+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Cyber Threat Intelligence Sharing Platforms - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 181 Pages
  • June 2026
  • Region: Global
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 6260192
The cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market size is projected to be USD 3.54 billion in 2025, USD 3.97 billion in 2026, and reach USD 7.62 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 13.93% from 2026 to 2031. This report is Segmented by Component (Software and Services), Deployment (Cloud, On-Premises, and Hybrid), Enterprise Size (Large Enterprises and Small and Medium Enterprises), Threat Intelligence Type (Strategic Intelligence, and More), End-User Industry (BFSI, Healthcare and Life Sciences, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Cyber Threat Intelligence Sharing Platforms Market Trends and Insights

Regulatory Pressure for Timely Incident Disclosure and Information Sharing

Regulatory mandates are the clearest near-term growth engine for the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market because they turn intelligence sharing into a documented control rather than a discretionary security practice. DORA has required financial entities and their ICT third-party providers to maintain formal cyber resilience and reporting processes since January 17, 2025, which raises the need for structured evidence and repeatable intelligence workflows. The source draft also notes that NIS2 expanded cyber reporting and information-sharing expectations across a much broader set of European organizations, which materially widened the addressable base for platforms that can automate intake, classification, and distribution. This regulatory shift matters because generic security logs do not provide the same exchange structure, enrichment context, or documentation trail that formal CTI platforms can provide during reviews and incident follow-up. It also affects multinational enterprises outside Europe, as suppliers and service partners supporting European customers increasingly need common workflows that meet these compliance expectations. In practice, the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market is seeing regulation shape both product design and purchasing urgency.

Rising Frequency of Multi-Party Threat Intelligence Collaboration

The cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market is also expanding as collaborative sharing models handle more data, more participants, and more sector-specific use cases than before. RH-ISAC closed 2025 with 333 core member organizations, added 52 new members during the year, reached 96% member engagement, and recorded nearly 20,000 total intelligence shares across platforms. FS-ISAC reported that its 2025 work reflected the needs of more than 5,000 financial firm members across 75 countries, with GenAI-enabled fraud and supply chain attacks ranking among the most important threats facing the sector. As the number of contributors and the volume of shared indicators rise, buyers place greater value on platforms that can merge community feeds with commercial intelligence into a single operating view. This is raising the relevance of ingestion, enrichment, confidence scoring, and workflow routing in the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market. Vendors that reduce the manual burden of collaboration are better placed because shared intelligence only creates value when it is easy to operationalize.

Intelligence Overload and Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio

A major restraint in the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market is that feed volume is rising faster than the human capacity to review, enrich, and act on it. Google Cloud found that 82% of security practitioners worried about missing critical threats due to alert volume, 61% cited too many feeds as the main obstacle to effective operationalization of threat intelligence, and 60% pointed to insufficient analyst capacity. This means buyers are not only asking for more intelligence, but also for better filtering, ranking, and workflow automation. The problem becomes more serious when community sharing expands, because contribution volume can rise faster than an organization’s ability to score indicators and decide which ones matter. As a result, the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market does not benefit equally from raw volume growth, since low-quality or poorly prioritized signals can reduce practical value. Vendors that offer pre-investigation, deduplication, and alert reduction are therefore better aligned with buyer needs than vendors that mainly add new feeds.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

  • Automation of IOC Normalization Across Disparate Security Stacks
  • Expansion of Sectoral ISAC and ISAO Participation
  • Trust Deficits Around Data Sensitivity and Source Attribution

Segment Analysis

Software dominated the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market with a 59.84% share in 2025, which shows that buyers still prefer licensed platforms that centralize feed ingestion, scoring, enrichment, and dissemination. This leadership stems from the practical need for a common system that connects intelligence to existing security workflows without creating new silos. In the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market, software also benefits from deeper integration with enterprise detection and response tools. Those integrations make software the default foundation for organizations that need broad visibility, standardized workflows, and consistent handling of internal and external data.

Services is projected to grow at a 14.98% CAGR from 2026 to 2031, making it the fastest-growing component in the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market. Growth in services reflects the fact that many organizations need intelligence outcomes quickly but still lack enough dedicated analysts to manage the entire process in-house. The source draft points to SOCRadar’s AI Agent Marketplace as an example of how vendors are automating tasks such as phishing detection, dark web monitoring, and brand abuse protection through modular delivery models. The cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market is, therefore, keeping software as the core layer while services expand access for buyers that want faster deployment and lower staffing pressure.

Cloud captured 52.91% of the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market in 2025, supported by scalability, faster feed updates, and lower infrastructure overhead for teams that do not want to manage everything on premises. Many buyers prefer this model because it shortens setup time and makes it easier to distribute intelligence across many users and locations. In the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market, cloud deployment also works well for mid-sized organizations that want broad functionality without a large local operations footprint. This keeps cloud as the leading deployment model by current revenue share.

Hybrid deployment is projected to grow at a 15.09% CAGR from 2026 to 2031, making it the fastest-growing deployment type in the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market. The growth case is strongest in regulated sectors that want to keep sensitive telemetry or local evidence under direct control while still using cloud-scale enrichment and collaboration for less sensitive indicators. DORA and related governance pressures support this architecture by increasing the need for documented handling, resilient workflows, and clear separation of sensitive processes where needed. The cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market is not moving away from cloud, but it is adapting to buyers who need more controlled operating models.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Component
    • Software
    • Services
  • By Deployment
    • Cloud
    • On-Premises
    • Hybrid
  • By Enterprise Size
    • Large Enterprises
    • Small and Medium Enterprises
  • By Threat Intelligence Type
    • Strategic Intelligence
    • Tactical Intelligence
    • Operational Intelligence
    • Technical Intelligence
  • By End-user Industry
    • BFSI
    • Healthcare and Life Sciences
    • Information Technology and Telecom
    • Retail and E-commerce
    • Industrial Manufacturing
    • Government and Public Sector
    • Other End-user Industries
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Russia
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • India
      • Japan
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Middle East
        • Saudi Arabia
        • United Arab Emirates
        • Rest of Middle East
      • Africa
        • South Africa
        • Nigeria
        • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

North America commanded 31.09% of the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market in 2025, making it the largest regional segment in the source draft. The region benefits from a large base of enterprise security operations, a mature ISAC ecosystem, and established usage across BFSI, energy, healthcare, and retail. In the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market, these conditions support strong demand for platforms that can connect internal teams with community sharing bodies and commercial intelligence sources. The United States remains the main engine of regional demand because it combines deep enterprise spending with a broad set of sector-specific collaboration models. This gives vendors a mature environment for cross-sell opportunities, workflow integration, and managed intelligence delivery.

Europe remained a major part of the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market in 2025, as regulatory obligations expanded sharply following the implementation phase of NIS2 and the operational phase of DORA. The source draft states that NIS2 widened the relevant compliance coverage from approximately 20,000 to 300,000 European entities, thereby materially expanding the potential user base for structured sharing and reporting workflows. DORA has added further pressure in 2026 because financial entities and related ICT providers now need stronger documentation and resilience procedures. Europe, therefore, stands out in the cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market as a region where buying decisions are increasingly tied to audit readiness and formal operating controls.

Asia-Pacific leads all regions in projected growth with a 15.53% CAGR from 2026 to 2031. The source draft attributes this rise to stronger nation-state activity and continued regulatory modernization across Japan, India, and South Korea. That combination is lifting demand for tools that can connect local operations with broader threat context and collaborative defense workflows. The cyber threat intelligence sharing platforms market also has room to expand across South America, the Middle East, and Africa as digital financial systems scale and formal sharing frameworks mature.



List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • Anomali, Inc.
  • Recorded Future, Inc.
  • ThreatConnect, Inc.
  • Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
  • CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
  • Google LLC
  • ZeroFox Holdings, Inc.
  • KELA Group
  • ReliaQuest, LLC
  • Flashpoint, Inc.
  • Intel 471, Inc.
  • EclecticIQ B.V.
  • SOCRadar Teknoloji A.S.
  • Securonix, Inc.
  • Cyble, Inc.
  • Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
  • Fortinet, Inc.
  • IBM Corporation
  • Microsoft Corporation

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Rising Frequency of Multi-Party Threat Intelligence Collaboration
4.2.2 Regulatory Pressure for Timely Incident Disclosure and Information Sharing
4.2.3 Automation of IOC Normalization Across Disparate Security Stacks
4.2.4 Expansion of Sectoral ISAC and ISAO Participation
4.2.5 Cross-Enterprise Exposure From Third-Party and Fourth-Party Risk
4.2.6 Demand for Shared Detection Content in Cloud and Identity-Centric Environments
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Intelligence Overload and Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio
4.3.2 Trust Deficits Around Data Sensitivity and Source Attribution
4.3.3 Integration Complexity With Legacy SIEM, SOAR, and EDR Workflows
4.3.4 Uneven Monetization of Shared Intelligence Across Smaller Buyers
4.4 Industry Value-Chain Analysis
4.5 Regulatory Landscape
4.6 Technological Outlook
4.7 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)
5.1 By Component
5.1.1 Software
5.1.2 Services
5.2 By Deployment
5.2.1 Cloud
5.2.2 On-Premises
5.2.3 Hybrid
5.3 By Enterprise Size
5.3.1 Large Enterprises
5.3.2 Small and Medium Enterprises
5.4 By Threat Intelligence Type
5.4.1 Strategic Intelligence
5.4.2 Tactical Intelligence
5.4.3 Operational Intelligence
5.4.4 Technical Intelligence
5.5 By End-user Industry
5.5.1 BFSI
5.5.2 Healthcare and Life Sciences
5.5.3 Information Technology and Telecom
5.5.4 Retail and E-commerce
5.5.5 Industrial Manufacturing
5.5.6 Government and Public Sector
5.5.7 Other End-user Industries
5.6 By Geography
5.6.1 North America
5.6.1.1 United States
5.6.1.2 Canada
5.6.1.3 Mexico
5.6.2 South America
5.6.2.1 Brazil
5.6.2.2 Argentina
5.6.2.3 Rest of South America
5.6.3 Europe
5.6.3.1 Germany
5.6.3.2 United Kingdom
5.6.3.3 France
5.6.3.4 Italy
5.6.3.5 Spain
5.6.3.6 Russia
5.6.3.7 Rest of Europe
5.6.4 Asia-Pacific
5.6.4.1 China
5.6.4.2 India
5.6.4.3 Japan
5.6.4.4 South Korea
5.6.4.5 Australia
5.6.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.6.5 Middle East and Africa
5.6.5.1 Middle East
5.6.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
5.6.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
5.6.5.1.3 Rest of Middle East
5.6.5.2 Africa
5.6.5.2.1 South Africa
5.6.5.2.2 Nigeria
5.6.5.2.3 Rest of Africa
6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
6.4.1 Anomali, Inc.
6.4.2 Recorded Future, Inc.
6.4.3 ThreatConnect, Inc.
6.4.4 Cisco Systems, Inc.
6.4.5 Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
6.4.6 CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
6.4.7 Google LLC
6.4.8 ZeroFox Holdings, Inc.
6.4.9 KELA Group
6.4.10 ReliaQuest, LLC
6.4.11 Flashpoint, Inc.
6.4.12 Intel 471, Inc.
6.4.13 EclecticIQ B.V.
6.4.14 SOCRadar Teknoloji A.S.
6.4.15 Securonix, Inc.
6.4.16 Cyble, Inc.
6.4.17 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
6.4.18 Fortinet, Inc.
6.4.19 IBM Corporation
6.4.20 Microsoft Corporation
7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Anomali, Inc.
  • Recorded Future, Inc.
  • ThreatConnect, Inc.
  • Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
  • CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
  • Google LLC
  • ZeroFox Holdings, Inc.
  • KELA Group
  • ReliaQuest, LLC
  • Flashpoint, Inc.
  • Intel 471, Inc.
  • EclecticIQ B.V.
  • SOCRadar Teknoloji A.S.
  • Securonix, Inc.
  • Cyble, Inc.
  • Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
  • Fortinet, Inc.
  • IBM Corporation
  • Microsoft Corporation