+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

South America Container Terminal Operations - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 120 Pages
  • September 2026
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 6287377
The South America container terminal operations market size was valued at USD 4.37 billion in 2025 and is estimated to grow from USD 4.56 billion in 2026 to reach USD 5.66 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 4.42% during the forecast period (2026-2031). Agribusiness export chains, stronger links with Asia-Pacific routes, and concession-backed capacity projects support demand across the South America container terminal operations market, while direct Pacific connections are changing the cargo-routing choices available to importers and exporters and placing greater focus on gateway reliability. This report is segmented by Service (Stevedoring, Cargo Handling, and More), by Ownership Model (State-Owned, Public-Private Partnership, and More), by Automation Level (Manual, Semi-Automated, and More), by Container Type (General Containers, Reefer Containers, and More), and by Country (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

South America Container Terminal Operations Market Trends and Insights

Expansion of Deep-Water Gateway Capacity

Deep-water expansion is allowing terminals to receive vessels that earlier required calls at hubs in Panama or Mexico, changing the commercial value of individual gateway locations across the South America container terminal operations market. Larger vessels require sufficient channel depth, berth strength, crane reach, yard space, and faster gate operations, because a delayed handover of high volumes can weaken the benefit of a direct call. Chile began an international bidding process for the San Antonio expansion in 2025 after the project cleared environmental review. The project is expected to provide 6 million TEUs of annual capacity, with construction planned to begin in 2027, and it would significantly increase Chile’s ability to receive larger container ships. Brazil is also pursuing channel deepening at Paranaguá through a 25-year access-channel concession. These projects increase the value of terminals that can coordinate water access, equipment upgrades, and landside capacity within one operating plan, rather than treating berth work and cargo evacuation as separate investments.

Asia-South America Service Upgrades and Pacific-Corridor Cargo Redistribution

Chancay began commercial operations in June 2025 and changed the routing options available to Pacific coast cargo owners in the South America container terminal operations market. The port handled 200,000 TEUs in the first half of 2026 across mainline and feeder services connecting Asia, Central America, and the South American Pacific coast. Its direct connection to Shanghai reduces transit time to 23 days from a previous 35 to 40 days, giving cargo owners a shorter route for time-sensitive shipments. Feeder services connect Chancay with 4 key Chilean terminals and with northern Pacific ports, including Paita and Guayaquil. Shipping lines are deploying vessels with a capacity of nearly 13,100 TEUs on these routes, a scale that was not previously viable on this trade lane. Terminals without the necessary draft and crane capability may lose direct calls as larger vessels become more common, while Pacific gateways may attract Asia-bound cargo that would otherwise move through Atlantic coast ports.

Road, Rail, and Climate Constraints Beyond the Terminal Gate

Quay capacity does not translate into higher throughput when road, rail, and waterway links remain unreliable for the South America container terminal operations market. Southern Brazilian corridors continue to face delays that add drayage time and raise cargo dwell costs, offsetting gains from better vessel turnaround at the berth. The BR-280 connection serving the Sao Francisco do Sul and Itapoa complex remains unresolved after a long planning period. Rail investment also takes longer to complete than many terminal construction programs, creating a gap between port capacity and the freight network needed to use it. The Paraná-Paraguay waterway can face navigability disruptions from silting and seasonal low-water conditions, affecting inland cargo aggregation ahead of export. Droughts, floods, and river-level changes can therefore reduce the benefit of berth productivity improvements, because trucks, railcars, and barges still determine how quickly containers can enter or leave a terminal.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:
  • Public-Private Concession Investment in Terminal Modernization
  • Cold-Chain Containerization and Equipment Electrification
  • Uneven Concession Terms, Customs Rules, and Automation Readiness

Segment Analysis

Stevedoring accounted for 43.50% of the South America container terminal operations market share in 2025. Vessel and quay services remain central because shipping alliances assess berth productivity, crane availability, berth windows, and reliability when selecting rotation ports. Operators continue to invest in cranes, berth infrastructure, and systems that support faster moves per hour, since each call must be completed within tightly managed shipping schedules. Cargo handling is the second-largest service area and includes yard management, stacking, storage, container release, and the movement of boxes between operating zones. Santos Brasil introduced 8 automated rubber-tired gantry cranes at Tecon Santos in 2025. The equipment is remotely operated and is expected to reduce CO2 emissions by 97% compared with the diesel equipment it replaced, while also removing the need for operators to climb into elevated crane cabs for each shift.

Transportation is expected to be the fastest-growing service segment during 2026-2031 with a CAGR of 4.81%. Terminal groups are expanding drayage, inland depot, and rail offerings to capture more value after containers leave the gate and to give cargo owners a more continuous service. These services can also reduce congestion by coordinating truck appointments, depot use, container positioning, and inland cargo flows before vehicles reach the terminal perimeter. Other services include customs support, cargo consolidation, inspection coordination, port agency work, and practical assistance that can reduce the number of separate logistics providers used by exporters. Exporters increasingly seek a more integrated logistics offer rather than managing several providers separately. ICTSI’s investment in the Rio-Minas and Rio-Suzano rail corridors shows how international operators are building inland logistics positions alongside terminal investments, rather than relying only on vessel-side handling revenue.

State-owned terminals accounted for 47.06% of the South America container terminal operations market size in 2025. This position reflects Brazil’s federal port network, Argentina’s public port authorities, and state management in parts of the Andean corridor, where public investment supports national trade and infrastructure priorities. Public ownership remains important where ports are treated as strategic assets that must maintain service continuity and cargo access. Private and independent facilities serve the rest of the sector, including carrier-owned terminals, standalone commercial operators, and facilities with different operating mandates. Their competitive position depends on concession security, traffic density, access to investment capital, and their ability to meet alliance requirements. Carrier acquisitions completed during 2025 have increased the importance of integrated ownership structures in major Brazilian terminals, raising concerns for independent operators that did not have a related carrier base.

Public-private partnerships are projected to grow at a 5.15% CAGR through 2031. The South America container terminal operations market size for PPP structures is supported by tenders that require private investment while keeping public oversight of strategic infrastructure. Brazil is running auctions for facilities in Fortaleza, Santana, Porto Alegre, and Natal, maintaining a pipeline that matches the long planning cycles used by international terminal groups. Mandatory investment obligations and ANTAQ oversight give investors clearer requirements for long-term business plans, including defined delivery expectations for capacity and infrastructure. Carrier-affiliated terminals may use handling rates to secure volume from related shipping networks and to support alliance commitments. Independent operators may therefore become more concentrated in secondary ports where automation investment is harder to fund, and throughput density may not justify the same equipment programs.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Service
    • Stevedoring
    • Cargo Handling
    • Transportation
    • Other Services
  • By Ownership Model
    • State-Owned
    • Public-Private Partnership
    • Private / Independent
  • By Automation Level
    • Manual
    • Semi-Automated
    • Fully Automated
  • By Container Type
    • General Containers
    • Reefer Containers
    • OOG / Project Containers
    • Dangerous Goods Containers
  • By Country
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Colombia
    • Peru
    • Rest of South America

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • DP World Limited.
  • APM Terminals B.V.
  • CMA CGM Group
  • Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
  • International Container Terminal Services, Inc.
  • Wilson Sons S.A.
  • Itapoa Terminais Portuarios S.A.
  • TCP Participacoes S.A.
  • JBS Terminais
  • PSA International Pte Ltd.
  • COSCO Shipping Ports Limited
  • Hanseatic Global Terminals Latin America S.A.
  • Terminal Puerto Coquimbo S.A.
  • Terminal Zarate S.A.
  • Neltume Ports
  • Terminal Cuenca del Plata S.A.
  • Sepetiba Tecon S.A.
  • Terminal Pacifico Sur Valparaiso S.A.
  • Terminal Internacional del Sur S.A.
  • Sociedad Portuaria Regional de Buenaventura S.A.

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 Introduction
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 Research Methodology3 Executive Summary
4 Market Landscape
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Expansion of Deep-Water Gateway Capacity
4.2.2 Asia-South America Service Upgrades and Larger Vessel Calls
4.2.3 Public-Private Concession Investment in Terminal Modernization
4.2.4 Cold-Chain Containerization of Agribusiness Exports
4.2.5 Electrification Improving Equipment Uptime and Operating Economics
4.2.6 Pacific-Corridor Cargo Redistribution Through Chancay and Callao
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Road and Rail Bottlenecks Beyond the Terminal Gate
4.3.2 Uneven Concession, Tariff, and Customs Regimes
4.3.3 Climate Exposure to Drought, Floods, and River-Level Volatility
4.3.4 High Retrofit Cost and Skills Scarcity for Automation
4.4 Value Chain and Distribution Channel Analysis
4.5 Regulatory Framework
4.6 Technological Outlook
4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.7.5 Rivalry Among Competitors
4.8 Impact of Geopolitical Events on the Market
5 Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)
5.1 By Service
5.1.1 Stevedoring
5.1.2 Cargo Handling
5.1.3 Transportation
5.1.4 Other Services
5.2 By Ownership Model
5.2.1 State-Owned
5.2.2 Public-Private Partnership
5.2.3 Private / Independent
5.3 By Automation Level
5.3.1 Manual
5.3.2 Semi-Automated
5.3.3 Fully Automated
5.4 By Container Type
5.4.1 General Containers
5.4.2 Reefer Containers
5.4.3 OOG / Project Containers
5.4.4 Dangerous Goods Containers
5.5 By Country
5.5.1 Argentina
5.5.2 Brazil
5.5.3 Chile
5.5.4 Colombia
5.5.5 Peru
5.5.6 Rest of South America
6 Competitive Landscape
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Key Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Geographic Coverage, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
6.4.1 DP World Limited.
6.4.2 APM Terminals B.V.
6.4.3 CMA CGM Group
6.4.4 Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
6.4.5 International Container Terminal Services, Inc.
6.4.6 Wilson Sons S.A.
6.4.7 Itapoa Terminais Portuarios S.A.
6.4.8 TCP Participacoes S.A.
6.4.9 JBS Terminais
6.4.10 PSA International Pte Ltd.
6.4.11 COSCO Shipping Ports Limited
6.4.12 Hanseatic Global Terminals Latin America S.A.
6.4.13 Terminal Puerto Coquimbo S.A.
6.4.14 Terminal Zarate S.A.
6.4.15 Neltume Ports
6.4.16 Terminal Cuenca del Plata S.A.
6.4.17 Sepetiba Tecon S.A.
6.4.18 Terminal Pacifico Sur Valparaiso S.A.
6.4.19 Terminal Internacional del Sur S.A.
6.4.20 Sociedad Portuaria Regional de Buenaventura S.A.
7 Market Opportunities and Future Outlook
7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • DP World Limited.
  • APM Terminals B.V.
  • CMA CGM Group
  • Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
  • International Container Terminal Services, Inc.
  • Wilson Sons S.A.
  • Itapoa Terminais Portuarios S.A.
  • TCP Participacoes S.A.
  • JBS Terminais
  • PSA International Pte Ltd.
  • COSCO Shipping Ports Limited
  • Hanseatic Global Terminals Latin America S.A.
  • Terminal Puerto Coquimbo S.A.
  • Terminal Zarate S.A.
  • Neltume Ports
  • Terminal Cuenca del Plata S.A.
  • Sepetiba Tecon S.A.
  • Terminal Pacifico Sur Valparaiso S.A.
  • Terminal Internacional del Sur S.A.
  • Sociedad Portuaria Regional de Buenaventura S.A.