+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Ship Leasing - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 120 Pages
  • April 2026
  • Region: Global
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 6246363
The ship leasing market size was valued at USD 16.80 billion in 2025 and estimated to grow from USD 19.08 billion in 2026 to reach USD 36.49 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 13.84% over 2026-2031. This report is Segmented by Lease Type (Financial Lease and Full-Service Lease), Application (Container Ships, Bulk Carriers, and Others), Type (Real-Time Lease, Periodic Tenancy, Bareboat Charter, and Other Types), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and the Middle East and Africa). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Ship Leasing Market Trends and Insights

Rapid Fleet Renewal Driven by IMO Decarbonization Rules

The IMO is set to review and likely increase the stringency of CII reduction factors. Between 2027 and 2030, ships will be required to achieve progressively lower carbon intensity levels, with specific targets to be finalized by 2026. Ships will need to implement advanced technologies, optimize routes, and enhance energy efficiency to remain compliant. Non-compliance may lead to commercial disadvantages, such as increased port fees or restricted access to certain ports. As the Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI) and CII frameworks evolve, they are becoming increasingly integrated with regional carbon markets. The European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) currently covers 50% of voyages into and out of Europe, with full coverage expected by 2026. Proactive fleets could potentially reduce operational costs by 10-15% through early compliance and strategic planning. Hamburg Commercial Bank, for instance, provided HOLBORN Europa Raffinerie GmbH with an additional EUR 100 million (USD 113.66 million) in financing for the development of a green diesel production plant. Hamburg Commercial Bank had been involved in the project since its inception and previously served as Mandated Lead Arranger for a EUR 100 million (USD 113.66 million) financing in 2023. The newest IMO life-cycle GHG guidance is prompting lessors to peg rent to CII performance, keeping lessee and lessor incentives aligned for the long haul.

Attractive Interest-Rate Spreads Amid Retreat of Traditional Maritime Lenders

Basel IV lifts risk weights on shipping and tightens concentration rules, which have led European and Japanese lenders to reduce maritime loan books since 2024 and have widened pricing for non-bank capital in the ship leasing market. The pullback increased spreads and created room for private credit and other non-bank lessors to originate leases at yields that reflect higher risk premiums. Capital from KKR, Apollo, and Oaktree is targeting sale-leasebacks at yields above 8%, compared with sub-6% returns that characterized legacy bank loans in prior cycles. The remaining banks are focusing on investment-grade exposures. Trade policy developments, including US port fees on Chinese-built ships, have also prompted restructurings of cross-border leasing special-purpose vehicles in Asia hubs, which adds to the appeal of flexible leasing formats in the ship leasing market.

Volatile Charter Rates Tied to Geopolitical Supply-Chain Disruptions

The Baltic Dry Index fluctuated between 700 and 2,500 points in 2024 as weather, conflict, and logistics constraints reshaped trade flows. Detours around the Cape of Good Hope added 10-14 days to Asia-Europe sailings, temporarily lifting spot rates. The Suez Canal Authority projects annual revenue of approximately USD 10 billion by 2026, driven by incentives for certain vessel categories. Some owners are reluctant to lock in above-cycle rates for long periods, which dampens appetite for long-term leases in parts of the ship leasing market. Bulk carrier demand remains tied to Chinese steel dynamics, even after China imported 1.1 billion tons of iron ore in 2024, keeping bulker exposure sensitive to macro policy. Forward-curve depth beyond 12-18 months is limited, and secondary liquidity in specialized classes is thin, increasing residual-value risk for lessors.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:
  • Chinese Policy Banks’ Push for Lease-Based Export Financing
  • Rising Demand for Long-Term Charter Cover by E-Commerce-Driven Liner Alliances
  • Stricter Basel IV Capital Rules Curbing Bank Syndication Appetite
For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Financial lease structures captured 56.57% of the ship leasing market share in 2025, while Full-Service Lease is projected to expand at a 13.89% CAGR through 2031 as operators pursue bundled support under regulatory uncertainty. Chinese lessors play a central role in the financial lease category, with Bank of Communications Financial Leasing managing a portfolio above RMB 100 billion (USD 14.58 billion) across 432 vessels, structured primarily to balance residual risk and tax efficiency. Larger shipowners that maintain technical management teams often prefer financial leases to minimize all-in ownership costs and keep control of operations within the ship leasing market. Mid-tier operators that lack scale benefits lean toward full-service lease packages that combine crewing, technical management, insurance, and compliance support to simplify operations. This split aligns capital efficiency with operating capabilities, enabling lessors to tailor products to distinct owner profiles in the ship leasing market.

Regulatory complexity is lifting demand for full-service offerings. The EU Emissions Trading System’s full inclusion of shipping from 2026, with carbon prices near EUR 80-90 per ton (USD 88-99), is expected to impose annual compliance costs that strain smaller operators that lack in-house carbon accounting tools. Full-service lessors are embedding emissions monitoring, CII optimization advice, and fuel management analytics into lease packages, which monetizes regulatory expertise. Diversified players such as SFL Corporation reported USD 182 million in quarterly revenue in 2024 and USD 113 million in EBITDA from a fleet spanning tankers, bulkers, containers, and car carriers, which illustrates margin potential in bundled models. The trajectory of Full-Service Lease growth will track mid-term IMO greenhouse gas policy milestones, which are expected to be clarified by 2027 and will shape investment plans in the ship leasing market.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Lease Type
    • Financial Lease
    • Full-Service Lease
  • By Application
    • Container Ships
    • Bulk Carriers
    • Others
  • By Type
    • Real-Time Lease
    • Periodic Tenancy
    • Bareboat Charter
    • Other Types
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Germany
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • South Korea
      • India
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Rest of South America
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Middle East
        • United Arab Emirates
        • Saudi Arabia
        • Rest of Middle East
      • Africa
        • South Africa
        • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

North America commanded 42.55% of the ship leasing market share in 2025, supported by Jones Act fleet renewal and a large pool of aging vessels in domestic trades. The Jones Act ecosystem invests over USD 1 billion annually and is contending with an average fleet age above 20 years, which encourages lease-backed renewal strategies. Major US operators such as Crowley, Matson, and TOTE placed LNG-powered orders with domestic yards for deliveries through 2028, which underpin multi-year leasing needs on coastal and domestic routes. The Jones Act’s build, flag, and crew requirements create a captive market with limited foreign competition, which sustains pricing premiums in the ship-leasing market. Canada’s National Shipbuilding Strategy continues to support Arctic-capable vessels and offshore patrol ships, which complement commercial leasing opportunities that form around domestic procurement cycles. Nearshoring and cross-border trade growth are driving feeder and short-sea demand in North American corridors, supporting a steady pipeline of lease originations as logistics networks are rebalanced.

Europe is the fastest-growing region with a projected 14.32% CAGR through 2031 as emissions policy becomes a central driver of fleet decisions in the ship leasing market. The EU Emissions Trading System’s full inclusion of shipping from 2026, with carbon prices near EUR 80-90 per ton (USD 88-99) and estimated annual compliance costs of EUR 10-15 billion (USD 11-16.5 billion), is accelerating demand for scrubber-fitted, LNG-powered, and methanol-ready tonnage. Hamburg Commercial Bank’s EUR 19.4 billion (USD 22.77 billion) ship-finance portfolio, which favors green shipping, signals how European capital is aligning with climate objectives in the ship leasing market. UK Export Finance support is encouraging more domestic deals, while German and French lenders remain core arrangers in syndicated lease transactions. The EU Taxonomy defines criteria for transition-aligned assets, which gives first movers in sustainability-linked leasing an advantage in origination and pricing.

Asia-Pacific remains the volume and liquidity hub for the ship leasing market. China accounts for more than one quarter of global ship finance, a position anchored by policy banks and state-owned lessors such as Bank of Communications Financial Leasing, which manages more than RMB 100 billion (USD 14.58 billion) across 432 vessels. Japan and South Korea continue to dominate high-value construction, including LNG carriers and ammonia-ready designs. They are partnering with global lessors to channel green-propulsion newbuilds into long-term charters. Singapore’s Maritime and Port Authority supports a data infrastructure that enables performance-linked leasing and digital asset innovations across the ship leasing market. India’s Sagarmala program is building coastal and inland waterway capacity, which is opening space for short-sea leasing demand that can scale over the medium term. South America concentrates activity in Brazil, where iron ore and soybean exports support Panamax and Capesize charters, while the Middle East and Africa are emerging as growth frontiers as Gulf sovereign funds explore partnerships with established lessors.



List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S
  • Global Ship Lease, Inc.
  • Bank of Communications Financial Leasing Co., Ltd.
  • Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
  • FSL Trust Management Pte. Ltd.
  • SFL Corporation Ltd.
  • Seaspan Corporation
  • COSCO Shipping Corporation Limited
  • Hamburg Commercial Bank AG
  • Standard Chartered Group
  • MUFG Bank, Ltd.
  • IFCHOR GALBRAITHS Group
  • Minsheng Financial Leasing Co., Ltd.

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Rapid fleet renewal driven by IMO decarbonization rules
4.2.2 Attractive interest-rate spreads amid retreat of traditional maritime lenders
4.2.3 Chinese policy banks’ push for lease-based export financing
4.2.4 Rising demand for long-term charter cover by e-commerce-driven liner alliances
4.2.5 Emergence of carbon-indexed lease structures with performance-based rent
4.2.6 Tokenization of vessel assets enabling fractional digital leases
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Volatile charter rates tied to geopolitical supply-chain disruptions
4.3.2 Stricter Basel IV capital rules curbing bank syndication appetite
4.3.3 Slow secondary-market liquidity for specialized vessel classes
4.3.4 ESG-driven investor exclusion of fossil-fuel tonnage
4.4 Value Chain Analysis
4.5 Regulatory Landscape
4.6 Technological Outlook
4.7 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)
5.1 By Lease Type
5.1.1 Financial Lease
5.1.2 Full-Service Lease
5.2 By Application
5.2.1 Container Ships
5.2.2 Bulk Carriers
5.2.3 Others
5.3 By Type
5.3.1 Real-Time Lease
5.3.2 Periodic Tenancy
5.3.3 Bareboat Charter
5.3.4 Other Types
5.4 By Geography
5.4.1 North America
5.4.1.1 United States
5.4.1.2 Canada
5.4.1.3 Mexico
5.4.2 Europe
5.4.2.1 United Kingdom
5.4.2.2 France
5.4.2.3 Germany
5.4.2.4 Rest of Europe
5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
5.4.3.1 China
5.4.3.2 Japan
5.4.3.3 South Korea
5.4.3.4 India
5.4.3.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.4.4 South America
5.4.4.1 Brazil
5.4.4.2 Rest of South America
5.4.5 Middle East and Africa
5.4.5.1 Middle East
5.4.5.1.1 United Arab Emirates
5.4.5.1.2 Saudi Arabia
5.4.5.1.3 Rest of Middle East
5.4.5.2 Africa
5.4.5.2.1 South Africa
5.4.5.2.2 Rest of Africa
6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
6.4.1 A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S
6.4.2 Global Ship Lease, Inc.
6.4.3 Bank of Communications Financial Leasing Co., Ltd.
6.4.4 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
6.4.5 FSL Trust Management Pte. Ltd.
6.4.6 SFL Corporation Ltd.
6.4.7 Seaspan Corporation
6.4.8 COSCO Shipping Corporation Limited
6.4.9 Hamburg Commercial Bank AG
6.4.10 Standard Chartered Group
6.4.11 MUFG Bank, Ltd.
6.4.12 IFCHOR GALBRAITHS Group
6.4.13 Minsheng Financial Leasing Co., Ltd.
7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
7.1 White-space and Unmet-need Assessment

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • A.P. Møller – Mærsk A/S
  • Global Ship Lease, Inc.
  • Bank of Communications Financial Leasing Co., Ltd.
  • Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
  • FSL Trust Management Pte. Ltd.
  • SFL Corporation Ltd.
  • Seaspan Corporation
  • COSCO Shipping Corporation Limited
  • Hamburg Commercial Bank AG
  • Standard Chartered Group
  • MUFG Bank, Ltd.
  • IFCHOR GALBRAITHS Group
  • Minsheng Financial Leasing Co., Ltd.