+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Software Asset Management With Sustainability Scoring - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 181 Pages
  • June 2026
  • Region: Global
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 6254402
The software asset management with Sustainability Scoring market size was valued at USD 0.98 billion in 2025 and estimated to grow from USD 1.14 billion in 2026 to reach USD 2.59 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 17.84% during the forecast period (2026-2031). This report is Segmented by Component (Solution, and Services), Deployment Mode (Cloud, On-Premises, and Hybrid), Enterprise Size (Large Enterprises, and Small and Medium Enterprises), Sustainability Function (Software Carbon Footprint Measurement, and More), End-Use Industry (BFSI, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Software Asset Management With Sustainability Scoring Market Trends and Insights

Rising SaaS License Leakage and Unused Entitlements

Rising SaaS waste is creating a direct, measurable demand base for the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market, as enterprises can no longer ignore large volumes of paid-for but unused subscriptions. In Q1 2026, 66% of enterprise SaaS licenses were untouched or surplus to requirements, indicating how far governance has fallen behind the pace of software adoption. In 2025, 35% of organizations said SaaS waste had worsened over the prior year, and only 50% felt comfortable with their SaaS visibility, which reinforces the same operational gap from a broader ITAM perspective. In the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market, this problem matters because inactive cloud software still consumes supporting compute resources, turning license waste into both a cost and an emissions issue. Buyers are therefore favoring platforms that translate reclamation actions into savings data and sustainability evidence in a single workflow, thereby strengthening the commercial case for the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market.

Need for Carbon-Aware Software Portfolio Rationalization

The need to rationalize software portfolios with a carbon lens is becoming a core growth engine for the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market, as many enterprises still lack a reliable way to link software use with emissions outcomes. The Software Carbon Intensity framework, aligned with ISO/IEC 21031:2024, provides vendors and buyers with a clearer way to measure emissions per functional unit of software, rather than relying on broad averages. The same foundation ratified the Sustainable Organizational Framework for Technology in November 2025, which moved the discussion from simple measurement to governance, operational accountability, and repeatable implementation models. The EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive has also increased pressure on large organizations to improve the quality and auditability of sustainability disclosures, which raises the value of software-level evidence within the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market. As a result, enterprises that once focused only on software spend are now looking at portfolio cleanup, workload choices, and procurement discipline in a more connected way, which supports stronger adoption across the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market.

Data Normalization Gaps Across SaaS, On-Premises, and Cloud Licenses

Data normalization remains a central restraint on the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market because sustainability scoring depends on one trusted software inventory across environments that were rarely designed to work together. Enterprises often hold software records in procurement systems, cloud consoles, ITSM tools, and local spreadsheets, and those records do not always align on product names, owners, use rights, or usage intensity. The Software Carbon Intensity model underscores the need for consistent data because carbon measurement must connect software activity to the operating context rather than rely on broad organizational averages. In the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market, weak normalization slows deployment, weakens confidence in reported scores, and makes formal assurance more difficult for organizations facing stricter disclosure expectations. Until enterprises improve the data foundation across SaaS, on-premises, and cloud assets, the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market will continue to face adoption friction even where buyer interest is already strong.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:
  • FinOps, ITAM, and Sustainability Reporting Convergence
  • Audit Pressure From Complex Vendor Contracting Models
  • Weak Internal Ownership Between Procurement, IT, and Sustainability Teams

Segment Analysis

The solution segment held 68.74% of the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market share in 2025, reflecting clear buyer preference for a single platform that covers discovery, normalization, reconciliation, reporting, and sustainability scoring in a single operating layer. In the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market, large organizations usually prefer integrated platforms because separate tools create more reconciliation work and weaken confidence in software records at the point of audit or disclosure. Buyers are also placing greater value on software publisher coverage, depth of usage, and reporting consistency because these features support both day-to-day governance and formal reporting needs. The Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring industry is, therefore, rewarding vendors that can combine operational control with a defensible sustainability framework rather than offering narrow tracking features. This explains why platform depth remains a decisive factor in enterprise purchasing across the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market.

Services are projected to expand at a 18.25% CAGR through 2031, reflecting that many buyers still lack internal teams to configure and manage these programs at scale. The Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market is seeing growing demand for managed support as reporting obligations become more structured and hybrid software estates require continuous data cleanup. The EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive is reinforcing this need by pushing large enterprises toward more auditable sustainability processes, which increases demand for implementation and reporting support. Service growth also aligns with the reality that software governance is not a one-time setup, since contracts, subscriptions, user behavior, and infrastructure patterns change throughout the year. For that reason, the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market continues to give strong weight to solution providers that can pair software platforms with sustained advisory, managed, and integration services.

Cloud accounted for 65.12% of the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market in 2025, indicating that buyers still favor the speed, lower infrastructure burden, and easier scalability of SaaS-delivered platforms. Cloud deployment aligns well with organizations that already manage large SaaS portfolios and want centralized updates, faster rollouts, and fewer local maintenance requirements. In the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market, this model also aligns well with enterprises that need faster visibility into subscription usage and want reporting outputs without a long on-premises setup cycle. The appeal is especially strong where software estates are already shifting toward cloud-native applications, remote work models, and broader workflow automation. As a result, cloud remained the most established delivery model across the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market in 2025.

Hybrid is projected to grow at a 18.05% CAGR through 2031, pointing to a different reality in large enterprises, where legacy environments and modern SaaS portfolios continue to coexist. The Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market is benefiting from hybrid demand, as many enterprises cannot retire on-premises systems quickly but still need a view across older infrastructure software and newer subscription tools. Hybrid setups also provide a more comprehensive data baseline for sustainability scoring by combining agent-driven discovery in traditional estates with cloud connectors in newer environments. This matters in the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market because software emissions governance is only credible when buyers can see the full estate rather than just the cloud portion. On-premises deployment is losing relative momentum in new projects, but it still retains a place in regulated settings where cloud migration is slower, and data control remains a higher priority.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Component
    • Solution
    • Services
  • By Deployment Mode
    • Cloud
    • On-Premises
    • Hybrid
  • By Enterprise Size
    • Large Enterprises
    • Small And Medium Enterprises
  • By Sustainability Function
    • Software Carbon Footprint Measurement
    • SaaS Utilization Optimization
    • License Rationalization
    • Cloud Resource Efficiency Monitoring
    • Sustainability Reporting
    • Green Software Governance
  • By End-Use Industry
    • IT and Telecom
    • BFSI
    • Manufacturing
    • Energy and Utilities
    • Retail and E-Commerce
    • Construction and Infrastructure
    • Government and Public Sector
    • Other End-User Industries
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Russia
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • India
      • Japan
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Middle East
        • Saudi Arabia
        • United Arab Emirates
        • Rest of Middle East
      • Africa
        • South Africa
        • Nigeria
        • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

Europe held 34.56% of the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market share in 2025, reflecting earlier regulatory pressure, stronger reporting expectations, and more mature governance practices across large enterprises. The phased implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive has been central to this position because it has widened the number of organizations that must support structured sustainability disclosures with stronger evidence and control. Wave 1 listed companies filed their first reports on FY2024 data in 2025, and other large undertakings are now reporting on FY2025 data in 2026, which is expanding current demand for auditable systems. The revised threshold discussion around more than 1,000 employees and over EUR 450 million, USD 486 million, in net turnover has concentrated the immediate mandated buyer pool while leaving broader voluntary adoption to continue through supplier ecosystems. Within Europe, Germany remains one of the more established national environments for this category because software governance and transparency in sustainability are treated as linked operational needs. For these reasons, the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market remains strongest in Europe.

North America continues to hold a major secondary position in the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market because enterprises in the region manage large SaaS estates and face heavy audit exposure from major software vendors. Demand there is driven more by cost control, license governance, and enterprise-led sustainability goals than by a single federal disclosure regime. Even so, multinational companies with European reporting obligations are extending their governance practices across broader global software estates, which supports adoption in the United States and Canada. This means the Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market in North America remains commercially attractive even without a CSRD-style federal framework.

Asia-Pacific is projected to record the fastest CAGR of 18.72% through 2031, reflecting large-scale digital transformation across China, India, Japan, and South Korea. The Software Asset Management with Sustainability Scoring market is expanding rapidly in the region, as SaaS adoption is outpacing governance maturity in many enterprise environments. India adds a distinct growth path because large IT services firms often need auditable software and sustainability data for global client relationships. South America remains smaller but is emerging, with multinational subsidiaries aligning their reporting practices with those of their overseas parents. The Middle East and Africa are still at an earlier stage, yet adoption is growing as organizations first use software asset management tools for cost and compliance, then add sustainability functions as program maturity improves.


List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • Flexera
  • ServiceNow, Inc.
  • USU Software AG
  • Ivanti, Inc.
  • Certero Limited
  • Matrix42 AG
  • Snow Software AB
  • OpenText Corporation
  • Lansweeper NV
  • Eracent, Inc.
  • License Dashboard Ltd.
  • Belarc, Inc.
  • Asset Panda, LLC
  • Zluri Inc.
  • Productiv, Inc.
  • BetterCloud, Inc.
  • Torii Labs Ltd.
  • Zylo, Inc.
  • Apptio, Inc.
  • BMC Software, Inc.
  • Tangoe, Inc.

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Rising SaaS License Leakage and Unused Entitlements
4.2.2 FinOps, ITAM, and Sustainability Reporting Convergence
4.2.3 Audit Pressure From Complex Vendor Contracting Models
4.2.4 Need For Carbon-Aware Software Portfolio Rationalization
4.2.5 Demand For Shadow AI and Shadow SaaS Discovery
4.2.6 Workspace Reallocation and Device Refresh Optimization
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Data Normalization Gaps Across SaaS, On-Premises, and Cloud Licenses
4.3.2 Weak Internal Ownership Between Procurement, IT, and Sustainability Teams
4.3.3 Limited ROI Visibility For Mid-Market Buyers
4.3.4 Model Complexity For Measuring Sustainability Scores at Software Asset Level
4.4 Industry Macroeconomic Factors and Their Impact
4.5 Industry Value Chain Analysis
4.6 Technological Outlook
4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)
5.1 By Component
5.1.1 Solution
5.1.2 Services
5.2 By Deployment Mode
5.2.1 Cloud
5.2.2 On-Premises
5.2.3 Hybrid
5.3 By Enterprise Size
5.3.1 Large Enterprises
5.3.2 Small And Medium Enterprises
5.4 By Sustainability Function
5.4.1 Software Carbon Footprint Measurement
5.4.2 SaaS Utilization Optimization
5.4.3 License Rationalization
5.4.4 Cloud Resource Efficiency Monitoring
5.4.5 Sustainability Reporting
5.4.6 Green Software Governance
5.5 By End-Use Industry
5.5.1 IT and Telecom
5.5.2 BFSI
5.5.3 Manufacturing
5.5.4 Energy and Utilities
5.5.5 Retail and E-Commerce
5.5.6 Construction and Infrastructure
5.5.7 Government and Public Sector
5.5.8 Other End-User Industries
5.6 By Geography
5.6.1 North America
5.6.1.1 United States
5.6.1.2 Canada
5.6.1.3 Mexico
5.6.2 South America
5.6.2.1 Brazil
5.6.2.2 Argentina
5.6.2.3 Rest of South America
5.6.3 Europe
5.6.3.1 Germany
5.6.3.2 United Kingdom
5.6.3.3 France
5.6.3.4 Italy
5.6.3.5 Spain
5.6.3.6 Russia
5.6.3.7 Rest of Europe
5.6.4 Asia-Pacific
5.6.4.1 China
5.6.4.2 India
5.6.4.3 Japan
5.6.4.4 South Korea
5.6.4.5 Australia
5.6.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.6.5 Middle East and Africa
5.6.5.1 Middle East
5.6.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
5.6.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
5.6.5.1.3 Rest of Middle East
5.6.5.2 Africa
5.6.5.2.1 South Africa
5.6.5.2.2 Nigeria
5.6.5.2.3 Rest of Africa
6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
6.4.1 Flexera
6.4.2 ServiceNow, Inc.
6.4.3 USU Software AG
6.4.4 Ivanti, Inc.
6.4.5 Certero Limited
6.4.6 Matrix42 AG
6.4.7 Snow Software AB
6.4.8 OpenText Corporation
6.4.9 Lansweeper NV
6.4.10 Eracent, Inc.
6.4.11 License Dashboard Ltd.
6.4.12 Belarc, Inc.
6.4.13 Asset Panda, LLC
6.4.14 Zluri Inc.
6.4.15 Productiv, Inc.
6.4.16 BetterCloud, Inc.
6.4.17 Torii Labs Ltd.
6.4.18 Zylo, Inc.
6.4.19 Apptio, Inc.
6.4.20 BMC Software, Inc.
6.4.21 Tangoe, Inc.
7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Flexera
  • ServiceNow, Inc.
  • USU Software AG
  • Ivanti, Inc.
  • Certero Limited
  • Matrix42 AG
  • Snow Software AB
  • OpenText Corporation
  • Lansweeper NV
  • Eracent, Inc.
  • License Dashboard Ltd.
  • Belarc, Inc.
  • Asset Panda, LLC
  • Zluri Inc.
  • Productiv, Inc.
  • BetterCloud, Inc.
  • Torii Labs Ltd.
  • Zylo, Inc.
  • Apptio, Inc.
  • BMC Software, Inc.
  • Tangoe, Inc.