+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Crypto Insurance - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 120 Pages
  • September 2026
  • Region: Global
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 6287418
The crypto insurance market size is projected to expand from USD 0.31 billion in 2025 and USD 0.39 billion in 2026 to USD 1.17 billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 24.56% between 2026 to 2031. This report is segmented by Coverage Type (Crime, Fidelity & Specie Insurance, and More), Insurance Model (Traditional Centralized, and More), Distribution Channel (Direct Distribution, and More), End User (Centralized Exchanges & Trading Platforms, and More), Insured Asset (NFTs, and More), and Geography (North America, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Crypto Insurance Market Trends and Insights

Growing Institutional Adoption Reshapes Demand Composition

Institutional digital-asset holdings are making insured custody more important for firms with fiduciary and oversight responsibilities. Pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and registered investment advisers face greater pressure to use custody arrangements that can address first-party loss exposure. This shift makes protection a condition for broader institutional participation rather than an optional addition. South Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act, effective from July 2024, requires virtual asset service providers to maintain insurance or reserves equal to at least 5% of the economic value of hot-wallet holdings. Samsung Fire & Marine’s policy for Korea Digital Asset began with a 15% premium rate and was later renewed at 10%, showing how early institutional demand can support price discovery in a new jurisdiction. The Crypto Insurance Market benefits when regulatory obligations and fiduciary standards apply at the same time because coverage demand becomes less tied to cryptocurrency price cycles.

Escalating Crypto Crime Losses Reinforce Structural Insurance Need

The value stolen from cryptocurrency services reached USD 3.4 billion in 2025, and North Korean state-sponsored actors were responsible for at least USD 2.02 billion of that amount. The same source reported that these actors accounted for 76% of service compromises, which highlights the concentration of major loss events. Only 4.2% of hacked assets were recovered in the first half of 2025, increasing the importance of first-party financial protection when recovery efforts fail. Smart-contract incidents require blockchain forensics, code review, and on-chain evidence, which differ from conventional cyber claims work. CertiK recorded USD 3.35 billion in losses across 760 on-chain incidents in 2025, a 37.1% increase from 2024. These events support demand in the Crypto Insurance Market but also make underwriters cautious about pricing, accumulation, and available limits.

Data Scarcity Constrains Actuarial Confidence

The short history of digital assets limits the availability of stable loss data for underwriting. AM Best stated in 2025 that meaningful crypto-asset loss data remained scarce because of the sector’s short operating history and prior reliance on self-insurance. Large losses also make forecasting difficult because they can distort historical averages and severity assumptions. The USD 1.5 billion Bybit incident was more than 1,000 times the median incident value, according to Chainalysis. Immunefi documented 191 publicly reported incidents across 2024 and 2025, totaling USD 4.67 billion. Until insurers gain a longer record of structured claims, the crypto insurance market is likely to face constrained capacity and higher premiums in several coverage lines.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:
  • DeFi and Tokenized Asset Expansion Creates a New Coverage Frontier
  • Embedded Insurance Integration Reduces Friction and Broadens Penetration
  • Structural Underwriting Capacity Gap Limits Market Scaling

Segment Analysis

Crime, fidelity, and specie insurance accounted for 42.4% of the crypto insurance market share in 2025. The segment remains the primary cover for institutional custodians, exchanges, and treasury operations that need protection against theft, employee dishonesty, and physical loss. Cold-storage crime cover has drawn more participation from Lloyd’s syndicates because the control environment is easier to assess than hot-wallet exposure. Hot-wallet coverage carries higher premium loading and tighter security requirements because it faces more frequent operational and cyber threats. Mosaic Insurance launched a combined cyber and financial institutions crime product through Lloyd’s Syndicate 1609, offering up to USD 10 million in cyber and technology capacity and USD 5 million in crime capacity. The product reflects the need for integrated cover where a loss can involve both technology failure and financial crime.

Cyber liability and technology errors and omissions insurance is projected to grow at a 29.1% CAGR between 2026 and 2031. MiCA, DORA, and the FCA’s cryptoasset regime are increasing attention to operational resilience and technology liability among licensed entities. These requirements are broadening demand for coverage related to security failures, technology errors, and service interruption. Digital-asset custody and crime insurance, smart-contract and protocol cover, stablecoin and DeFi financial-risk insurance, professional liability, and infrastructure protection remain part of the wider coverage mix. MiCA Article 67 allows crypto-asset service providers to use a qualified insurance policy as an alternative to holding certain financial resources, which directly supports liability coverage demand in the European Union. The crypto insurance market size therefore continues to combine established custody protection with newer policy forms for regulated technology risk.

Traditional centralized and regulated insurance captured 68.3% of the crypto insurance market share in 2025. Lloyd’s syndicates and specialist admitted carriers led institutional placements because regulated exchanges and institutional investors often require rated coverage. Their position also reflects greater capacity, established claims processes, and acceptance within formal compliance programs. Decentralized protocols cannot yet meet all carrier eligibility requirements in most jurisdictions. Native Risk Collective, launched in July 2025, linked premium discounts to verified security controls and brought together Mosaic Insurance, Chaucer, and security technology vendors. The program shows how traditional capacity is using technical controls to improve underwriting confidence.

Decentralized and on-chain mutual and cover protocols are projected to grow at a 36.3% CAGR between 2026 and 2031. These models use smart-contract pooling and community governance to address risks that can fall outside conventional policy wording. Nexus Mutual integrated with Symbiotic in 2025 to create a yield-generating reinsurance layer backed by restaking capital. The arrangement can increase effective capacity without relying solely on dedicated idle reserves. Hybrid and alternative risk-sharing models remain relevant where buyers need both regulated coverage and on-chain risk transfer. Research in the Journal of Banking and Finance supports the role of DeFi insurance where basis risk and default risk remain moderate. The crypto insurance market size is therefore expected to benefit from the gradual adoption of both regulated and on-chain risk-transfer models.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Coverage Type
    • Crime, Fidelity & Specie Insurance
    • Cyber Liability & Technology Errors & Omissions
    • Professional and Liability Insurance
    • Property & Hardware Insurance
    • Other Specialty & Hybrid Covers
  • By Insurance Model
    • Traditional Centralized/Regulated Insurance
    • Hybrid & Alternative Risk-Transfer Models
    • Decentralized/On-Chain Mutual & Cover Protocols
  • By Distribution Channel
    • Direct Distribution
    • Brokers and Specialty Intermediaries
    • Embedded/Platform Distribution
    • Digital Insurance Marketplaces & Online Channels
  • By End User
    • Centralized Exchanges & Trading Platforms
    • Qualified Custodians & Digital-Asset Wallet/Custody Providers
    • DeFi Protocols & Decentralized/Web3 Organisations
    • Institutional Investors and Asset Managers
    • Other Digital-Asset Businesses
    • Retail Investors
  • By Insured Asset/Exposure
    • Cryptocurrencies
    • Stablecoins
    • Other Fungible Tokens & Tokenized Assets
    • Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs)
    • Digital-Asset Infrastructure & Related Operational Exposures
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • United Kingdom
      • Germany
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Indonesia
      • Thailand
      • Malaysia
      • Singapore
      • Vietnam
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Turkey
      • South Africa
      • Egypt
      • Rest of Middle East and Africa

Geography Analysis

North America held 41.1% of the crypto insurance market share in 2025. The region benefits from a concentration of institutional digital-asset capital, registered investment advisers, specialist underwriters, and excess and surplus market capacity. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act was passed by the United States House in 2025 and sought to define SEC and CFTC responsibilities across digital assets. The GENIUS Act also provided a stablecoin framework that reduced uncertainty around reserve standards and disclosures. Canada’s position on crypto exchange-traded funds and exchange registration, together with Mexico’s growing retail activity, adds to regional demand. North America’s advantage also reflects the depth of specialist managing general agents and co-insurance structures that can assemble larger single-risk limits. This depth allows carriers to share larger placements without depending on one balance sheet. The regional structure gives established buyers greater access to specialist underwriting than many other markets.

Europe was the second-largest regional market in 2025. MiCA has been fully effective since December 2024 and has reshaped how insurers engage with regulated crypto-asset service providers. Article 67 allows eligible insurance coverage to support financial-resource requirements across the 27 European Union member states. DORA applied from January 17, 2025, adding operational-resilience requirements that increasingly influence insurance renewal discussions. The United Kingdom remains outside MiCA but contributes capacity through Lloyd’s of London and the FCA’s developing cryptoasset framework. Germany, France, and the Benelux countries are important demand centers as providers complete MiCA authorization and integrate coverage into their operating requirements.

Asia-Pacific is projected to grow at a 29.8% CAGR between 2026 and 2031. Singapore, Hong Kong, and Australia are supporting growth through licensing, institutional inflows, and high digital-asset transaction activity. Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission issued its A-S-P-I-Re roadmap in 2025, expanding the range of regulated virtual-asset activities and encouraging formal insurance arrangements. Singapore activated its Digital Token Service Provider framework on June 30, 2025, requiring offshore providers to obtain licenses and comply with anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing rules. Canopius selected Hong Kong-based MGA Qubit as its first Lloyd’s Coverholder in Asia-Pacific in February 2025, helping build regional distribution for custody and crime products. The Middle East, South Africa, and South America remain smaller opportunity areas, with the UAE, Brazil, and other active markets generating demand for custody and liability coverage.


List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • Chubb Limited
  • Munich Re
  • Evertas
  • Marsh McLennan
  • Aon plc
  • Arch Insurance Group
  • Lloyd's of London
  • AXA XL
  • Beazley
  • Canopius
  • Tokio Marine HCC
  • Coincover
  • Nexus Mutual
  • Relm Insurance
  • InsurAce
  • Etherisc
  • Bridge Mutual
  • Neptune Mutual
  • OpenCover
  • Nayms

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Growing Institutional Adoption and Investment in Digital Assets
4.2.2 Rising Demand for Custody, Exchange, and Digital-Asset Liability Coverage
4.2.3 Expansion of DeFi and Tokenized Assets Increasing Insurable Risk Exposure
4.2.4 Increasing Incidence of Crypto Theft, Cyberattacks, and Smart-Contract Exploits
4.2.5 Integration of Embedded Insurance Across Digital-Asset Platforms
4.2.6 Improving Crypto Risk Analytics and Specialist Underwriting Capabilities
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Limited Historical Loss Data and High Risk-Modelling Uncertainty
4.3.2 Limited Underwriting Capacity for High-Risk Crypto Exposures
4.3.3 High Premium Costs and Restrictive Coverage Terms
4.3.4 Broad Coverage Exclusions for Market Losses, User Error, and Systemic Failures
4.4 Value and Supply-Chain Analysis
4.5 Value Chain and Ecosystem Analysis
4.5.1 Risk Originators and Insured Entities
4.5.2 Brokers, MGAs, Insurers, and Reinsurers
4.5.3 Underwriting, Risk Assessment, and Claims Management
4.6 Regulatory Landscape
4.6.1 European Union: MiCA and DORA
4.6.2 United States: Digital-Asset and Stablecoin Regulation
4.6.3 United Kingdom: FCA Cryptoasset Regulatory Framework
4.6.4 Asia: Hong Kong SFC and Singapore MAS Frameworks
4.6.5 United Arab Emirates: VARA Regulatory Framework
4.6.6 Global Standards: FATF AML/CFT and OECD CARF
4.7 Technology and Risk Management Outlook
4.7.1 Digital-Asset Custody and Security Infrastructure
4.7.2 Smart-Contract and Protocol Risk Assessment
4.7.3 Blockchain Analytics and On-Chain Monitoring
4.7.4 Automated and Smart-Contract-Based Claims Settlement
4.8 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.8.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.8.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.8.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS
5.1 By Coverage Type
5.1.1 Crime, Fidelity & Specie Insurance
5.1.2 Cyber Liability & Technology Errors & Omissions
5.1.3 Professional and Liability Insurance
5.1.4 Property & Hardware Insurance
5.1.5 Other Specialty & Hybrid Covers
5.2 By Insurance Model
5.2.1 Traditional Centralized/Regulated Insurance
5.2.2 Hybrid & Alternative Risk-Transfer Models
5.2.3 Decentralized/On-Chain Mutual & Cover Protocols
5.3 By Distribution Channel
5.3.1 Direct Distribution
5.3.2 Brokers and Specialty Intermediaries
5.3.3 Embedded/Platform Distribution
5.3.4 Digital Insurance Marketplaces & Online Channels
5.4 By End User
5.4.1 Centralized Exchanges & Trading Platforms
5.4.2 Qualified Custodians & Digital-Asset Wallet/Custody Providers
5.4.3 DeFi Protocols & Decentralized/Web3 Organisations
5.4.4 Institutional Investors and Asset Managers
5.4.5 Other Digital-Asset Businesses
5.4.6 Retail Investors
5.5 By Insured Asset/Exposure
5.5.1 Cryptocurrencies
5.5.2 Stablecoins
5.5.3 Other Fungible Tokens & Tokenized Assets
5.5.4 Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs)
5.5.5 Digital-Asset Infrastructure & Related Operational Exposures
5.6 By Geography
5.6.1 North America
5.6.1.1 United States
5.6.1.2 Canada
5.6.1.3 Mexico
5.6.2 South America
5.6.2.1 Brazil
5.6.2.2 Argentina
5.6.2.3 Rest of South America
5.6.3 Europe
5.6.3.1 United Kingdom
5.6.3.2 Germany
5.6.3.3 France
5.6.3.4 Italy
5.6.3.5 Spain
5.6.3.6 Rest of Europe
5.6.4 Asia-Pacific
5.6.4.1 China
5.6.4.2 Japan
5.6.4.3 India
5.6.4.4 South Korea
5.6.4.5 Australia
5.6.4.6 Indonesia
5.6.4.7 Thailand
5.6.4.8 Malaysia
5.6.4.9 Singapore
5.6.4.10 Vietnam
5.6.4.11 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.6.5 Middle East and Africa
5.6.5.1 Saudi Arabia
5.6.5.2 United Arab Emirates
5.6.5.3 Turkey
5.6.5.4 South Africa
5.6.5.5 Egypt
5.6.5.6 Rest of Middle East and Africa
6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis (Top 5-6 players)
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
6.4.1 Chubb Limited
6.4.2 Munich Re
6.4.3 Evertas
6.4.4 Marsh McLennan
6.4.5 Aon plc
6.4.6 Arch Insurance Group
6.4.7 Lloyd's of London
6.4.8 AXA XL
6.4.9 Beazley
6.4.10 Canopius
6.4.11 Tokio Marine HCC
6.4.12 Coincover
6.4.13 Nexus Mutual
6.4.14 Relm Insurance
6.4.15 InsurAce
6.4.16 Etherisc
6.4.17 Bridge Mutual
6.4.18 Neptune Mutual
6.4.19 OpenCover
6.4.20 Nayms
7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment
7.1.1 Hot-Wallet and Cross-Chain Capacity Gap
7.1.2 Coverage for Staking, Bridges, Oracles, and Governance
7.1.3 Insurance for Tokenized-Asset and Stablecoin Infrastructure
7.1.4 Retail and SME Distribution Gap
7.1.5 Claims Automation and Transparent Proof of Insurance

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Chubb Limited
  • Munich Re
  • Evertas
  • Marsh McLennan
  • Aon plc
  • Arch Insurance Group
  • Lloyd's of London
  • AXA XL
  • Beazley
  • Canopius
  • Tokio Marine HCC
  • Coincover
  • Nexus Mutual
  • Relm Insurance
  • InsurAce
  • Etherisc
  • Bridge Mutual
  • Neptune Mutual
  • OpenCover
  • Nayms