+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

United States Defense Logistics - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 150 Pages
  • June 2026
  • Region: United States
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 6253968
The united states defense logistics market size was valued at USD 45.19 billion in 2025 and is estimated to grow from USD 47.61 billion in 2026 to reach USD 61.02 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 5.09% during the forecast period 2026 to 2031. The United States defense logistics market is expanding because the Department of Defense entered 2026 with a materially higher procurement pipeline, stronger munitions replenishment needs, and continued shipbuilding and missile spending that have kept transportation, warehousing, and sustainment demand elevated for multiple years. This report is Segmented by Service Type (Armament, Troop Movement, Technical Support, Medical Aid and Health Services, and More), by Logistics Functions (Transportation, Warehousing and Distribution, and Value-Added Services), by End User (Army, Navy, Air Force, and More), and by Region (Northeast, Southeast, Midwest, Southwest, and West). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

United States Defense Logistics Market Trends and Insights

Rising DoD Procurement for Sustainment and Modernization

The Pentagon’s FY2026 procurement budget stands near USD 205 billion, up from the FY2025 enacted procurement of USD 174 billion, and that increase directly expands the logistics workload associated with receiving, storing, transporting, and maintaining new equipment and spare parts. Reconciliation spending also includes a USD 25 billion munitions envelope, which supports armament handling, depot throughput, and secure transportation across the United States defense logistics market. The demand is not limited to the initial procurement year, because logistics costs continue throughout the life of each platform, thereby extending contract visibility for firms with established sustainment capacity. Reverse logistics also remains important because the Defense Logistics Agency processed property originally valued at USD 232 billion in FY2025 and reutilized 2.4 million items valued at USD 2 billion, demonstrating that disposal, recovery, redistribution, and reuse continue to generate workload beyond forward delivery. As the 2026 budget is executed and follow-on plans are shaped, contractors with proven depot support, hazardous material handling, and inventory management records are positioned to capture recurring work across the United States defense logistics market. This maintains revenue durability even as acquisition cycles eventually moderate.

Indo-Pacific Pivot Boosting Pre-Positioned Stocks

The strongest structural shift in the United States defense logistics market remains the Indo-Pacific posture, where theater scale, distributed islands, and long sea and air routes require more inventory nodes and more resilient sustainment planning. The Marine Corps also established a new prepositioning program at Subic Bay. They evaluated additional sites in Palau and Australia, while the Navy pursued a large, climate-controlled storage facility in the Philippines under a 10-year lease. Joint exercises also validated forward arming and refueling concepts near the first island chain, indicating rising demand for fuel handling, ammunition staging, and rapid resupply services in austere settings. Japan’s 2026 Indo-Pacific deployment schedule adds another layer of multinational sustainment coordination, and that supports more contracting activity for transportation, warehousing, and forward support across the United States defense logistics market. The result is a wider logistics footprint that depends less on single hubs and more on flexible commercial and military distribution links.

Vendor Base Contraction and Supply-Chain Fragility

Supplier fragility remains a restraint on the United States defense logistics market because logistics performance depends on stable access to components, specialized materials, and qualified maintenance inputs. Naval Postgraduate School research in 2026 found that more than 84% of prime contractors lacked visibility beyond Tier-1 suppliers, which means disruptions in castings, energetics, bearings, and similar inputs can surface late and delay program execution. Certification and cyber compliance costs add more pressure on smaller firms that were already operating with limited capital and narrow labor pools. Business Executives for National Security also warned in 2025 that a large wave of small-business ownership transitions is approaching, increasing the risk of exits or consolidation among specialized suppliers that are difficult to replace. In practical terms, a thinner supplier base can slow replenishment cycles, reduce pricing flexibility, and increase the need for working capital buffers across the United States defense logistics market. That is especially relevant in ammunition, aviation parts, and other categories where alternate sourcing is limited.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:
  • Digital Transformation and AI-Enabled Predictive Logistics
  • DLA WMS Roll-Out Unlocking Outsourced 3PL Demand
  • Federal Budget Uncertainty/CRs Delaying Contract Awards

Segment Analysis

Armament held 43.11% of the United States defense logistics market size in 2025, making it the largest service type. Its leading position reflects ongoing munitions drawdowns, replenishment demand, and a 2026 funding environment that continues to prioritize procurement and supply-chain support for weapons inventories. The operating pattern is broader than a short procurement wave because live theater support and war reserve rebuilding occur in parallel, creating sustained throughput at depots and distribution sites. Contractors with hazardous-material transport qualifications, secure storage capacity, and certified handling processes remain well-positioned under this demand structure. The scale and sensitivity of munitions movement also limit the number of providers that can compete across the full workflow, which supports repeat business for established performers.

Medical aid and health services are the fastest-growing service type. They are projected to expand at a 7.93% CAGR through 2031, supported by evolving casualty care requirements and heightened evacuation readiness in dispersed theaters. That keeps medical supply positioning, cold-chain support, and field response logistics relevant to future contracting scopes. Military troop movement, firefighting protection, and other services add a stable base of recurring activity, and together they keep the United States defense logistics industry tied not only to combat resupply but also to installation continuity, readiness support, and contingency planning.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Service Type
    • Armament
    • Military Troops Movement Support
    • Technical Support & Maintenance
    • Medical Aid & Health Services
    • Fire-fighting Protection
    • Other Services
  • By Logistics Function
    • Transportation
      • Road
      • Air
      • Sea and Inland Waterways
      • Rail
    • Warehousing & Distribution
    • Value-added Services (Labelling, Kitting, Consulting)
  • By End User
    • Army
    • Navy
    • Air Force
    • Others
  • By Region
    • Northeast
    • Southeast
    • Midwest
    • Southwest
    • West

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • Lockheed Martin
  • Northrop Grumman
  • RTX Corporation (Raytheon business units)
  • General Dynamics
  • Boeing Defense, Space & Security
  • Leidos
  • L3Harris Technologies
  • Huntington Ingalls Industries
  • Booz Allen Hamilton
  • Amentum
  • KBR
  • Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)
  • ASRC Federal
  • FedEx Government Services
  • UPS Government & Defense
  • J.B. Hunt Transport Services
  • Werner Enterprises
  • Schneider National
  • Crowley
  • Maersk Line, Limited

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 Introduction
1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 Research Methodology3 Executive Summary
4 Market Landscape
4.1 Market Overview & Role of Logistics in Modern Warfare
4.2 Defense Spending Trends
4.3 Market Drivers
4.3.1 Rising DoD Procurement for Sustainment and Modernization
4.3.2 Indo-Pacific Pivot Boosting Pre-Positioned Stocks
4.3.3 Digital Transformation and AI-Enabled Predictive Logistics
4.3.4 DLA WMS Roll-Out Unlocking Outsourced 3PL Demand
4.3.5 Net-Zero Mandates Spurring Electric/Autonomous Base Fleets
4.3.6 Warstopper and Industrial-Base Funds for Niche Suppliers
4.4 Market Restraints
4.4.1 Vendor Base Contraction and Supply-Chain Fragility
4.4.2 Federal Budget Uncertainty/CRs Delaying Contract Awards
4.4.3 PFAS Remediation Inflating Infrastructure Costs
4.4.4 Zero-Trust Cyber Compliance Slowing System Roll-Outs
4.5 Regulatory Framework
4.6 Value Chain and Distribution Channel Analysis
4.7 Technology Innovations Outlook
4.8 Porter's Five Forces
4.8.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.8.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.8.5 Rivalry Among Competitors
4.9 Evolution of Defense Logistics Requirements
4.10 Impact of Geo-Political Events on Supply Chain Shifts
5 Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, 2026-2031)
5.1 By Service Type
5.1.1 Armament
5.1.2 Military Troops Movement Support
5.1.3 Technical Support & Maintenance
5.1.4 Medical Aid & Health Services
5.1.5 Fire-fighting Protection
5.1.6 Other Services
5.2 By Logistics Function
5.2.1 Transportation
5.2.1.1 Road
5.2.1.2 Air
5.2.1.3 Sea and Inland Waterways
5.2.1.4 Rail
5.2.2 Warehousing & Distribution
5.2.3 Value-added Services (Labelling, Kitting, Consulting)
5.3 By End User
5.3.1 Army
5.3.2 Navy
5.3.3 Air Force
5.3.4 Others
5.4 By Region
5.4.1 Northeast
5.4.2 Southeast
5.4.3 Midwest
5.4.4 Southwest
5.4.5 West
6 Competitive Landscape
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Key Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
6.4.1 Lockheed Martin
6.4.2 Northrop Grumman
6.4.3 RTX Corporation (Raytheon business units)
6.4.4 General Dynamics
6.4.5 Boeing Defense, Space & Security
6.4.6 Leidos
6.4.7 L3Harris Technologies
6.4.8 Huntington Ingalls Industries
6.4.9 Booz Allen Hamilton
6.4.10 Amentum
6.4.11 KBR
6.4.12 Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)
6.4.13 ASRC Federal
6.4.14 FedEx Government Services
6.4.15 UPS Government & Defense
6.4.16 J.B. Hunt Transport Services
6.4.17 Werner Enterprises
6.4.18 Schneider National
6.4.19 Crowley
6.4.20 Maersk Line, Limited
7 Market Opportunities & Future Outlook
7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Lockheed Martin
  • Northrop Grumman
  • RTX Corporation (Raytheon business units)
  • General Dynamics
  • Boeing Defense, Space & Security
  • Leidos
  • L3Harris Technologies
  • Huntington Ingalls Industries
  • Booz Allen Hamilton
  • Amentum
  • KBR
  • Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)
  • ASRC Federal
  • FedEx Government Services
  • UPS Government & Defense
  • J.B. Hunt Transport Services
  • Werner Enterprises
  • Schneider National
  • Crowley
  • Maersk Line, Limited