+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Infrastructure Asset Management - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 168 Pages
  • June 2026
  • Region: Global
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 6254111
The infrastructure asset management market size is expected to increase from USD 28.12 billion in 2025 to USD 30.72 billion in 2026 and reach USD 50.11 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 10.28% over 2026-2031. This report is Segmented by Component (Software and Services), Asset Management Function (Strategic Asset Management, and More), Deployment Model (Cloud-Based, On-Premises, and Hybrid), Asset Type (Transportation Infrastructure, Energy Infrastructure, and More), End-User (Government and Municipal Authorities, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Infrastructure Asset Management Market Trends and Insights

Aging Infrastructure Renewal And Lifecycle Cost Pressure

A large share of infrastructure spending still falls after commissioning, which keeps the infrastructure asset management market closely tied to maintenance planning rather than optional IT budgets. The American Society of Civil Engineers reported a USD 3.7 trillion U.S. funding gap across 18 infrastructure categories over the next decade, which shows that current spending is still not enough to close renewal needs. The same ASCE work also showed that sustained investment improves condition and economic outcomes, which supports the case for earlier intervention rather than deferred replacement. Pew Charitable Trusts found that U.S. state and local governments carried nearly USD 105 billion in deferred road and bridge maintenance by 2023, and that backlog reinforces the need for better inspection sequencing and repair prioritization across the infrastructure asset management market. That cost pattern favors platforms that can rank assets by risk, condition, and lifecycle consequence before failures move from manageable repair to costly replacement. The infrastructure asset management market is therefore benefiting from a shift in buyer focus from simple recordkeeping toward tools that guide capital timing, field work, and long-term renewal logic.

Predictive Maintenance And Condition Monitoring Adoption

Predictive maintenance is moving further into the infrastructure asset management market because operators now have stronger reason to link live asset data with work planning and failure prevention. A March 2026 paper in Applied Sciences described open frameworks that connect industrial condition monitoring data with large language model workflows, which reflects the broader move toward adaptive analysis in monitoring environments. This matters because asset owners need systems that can interpret streaming equipment data in a usable way rather than just store it. In practice, the infrastructure asset management market is gaining from the operational value of earlier fault detection, lower unplanned downtime, and clearer maintenance prioritization across rail, utility, and water assets. The same standards-driven shift is also making buyers more attentive to data architecture, cybersecurity, and traceability before they scale condition-based programs across large portfolios. As a result, the infrastructure asset management market is moving toward platforms that combine monitoring, work orders, analytics, and compliance documentation in one operating environment.

High Implementation And Integration Costs

Implementation cost remains a real brake on the infrastructure asset management market because software licenses are only one part of the total project burden. Many deployments require links across GIS, billing systems, field mobility tools, and operating environments, and this stretches project scope well beyond a standard enterprise software rollout. Public-sector buyers are especially exposed because procurement cycles are slow and capital budgets are often split across departments with different priorities. That makes the infrastructure asset management market harder to penetrate for smaller municipalities and utilities that do not have dedicated internal teams to manage staged rollouts and data migration. The effect is often delayed procurement, a narrower project scope, or phased adoption that captures only part of the expected value. This cost barrier is one reason services are gaining share in the infrastructure asset management market, since outside partners are often needed just to get platforms into production.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:
  • Smart Infrastructure And Modernization Spending
  • Cloud And GIS-Centric Platform Adoption
  • Legacy System And Data Interoperability Complexity

Segment Analysis

Software retained a 57.91% share in 2025, which kept the infrastructure asset management market centered on enterprise platforms that already sit inside large public and utility portfolios. Software accounted for 57.91% share of the infrastructure asset management market size in 2025, and that lead reflected the entrenched role of platforms such as IBM Maximo, SAP S/4HANA EAM, Bentley AssetWise, and Oracle Primavera Unifier in large asset owner environments. The software layer remains essential because it acts as the system for asset records, work orders, inspection history, risk scoring, and capital planning across long-lived infrastructure networks. In practical terms, buyers still start with software because it sets the data model that every other service and workflow will use.

Services are forecast to grow at an 11.62% CAGR from 2026 to 2031, which shows how much execution complexity is now shaping the infrastructure asset management market. Hitachi launched “Social Infrastructure Maintenance powered by Lumada” in February 2026 to bring together more than 40 digital maintenance solutions across roads, bridges, tunnels, water, and power systems, which signaled a stronger vendor focus on lifecycle service delivery. IBM Consulting also announced Process Studio in May 2026 to convert legacy standard operating procedures into agent-ready AI workflows, reinforcing the shift toward service-led modernization around installed platforms. The infrastructure asset management industry is therefore seeing advisory work move upstream, implementation stay spend-intensive, and managed services gain appeal where public clients lack internal digital teams. This service mix is changing the revenue structure of the infrastructure asset management market without weakening software’s role as the anchor layer.

Operational asset management held a 40.87% share in 2025, which shows that most spending in the infrastructure asset management market still follows day-to-day reliability and field execution needs. That lead is logical because transport, water, energy, and building operators must keep assets available every day, and operational workflows are where work orders, inspection cycles, and maintenance schedules are actively used. Tactical asset management remains the middle layer because it helps coordinate maintenance planning and resource allocation over the medium term. Even so, the current demand base still leaned toward execution visibility over long-range capital modeling.

Strategic asset management is projected to grow at a 10.78% CAGR from 2026 to 2031, making it the fastest-growing function in the infrastructure asset management market. The American Water Works Association stated in 2026 that U.S. drinking water systems need USD 90.2 billion in annual investment through 2050 against current spending of USD 33.6 billion, which forces utilities to make long-horizon capital decisions with stronger analytical support. Veolia’s digital twin deployment for Atlanta’s combined sewer system showed how model-based planning can improve intervention timing and avoid environmental penalties in complex urban networks. AIVALIX also reported in May 2026 that its AI-driven planning demonstration cut total man-hours for water utility asset planning by 61% versus standard practice, highlighting the labor value of stronger planning tools. The infrastructure asset management industry is therefore moving beyond maintenance execution alone and giving more weight to tools that shape multi-decade capital programs.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Component
    • Software
    • Services
      • Consulting and Advisory Services
      • Implementation and Integration Services
      • Managed Services and Support Services
  • By Asset Management Function
    • Strategic Asset Management
    • Operational Asset Management
    • Tactical Asset Management
  • By Deployment Model
    • Cloud-Based
    • On-Premises
    • Hybrid
  • By Asset Type
    • Transportation Infrastructure
    • Energy Infrastructure
    • Water and Wastewater Infrastructure
    • Buildings and Facilities Infrastructure
    • Digital and Critical Infrastructure
  • By End User
    • Government and Municipal Authorities
    • Utilities Operators
    • Transportation Agencies and Concessionaires
    • Engineering and Construction Firms
    • Industrial and Private Infrastructure Operators
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Turkey
      • South Africa
      • Egypt
      • Rest of Middle East and Africa

Geography Analysis

North America held 37.56% of the infrastructure asset management market share in 2025, which made it the largest regional contributor. The region benefits from a large installed base of enterprise EAM platforms and a dense policy environment that links infrastructure funding to performance, reporting, and compliance activity. ASCE’s 2025 report card showed that U.S. infrastructure conditions improved but still carried a major long-term funding gap, which keeps digital planning tools relevant across transport, water, and public works portfolios. The EPA’s lead and copper rule improvements, along with federal infrastructure grants secured by more than 1,600 municipalities by mid-2026, are also supporting procurement of software and services across the infrastructure asset management market.

Europe held the second-largest regional share in 2025, and the infrastructure asset management market there is being shaped by aging assets, decarbonization programs, and strong compliance expectations. The European grid digitalization agenda, supported by EUR 170 billion, approximately USD 192 billion, through 2030, gives the region a clear utility-centered demand base for data-driven asset oversight. Companies serving Europe are also being pushed to align with stricter cybersecurity and data-governance requirements, which raises the value of built-in compliance and auditability in platform design. Bentley argued in May 2026 that Europe’s infrastructure renewal path increasingly depends on connected data and AI-enabled workflows, which reflects the region’s need to rebuild at scale without losing delivery discipline.

Asia-Pacific is projected to grow at a 10.61% CAGR from 2026 to 2031, which makes it the fastest-growing regional part of the infrastructure asset management market. China’s 2026 infrastructure investment plan and earlier resilient city guidance are pushing digital controls, sensing, and network visibility deeper into new infrastructure programs. Japan is also moving on workforce-led modernization, with Hitachi packaging social infrastructure maintenance solutions and SoftBank partnering to embed generative AI and IoT in operational workflows. South Korea, Australia, and Southeast Asia add to that momentum through public digitalization programs, while South America and the Middle East and Africa are emerging demand nodes tied to new project pipelines and smart-city development. Peru’s February 2026 Corredor Sur digital governance pilot showed that South America is moving toward more structured adoption of integrated asset oversight across road, port, and rail concessions.


List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • IBM Corporation
  • Bentley Systems, Incorporated
  • Trimble Inc.
  • Hexagon AB
  • Oracle Corporation
  • SAP SE
  • Schneider Electric SE
  • AVEVA Group Limited
  • Siemens AG
  • Autodesk, Inc.
  • Esri, Inc.
  • AssetWorks LLC
  • Tyler Technologies, Inc.
  • IFS AB
  • Infor, Inc.
  • Hitachi Energy Ltd.
  • ABB Ltd.
  • Brightly Software, Inc.
  • Accruent, LLC
  • ServiceNow, Inc.

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Aging Infrastructure Renewal and Lifecycle Cost Pressure
4.2.2 Predictive Maintenance and Condition Monitoring Adoption
4.2.3 Smart Infrastructure and Modernization Spending
4.2.4 Cloud and GIS-Centric Platform Adoption
4.2.5 Resilience-Mandated Asset Planning for Extreme Weather
4.2.6 Lead Service Line and Utility Network Inventory Compliance
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 High Implementation and Integration Costs
4.3.2 Legacy System and Data Interoperability Complexity
4.3.3 Cybersecurity and Multi-Regulation Compliance Burden
4.3.4 Public-Sector Skills and Procurement Bottlenecks
4.4 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
4.5 Industry Value Chain Analysis
4.6 Regulatory Landscape
4.7 Technological Outlook
4.8 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4.8.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.8.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.8.5 Competitive Rivalry
5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)
5.1 By Component
5.1.1 Software
5.1.2 Services
5.1.2.1 Consulting and Advisory Services
5.1.2.2 Implementation and Integration Services
5.1.2.3 Managed Services and Support Services
5.2 By Asset Management Function
5.2.1 Strategic Asset Management
5.2.2 Operational Asset Management
5.2.3 Tactical Asset Management
5.3 By Deployment Model
5.3.1 Cloud-Based
5.3.2 On-Premises
5.3.3 Hybrid
5.4 By Asset Type
5.4.1 Transportation Infrastructure
5.4.2 Energy Infrastructure
5.4.3 Water and Wastewater Infrastructure
5.4.4 Buildings and Facilities Infrastructure
5.4.5 Digital and Critical Infrastructure
5.5 By End User
5.5.1 Government and Municipal Authorities
5.5.2 Utilities Operators
5.5.3 Transportation Agencies and Concessionaires
5.5.4 Engineering and Construction Firms
5.5.5 Industrial and Private Infrastructure Operators
5.6 By Geography
5.6.1 North America
5.6.1.1 United States
5.6.1.2 Canada
5.6.1.3 Mexico
5.6.2 South America
5.6.2.1 Brazil
5.6.2.2 Argentina
5.6.2.3 Rest of South America
5.6.3 Europe
5.6.3.1 Germany
5.6.3.2 United Kingdom
5.6.3.3 France
5.6.3.4 Italy
5.6.3.5 Rest of Europe
5.6.4 Asia-Pacific
5.6.4.1 China
5.6.4.2 Japan
5.6.4.3 India
5.6.4.4 South Korea
5.6.4.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.6.5 Middle East and Africa
5.6.5.1 Saudi Arabia
5.6.5.2 United Arab Emirates
5.6.5.3 Turkey
5.6.5.4 South Africa
5.6.5.5 Egypt
5.6.5.6 Rest of Middle East and Africa
6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
6.4.1 IBM Corporation
6.4.2 Bentley Systems, Incorporated
6.4.3 Trimble Inc.
6.4.4 Hexagon AB
6.4.5 Oracle Corporation
6.4.6 SAP SE
6.4.7 Schneider Electric SE
6.4.8 AVEVA Group Limited
6.4.9 Siemens AG
6.4.10 Autodesk, Inc.
6.4.11 Esri, Inc.
6.4.12 AssetWorks LLC
6.4.13 Tyler Technologies, Inc.
6.4.14 IFS AB
6.4.15 Infor, Inc.
6.4.16 Hitachi Energy Ltd.
6.4.17 ABB Ltd.
6.4.18 Brightly Software, Inc.
6.4.19 Accruent, LLC
6.4.20 ServiceNow, Inc.
7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • IBM Corporation
  • Bentley Systems, Incorporated
  • Trimble Inc.
  • Hexagon AB
  • Oracle Corporation
  • SAP SE
  • Schneider Electric SE
  • AVEVA Group Limited
  • Siemens AG
  • Autodesk, Inc.
  • Esri, Inc.
  • AssetWorks LLC
  • Tyler Technologies, Inc.
  • IFS AB
  • Infor, Inc.
  • Hitachi Energy Ltd.
  • ABB Ltd.
  • Brightly Software, Inc.
  • Accruent, LLC
  • ServiceNow, Inc.