+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Los Angeles Data Center - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2032)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 150 Pages
  • August 2026
  • Region: Global
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 6264823
The los angeles data center market size was valued at 776.5 MW in 2025 and estimated to grow from 778.6 MW in 2026 to reach 791.29 MW by 2032, at a CAGR of 0.27% during the forecast period (2026-2032). This report is Segmented by Data Center Size (Small, Medium, Large, Mega, Massive), Tier Standard (Tier 1 and 2, Tier 3, Tier 4), and Absorption (Utilized by Colocation Type and End-User Industry, Non-Utilized). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of MW Capacity.

Los Angeles Data Center Market Trends and Insights

AI-centric hyperscale tranche demand

Liquid-cooled racks exceeding 50 kW are now standard in new builds as GPU training clusters reshape facility design parameters. Digital Realty introduced direct liquid cooling across its Los Angeles footprint in May 2024, eliminating the thermal limitations of legacy CRAC systems. Equinix followed with a USD 15 billion joint venture that allocates more than 1.5 GW of hyperscale power to key U.S. metros, including Los Angeles. Procurement lead times reinforce first-mover advantages: Cooling Distribution Units now average 25 weeks, constraining late entrants from scaling at the pace demanded by AI tenants. Combined, these factors elevate the Los Angeles data center market as an AI infrastructure linchpin for workloads bridging North America and Asia-Pacific.

Surging film-render and streaming workloads

Netflix’s cloud-native Media Production Suite handles up to 700 TB per title, eliminating physical media and requiring edge nodes close to Hollywood studios. Warner Bros. committed USD 500 million to expand 16 soundstages - proof that studio operators view local compute as indispensable. Gaming adds parallel demand; Riot Games’ esports platform moves 3.2 PB in under 30 minutes during tournament play, reinforcing latency-sensitive traffic patterns. These workflows translate into sustained power draws for edge nodes within the Los Angeles Basin.

Scarce 230 kV transmission interconnects within LA Basin

California ISO lists 28.4 GW of renewable projects already delayed by transmission constraints, a backlog mirrored in data-center queue positions. LADWP’s McCullough-Victorville upgrades add only 475 MW by 2029, insufficient for the sub-gigawatt requests lodged by hyperscale aspirants. As a result, downtown expansions depend increasingly on networked diesel or gas-turbine generators for standby megawatts, inflating capital intensity and complicating air-quality permitting.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

  • West-Coast subsea cable landings (Hawaiki Nui, CAP-1)
  • 400 MW Southern CA utility-scale solar + BESS PPAs
  • Rising seismic-design CAPEX premiums (Zone 4b)

Segment Analysis

Facilities exceeding 50 MW account for the fastest-growing slice of the Los Angeles data center market, expanding at a 0.96% CAGR to 2032, although mid-range Medium deployments still led with 45.62% of 2025 installed capacity. The Los Angeles data center market size for mega-scale builds registered an incremental 60 MW in 2024 after Prime Data Centers energized its 33 MW Vernon campus, the single-largest addition of the year. Edge nodes below 5 MW persist for specialized rendering, but their aggregate footprint remains less than 5% of capacity, underscoring a bifurcated demand curve favoring either hyperscale or highly targeted micro-edge projects.

Economies of scale drive this gravitation toward larger blocks because seismic-design premiums and protracted utility queues dilute unit costs when amortized over higher IT loads. Hyperscale operators also prefer campus-style layouts that support future expansions under a single permit umbrella, mitigating the risk of interconnect moratoria. Santa Clarita Valley, once a secondary location, now attracts master-planned campuses upwards of 80 MW as land and water availability exceed what downtown parcels can provide. Consequently, the Los Angeles data center market continues to consolidate incremental megawatts into fewer, but markedly larger, footprints.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Data Center Size
    • Small
    • Medium
    • Large
    • Hyperscale
  • By Tier Standard
    • Tier I and II
    • Tier III
    • Tier IV
  • By Absorption
    • Non-Utilised
    • Utilised
      • By Colocation Type
        • Retail
        • Wholesale
      • By End-User Industry
        • Cloud Service Providers
        • Media and Entertainment
        • Manufacturing
        • Telecom
        • BFSI
        • E-commerce
        • Government
        • Other End User

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • ColoHouse Netherlands B.V.
  • Leaseweb Global B.V.
  • HostDime Global Corp.
  • CoreSite
  • Krypt
  • Prime Data Centers, LLC
  • Csquare (Phoenix Infrastructure LLC)
  • Digital Realty Trust Inc.
  • Teraswitch Networks, Inc.
  • Equinix Inc.
  • Zenlayer Inc.
  • EVODC, LLC (Evocative)
  • Vultr (The Constant Company, LLC.)
  • Colocrossing LLC
  • Alchemy Data Centers, LLC
  • Profuse Solutions Inc.(Psychz Networks)
  • Xfernet (PSI Premier Holdings, LLC)
  • Metanet, Inc.
  • Colocation America
  • Quadranet Systems Limited

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 AI-centric hyperscale tranche demand
4.2.2 Surging film-render and streaming workloads
4.2.3 West-Coast subsea cable landings (Hawaiki Nui, CAP-1)
4.2.4 400-MW Southern CA utility-scale solar + BESS PPAs
4.2.5 Revitalisation of under-utilised Hollywood sound stages into edge DCs
4.2.6 State “L.A. Clean Grid 2045” incentives for on-site micro-nuclear SMRs
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Scarce 230 kV transmission interconnects within LA Basin
4.3.2 Rising seismic-design CAPEX premiums (Zone 4b)
4.3.3 Lengthy LADWP and SCE power-delivery queue (48-60 months)
4.3.4 Shortage of Tier IV-certified technicians and electricians
4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
4.5 Regulatory Landscape
4.6 Technological Outlook
4.7 Porter’s Five Forces
4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry
5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE AND MW)
5.1 By Data Center Size
5.1.1 Small
5.1.2 Medium
5.1.3 Large
5.1.4 Hyperscale
5.2 By Tier Standard
5.2.1 Tier I and II
5.2.2 Tier III
5.2.3 Tier IV
5.3 By Absorption
5.3.1 Non-Utilised
5.3.2 Utilised
5.3.2.1 By Colocation Type
5.3.2.1.1 Retail
5.3.2.1.2 Wholesale
5.3.2.2 By End-User Industry
5.3.2.2.1 Cloud Service Providers
5.3.2.2.2 Media and Entertainment
5.3.2.2.3 Manufacturing
5.3.2.2.4 Telecom
5.3.2.2.5 BFSI
5.3.2.2.6 E-commerce
5.3.2.2.7 Government
5.3.2.2.8 Other End User
6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Share Analysis
6.2 Company Landscape
6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
6.3.1 ColoHouse Netherlands B.V.
6.3.2 Leaseweb Global B.V.
6.3.3 HostDime Global Corp.
6.3.4 CoreSite
6.3.5 Krypt
6.3.6 Prime Data Centers, LLC
6.3.7 Csquare (Phoenix Infrastructure LLC)
6.3.8 Digital Realty Trust Inc.
6.3.9 Teraswitch Networks, Inc.
6.3.10 Equinix Inc.
6.3.11 Zenlayer Inc.
6.3.12 EVODC, LLC (Evocative)
6.3.13 Vultr (The Constant Company, LLC.)
6.3.14 Colocrossing LLC
6.3.15 Alchemy Data Centers, LLC
6.3.16 Profuse Solutions Inc.(Psychz Networks)
6.3.17 Xfernet (PSI Premier Holdings, LLC)
6.3.18 Metanet, Inc.
6.3.19 Colocation America
6.3.20 Quadranet Systems Limited
6.4 List of Companies Studied
7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • ColoHouse Netherlands B.V.
  • Leaseweb Global B.V.
  • HostDime Global Corp.
  • CoreSite
  • Krypt
  • Prime Data Centers, LLC
  • Csquare (Phoenix Infrastructure LLC)
  • Digital Realty Trust Inc.
  • Teraswitch Networks, Inc.
  • Equinix Inc.
  • Zenlayer Inc.
  • EVODC, LLC (Evocative)
  • Vultr (The Constant Company, LLC.)
  • Colocrossing LLC
  • Alchemy Data Centers, LLC
  • Profuse Solutions Inc.(Psychz Networks)
  • Xfernet (PSI Premier Holdings, LLC)
  • Metanet, Inc.
  • Colocation America
  • Quadranet Systems Limited