+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 192 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 4904896
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

In-vitro diagnostics quality control plays a critical role in modern laboratory environments, directly affecting operational reliability and the accuracy of clinical decisions. Senior laboratory leaders turn to robust quality control strategies to ensure compliance, efficiency, and patient safety within evolving healthcare systems.

Market Snapshot: Growth Dynamics in In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control

The in-vitro diagnostics quality control market is experiencing steady expansion, bolstered by increasing expectations for precise laboratory outcomes and stricter global regulations. Laboratories are adopting automated testing platforms and advanced digital analytics to meet clinical demands efficiently. As both established and emerging markets prioritize process optimization, continuous technological innovation fuels further market development. These shifts highlight the need for laboratories to respond proactively to new regulatory standards and a more complex diagnostics landscape.

Scope & Segmentation: Defining the In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Landscape

  • Product Types: Laboratory analyzers and instruments—including automated and semi-automated systems—enable a range of throughput requirements. Quality control (QC) reagents, available in both liquid and lyophilized formats, support reliable test performance, while control materials and comprehensive software solutions such as laboratory information management systems (LIMS) and dedicated QC software streamline data management and reporting.
  • Technology Modalities: Clinical chemistry processes utilize colorimetric and turbidimetric techniques for precise analyte measurements. Hematology laboratories benefit from automated cell counters and flow cytometry, while immunoassays integrate chemiluminescence, ELISA, and fluorescence technologies for increased analytical scope. Microbiology applies both traditional culture-based procedures and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), with molecular diagnostics advancing through methods like next-generation sequencing and PCR to deliver broader testing capabilities at higher speeds.
  • Applications: Cardiology labs concentrate on cardiac marker and point-of-care testing, offering rapid results for acute care. Genetic testing enables carrier screening and supports prenatal diagnostics. Infectious disease applications address bacterial and viral identification needs, while oncology laboratories focus on minimal residual disease and tumor marker analysis. Toxicology spans both drugs of abuse testing and therapeutic drug monitoring.
  • End Users: National and regional blood banks emphasize volumetric controls for large-scale screening and stability management. Hospital-based and independent diagnostic laboratories look for integrated, high-throughput QC approaches to boost operational efficiency. Hospitals, clinics, and research institutes prioritize adaptable frameworks that accommodate ongoing regulatory changes and innovation-driven workflows.
  • Regions Covered: The Americas (North America, Latin America), Europe, Middle East & Africa (including Western and Eastern Europe, Middle East, Africa), and Asia-Pacific each exhibit distinct adoption rates, technology preferences, and investment patterns shaped by regional healthcare policies and laboratory infrastructure diversity.

Key Takeaways for Senior Decision-Makers

  • Automated quality control platforms are reshaping lab processes, minimizing manual errors and increasing testing throughput to meet growing clinical demands.
  • Digital data analytics and cloud-based management tools support real-time anomaly detection, enhanced result traceability, and seamless collaboration across multi-site laboratory networks.
  • Contemporary regulatory requirements are encouraging implementation of unified digital audit trails and standardized QC frameworks, raising overall compliance standards for laboratories.
  • The expanding use of point-of-care diagnostics encourages adoption of simplified workflows and versatile reagent solutions that uphold quality even with limited resources or expertise.
  • Strategic partnerships involving manufacturers, software integrators, and training providers enable tailored support aligned with unique regional and segment-specific challenges.
  • Custom quality control solutions for sectors such as oncology, infectious diseases, and genetic testing equip laboratories to respond nimbly to shifting clinical and operational expectations.

Impact of United States Tariffs on Quality Control Supply Chains

Recent tariff measures on imported reagents and instruments in the United States are requiring laboratories to evolve their supply chain strategies. Many are revising procurement terms and exploring local manufacturing alliances to lessen risk. These responses may lead to increased lead times and added inventory expenses, making process optimization essential to sustain consistent quality standards. Close coordination among distributors, regional suppliers, and laboratory managers is central to adapting to shifting supply chain and market conditions.

Methodology & Data Sources

This analysis draws on primary interviews with laboratory and quality assurance leaders, as well as a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed publications, regulatory texts, and leading industry white papers. Data triangulation was applied to integrate rigorous quantitative metrics with nuanced qualitative market perspectives.

Why This Report Matters for In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control

  • Provides robust benchmarking of procurement, automation, and compliance practices against industry leaders in the in-vitro diagnostics quality control sector.
  • Facilitates well-informed investment choices through detailed segmentation by product, application, and region, supporting effective planning in fast-changing regulatory contexts.
  • Prepares senior executives to address supply chain disruptions, embrace new technologies, and adapt organizational structures for market resilience.

Conclusion

In-vitro diagnostics quality control is advancing through new technologies, updated regulations, and evolving operational frameworks. Integrated approaches empower senior decision-makers to enhance laboratory reliability, control costs, and proactively address laboratory challenges.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Adoption of AI-driven image analysis for automated quality control in hematology testing
5.2. Implementation of blockchain enabled traceability for reagent lot management in diagnostics
5.3. Development of point-of-care molecular assays with integrated on device quality control metrics
5.4. Regulatory harmonization of quality standards for rapid antigen tests across emerging markets
5.5. Use of digital twin simulations for predicting system failures in automated immunoassay platforms
5.6. Standardization of multi analyte proficiency testing protocols in centralized clinical laboratories
5.7. Integration of IoT sensors for real time monitoring of pre analytic sample handling conditions
5.8. Advancements in lyophilized control materials for extended stability in remote diagnostic settings
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market, by Product Type
8.1. Analyzers & Instruments
8.1.1. Automated Systems
8.1.2. Semi-Automated Systems
8.2. Control Materials
8.3. QC Reagents
8.3.1. Liquid Controls
8.3.2. Lyophilized Controls
8.4. Software Solutions
8.4.1. Data Management Systems
8.4.2. LIMS
8.4.3. QC Software
9. In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market, by Technology
9.1. Clinical Chemistry
9.1.1. Colorimetric
9.1.2. Turbidimetric
9.2. Hematology
9.2.1. Automated Cell Counters
9.2.2. Flow Cytometry
9.3. Immunoassay
9.3.1. Chemiluminescence Immunoassay
9.3.2. ELISA
9.3.3. Fluorescence Immunoassay
9.4. Microbiology
9.4.1. Culture
9.4.2. PCR
9.5. Molecular Diagnostics
9.5.1. Next-Generation Sequencing
9.5.2. PCR
10. In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market, by Application
10.1. Cardiology
10.1.1. Cardiac Marker Testing
10.1.2. Point-Of-Care Testing
10.2. Genetic Testing
10.2.1. Carrier Screening
10.2.2. Prenatal Testing
10.3. Infectious Disease Testing
10.3.1. Bacterial Detection
10.3.2. Viral Detection
10.4. Oncology
10.4.1. Minimal Residual Disease
10.4.2. Tumor Marker Testing
10.5. Toxicology
10.5.1. Drugs Of Abuse
10.5.2. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
11. In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market, by End User
11.1. Blood Banks
11.1.1. National Blood Banks
11.1.2. Regional Blood Banks
11.2. Diagnostic Laboratories
11.2.1. Hospital-Based Laboratories
11.2.2. Independent Laboratories
11.3. Hospitals & Clinics
11.3.1. Clinic Laboratories
11.3.2. Reference Laboratories
11.4. Research Institutes
11.4.1. Academic Institutes
11.4.2. Private Research Laboratories
12. In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market, by Region
12.1. Americas
12.1.1. North America
12.1.2. Latin America
12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
12.2.1. Europe
12.2.2. Middle East
12.2.3. Africa
12.3. Asia-Pacific
13. In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market, by Group
13.1. ASEAN
13.2. GCC
13.3. European Union
13.4. BRICS
13.5. G7
13.6. NATO
14. In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control Market, by Country
14.1. United States
14.2. Canada
14.3. Mexico
14.4. Brazil
14.5. United Kingdom
14.6. Germany
14.7. France
14.8. Russia
14.9. Italy
14.10. Spain
14.11. China
14.12. India
14.13. Japan
14.14. Australia
14.15. South Korea
15. Competitive Landscape
15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
15.3. Competitive Analysis
15.3.1. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
15.3.2. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
15.3.3. Abbott Laboratories
15.3.4. Roche Diagnostics International AG
15.3.5. Danaher Corporation
15.3.6. Sysmex Corporation
15.3.7. Siemens Healthineers AG
15.3.8. Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Inc.
15.3.9. Randox Laboratories Ltd
15.3.10. BioMérieux S.A.
List of Tables
List of Figures

Samples

Loading
LOADING...

Companies Mentioned

The key companies profiled in this In-Vitro Diagnostics Quality Control market report include:
  • Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Roche Diagnostics International AG
  • Danaher Corporation
  • Sysmex Corporation
  • Siemens Healthineers AG
  • Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Inc.
  • Randox Laboratories Ltd
  • BioMérieux S.A.

Table Information