+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

PRINTER FRIENDLY

Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Report Suite | US | 2019-2025

  • ID: 4876621
  • Report
  • June 2019
  • Region: United States
  • 309 Pages
  • iData Research
1 of 3

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • ACTEON Group
  • Apiary Medical
  • Camber Spine
  • CoreLink Surgical
  • GS Medical
  • Joimax
  • MORE
Overall, the U.S. minimally invasive spinal implants market was valued at $1.8 billion in 2018. This is expected to increase over the forecast period at a CAGR of 3.3% to reach $2.26 billion by 2025.

The full report suite on the U.S. market for spinal implants and VCF includes segments for traditional cervical and thoracolumbar fixation devices, interbody devices, motion preservation devices, vertebral compression fracture (VCF) treatment, spinal electrical stimulation and spinal instrumentation.
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
2 of 3

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • ACTEON Group
  • Apiary Medical
  • Camber Spine
  • CoreLink Surgical
  • GS Medical
  • Joimax
  • MORE
TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF CHARTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

U.S. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
MARKET TRENDS
MARKET DEVELOPMENTS
PROCEDURE NUMBERS
PROCEDURE CODES INVESTIGATED
MARKETS INCLUDED
VERSION HISTORY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring

2. DISEASE OVERVIEW

2.1 INTRODUCTION
2.1.1 Degenerative Disc Disease
2.1.1.1 Disc Herniation
2.1.1.2 Stenosis
2.1.1.3 Spondyloisthesis
2.1.1.4 Arthritis
2.1.2 Spinal Deformities
2.1.2.1 Scoliosis
2.1.2.2 Kyphosis and Lordosis
2.1.3 Trauma and Tumor
2.1.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures
2.1.4.1 Osteoporosis
2.1.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures

3. PRODUCT ASSESSMENT

3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.2 PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS
3.2.1 Cervical Fixation
3.2.1.1 Anterior Cervical Fixation
3.2.1.1.1 Constrained
3.2.1.1.2 Semi-Constrained
3.2.1.1.3 Dynamic
3.2.1.1.4 Bioresorbable
3.2.1.2 Posterior Cervical Fixation
3.2.2 Thoracolumbar Fixation
3.2.2.1 Traditional Systems
3.2.2.2 Minimally Invasive Systems
3.2.3 Interbody Devices
3.2.3.1 Approaches
3.2.3.1.1 ALIF
3.2.3.1.2 PLIF
3.2.3.1.3 TLIF
3.2.3.1.4 Minimally Invasive PLIF
3.2.3.1.5 Minimally Invasive TLIF
3.2.3.1.6 LLIF
3.2.3.1.7 OLIF
3.2.3.1.8 Cervical
3.2.3.1.9 VBR/Corpectomy
3.2.3.2 Materials
3.2.3.2.1 Metal
3.2.3.2.2 PEEK
3.2.3.2.3 Machined Bone Allograft
3.2.4 Motion Preservation Devices
3.2.4.1.1 Artificial Discs
3.2.4.1.2 Dynamic Stabilization
3.2.4.1.3 Nucleus Replacement
3.2.4.1.4 Facet Arthroplasty
3.2.5 Spinous Process Fixation
3.2.6 Facet Fixation
3.2.7 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
3.2.8 Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices
3.2.8.1.1 Percutaneous Vertebroplasty
3.2.8.1.2 Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Including Kyphoplasty
3.2.9 Spine Endoscopes
3.2.10 Spinal Electrical Stimulation Devices
3.3 PRODUCT PIPELINES
3.3.1 Nexxt Spine
3.3.1.1 SAXXONY™ Posterior Cervical Thoracic System
3.3.1.2 NEXXT MATRIXX™ Cervical Interbody/VBR System
3.3.2 NLT Spine/SeaSpine
3.3.2.1 PROW FUSION-V™ - Expandable Intervertebral Fusion Device
3.3.2.2 PROW FUSION-L™ - Lateral Intervertebral Fusion Device
3.3.2.3 SIJ- Expandable Screw
3.3.3 SpineArt
3.3.3.1 PERLA®
3.3.3.2 OTELO®LL
3.3.4 SpineFrontier
3.3.4.1 SIJ-Fuse Rod
3.3.4.2 SIJ-Fuse Screw
3.3.4.3 VBR
3.3.4.4 PedFuse Rely
3.3.4.5 LESplasty
3.3.4.6 Expanding P-LIFT
3.4 DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
3.4.1 3D Printed Implants
3.4.2 Endoscopic Spine Surgery
3.4.3 Metallurgy/Alloy of Instrumentation
3.4.4 Nanotechnology Use in Spinal Implants
3.4.5 Operating Room Automation and Connectivity
3.5 FDA RECALLS
3.5.1 Alphatec Spine
3.5.2 Amedica
3.5.3 Back 2 Basics Direct
3.5.4 DePuy Synthes
3.5.5 Innovasis
3.5.6 Interventional Spine
3.5.7 Kiscomedica
3.5.8 Medacta
3.5.9 Medtronic
3.5.10 Neuropro Spinal Jaxx
3.5.11 Orthofix
3.5.12 OrthoPediatrics Corp
3.5.13 SpineArt
3.5.14 Stryker
3.5.15 Ulrich Medical USA Inc
3.5.16 XTANT MEDICAL INC
3.5.17 Zimmer Biomet
3.6 CLINICAL TRIALS
3.6.1 DePuy Synthes
3.6.2 Duke University
3.6.3 Globus Medical
3.6.4 Hamilton Health Sciences
3.6.5 K2M (Stryker)
3.6.6 Medtronic
3.6.7 Nexxt Spine
3.6.8 RTI Surgical
3.6.9 Stryker
3.6.10 Orthofix
3.6.11 Premia Spine
3.6.12 Zimmer Biomet

4. U.S. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW

4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.1.1 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion
4.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
4.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
4.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
4.1.1.4 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
4.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery Pedicle Screws
4.1.2.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
4.1.2.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems
4.1.3 Spinous Process Fixation
4.1.4 Facet Fixation
4.1.5 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
4.1.6 MIS Spine Endoscopes
4.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
4.3 TREND ANALYSIS BY SEGMENT
4.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
4.4.1 Market Drivers
4.4.2 Market Limiters
4.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
4.6 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
4.7 COMPANY PROFILES
4.7.1 Aesculap (B. Braun)
4.7.2 Alphatec Spine
4.7.3 CTL Amedica (SINTX Technologies, Inc.)
4.7.4 DePuy Synthes
4.7.5 DJO Global
4.7.6 Globus Medical
4.7.7 K2M (Stryker)
4.7.8 Medtronic
4.7.9 NuVasive
4.7.10 Orthofix
4.7.11 SI-BONE
4.7.12 Stryker
4.7.13 Zimmer Biomet
4.8 SWOT ANALYSIS
4.8.1 Aesculap (B. Braun)
4.8.2 Alphatec Spine
4.8.3 CTL Amedica (SINTX Technologies, Inc.)
4.8.4 DePuy Synthes
4.8.5 DJO Global
4.8.6 Globus Medical
4.8.7 Medtronic
4.8.8 NuVasive
4.8.9 Orthofix
4.8.10 SI-BONE
4.8.11 Stryker
4.8.12 Zimmer Biomet

5. PROCEDURE NUMBERS

5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 PROCEDURES
5.2.1 Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures
5.2.2 MIS Interbody Device Procedures
5.2.2.1 Total MIS Interbody Device Procedures
5.2.2.1.1 Total Levels Treated by MIS Interbody Device
5.2.2.2 MIPLIF Procedures
5.2.2.3 MITLIF Procedures
5.2.2.4 LLIF Procedures
5.2.2.5 OLIF Procedures
5.2.3 MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures
5.2.3.1 Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures
5.2.3.1.1 Total Levels Treated by MIS Pedicle Screw
5.2.3.2 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures
5.2.3.3 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures
5.2.3.4 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures
5.2.4 Spinous Process Fixation Procedures
5.2.5 Facet Fixation Procedures
5.2.6 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures
5.2.7 Spine Endoscope Procedures

6. MIS INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET

6.1 INTRODUCTION
6.1.1 Approach Types
6.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.4 Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.5 eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.6 Guided Lateral Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.7 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion
6.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
6.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
6.3.1 Total MIS Interbody Device Market
6.3.2 MIPLIF Market
6.3.3 MITLIF Market
6.3.4 LLIF Market
6.3.5 OLIF Market
6.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
6.4.1 Market Drivers
6.4.2 Market Limiters
6.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

7. MIS PEDICLE SCREW MARKET

7.1 INTRODUCTION
7.1.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
7.1.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems
7.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
7.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
7.3.1 Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market
7.3.2 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
7.3.3 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
7.3.4 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
7.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
7.4.1 Market Drivers
7.4.2 Market Limiters
7.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

8. SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET

8.1 INTRODUCTION
8.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
8.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
8.3.1 Market Drivers
8.3.2 Market Limiters
8.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

9. FACET FIXATION MARKET

9.1 INTRODUCTION
9.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
9.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
9.3.1 Market Drivers
9.3.2 Market Limiters
9.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

10. SI JOINT FUSION MARKET

10.1 INTRODUCTION
10.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
10.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
10.3.1 Market Drivers
10.3.2 Market Limiters
10.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

11. SPINE ENDOSCOPE MARKET

11.1 INTRODUCTION
11.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
11.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
11.3.1 Endoscope Market
11.3.2 Instrumentation Market
11.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
11.4.1 Market Drivers
11.4.2 Market Limiters
11.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

12. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL SURGERY INSTRUMENTATION MARKET

12.1 INTRODUCTION
12.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
12.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
12.3.1 Market Drivers
12.3.2 Market Limiters
12.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

13. ABBREVIATIONS
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
3 of 3

Loading
LOADING...

4 of 3
  • ACTEON Group
  • Aesculap
  • Alphatec Spine
  • Amedica
  • Apiary Medical
  • Atlas Spine
  • Aurora Spine
  • Boss Instruments
  • Camber Spine
  • Captiva Spine
  • Centinel Spine
  • Clariance
  • CoreLink Surgical
  • DePuy Synthes
  • Genesys Spine
  • Globus Medical
  • GS Medical
  • gSource
  • Innomed
  • Integra LifeSciences
  • Joimax
  • Karl Storz
  • Life Instruments
  • Life Spine
  • Medacta International
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
Adroll
adroll