+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Stablecoin Infrastructure - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 120 Pages
  • September 2026
  • Region: Global
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 6287073
The stablecoin infrastructure market size is expected to increase from USD 8.96 billion in 2025 to USD 9.57 billion in 2026 and reach USD 15.02 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 9.43% over 2026-2031. This report is segmented by Arrangement Function (Transfer, Clearing and Settlement, and More), Denomination Currency (Euro, and More), Application (Payments and Settlement, and More), Economic Buyer (Enterprises and Merchants, and More), Access Channel (Exchange and Broker Channels, and More), and Geography (North America, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Stablecoin Infrastructure Market Trends and Insights

Regulatory Enablement of Compliant Stablecoin Infrastructure

The GENIUS Act was signed into law on July 18, 2025, establishing requirements for payment stablecoins, including 1:1 reserves in high-quality liquid assets and monthly reporting with third-party examination. MiCA’s transition period ended on July 1, 2026, strengthening requirements for authorization and e-money tokens. Circle began issuing MiCA-compliant USDC and EURC in the European Union on July 1, 2024, while Qivalis was formed by 10 European banks in December 2025 to develop a euro stablecoin. These developments increase demand for reserve management, custody, compliance, and reporting infrastructure.

Growing Demand for 24/7 Cross-Border Settlement Infrastructure

Stablecoins can reduce settlement times and intermediary steps in correspondent banking by enabling programmable, 24/7 transfers. The Federal Reserve highlighted its potential to reduce cross-border payment frictions and intermediation costs. In March 2026, Thunes enabled 11,500 financial institutions on the SWIFT network to reach more than 500 million stablecoin wallets across 140+ countries without additional integration. This creates demand for settlement, liquidity, custody, compliance, and fiat-to-stablecoin conversion infrastructure.

Fragmented Regulatory, Licensing and Compliance Requirements

Stablecoin infrastructure providers face different licensing, reserve, reporting, AML, KYC, sanctions, and Travel Rule requirements across major markets, increasing compliance costs and limiting the use of a single global operating model. The Basel Committee’s prudential framework for banks’ cryptoasset exposures became effective on January 1, 2026, adding capital, liquidity, risk-management, and disclosure considerations for bank exposures to cryptoassets, including stablecoins. The European Commission also launched a MiCA review consultation on May 20, 2026, examining whether the framework remains fit for purpose as the market evolves. Smaller providers can face greater compliance burdens because they must adapt infrastructure and controls to multiple regulatory regimes, potentially slowing cross-border interoperability.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:
  • Institutional Integration of Stablecoins into Treasury and Payments Workflows
  • Emergence of Stablecoin-Native Machine and Agent Payments
  • Reserve, Redemption and Counterparty Risks

Segment Analysis

Issuance, redemption, and reserve management held 87.45% of the Stablecoin Infrastructure Market share in 2025. This reflects the capital-intensive role of reserve infrastructure supporting more than USD 307 billion in circulating supply. MiCA’s 100% high-quality liquid asset requirement and the GENIUS Act’s custody requirements concentrate activity among the largest issuers. Transfer, clearing, settlement, storage, exchange, and fiat access functions support the middle layer of the value chain. On-ramp and off-ramp services are becoming a distinct area of competition as institutions seek easier links to fiat systems.

Governance, attestation, and compliance services are projected to grow at a 16.22% CAGR through 2031. Monthly reserve attestations, executive certifications, and on-chain reserve dashboards are moving from optional features to operating requirements. Deloitte provides reserve attestation services to Circle. Tether’s move toward full audit coverage in 2025 also showed how regulatory standing can influence issuer competition. FinCEN and Financial Action Task Force guidance, along with the European Union anti-money-laundering package that applies from July 2027, add to the demand for compliance infrastructure. The Stablecoin Infrastructure Market size for this function can therefore benefit from rules that require verified data and controlled operating processes.

The United States dollar held 97.82% of the Stablecoin Infrastructure Market share in 2025. Tether’s USDT held 59% of the total stablecoin supply at USD 184 billion in mid-2026, while Circle’s USDC held 24%. Together, they represented more than 83% of the USD 307 billion supply base. This concentration reflects the role of the United States dollar in global digital-asset trading and cross-border settlement. It also means that the market’s current liquidity and infrastructure are heavily tied to dollar-based rails.

Other fiat currencies are projected to grow at a 21.34% CAGR through 2031. Japan’s amended Payment Services Act took effect on June 1, 2026, and enabled SBI’s JPYSC as a trust-type yen stablecoin under Financial Services Agency approval. Qivalis, a joint venture of 10 European banks, targets a MiCA-compliant euro stablecoin launch in the second half of 2026. The United Arab Emirates Central Bank-licensed DDSC dirham stablecoin also connects regional fiat infrastructure with M-Pesa users in Africa. These developments require foreign-exchange liquidity and settlement capabilities that have not yet reached scale for non-dollar denominations. The Stablecoin Infrastructure Market industry will need multi-currency liquidity management if regional stablecoins gain broader use.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Arrangement Function
    • Issuance, Redemption and Reserve Management
    • Transfer, Clearing and Settlement
    • Store, Exchange and Fiat Access
    • Governance, Attestation and Compliance Services
  • By Denomination Currency
    • United States Dollar
    • Euro
    • Other Fiat Currencies
  • By Application
    • Trading, Exchange Liquidity and Market-Making
    • Payments and Settlement
    • Corporate Treasury and Cash Management
    • Capital-Markets Collateral and Settlement
    • Other On-Chain use
  • By Economic Buyer
    • Banks, Payment Institutions and Money-Transfer Operators
    • Crypto Exchanges and Trading Venues
    • Enterprises and Merchants
    • Asset Managers and Institutional Investors
    • Fintechs and Platform Developers
  • By Access Channel
    • Exchange and Broker Channels
    • Bank and Payment-Institution Channels
    • Direct Issuer, API and White-Label Channels
    • Self-Custody Wallet Access
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • United Kingdom
      • Germany
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Indonesia
      • Thailand
      • Malaysia
      • Singapore
      • Vietnam
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Turkey
      • South Africa
      • Egypt
      • Rest of Middle East and Africa

Geography Analysis

North America held 36.63% of the Stablecoin Infrastructure Market share in 2025. The region includes major issuers such as Tether, Circle, and Paxos, as well as deep custody, compliance, and settlement capacity. The GENIUS Act, enacted on July 18, 2025, created a federal licensing framework for permitted payment stablecoin issuers. It requires 1:1 reserve backing, monthly accounting-firm examinations, and qualified reserve custody. Implementing rules are being finalized in 2026 and can clarify the federal and state split for larger issuers. Canada’s Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions and Mexico’s digital payment policy work also create potential expansion paths as regional coordination develops.

Europe is projected to grow at a 12.74% CAGR through 2031. MiCA allows an authorized issuer to serve all 27 European Union member states without obtaining separate authorization in every country. Circle’s authorization for USDC and EURC gives it an early position in the regional market. The European Commission consultation examines multi-issuer stablecoin models, non-European Union issuer equivalence, and asset-referenced token authorization. The European Central Bank’s Pontes project is scheduled to offer distributed ledger technology-linked wholesale settlement through TARGET from September 2026. Private initiatives, including Qivalis and DekaBank’s consortium, are developing alongside this public infrastructure.

Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and Africa, and South America offer growth opportunities where stablecoin systems address weak correspondent banking links. Japan’s Payment Services Act amendment created a legal path for foreign trust-type stablecoins, while the Cabinet included on-chain finance promotion in its July 2026 fiscal policy document. Singapore’s Monetary Authority of Singapore BLOOM framework supported Visa’s stablecoin settlement pilot with Nium in August 2026. In South America, Brazil and Argentina use dollar-denominated stablecoins as currency hedges. The United Arab Emirates Central Bank-licensed DDSC stablecoin launched on ADI Chain with M-Pesa connectivity across 8 African countries. Circle also partnered with Cassava Technologies to extend USDC settlement across 30 African countries


List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • Tether Limited
  • Circle Internet Group, Inc.
  • Paxos Trust Company, LLC
  • Ripple Labs Inc.
  • PayPal Holdings, Inc.
  • Coinbase Global, Inc.
  • Fireblocks Ltd.
  • BitGo Holdings, Inc.
  • Anchorage Digital Bank, National Association
  • Stripe, Inc.
  • Bridge, a Stripe Company
  • BVNK Limited
  • Zero Hash Holdings, Inc.
  • Visa Inc.
  • Mastercard Incorporated
  • Thunes
  • Nium Pte. Ltd.
  • Société Générale-FORGE
  • First Digital Labs Limited
  • Ethena Labs

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Regulatory Enablement of Compliant Stablecoin Infrastructure
4.2.2 Growing Demand for 24/7 Cross-Border Settlement Infrastructure
4.2.3 Institutional Integration of Stablecoins into Treasury and Payments Workflows
4.2.4 Expansion of Multi-Chain Stablecoin Liquidity and Settlement
4.2.5 Embedded Distribution Through Wallets, Payment Platforms and APIs
4.2.6 Emergence of Stablecoin-Native Machine and Agent Payments
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Fragmented Regulatory, Licensing and Compliance Requirements
4.3.2 Reserve, Redemption and Counterparty Risks
4.3.3 Fragmentation of Liquidity and Fiat Access Infrastructure
4.3.4 Pressure on Stablecoin Infrastructure Economics
4.4 Value Chain Analysis
4.4.1 Reserve Management and Stablecoin Issuance
4.4.2 Blockchain Settlement and Transaction Processing
4.4.3 Wallet, Custody and Liquidity Infrastructure
4.4.4 Payment Connectivity, Fiat On/Off-Ramps and Distribution
4.5 Regulatory Landscape
4.5.1 Stablecoin-Specific Licensing and Issuer Authorization Regimes
4.5.2 Reserve Backing, Segregation and Prudential Requirements
4.5.3 Redemption Rights, Disclosure and Attestation Requirements
4.5.4 AML/KYC, Sanctions and Cross-Border Compliance Requirements
4.6 Technological Outlook
4.6.1 Multi-Chain Issuance, Interoperability and Cross-Chain Settlement
4.6.2 Programmable Stablecoin Controls and Automated Compliance Infrastructure
4.6.3 Institutional-Grade Wallet, Custody and Key-Management Infrastructure
4.6.4 Embedded and Programmable Stablecoin Payment Infrastructure
4.7 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Reserve and Banking Partners
4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Institutional Buyers
4.7.4 Threat of Substitute Digital Money Infrastructure
4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry
5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS
5.1 By Arrangement Function
5.1.1 Issuance, Redemption and Reserve Management
5.1.2 Transfer, Clearing and Settlement
5.1.3 Store, Exchange and Fiat Access
5.1.4 Governance, Attestation and Compliance Services
5.2 By Denomination Currency
5.2.1 United States Dollar
5.2.2 Euro
5.2.3 Other Fiat Currencies
5.3 By Application
5.3.1 Trading, Exchange Liquidity and Market-Making
5.3.2 Payments and Settlement
5.3.3 Corporate Treasury and Cash Management
5.3.4 Capital-Markets Collateral and Settlement
5.3.5 Other On-Chain use
5.4 By Economic Buyer
5.4.1 Banks, Payment Institutions and Money-Transfer Operators
5.4.2 Crypto Exchanges and Trading Venues
5.4.3 Enterprises and Merchants
5.4.4 Asset Managers and Institutional Investors
5.4.5 Fintechs and Platform Developers
5.5 By Access Channel
5.5.1 Exchange and Broker Channels
5.5.2 Bank and Payment-Institution Channels
5.5.3 Direct Issuer, API and White-Label Channels
5.5.4 Self-Custody Wallet Access
5.6 By Geography
5.6.1 North America
5.6.1.1 United States
5.6.1.2 Canada
5.6.1.3 Mexico
5.6.2 South America
5.6.2.1 Brazil
5.6.2.2 Argentina
5.6.2.3 Rest of South America
5.6.3 Europe
5.6.3.1 United Kingdom
5.6.3.2 Germany
5.6.3.3 France
5.6.3.4 Italy
5.6.3.5 Spain
5.6.3.6 Rest of Europe
5.6.4 Asia-Pacific
5.6.4.1 China
5.6.4.2 Japan
5.6.4.3 India
5.6.4.4 South Korea
5.6.4.5 Australia
5.6.4.6 Indonesia
5.6.4.7 Thailand
5.6.4.8 Malaysia
5.6.4.9 Singapore
5.6.4.10 Vietnam
5.6.4.11 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.6.5 Middle East and Africa
5.6.5.1 Saudi Arabia
5.6.5.2 United Arab Emirates
5.6.5.3 Turkey
5.6.5.4 South Africa
5.6.5.5 Egypt
5.6.5.6 Rest of Middle East and Africa
6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis (Top 5-6 players)
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
6.4.1 Tether Limited
6.4.2 Circle Internet Group, Inc.
6.4.3 Paxos Trust Company, LLC
6.4.4 Ripple Labs Inc.
6.4.5 PayPal Holdings, Inc.
6.4.6 Coinbase Global, Inc.
6.4.7 Fireblocks Ltd.
6.4.8 BitGo Holdings, Inc.
6.4.9 Anchorage Digital Bank, National Association
6.4.10 Stripe, Inc.
6.4.11 Bridge, a Stripe Company
6.4.12 BVNK Limited
6.4.13 Zero Hash Holdings, Inc.
6.4.14 Visa Inc.
6.4.15 Mastercard Incorporated
6.4.16 Thunes
6.4.17 Nium Pte. Ltd.
6.4.18 Société Générale-FORGE
6.4.19 First Digital Labs Limited
6.4.20 Ethena Labs
7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment
7.1.1 Regulated Local-Currency Stablecoin Corridors and Fiat Connectivity
7.1.2 Enterprise Treasury, Liquidity and Multi-Chain Settlement Orchestration
7.1.3 Scalable Compliance Infrastructure for Smaller Issuers and Emerging-Market PSPs
7.1.4 Infrastructure for Agentic Payments and Institutional Capital-Markets Settlement
7.2 Future Outlook
7.2.1 Issuer Diversification and Expansion of Bank-Embedded Stablecoin Models
7.2.2 Institutionalisation of Stablecoin-Based Treasury and Settlement
7.2.3 Multi-Chain Network Effects and Increasing Infrastructure Interoperability
7.2.4 Regulatory Convergence and Evolving Stablecoin Infrastructure Economics

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Tether Limited
  • Circle Internet Group, Inc.
  • Paxos Trust Company, LLC
  • Ripple Labs Inc.
  • PayPal Holdings, Inc.
  • Coinbase Global, Inc.
  • Fireblocks Ltd.
  • BitGo Holdings, Inc.
  • Anchorage Digital Bank, National Association
  • Stripe, Inc.
  • Bridge, a Stripe Company
  • BVNK Limited
  • Zero Hash Holdings, Inc.
  • Visa Inc.
  • Mastercard Incorporated
  • Thunes
  • Nium Pte. Ltd.
  • Société Générale-FORGE
  • First Digital Labs Limited
  • Ethena Labs