+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

South Korea Plastic Waste Management Services - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 150 Pages
  • July 2026
  • Region: South Korea
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 6260692
The south korea plastic waste management services market size is projected to be USD 1.08 billion in 2025, USD 1.13 billion in 2026, and reach USD 1.47 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 5.40% from 2026 to 2031. This report is Segmented by Source (Residential, Commercial, Industrial, and Others), by Service Provider (Public/Municipal, Private Waste Management Companies, and Others), and by Service Type (Collection, Transportation, Sorting & Segregation, Disposal / Treatment, and Others). The Report Offers Market Size and Forecasts in Value (USD) for all the Above Segments.

South Korea Plastic Waste Management Services Market Trends and Insights

Growing Industrial and Commercial Plastic Waste Generation

Rising volumes of plastic waste from industrial and commercial activity continue to expand the addressable workload for formal service providers. Government projections show that household and commercial plastic waste could reach 10.12 million tons by 2030 without intervention, which keeps pressure on collection, transfer, sorting, and treatment systems across the country. The heaviest streams still come from petrochemicals, electronics packaging, automotive components, logistics, and retail distribution, which gives the South Korea plastic waste management services market a strong industrial base and a growing commercial layer. Commercial waste is expanding faster because parcel shipping and packaging intensity remain well above earlier norms, and private operators still have room to build more tailored services for offices, retail chains, and fulfillment networks. The April 2026 plan also targets a 30% reduction in virgin naphtha-derived plastic waste relative to the projected 2030 baseline, confirming that current volumes are high enough to require both source reduction and downstream processing upgrades simultaneously. Until those prevention measures take fuller effect, the South Korea Plastic waste management services market continues to gain from expanding tonnage that must be collected, documented, and treated through licensed channels.

Stronger EPR Rules for Packaging and Consumer Goods

South Korea’s EPR system is moving into a stricter phase that raises the value of verified recycling and better quality output. The 2025 amendment to the resource conservation and recycling framework requires manufacturers to incorporate minimum recycled material content, starting at 3% for most categories and 10% for PET bottles from 2026, with PET targets rising to 30% by 2030. This change is important because it shifts the market from a system focused mainly on recycling output obligations to one that also creates direct demand for recycled inputs, favoring operators that can deliver reliable purity and certification. The Korea Plastic Recycling Corporation continues to publish mandatory recycling categories and scope, which provides service providers with a clearer compliance framework and a more predictable demand base for recoverable materials.Proof-of-recycling documentation and contribution fee calculations audited within the compliance system are already encouraging investment in upgraded sorting lines and certification-linked recovery capacity. The South Korea plastic waste management services market, therefore, benefits not only from higher recycling obligations but also from stronger monetization of certified tonnage.

Rising Operational and Energy Costs

Rising collection, treatment, and energy costs are steadily putting pressure on the economics of plastic waste recycling in South Korea, reducing operator margins faster than EPR fee increases can offset. In 2024, national waste treatment costs reached KRW 5.683 trillion (USD 3.99 billion), while revenue recovered through the Volume-Based Waste Fee system and related charges was only KRW 1.510 trillion (USD 1.062 billion), leaving a budget self-sufficiency rate of 26.6%, down 1.9 percentage points from the prior year. Municipalities affected by direct-landfill restrictions are also paying KRW 140,000 to 160,000 per ton (USD 98.5-112.5 per ton) to private incinerators, compared with KRW 116,855 per ton (USD 82.19 per ton) for public landfills or less than KRW 120,000 per ton (USD 84.40 per ton) for public incineration, which is raising collection and disposal costs across the system. Energy and raw material inflation worsened pressure in 2026, as naphtha supply disruptions increased the cost of producing polyethylene bags used in the VBWF system and pushed contract prices higher. At the same time, the 2026 EPR contribution-fee adjustment was set at only 2.5%, which remained below the 8% to 10% rise in waste-plastic procurement costs reported by recyclers, leaving small and mid-sized operators especially exposed.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

  • Rising Investment in Advanced Waste Management Technologies
  • Circular Economy and Resource Circulation Policies
  • Reliance on Incineration & Waste-to-Energy for Plastic Waste Management

Segment Analysis

Industrial sources accounted for the largest revenue, accounting 40.50% share in the South Korea plastic waste management services market in 2025, as the country’s petrochemical, manufacturing, electronics, and export packaging sectors generate dense, regular plastic waste streams. These industrial flows include industrial films, drums, mixed resins, and process-linked plastic residues that often require specialized handling and more structured contracts than household waste. That profile gives industrial waste a stronger revenue yield per ton for operators that can manage designated categories and deliver consistent treatment or recycling performance.

Commercial segment is the fastest-growing source stream, and it is projected to rise at a 6.2% CAGR through 2031 as parcel shipping, retail packaging, and office waste continue to expand. The South Korean plastic waste management services industry, therefore, relies on industrial-scale operations for current revenue while pursuing commercial growth to expand the future contract pool. Commercial expansion is being reinforced by the fact that household and commercial plastic waste is still projected to reach 10.12 million tons by 2030 without intervention, which maintains a large pipeline of service demand. Electronic tracking requirements under the waste management framework also improve contract pricing and route planning because industrial and commercial transfers are becoming more visible and easier to document within formal systems. That shift favors operators that can combine route optimization, source-stream analytics, and compliance reporting, rather than relying only on fixed collection schedules. Residential waste remains important because the VBWF structure preserves a steady municipal collection base. Still, its revenue intensity is lower than that of industrial and commercial waste because collection is more subsidized and standardized. Other sources, including institutional and agricultural streams, still account for a smaller share of the South Korea plastic waste management services market.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Source
    • Residential
    • Commercial (retail, office, etc.)
    • Industrial
    • Others (institutional, agricultural, etc)
  • By Service Provider
    • Public/Municipal
    • Private Waste Management Companies
    • Others - Producer Responsibility Organizations (PROs), etc.
  • By Service Type
    • Collection, Transportation, Sorting & Segregation
    • Disposal / Treatment
      • Landfill
      • Recycling & Resource Recovery
      • Incineration & Waste-to-Energy
      • Others (Chemical Treatment, etc.)
    • Others (Consulting, Audit & Training, etc.)

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • SK ecoplant
  • ECORBIT
  • CESCo Solutions
  • KC Green Holdings
  • Veolia Environnement S.A.
  • SUEZ
  • IS Dongseo
  • EMC Holdings Co., Ltd.
  • Remondis SE & Co. KG
  • Sejin G&E Co., Ltd.
  • Woongjin Energy Environment
  • TOMRA
  • Daewon GSI
  • Retech Co. Ltd.
  • EcoDream Co. Ltd.
  • Hansol EME Co., Ltd.
  • EcoCreation
  • Ecube Labs
  • Samyang EcoTech
  • SuperBin

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 Introduction
1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 Research Methodology3 Executive Summary
4 Market Landscape
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Growing Industrial and Commercial Plastic Waste Generation
4.2.2 Stronger EPR Rules for Packaging and Consumer Goods
4.2.3 Rising Investment in Advanced Waste Management Technologies
4.2.4 Circular Economy and Resource Circulation Policies
4.2.5 Expansion of Smart Waste Collection and AI-Based Sorting Infrastructure
4.2.6 Expansion of Volume-Based Waste Fee System
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Rising Operational and Energy Costs
4.3.2 Reliance on Incineration & Waste-to-Energy for Plastic Waste Management
4.3.3 Limited Availability of Land for Waste Treatment Facilities
4.3.4 Complex Multi-Layer and Flexible Plastic Packaging
4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
4.5 Regulatory Landscape
4.6 Technological Outlook
4.7 Porter's Five Forces
4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.7.5 Industry Rivalry
4.8 Startup Ecosystem Analysis
4.9 Global Trade Flows & Import Restrictions
4.10 Impact of Geopolitical Events on the Market
5 Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value, In USD Billion)
5.1 By Source
5.1.1 Residential
5.1.2 Commercial (retail, office, etc.)
5.1.3 Industrial
5.1.4 Others (institutional, agricultural, etc)
5.2 By Service Provider
5.2.1 Public/Municipal
5.2.2 Private Waste Management Companies
5.2.3 Others - Producer Responsibility Organizations (PROs), etc.
5.3 By Service Type
5.3.1 Collection, Transportation, Sorting & Segregation
5.3.2 Disposal / Treatment
5.3.2.1 Landfill
5.3.2.2 Recycling & Resource Recovery
5.3.2.3 Incineration & Waste-to-Energy
5.3.2.4 Others (Chemical Treatment, etc.)
5.3.3 Others (Consulting, Audit & Training, etc.)
6 Competitive Landscape
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
6.4.1 SK ecoplant
6.4.2 ECORBIT
6.4.3 CESCo Solutions
6.4.4 KC Green Holdings
6.4.5 Veolia Environnement S.A.
6.4.6 SUEZ
6.4.7 IS Dongseo
6.4.8 EMC Holdings Co., Ltd.
6.4.9 Remondis SE & Co. KG
6.4.10 Sejin G&E Co., Ltd.
6.4.11 Woongjin Energy Environment
6.4.12 TOMRA
6.4.13 Daewon GSI
6.4.14 Retech Co. Ltd.
6.4.15 EcoDream Co. Ltd.
6.4.16 Hansol EME Co., Ltd.
6.4.17 EcoCreation
6.4.18 Ecube Labs
6.4.19 Samyang EcoTech
6.4.20 SuperBin
7 Market Opportunities & Future Outlook
7.1 White-space & unmet-need assessment

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • SK ecoplant
  • ECORBIT
  • CESCo Solutions
  • KC Green Holdings
  • Veolia Environnement S.A.
  • SUEZ
  • IS Dongseo
  • EMC Holdings Co., Ltd.
  • Remondis SE & Co. KG
  • Sejin G&E Co., Ltd.
  • Woongjin Energy Environment
  • TOMRA
  • Daewon GSI
  • Retech Co. Ltd.
  • EcoDream Co. Ltd.
  • Hansol EME Co., Ltd.
  • EcoCreation
  • Ecube Labs
  • Samyang EcoTech
  • SuperBin