.2. Potential of New Entrants
14.3. Power of Suppliers
14.4. Power of Customers
14.5. Threat of Substitute Products
15. Competitive Landscape
15.1. Siemens AG
15.1.1. Business Overview
15.1.2. Products & Services
15.1.3. Recent Developments
15.1.4. Key Personnel
15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
15.2. Honeywell International Inc.
15.3. ABB Group
15.4. National Instruments Corporation
15.5. Acellent Technologies, Inc.
15.6. Pure Technologies Ltd.
15.7. Structural Monitoring Systems plc
15.8. Emerson Electric Co.
15.9. Campbell Scientific, Inc.
15.10. Rockwell Automation
16. Strategic Recommendations

Companies Mentioned

The key players profiled in this Infrastructure Monitoring market report include:
  • Siemens AG
  • Honeywell International Inc.
  • ABB Group
  • National Instruments Corporation
  • Acellent Technologies, Inc.
  • Pure Technologies Ltd.
  • Structural Monitoring Systems PLC
  • Emerson Electric Co.
  • Campbell Scientific, Inc.
  • Rockwell Automation

Table Information