+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Treasury Management Services - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 120 Pages
  • September 2026
  • Region: Global
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 6287191
The treasury management services market size was valued at USD 72.2 billion in 2025 and is estimated to grow from USD 76.1 billion in 2026 to reach USD 99.6 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 5.5% during the forecast period (2026-2031). The treasury management services market is being reshaped by real-time payment networks, the migration to ISO 20022 messaging, and wider use of artificial intelligence in cash forecasting. This report is segmented by Service Type (Payments and Disbursements, and More), Client Segment (Large Corporates and Multinationals, and More), Provider Type (Global Transaction Banks, and More), Industry Vertical (Financial Corporations, and More), and Geography (North America, South America, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Treasury Management Services Market Trends and Insights

Growing Demand for Real-Time Cash and Liquidity Visibility

The treasury management services market is benefiting from the growing need for current cash and liquidity information. This need is strengthening demand across the treasury management services market. Real-time payment networks have removed much of the overnight processing buffer that treasury teams previously used for liquidity decisions. FedNow, SEPA Instant, and comparable networks require companies to monitor positions throughout the day. The Association for Financial Professionals reported that 68% of corporate treasury departments used artificial intelligence or machine learning in forecasting in 2025, compared with 41% in 2023. A 2025 Asia Pacific cash management survey found that all respondents ranked real-time cash flow management as a top priority. Better visibility can reduce excess cash holdings and limit short-term credit use when organizations can identify funding needs earlier.

Increasing Cross-Border Payment and Foreign Exchange Management Complexity

Cross-border activity is increasing the number of payment corridors, currencies, and controls that treasury teams must manage. Standard Chartered reported that cross-border payment volumes reached USD 194 trillion in 2024 and are forecast to reach USD 320 trillion by 2032. Its research also found that 56% of corporates ranked foreign exchange risk management as their top treasury priority. The move away from SWIFT MT103 and MT202 formats requires companies to support structured ISO 20022 information across enterprise resource planning, treasury, and bank connectivity systems. J.P. Morgan noted in 2026 that 30% of global trade could shift to alternative corridors by 2035, increasing the need to recalibrate hedging and payment strategies. The treasury management services market therefore has opportunities for platforms that combine local instant payment networks, SWIFT CBPR+, and emerging settlement options within one controlled workflow.

High Implementation and Integration Complexity

Implementation complexity remains a material restraint on the treasury management services market. It can delay purchasing decisions across the treasury management services market. Many organizations work with fragmented data environments that existed before the adoption of modern treasury platforms. NeuGroup reported in 2026 that more than 1 in 5 surveyed member companies operated multiple enterprise resource planning systems. Multiple systems can use inconsistent data models and require middleware before a treasury platform can produce consistent forecasts. Each additional entity, currency, or bank connection expands the work required to integrate and test the platform. The effect is particularly significant for mid-market companies that have limited information technology resources and less capacity to absorb a failed deployment.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:
  • Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Treasury Automation and Advanced Cash Forecasting
  • Expansion of Cloud-Based Treasury Management Platforms
  • Data Security, Privacy, and Third-Party Dependency Risks

Segment Analysis

Payments and disbursements held 33.8% of the treasury management services market size in 2025, making it the largest service category. Companies route large transaction volumes through banking channels, which supports this position. J.P. Morgan processed USD 16.1 trillion in payments on a single day in 2025 and routinely moved nearly USD 12 trillion daily across 120 currencies. Collections and receivables are becoming more complex as e-commerce creates multi-currency and multi-rail payment flows. These flows require automated matching and reconciliation at scale. Liquidity and cash concentration services also remain relevant for multinational groups seeking to centralize cash across entities. Commercial payables cards remain smaller, but J.P. Morgan Payments introduced business-to-business virtual card capabilities in Europe with Mastercard during 2025.

Account services, information reporting, and bank connectivity are projected to grow at a 7.1% CAGR through 2031. The treasury management services industry is seeing stronger demand for data connectivity as ISO 20022 replaces legacy bank-file formats. The November 2026 SWIFT requirement for structured postal addresses in CBPR+ messages is accelerating upgrade decisions across Europe, Asia Pacific, and North America. Treasury teams need information that can move between enterprise systems and banking partners in a structured format. Kyriba reported that its network spans more than 10,000 bank connections and processes USD 51 trillion in payments annually for more than 4,000 customers. This scale places connectivity closer to a shared operating layer than a stand-alone product feature. The faster growth rate reflects the value of timely and complete bank information for forecasting, controls, and reporting.

Large corporates and multinationals held 37.2% of revenue in 2025, the largest client share in the treasury management services market. Their operations often include multi-entity cash pooling, in-house banking, foreign exchange hedging, and reporting across several jurisdictions. These needs create sustained reliance on premium banking and technology services. Financial institutions form a distinct revenue pool through correspondent banking and interbank settlement requirements. Public sector and nonprofit users also need compliance and reporting functions that align with accounting standards and procurement rules. The operating complexity of these clients establishes the functional baseline for higher-value treasury offerings.

Mid-market and commercial banking clients are projected to grow at a 6.6% CAGR through 2031. SaaS platforms have made structured treasury tools more viable for companies below USD 1 billion in revenue. Cross-border trade by mid-sized e-commerce businesses is also increasing the need for multi-currency management. The treasury management services industry is gaining opportunities as private equity owners seek to replace informal spreadsheet-based processes with standardized platforms. NeuGroup reported that Kyriba was used by nearly 30% of 226 surveyed companies in 2026, followed by FIS at 20% and ION Group at 17%. The Association for Financial Professionals found that 57% of respondents identified automation of manual processes as the second-most challenging treasury task in 2025. ISO 20022, Payment Services Directive 3, and Digital Operational Resilience Act requirements can add urgency to spending that some companies would otherwise defer.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Service Type
    • Payments and Disbursements
    • Collections and Receivables
    • Liquidity and Cash Concentration
    • Account Services, Information Reporting, and Bank Connectivity
    • Commercial Payables Cards
  • By Client Segment
    • Large Corporates and Multinationals
    • Mid-Market/Commercial Banking Clients
    • Financial-Institution Clients
    • Public Sector and Non-Profits
  • By Provider Type
    • Global Transaction Banks
    • Regional/Domestic Commercial Banks
    • Specialist Non-Bank Operational-Treasury Providers
  • By Industry Vertical
    • Financial Corporations
    • Manufacturing and Industrial
    • Retail, Consumer Goods and E-Commerce
    • Information Technology and Telecommunications
    • Healthcare and Life Sciences
    • Energy and Utilities
    • Transportation and Logistics
    • Government and Public Sector
    • Other Industry Verticals
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • United Kingdom
      • Germany
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Indonesia
      • Thailand
      • Malaysia
      • Singapore
      • Vietnam
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Turkey
      • South Africa
      • Egypt
      • Rest of Middle East and Africa

Geography Analysis

North America held 34.7% of revenue in 2025, the largest geographic share in the treasury management services market. The United States has 2 real-time payment rails, FedNow and The Clearing House RTP, and a high concentration of large corporate treasury functions. J.P. Morgan reported USD 19.3 billion in Payments revenue during 2025, an increase of 7%, while deposits grew 13% and fees rose 10%. Canada contributes through resource-sector requirements, where commodity-linked revenue creates continuing multi-currency exposure. Mexico benefits from nearshoring activity that adds cross-entity cash management and cross-border payment needs for manufacturers.

Europe remains shaped by an intensive regulatory timetable. The Payment Services Directive 3 and Payment Services Regulation texts were finalized before the European Parliament Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee in April 2026, with application expected in the first half of 2028 after a 21-month transposition period. The November 2026 ISO 20022 structured address mandate is accelerating connectivity upgrades, especially in Germany and the Netherlands. The United Kingdom CHAPS system had used ISO 20022 since June 2023, leaving British companies relatively advanced in structured-data migration. AFTE reported in January 2026 that 36% of surveyed French corporate treasurers expected improvements during 2026, while 35% expected stability. These conditions support steady technology investment and make programmable liquidity and application programming interface connectivity important competitive features.

South America is projected to grow at a 7.5% CAGR through 2031, the fastest regional rate in the treasury management services market size. This expansion broadens the treasury management services market beyond its established North American base. Brazil's Pix processed 63.4 billion transactions in 2024, while its open finance framework processed more than 1.5 billion application programming interface calls each week. Ripple launched a full-stack digital banking infrastructure platform in Brazil and applied for a VASP license in March 2026. Asia Pacific is also advancing, as HSBC found that 90% of regional treasurers prioritized foreign exchange and interest-rate management in 2025. Citi launched Real-Time Funding for corporate clients in Singapore in August 2025, enabling automated cross-border liquidity transfers around the clock. The Middle East and Africa are emerging opportunities as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates invest in digital banking and payment capabilities.


List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
  • Citigroup Inc.
  • HSBC Holdings plc
  • Bank of America Corporation
  • Wells Fargo & Company
  • BNP Paribas
  • Deutsche Bank AG
  • The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BNY)
  • Standard Chartered PLC
  • Kyriba Corporation
  • ION Group
  • GTreasury
  • FIS
  • SAP SE
  • Oracle Corporation
  • Coupa Software
  • Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS)
  • Serrala
  • Nomentia
  • Bottomline

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Growing Demand for Real-Time Cash and Liquidity Visibility
4.2.2 Increasing Cross-Border Payment and FX Management Complexity
4.2.3 Increasing Need for Working Capital and Liquidity Optimization
4.2.4 Expansion of Cloud-Based Treasury Management Platforms
4.2.5 Growing Regulatory Compliance, Fraud Prevention and Cybersecurity Requirements
4.2.6 AI-Enabled Treasury Automation and Advanced Cash Forecasting
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 High Implementation and Integration Complexity
4.3.2 High Implementation, Customization and Ongoing Operating Costs
4.3.3 Data Security, Privacy and Third-Party Dependency Risks
4.3.4 Shortage of Treasury Technology and Risk Management Expertise
4.4 Value Chain Analysis
4.4.1 Treasury Management Service Providers
4.4.2 Treasury Technology and Software Providers
4.4.3 Banking, Payment and Financial Connectivity Infrastructure
4.4.4 Corporate Treasury End Users and Shared-Service Centers
4.5 Regulatory Landscape
4.5.1 Payment Services and Open Banking Regulations
4.5.2 Data Privacy, Cybersecurity and Operational Resilience Requirements
4.5.3 Anti-Money Laundering, Sanctions and Know-Your-Customer Requirements
4.5.4 Financial Reporting, Hedge Accounting and Treasury Risk Regulations
4.6 Technological Outlook
4.6.1 Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Treasury Automation
4.6.2 APIs, Open Banking and Real-Time Bank Connectivity
4.6.3 Robotic Process Automation and Intelligent Workflow Automation
4.6.4 Blockchain, Distributed Ledger Technology and Tokenized Settlement
4.7 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry
5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS
5.1 By Service Type
5.1.1 Payments and Disbursements
5.1.2 Collections and Receivables
5.1.3 Liquidity and Cash Concentration
5.1.4 Account Services, Information Reporting, and Bank Connectivity
5.1.5 Commercial Payables Cards
5.2 By Client Segment
5.2.1 Large Corporates and Multinationals
5.2.2 Mid-Market/Commercial Banking Clients
5.2.3 Financial-Institution Clients
5.2.4 Public Sector and Non-Profits
5.3 By Provider Type
5.3.1 Global Transaction Banks
5.3.2 Regional/Domestic Commercial Banks
5.3.3 Specialist Non-Bank Operational-Treasury Providers
5.4 By Industry Vertical
5.4.1 Financial Corporations
5.4.2 Manufacturing and Industrial
5.4.3 Retail, Consumer Goods and E-Commerce
5.4.4 Information Technology and Telecommunications
5.4.5 Healthcare and Life Sciences
5.4.6 Energy and Utilities
5.4.7 Transportation and Logistics
5.4.8 Government and Public Sector
5.4.9 Other Industry Verticals
5.5 By Geography
5.5.1 North America
5.5.1.1 United States
5.5.1.2 Canada
5.5.1.3 Mexico
5.5.2 South America
5.5.2.1 Brazil
5.5.2.2 Argentina
5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
5.5.3 Europe
5.5.3.1 United Kingdom
5.5.3.2 Germany
5.5.3.3 France
5.5.3.4 Italy
5.5.3.5 Spain
5.5.3.6 Rest of Europe
5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
5.5.4.1 China
5.5.4.2 Japan
5.5.4.3 India
5.5.4.4 South Korea
5.5.4.5 Australia
5.5.4.6 Indonesia
5.5.4.7 Thailand
5.5.4.8 Malaysia
5.5.4.9 Singapore
5.5.4.10 Vietnam
5.5.4.11 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
5.5.5.1 Saudi Arabia
5.5.5.2 United Arab Emirates
5.5.5.3 Turkey
5.5.5.4 South Africa
5.5.5.5 Egypt
5.5.5.6 Rest of Middle East and Africa
6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis (Top 5-6 players)
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
6.4.1 J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
6.4.2 Citigroup Inc.
6.4.3 HSBC Holdings plc
6.4.4 Bank of America Corporation
6.4.5 Wells Fargo & Company
6.4.6 BNP Paribas
6.4.7 Deutsche Bank AG
6.4.8 The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BNY)
6.4.9 Standard Chartered PLC
6.4.10 Kyriba Corporation
6.4.11 ION Group
6.4.12 GTreasury
6.4.13 FIS
6.4.14 SAP SE
6.4.15 Oracle Corporation
6.4.16 Coupa Software
6.4.17 Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS)
6.4.18 Serrala
6.4.19 Nomentia
6.4.20 Bottomline
7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment
7.1.1 Scalable Treasury Solutions for Mid-Market and Small Enterprises
7.1.2 Real-Time Multi-Bank Cash and Liquidity Visibility
7.1.3 AI-Enabled Cash Forecasting and Treasury Automation with Explainability
7.2 Future Outlook
7.2.1 Cloud-Native and API-First Treasury Architecture
7.2.2 Real-Time, Integrated Bank, ERP and Payment Connectivity
7.2.3 Increasing Automation and Intelligent Treasury Operations

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
  • Citigroup Inc.
  • HSBC Holdings plc
  • Bank of America Corporation
  • Wells Fargo & Company
  • BNP Paribas
  • Deutsche Bank AG
  • The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BNY)
  • Standard Chartered PLC
  • Kyriba Corporation
  • ION Group
  • GTreasury
  • FIS
  • SAP SE
  • Oracle Corporation
  • Coupa Software
  • Treasury Intelligence Solutions (TIS)
  • Serrala
  • Nomentia
  • Bottomline