+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Arsenic Removal Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 196 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 6015180
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

Senior industry leaders are confronting fast-evolving regulatory demands and increasing expectations for sustainable water treatment solutions. In this landscape, the arsenic removal market is undergoing significant shifts as organizations pivot to advanced, efficient technologies and adaptive sourcing strategies that address both compliance challenges and operational efficiencies.

Market Snapshot: Arsenic Removal Market Growth and Strategic Context

The arsenic removal market grew from USD 104.20 million in 2024 to USD 110.46 million in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 167.42 million by 2032, advancing at a CAGR of 6.10%. This strong growth is underpinned by intensifying regulatory scrutiny, heightened water quality standards, and increasing incidences of arsenic contamination globally. Factors influencing the market include technological innovation, evolving supply chains, and diversified regional adoption influenced by local resource conditions and regulatory landscapes.

Scope & Segmentation: Comprehensive Market Coverage

  • Technology: Adsorption (Activated Alumina, Biomass, Ion Exchange Resin, Iron Oxide), Biological Treatment (Aerobic, Anaerobic), Coagulation Precipitation (Alum, Ferric Chloride, Ferric Sulfate, Poly Aluminum Chloride), Ion Exchange (Non Regenerable Resins, Regenerable Resins), Membrane Filtration (Nano Filtration, Reverse Osmosis, Ultra Filtration), and Oxidation (Chlorination, Hydrogen Peroxide, Ozonation, Permanganate).
  • End Use Industry: Industrial Water (Electronics, Mining, Oil and Gas, Pharmaceuticals, Textiles), Municipal Water, Residential Water.
  • System Scale: Centralized, Decentralized, Point Of Entry (Whole Building, Whole House), Point Of Use (Countertop, Faucet Mounted, Under Sink).
  • Operation Mode: Batch, Continuous Flow.
  • Regional Coverage: Americas (United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Peru), Europe (United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Sweden, Poland, Switzerland), Middle East (United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Israel), Africa (South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt, Kenya), Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan).
  • Key Companies: Veolia Environnement S.A., Suez S.A., Xylem Inc., Ecolab Inc., Pentair plc, Evoqua Water Technologies Corp., Kurita Water Industries Ltd., Calgon Carbon Corporation, Lanxess AG, BWT AG.

Key Takeaways: Strategic Insights for Senior Decision-Makers

  • The arsenic removal market is in a phase of rapid innovation, with adsorbent and membrane-based systems offering higher efficiency and sustainability.
  • Collaboration between technology vendors, research bodies, and end users is accelerating commercialization and promoting resilient solutions in diverse settings.
  • Operators are increasingly moving toward modular and decentralized treatment systems, making arsenic remediation more accessible in underserved and remote regions.
  • Sustainability imperatives are shaping procurement and technology adoption, with organizations prioritizing regenerable and low-waste materials to meet environmental goals.
  • Customized solutions are essential as each sector—industrial, municipal, and residential—faces distinct influent characteristics and regulatory benchmarks. Effective alignment of technology with operational priorities optimizes long-term value and compliance.

Tariff Impact Across the Arsenic Removal Market

The introduction of United States tariffs on essential chemicals and equipment, such as ferric chloride, coagulants, specialized resins, and membrane modules, has significantly altered supply chains and cost structures. These policy shifts have prompted many treatment providers to seek regional or nearshore suppliers and negotiate long-term agreements to secure component availability. Adoption of modular, locally sourced systems has grown as stakeholders seek to reduce tariff exposure and boost supply chain resilience.

Methodology & Data Sources

This report is based on a rigorous methodology blending primary interviews with water treatment engineers, regulators, and developers, along with an extensive review of secondary sources such as industry journals and white papers. Data triangulation and peer review ensure both analytical accuracy and actionable insights.

Why This Report Matters: Actionable Value for Stakeholders

  • Guides senior leaders in making informed technology selection and sourcing decisions in response to regulatory, operational, and tariff-driven disruptions.
  • Equips organizations with strategic recommendations for adopting hybrid, resilient, and sustainable arsenic removal systems that address evolving market standards.

Conclusion

This analysis provides a strategic framework for advancing arsenic removal operations amid regulatory and technological disruption. Stakeholders can leverage these insights to drive innovation, ensure compliance, and capture new market opportunities.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Integration of AI-powered real time monitoring and predictive maintenance in arsenic removal systems to optimize performance
5.2. Development of novel biochar adsorbents derived from agricultural waste for high efficiency arsenic remediation in groundwater
5.3. Expansion of point-of-use arsenic removal devices with smartphone connectivity for data logging in rural communities
5.4. Rise of hybrid membrane adsorption technologies combining nanofiltration and iron oxide coatings for enhanced arsenic removal
5.5. Adoption of decentralized solar powered arsenic removal units to address remote village water contamination challenges
5.6. Implementation of membrane distillation processes using low grade heat sources for sustainable arsenic separation in industrial effluents
5.7. Regulatory harmonization efforts across borders to standardize arsenic maximum contaminant levels and testing protocols in water supplies
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Arsenic Removal Market, by Technology
8.1. Adsorption
8.1.1. Activated Alumina
8.1.2. Biomass
8.1.3. Ion Exchange Resin
8.1.4. Iron Oxide
8.2. Biological Treatment
8.2.1. Aerobic
8.2.2. Anaerobic
8.3. Coagulation Precipitation
8.3.1. Alum
8.3.2. Ferric Chloride
8.3.3. Ferric Sulfate
8.3.4. Poly Aluminum Chloride
8.4. Ion Exchange
8.4.1. Non Regenerable Resins
8.4.2. Regenerable Resins
8.5. Membrane Filtration
8.5.1. Nano Filtration
8.5.2. Reverse Osmosis
8.5.3. Ultra Filtration
8.6. Oxidation
8.6.1. Chlorination
8.6.2. Hydrogen Peroxide
8.6.3. Ozonation
8.6.4. Permanganate
9. Arsenic Removal Market, by End Use Industry
9.1. Industrial Water
9.1.1. Electronics
9.1.2. Mining
9.1.3. Oil Gas
9.1.4. Pharmaceuticals
9.1.5. Textiles
9.2. Municipal Water
9.3. Residential Water
10. Arsenic Removal Market, by System Scale
10.1. Central Systems
10.1.1. Centralized
10.1.2. Decentralized
10.2. Point Of Entry
10.2.1. Whole Building
10.2.2. Whole House
10.3. Point Of Use
10.3.1. Countertop
10.3.2. Faucet Mounted
10.3.3. Under Sink
11. Arsenic Removal Market, by Operation Mode
11.1. Batch
11.2. Continuous Flow
12. Arsenic Removal Market, by Region
12.1. Americas
12.1.1. North America
12.1.2. Latin America
12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
12.2.1. Europe
12.2.2. Middle East
12.2.3. Africa
12.3. Asia-Pacific
13. Arsenic Removal Market, by Group
13.1. ASEAN
13.2. GCC
13.3. European Union
13.4. BRICS
13.5. G7
13.6. NATO
14. Arsenic Removal Market, by Country
14.1. United States
14.2. Canada
14.3. Mexico
14.4. Brazil
14.5. United Kingdom
14.6. Germany
14.7. France
14.8. Russia
14.9. Italy
14.10. Spain
14.11. China
14.12. India
14.13. Japan
14.14. Australia
14.15. South Korea
15. Competitive Landscape
15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
15.3. Competitive Analysis
15.3.1. Veolia Environnement S.A.
15.3.2. Suez S.A.
15.3.3. Xylem Inc.
15.3.4. Ecolab Inc.
15.3.5. Pentair plc
15.3.6. Evoqua Water Technologies Corp.
15.3.7. Kurita Water Industries Ltd.
15.3.8. Calgon Carbon Corporation
15.3.9. Lanxess AG
15.3.10. BWT AG

Samples

Loading
LOADING...

Companies Mentioned

The key companies profiled in this Arsenic Removal market report include:
  • Veolia Environnement S.A.
  • Suez S.A.
  • Xylem Inc.
  • Ecolab Inc.
  • Pentair plc
  • Evoqua Water Technologies Corp.
  • Kurita Water Industries Ltd.
  • Calgon Carbon Corporation
  • Lanxess AG
  • BWT AG

Table Information