+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Net-Zero Strategy Software - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 183 Pages
  • June 2026
  • Region: Global
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 6254562
The net-zero strategy software market size is projected to expand from USD 3.42 billion in 2025 and USD 4.03 billion in 2026 to USD 9.41 billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 18.48% between 2026 and 2031. This report is Segmented by Offering (Software and Services), Deployment Mode (Cloud-Based, On-Premise, and Hybrid), Enterprise Size (Large Enterprises, and Small and Medium Enterprises), Application (Carbon Management and Reporting, More), End-User Industry (Manufacturing and Industrial, BFSI, More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Net-Zero Strategy Software Market Trends and Insights

Stricter Climate Disclosure Mandates

The net-zero strategy software market is seeing immediate demand from the first active cycle of CSRD reporting, as many large companies have moved beyond consultant-led spreadsheets and now need systems to manage recurring disclosures at scale. The Omnibus I changes reduced the total reporting universe, but they kept ESRS E1 climate disclosure obligations in place and preserved the need for documented scenario analysis, traceable data sources, and more structured reporting workflows. In the United States, the SEC’s May 2026 proposal to rescind its climate disclosure rules shifted spending patterns, but it did not eliminate compliance investment, because companies still face state rules and investor pressure. California’s SB 253 has become especially important because companies with more than USD 1 billion in annual California revenue must disclose Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by August 2026 and face material penalties for non-compliance. This patchwork of rules favors multi-framework systems that can handle European reporting, investor-aligned standards, and state mandates within a single workflow, rather than single-purpose tools. That is one reason the net-zero strategy software market is moving toward broader enterprise platforms instead of narrow reporting products.

Rising Scope 3 Supplier Data Pressure

Scope 3 emissions often account for the largest share of corporate footprints, which is pushing the net-zero strategy software market toward tools that can gather primary supplier data rather than rely on generic estimates. In early 2026, 45% of business leaders reported only limited confidence in the accuracy of their Scope 3 data, which shows how far many companies still are from assurance-ready value chain reporting. ESRS E1 requires traceable Scope 3 disclosure methods, source data, and calculation logic, so spend-based estimates alone are no longer enough for many in-scope companies. The result is a clear downstream effect, because large enterprises are asking smaller suppliers for direct activity data and making carbon reporting part of routine supplier qualification. Verra’s planned Scope 3 Standard launch in Q3 2026 adds another layer, because shipment-level and supply chain records will need stronger digital infrastructure to support verified decarbonization claims. The ICC-Sage stocktake also found that SMEs using digital carbon-tracking tools were 2.4 times more likely to have formal reporting systems, which supports the expanding role of net-zero strategy software in smaller supply chain participants.

Fragmented Emission Factors And Data Standards

The net-zero strategy software market still faces a fundamental data problem: there is no single global emission factor library that companies can use across all reporting contexts. Multinational firms often need to reconcile ESRS E1 rules, GHG Protocol methods, ISO standards, and country-specific factors within a single auditable reporting system. That creates a direct assurance risk, because the same activity can produce different emissions results depending on the methodology or factor source applied. Product-level data exchange frameworks such as PACT help reduce some of that variation, but adoption remains uneven, especially where suppliers are reluctant to share commercially sensitive process data. Vendors with proprietary, frequently updated factor databases have an advantage because they can reduce client friction and make methodology choices more transparent. Even so, uneven factor standards remain a drag on the software market for net-zero strategies, especially for companies operating across multiple jurisdictions and product categories.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:
  • Expansion Of AI-Enabled Emissions Modeling
  • Integration With ERP, EHS, And Finance Systems
  • High Integration Burden Across Legacy Enterprise Stacks

Segment Analysis

Software remained the largest offering by revenue, contributing 68.34% of revenue in 2025, while services are expected to record the fastest growth at a 19.84% CAGR from 2026 to 2031. That pattern shows that the net-zero strategy software market still earns most of its revenue from recurring platform subscriptions, but it also shows that customers increasingly need help getting reliable data into those systems. Many companies that bought platforms in 2024 and 2025 found that the reporting logic worked, but the source data from suppliers, business units, and operational systems was incomplete or inconsistent. As a result, buyers are now spending more on implementation, managed data collection, assurance preparation, and workflow support. The net-zero strategy software industry is therefore shifting toward mixed commercial models in which services are not an add-on, but a core part of client retention and delivery.

This shift also reflects the labor gap in climate data operations. Companies often need teams that understand the GHG Protocol, supplier engagement, system integration, and disclosure controls simultaneously, and that combination is still hard to hire for at scale. In practice, this makes managed services valuable even when customers prefer software-led operating models. Vendors that add advisory and data operations support can improve customer adoption, reduce reporting delays, and expand contract value over time. The result is that services are growing faster because they solve execution problems that software licenses by themselves cannot solve. That makes this part of the net-zero strategy software market important not just for growth, but also for long-term account stability.

Cloud-based deployment accounted for 65.47% of the net-zero strategy software market in 2025, while hybrid deployment is projected to grow at a 20.12% CAGR through 2031. Cloud platforms maintained their lead because buyers want automated regulatory content updates and faster product releases in a market where reporting frameworks are constantly evolving. This has been especially important for enterprises that need to align climate disclosure, supplier engagement, and board reporting without running frequent manual updates. The net-zero strategy software market, therefore, continues to favor cloud models where compliance content and calculation logic can be refreshed centrally. At the same time, hybrid deployment is gaining share because some organizations still need to keep sensitive operational or financial data within controlled environments.

That makes hybrid architecture a deliberate design choice rather than a temporary compromise. Large organizations in BFSI, energy, and government often need a structure where confidential records remain on-premise while emissions engines and reporting workflows operate in the cloud. This setup supports both compliance and internal governance, especially in regions with strict data sovereignty and cybersecurity rules. On-premise systems still matter in settings where local control over production data is a high priority, but their structural limits are clearer now than they were a few years ago. Within the net-zero strategy software market, deployment choices are increasingly reflecting governance needs rather than just IT preferences. The net-zero strategy software industry is therefore rewarding vendors that can support flexible deployment models without weakening security or reporting speed.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Offering
    • Software
    • Services
  • By Deployment Mode
    • Cloud-Based
    • On-Premise
    • Hybrid
  • By Enterprise Size
    • Large Enterprises
    • Small and Medium Enterprises
  • By Application
    • Carbon Management and Reporting
    • Climate Transition Planning and Decarbonization Analytics
    • Scope 3 and Value Chain Engagement
    • Product and Lifecycle Carbon Management
    • Assurance and Governance
  • By End-user Industry
    • Manufacturing and Industrial
    • Energy, Utilities and Natural Resources
    • BFSI
    • Retail and Consumer Goods
    • IT and Telecom
    • Healthcare and Life Sciences
    • Government and Public Sector
    • Transportation and Logistics
    • Other End-user Industries
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Russia
      • Netherlands
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Australia and New Zealand
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
      • South Africa
      • Nigeria
      • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

North America held 35.10% of the net-zero strategy software market share in 2025, while Asia-Pacific is expected to expand at a 24.63% CAGR through 2031. North America remained the largest regional revenue pool because large enterprises there had already built voluntary reporting habits, investor-facing disclosure processes, and early Scope 3 programs before several other regions. The SEC’s May 2026 proposal to rescind federal climate disclosure rules shifted the policy direction at the federal level, but it did not eliminate software demand, as state mandates, especially in California, continue to require emissions reporting from large companies. Canada and Mexico remain smaller contributors, but both benefit from buyer pressure coming from export chains and large corporate groups. For the net-zero strategy software market, North America still offers scale, even with a less certain federal rule path.

Europe remained the second-largest region because it has the most structured disclosure architecture and the clearest alignment between corporate reporting and assurance expectations. CSRD and ESRS E1 continue to set the tone for enterprise buying, and the 2026 Omnibus changes narrowed the universe without removing climate disclosure as a core requirement. Germany stands out because manufacturers there face pressure from product carbon rules and value-chain reporting simultaneously. The United Kingdom continues to follow a parallel domestic route with reporting expectations that remain close to international standards. As a result, Europe keeps its role as the region where the net-zero strategy software market is most deeply tied to assurance-ready corporate processes.

Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region because regulatory reforms, industrial decarbonization, and export-driven demand from suppliers are all rising together. China’s industrial policy and digital energy-carbon management push are supporting software demand beyond companies directly exposed to overseas reporting rules, while Japan’s transition finance direction is expanding corporate use cases. Domestic platforms are also becoming more visible, with Asuene serving more than 15,000 companies as of August 2025 and Zeroboard integrating the AIST-IDEA factor database as a standard feature. The Shanghai Academy of Sciences’ 2026 release of a panoramic carbon accounting large model also points to strong regional interest in AI-led carbon infrastructure. South America, the Middle East, and Africa remain smaller in revenue terms, but demand is expanding in export sectors and state-backed net-zero programs, even as talent shortages push many buyers toward managed services and simpler platform tiers.


List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • Persefoni AI, Inc.
  • Watershed Technologies, Inc.
  • Greenly SAS
  • Sweep SAS
  • Plan A ESG GmbH
  • Normative AB
  • CarbonChain Limited
  • Emitwise Ltd
  • SINAI Technologies, Inc.
  • Novisto Inc.
  • Cozero GmbH
  • 51toCarbonZero Limited
  • Carbmee GmbH
  • FigBytes Inc.
  • ClimatePartner GmbH
  • EcoVadis SAS
  • Sphera Solutions, Inc.
  • Enablon B.V.
  • Workiva Inc.
  • UL Solutions Inc.

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Stricter Climate Disclosure Mandates
4.2.2 Rising Scope 3 Supplier Data Pressure
4.2.3 Expansion Of AI-Enabled Emissions Modeling
4.2.4 Integration With ERP, EHS, and Finance Systems
4.2.5 Demand For Audit-Ready Traceability And Assurance
4.2.6 Product Carbon Footprint And Digital Product Passport Readiness
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Fragmented Emission Factors And Data Standards
4.3.2 High Integration Burden Across Legacy Enterprise Stacks
4.3.3 Supplier Data Access And Confidentiality Constraints
4.3.4 Specialized Talent Shortage In Climate Data Operations
4.4 Industry Value Chain Analysis
4.5 Regulatory Landscape
4.6 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
4.7 Technological Outlook
4.8 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4.8.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.8.3 Threat of New Entrants
4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.8.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)
5.1 By Offering
5.1.1 Software
5.1.2 Services
5.2 By Deployment Mode
5.2.1 Cloud-Based
5.2.2 On-Premise
5.2.3 Hybrid
5.3 By Enterprise Size
5.3.1 Large Enterprises
5.3.2 Small and Medium Enterprises
5.4 By Application
5.4.1 Carbon Management and Reporting
5.4.2 Climate Transition Planning and Decarbonization Analytics
5.4.3 Scope 3 and Value Chain Engagement
5.4.4 Product and Lifecycle Carbon Management
5.4.5 Assurance and Governance
5.5 By End-user Industry
5.5.1 Manufacturing and Industrial
5.5.2 Energy, Utilities and Natural Resources
5.5.3 BFSI
5.5.4 Retail and Consumer Goods
5.5.5 IT and Telecom
5.5.6 Healthcare and Life Sciences
5.5.7 Government and Public Sector
5.5.8 Transportation and Logistics
5.5.9 Other End-user Industries
5.6 By Geography
5.6.1 North America
5.6.1.1 United States
5.6.1.2 Canada
5.6.1.3 Mexico
5.6.2 South America
5.6.2.1 Brazil
5.6.2.2 Argentina
5.6.2.3 Rest of South America
5.6.3 Europe
5.6.3.1 Germany
5.6.3.2 United Kingdom
5.6.3.3 France
5.6.3.4 Italy
5.6.3.5 Spain
5.6.3.6 Russia
5.6.3.7 Netherlands
5.6.3.8 Rest of Europe
5.6.4 Asia-Pacific
5.6.4.1 China
5.6.4.2 Japan
5.6.4.3 India
5.6.4.4 South Korea
5.6.4.5 Australia and New Zealand
5.6.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.6.5 Middle East
5.6.5.1 Saudi Arabia
5.6.5.2 United Arab Emirates
5.6.5.3 Rest of Middle East
5.6.6 Africa
5.6.6.1 South Africa
5.6.6.2 Nigeria
5.6.6.3 Rest of Africa
6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
6.4.1 Persefoni AI, Inc.
6.4.2 Watershed Technologies, Inc.
6.4.3 Greenly SAS
6.4.4 Sweep SAS
6.4.5 Plan A ESG GmbH
6.4.6 Normative AB
6.4.7 CarbonChain Limited
6.4.8 Emitwise Ltd
6.4.9 SINAI Technologies, Inc.
6.4.10 Novisto Inc.
6.4.11 Cozero GmbH
6.4.12 51toCarbonZero Limited
6.4.13 Carbmee GmbH
6.4.14 FigBytes Inc.
6.4.15 ClimatePartner GmbH
6.4.16 EcoVadis SAS
6.4.17 Sphera Solutions, Inc.
6.4.18 Enablon B.V.
6.4.19 Workiva Inc.
6.4.20 UL Solutions Inc.
7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Persefoni AI, Inc.
  • Watershed Technologies, Inc.
  • Greenly SAS
  • Sweep SAS
  • Plan A ESG GmbH
  • Normative AB
  • CarbonChain Limited
  • Emitwise Ltd
  • SINAI Technologies, Inc.
  • Novisto Inc.
  • Cozero GmbH
  • 51toCarbonZero Limited
  • Carbmee GmbH
  • FigBytes Inc.
  • ClimatePartner GmbH
  • EcoVadis SAS
  • Sphera Solutions, Inc.
  • Enablon B.V.
  • Workiva Inc.
  • UL Solutions Inc.