+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Japan Hydraulic Presses - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 150 Pages
  • September 2026
  • Region: Japan
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 6287254
The Japan hydraulic presses market size is projected to be USD 267.80 million in 2025, USD 276.30 million in 2026, and reach USD 323.5 million by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 3.20% from 2026 to 2031. This report is segmented by Frame / Structural Configuration (C-Frame / Gap-Frame Hydraulic Presses, H-Frame / Straight-Side, and More), by Tonnage / Press Force (Up To 100 Tons, 101-500 Tons, and More), by Application (Forging, Hydroforming, and More), and by End-Use Industry (Automotive & Transportation, Electrical and Electronics, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Japan Hydraulic Presses Market Trends and Insights

Electric-Vehicle Battery Case and Battery Component Forming

Battery case production has become a central source of demand for deep-drawing equipment in the Japan hydraulic presses market. AIDA ENGINEERING introduced the DIS-1600 for cylindrical storage battery cases and the DPH Former for prismatic cases in June 2025. Mazda signed an agreement in September 2025 to build its Iwakuni battery module-pack plant, which targets an annual capacity of 10GWh. Nissan also committed JPY 153.3 billion (USD 1.02 billion) to an LFP battery factory in Kitakyushu, with construction beginning in fiscal year 2025 and operations planned for fiscal year 2028. Several battery projects moving into construction at the same time can concentrate orders for forming lines and place greater planning demands on equipment and tooling suppliers.

Automation, Robotics, and Connected Press Adoption

Japan has positioned automation and AI-enabled robotics as a response to manufacturing productivity gaps caused by a smaller working-age population. The Japan Robot Association reported shipments of 211,139 robots in 2025, up 16.4% from 2024, while export growth reached 28.2%. For press users, robotic handling requires controls that can coordinate the press with loading, unloading, and safety functions. AIDA’s A-1Y Hand-in-Die Collaborative Robot, launched in July 2025, was designed to work with existing general-purpose presses. This creates a practical route for factories that need automation but cannot justify replacing an entire press line. The Japan hydraulic presses market can therefore benefit from controls and automation upgrades as well as sales of new equipment.

High Capital Cost and Extended Investment Approval Cycles

Hydraulic press purchases are closely reviewed in manufacturing budgets, particularly among small and medium-sized enterprises. A standard 250-ton hydraulic fine-blanking press from a leading domestic supplier is priced at JPY 60 million (USD 0.40 million) to JPY 90 million (USD 0.60 million), while servo-hydraulic or IIoT-equipped versions can exceed JPY 150 million (USD 1 million). Japan Finance Corporation found that machinery and equipment represented 57.3% of planned SME investment in 2025, although firms remained cautious about their overall commitments. Many buyers wait for subsidy decisions before releasing orders, which makes demand uneven. Periodic inspection and safety-device certification also add time to procurement and replacement projects under Japan’s industrial safety requirements. The Japan hydraulic presses market is therefore exposed to delayed decisions even when factories recognize the need to upgrade equipment.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:
  • Aerospace, Defense, Shipbuilding, and Energy-Equipment Investment
  • Brownfield Press Replacement for Energy, Safety, and Controls Obsolescence
  • Competition from Mechanical, Electric, Servo, and Alternative Forming Technologies

Segment Analysis

C-frame presses held 31% of Japan hydraulic presses market share in 2025, making them the largest structural configuration. They serve broad mid-market stamping, assembly, and general-purpose work. Their open-throat layout and compact footprint suit electronics, plastics, and light-assembly operations. Users value quick die changes and flexible use across several shifts. H-frame and straight-side machines formed the next major revenue group for forging, blanking, and deep drawing. Automotive buyers favor their frame rigidity and ram parallelism for heavier-duty work.

Four-post and four-column machines are forecast to grow at a 5.1% CAGR through 2031, the fastest rate among structural configurations. Their design supports battery-case forming and composite molding, where even pressure over larger bolster areas is important. Platen parallelism matters more in these processes than the access flexibility of a C-frame. Two-post and benchtop presses continued to serve prototype rooms, maintenance areas, and small-batch specialty fabricators. These smaller formats are less exposed to broad investment cycles and provide a stable baseline demand. Safety obligations under the Industrial Safety and Health Act apply across the configuration range and add compliance cost to each equipment type.

The 101-500-ton class held 34% share of the Japan hydraulic presses market in 2025 because it serves automotive stamping, medium forging, and industrial assembly. Established tooling, die sets, and automation interfaces reduce the ownership cost of these widely used systems. The up-to-100-ton category retained steady volumes from electronics, medical devices, and precision instruments. Compact footprints and fast cycling are more important than high press force in these applications. Presses rated from 501 tons to 2,000 tons serve structural automotive work, shipbuilding, and heavy forging.

Above-2,000-ton equipment is forecast to grow at a 5.8% CAGR through 2031, the fastest rate among tonnage classes. Naval structures, landing gear, and large energy equipment require substantial forming force. These purchases are usually linked to long-term program commitments and specialized engineering requirements. JIS B 6411-3:2025 updated safety requirements for hydraulic presses in March 2025 and aligns with ISO 16092-3. The standard raises engineering expectations across all capacity bands. Older systems that cannot be upgraded economically may be replaced sooner, which supports demand in the highest-force categories.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Frame / Structural Configuration
    • C-Frame / Gap-Frame Hydraulic Presses
    • H-Frame / Straight-Side / Gib-Guided Hydraulic Presses
    • Four-Post / Four-Column Hydraulic Presses
    • Two-Post / Column Hydraulic Presses
    • Benchtop / Workshop Hydraulic Presses
    • Other Specialized Hydraulic Press Configurations
  • By Tonnage / Press Force
    • Up to 100 Tons
    • 101-500 Tons
    • 501-1,000 Tons
    • 1,001-2,000 Tons
    • Above 2,000 Tons
  • By Application / Forming Process
    • Sheet Metal Forming and Deep Drawing
    • Forging
    • Bending and Straightening
    • Punching, Blanking, and Coining
    • Compression Molding
    • Powder Compaction
    • Hydroforming
    • Assembly, Press-Fitting, and General Pressing
    • Other Specialized Applications
  • By End-Use Industry
    • Automotive and Transportation
    • Aerospace and Defense
    • Industrial Machinery and General Manufacturing
    • Electrical and Electronics
    • Plastics, Rubber, and Composites
    • Construction and Heavy Equipment
    • Energy and Power Equipment
    • Rail and Marine
    • Powder Metallurgy, Ceramics, and Advanced Materials
    • Other End-Use Industries

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • Komatsu Ltd.
  • AIDA ENGINEERING, LTD.
  • Kojima Iron Works Co., Ltd.
  • SANKI SEIKO CO., LTD.
  • Amino Corporation
  • Japan Automatic Machine Co., Ltd.
  • Kuroda Precision Industries Ltd.
  • Osaka Jack Co., Ltd.
  • Yamada Dobby Co., Ltd.
  • AMADA CO., LTD.
  • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Machine Tool Co., Ltd.
  • Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  • Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  • Daikin Industries, Ltd.
  • Nippon Pneumatic Mfg. Co., Ltd.
  • Asai Corporation
  • Sugino Machine Limited
  • Takashima Sangyo Co., Ltd.
  • Meiki Co., Ltd.
  • Shibuya Corporation
  • Niigata Machine Techno Co., Ltd.

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 Introduction
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 Research Methodology3 Executive Summary
4 Market Landscape
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Electric-Vehicle Battery Case and Battery Component Forming
4.2.2 Automation, Robotics, and Connected Press Adoption
4.2.3 Aerospace, Defense, Shipbuilding, and Energy-Equipment Investment
4.2.4 Brownfield Press Replacement for Energy, Safety, and Controls Obsolescence
4.2.5 Precision Forming for Advanced and Lightweight Materials
4.2.6 Localized Tooling, Die, and Process Validation Networks
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 High Capital Cost and Extended Investment Approval Cycles
4.3.2 Competition from Mechanical, Electric, Servo, and Alternative Forming Technologies
4.3.3 Shortage of Hydraulic, Controls, Programming, and Commissioning Specialists
4.3.4 Imported Component Dependence and Cross-Border Service Delays
4.4 Value Chain and Supply Chain Analysis
4.4.1 Raw Materials and Structural Components
4.4.2 Hydraulic Power Units, Pumps, Valves, and Cylinders
4.4.3 Controls, Sensors, and Automation Components
4.4.4 Tooling and Die Ecosystem
4.4.5 Installation, Maintenance, Retrofit, and Rebuild Services
4.5 Regulatory Landscape
4.5.1 JIS B 6411-3:2025 Safety Requirements for Hydraulic Presses
4.5.2 JIS B 6403:2020 Hydraulic Press Accuracy and Inspection Requirements
4.5.3 Japan Occupational Safety and Health Requirements for Press Machinery
4.5.4 Safety Guards, Light Curtains, Interlocks, and Periodic Inspection Requirements
4.5.5 Noise, Hydraulic Fluid, and Environmental Compliance Requirements
4.6 Technological Outlook
4.6.1 Servo-Hydraulic and Energy-Efficient Drive Systems
4.6.2 Advanced Controls and Closed-Loop Force/Position Control
4.6.3 Automation, Robotics, and Automated Material Handling
4.6.4 Connected Presses, IIoT, and Condition Monitoring
4.6.5 Predictive Maintenance and Process Traceability
4.6.6 Hybrid Hydraulic-Electric Press Technologies
4.6.7 Advanced Material and Composite Forming Technologies
4.7 Impact of Geopolitical and Trade Developments
4.7.1 Chinese Equipment Competition in Standardized Press Applications
4.7.2 Import Exposure for Hydraulic and Electronic Components
4.7.3 Localization of Critical Press Components
4.7.4 Manufacturing Relocation and Overseas Production by Japanese OEMs
4.8 Industry and Manufacturing Trends
4.8.1 Electrification of Automotive and Industrial Equipment
4.8.2 High-Mix Low-Volume Production
4.8.3 Energy-Efficiency and Carbon-Neutral Factory Programs
4.8.4 Skilled-Labor Substitution Through Automation
5 Market Size & Growth Forecasts
5.1 By Frame / Structural Configuration
5.1.1 C-Frame / Gap-Frame Hydraulic Presses
5.1.2 H-Frame / Straight-Side / Gib-Guided Hydraulic Presses
5.1.3 Four-Post / Four-Column Hydraulic Presses
5.1.4 Two-Post / Column Hydraulic Presses
5.1.5 Benchtop / Workshop Hydraulic Presses
5.1.6 Other Specialized Hydraulic Press Configurations
5.2 By Tonnage / Press Force
5.2.1 Up to 100 Tons
5.2.2 101-500 Tons
5.2.3 501-1,000 Tons
5.2.4 1,001-2,000 Tons
5.2.5 Above 2,000 Tons
5.3 By Application / Forming Process
5.3.1 Sheet Metal Forming and Deep Drawing
5.3.2 Forging
5.3.3 Bending and Straightening
5.3.4 Punching, Blanking, and Coining
5.3.5 Compression Molding
5.3.6 Powder Compaction
5.3.7 Hydroforming
5.3.8 Assembly, Press-Fitting, and General Pressing
5.3.9 Other Specialized Applications
5.4 By End-Use Industry
5.4.1 Automotive and Transportation
5.4.2 Aerospace and Defense
5.4.3 Industrial Machinery and General Manufacturing
5.4.4 Electrical and Electronics
5.4.5 Plastics, Rubber, and Composites
5.4.6 Construction and Heavy Equipment
5.4.7 Energy and Power Equipment
5.4.8 Rail and Marine
5.4.9 Powder Metallurgy, Ceramics, and Advanced Materials
5.4.10 Other End-Use Industries
6 Competitive Landscape
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (Includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as Available, Strategic Information, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
6.4.1 Komatsu Ltd.
6.4.2 AIDA ENGINEERING, LTD.
6.4.3 Kojima Iron Works Co., Ltd.
6.4.4 SANKI SEIKO CO., LTD.
6.4.5 Amino Corporation
6.4.6 Japan Automatic Machine Co., Ltd.
6.4.7 Kuroda Precision Industries Ltd.
6.4.8 Osaka Jack Co., Ltd.
6.4.9 Yamada Dobby Co., Ltd.
6.4.10 AMADA CO., LTD.
6.4.11 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Machine Tool Co., Ltd.
6.4.12 Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
6.4.13 Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd.
6.4.14 Daikin Industries, Ltd.
6.4.15 Nippon Pneumatic Mfg. Co., Ltd.
6.4.16 Asai Corporation
6.4.17 Sugino Machine Limited
6.4.18 Takashima Sangyo Co., Ltd.
6.4.19 Meiki Co., Ltd.
6.4.20 Shibuya Corporation
6.4.21 Niigata Machine Techno Co., Ltd.
7 Market Opportunities & Future Outlook
7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment
7.1.1 Energy-Efficient and Servo-Hydraulic Presses
7.1.2 Retrofit and Modernization of Legacy Presses
7.1.3 Automated and Connected Hydraulic Press Systems
7.1.4 Battery Case and Advanced Material Forming
7.1.5 Compact Presses for High-Mix Japanese Manufacturing
7.1.6 High-Tonnage Forging and Special-Purpose Applications

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Komatsu Ltd.
  • AIDA ENGINEERING, LTD.
  • Kojima Iron Works Co., Ltd.
  • SANKI SEIKO CO., LTD.
  • Amino Corporation
  • Japan Automatic Machine Co., Ltd.
  • Kuroda Precision Industries Ltd.
  • Osaka Jack Co., Ltd.
  • Yamada Dobby Co., Ltd.
  • AMADA CO., LTD.
  • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Machine Tool Co., Ltd.
  • Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  • Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  • Daikin Industries, Ltd.
  • Nippon Pneumatic Mfg. Co., Ltd.
  • Asai Corporation
  • Sugino Machine Limited
  • Takashima Sangyo Co., Ltd.
  • Meiki Co., Ltd.
  • Shibuya Corporation
  • Niigata Machine Techno Co., Ltd.