+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Surgical Incision Closures Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 184 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5889351
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The surgical incision closures market is undergoing rapid transformation as healthcare providers seek advanced closure solutions that streamline workflow and deliver safe patient outcomes.

Market Snapshot: Surgical Incision Closures Market

The global surgical incision closures market achieved a valuation of USD 16.74 billion in 2024, with projections estimating an increase to USD 17.94 billion in 2025. This progress corresponds to a CAGR of 7.04%. Key growth drivers include continuous investment in closure technology, the rising adoption of innovative systems across key healthcare settings, and the push for solutions aligned with evolving care models. Enhanced use of biomaterials, mechanical closure systems, and medical adhesives is shifting procurement priorities and clinical protocols, encouraging organizations to modernize and respond to new standards in surgical care.

Scope & Segmentation

This report delivers strategic market intelligence valuable for leaders in procurement, technology evaluation, and clinical application of surgical closure devices. Key areas of segmentation are:

  • Product Type: Assessment covers hemostatic agents, staple systems, absorbable and non-absorbable sutures, advanced adhesives (including cyanoacrylate, fibrin sealants, and polyethylene glycol). Insights focus on product compatibility with established workflows and their potential to support optimal recovery for patients across diverse surgical procedures.
  • End User: Analysis of trends and operational requirements within hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, multispecialty clinics, and the expanding home care sector. This includes particular attention to varying compliance obligations and the operational needs of each care setting.
  • Application: Comparison of closure devices suited for internal and external use, including those adapted to minimally invasive and traditional open surgeries. The segment highlights operational implications for procurement and clinical integration.
  • Indication: Review of closure technologies addressing the needs of cardiovascular, general, gynecological, neurosurgical, orthopedic, and pediatric surgeries. Special consideration is given to unique specialty requirements and technical complexities inherent to different procedures.
  • Wound Type: Overview of products designed for clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, and dirty wounds. Emphasis is placed on supporting clinicians in risk-adjusted decision-making to address a variety of clinical scenarios while optimizing recovery outcomes.
  • Regional Coverage: Examination of market and procurement dynamics in the Americas, Europe, Middle East and Africa, and Asia-Pacific. Analysis highlights variations in regulatory landscapes, supply chain robustness, and how localized needs influence decision-making for organizations aiming to balance cost, compliance, and patient care.
  • Key Companies: Profiles of major industry leaders, including Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic plc, 3M Company, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Smith & Nephew plc, Baxter International Inc., Teleflex Incorporated, Integra LifeSciences, Coloplast A/S, and Terumo Corporation. The section assesses corporate strategies and the impact of collaboration in enhancing competitive positioning.

Key Takeaways for Senior Decision-Makers

  • Integration of digital solutions and next-generation biomaterials improves procedural consistency, supporting effective care transitions across varied surgical settings.
  • Growth in ambulatory and outpatient procedures intensifies demand for intuitive closure technologies, resulting in greater operational efficiency and improved patient experiences.
  • The advancement of sutureless closures and sophisticated adhesives expands options for protocol modernization and meets the requirements of minimally invasive interventions.
  • Broader device portfolios enable procurement teams to address patient diversity and specialty care needs, reinforcing alignment with evolving institutional strategies.
  • Diversified sourcing strategies and stronger supplier partnerships have become essential for minimizing supply risks and responding adaptively to changes in trade policy or market conditions.

Tariff Impact and Supply Chain Adaptations

Recent U.S. tariff policies affecting imported surgical closure devices have influenced procurement teams to explore regional manufacturing and forge closer alliances with purchasing consortia. These responses are strengthening supply chain resilience and averting potential disruptions due to shifts in trade or logistics environments.

Methodology & Data Sources

This report's conclusions are founded on direct interviews with surgical leaders, procurement executives, and clinical R&D specialists. These qualitative insights are corroborated by peer-reviewed research and formal regulatory documents, ensuring findings reflect real-world operational and clinical practices.

Why This Report Matters

  • Enables executives to refine procurement and sourcing decisions for surgical devices, supporting consistency and value across different care sites.
  • Provides robust guidance for clinical and supply chain professionals coping with regulatory shifts and reimbursement planning requirements.
  • Supports evidence-driven adoption of technologies that reinforce efficiency and maintain care standards in surgical departments.

Conclusion

Advancements in surgical closure technologies, together with adaptive sourcing and cohesive supplier relationships, prepare organizations to respond strategically to shifting requirements. Solid market intelligence remains critical for teams aligning procurement with organizational and patient care goals.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Rising adoption of antimicrobial suture coatings to reduce postoperative infection rates
5.2. Integration of smart wound monitoring devices with suture lines for real-time healing data
5.3. Growth in demand for barbed sutures enabling knotless tissue approximation in minimally invasive surgeries
5.4. Advancements in biodegradable polymer-based closures for improved patient wound healing outcomes
5.5. Expansion of robotic-assisted suture placement techniques increasing precision in complex procedures
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Surgical Incision Closures Market, by Product Type
8.1. Hemostats
8.1.1. Absorbable Gelatin Sponges
8.1.2. Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose
8.1.3. Thrombin Based
8.2. Staples
8.2.1. Manual
8.2.2. Powered
8.3. Sutures
8.3.1. Absorbable
8.3.1.1. Poliglecaprone
8.3.1.2. Polydioxanone
8.3.1.3. Polyglycolic Acid
8.3.2. Non Absorbable
8.3.2.1. Nylon
8.3.2.2. Polypropylene
8.3.2.3. Silk
8.4. Tissue Adhesives
8.4.1. Cyanoacrylate Adhesives
8.4.2. Fibrin Sealants
8.4.3. Polyethylene Glycol Sealants
9. Surgical Incision Closures Market, by End User
9.1. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
9.2. Clinics
9.2.1. Multi Specialty
9.2.2. Single Specialty
9.3. Home Care
9.4. Hospitals
9.4.1. Private
9.4.2. Public
10. Surgical Incision Closures Market, by Application
10.1. External
10.2. Internal
11. Surgical Incision Closures Market, by Indication
11.1. Cardiovascular
11.2. General Surgery
11.3. Gynecology
11.4. Neurosurgery
11.5. Orthopedic
11.6. Pediatric
12. Surgical Incision Closures Market, by Wound Type
12.1. Clean
12.2. Clean Contaminated
12.3. Contaminated
12.4. Dirty
13. Surgical Incision Closures Market, by Region
13.1. Americas
13.1.1. North America
13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
13.2.1. Europe
13.2.2. Middle East
13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific
14. Surgical Incision Closures Market, by Group
14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO
15. Surgical Incision Closures Market, by Country
15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea
16. Competitive Landscape
16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
16.3. Competitive Analysis
16.3.1. Johnson & Johnson
16.3.2. Medtronic plc
16.3.3. 3M Company
16.3.4. B. Braun Melsungen AG
16.3.5. Smith & Nephew plc
16.3.6. Baxter International Inc.
16.3.7. Teleflex Incorporated
16.3.8. Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation
16.3.9. Coloplast A/S
16.3.10. Terumo Corporation

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this Surgical Incision Closures market report include:
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Medtronic plc
  • 3M Company
  • B. Braun Melsungen AG
  • Smith & Nephew plc
  • Baxter International Inc.
  • Teleflex Incorporated
  • Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation
  • Coloplast A/S
  • Terumo Corporation

Table Information