+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Material Testing - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 162 Pages
  • September 2026
  • Region: Global
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 6287033
The material testing market size is projected to expand from USD 60.05 billion in 2025 and USD 63.99 billion in 2026 to USD 90.34 billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 7.14% between 2026 to 2031. This report is segmented by Offering (Material Testing Equipment, and Material Testing Services), Equipment Type (Universal Testing Machines, and More), Service Type (Laboratory Testing, and On-Site Testing), Accreditation (Accredited Testing, and More), End-Use Industry (Industrial Manufacturing, Oil and Gas, and More), and Geography. The Market Sizes and Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value in (USD).

Global Material Testing Market Trends and Insights

Stringent Quality, Safety, and Regulatory Standards

Quality and safety requirements provide a recurring demand base for the Material Testing Market. ISO/IEC 17025:2017 sets general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, which supports acceptance of laboratory results by buyers and regulators. ISO/IEC 17020:2026 specifies requirements for bodies performing inspection, including competence and impartiality requirements that apply across materials, products, plants, and processes. Manufacturers must also requalify materials and production lines when applicable test protocols change. This makes demand recurring because compliance is tied to continued production and supplier approval, not simply to the first introduction of a product, and laboratories must maintain documentation, method control, equipment capability, and staff competence to retain confidence in each reported result. Mutual recognition arrangements can reduce duplicate testing, but they also place greater importance on accredited conformity assessment bodies, because a result must be traceable, repeatable, and accepted by parties that may be located in different regulatory jurisdictions, creating a durable advantage for laboratories with recognized quality systems.

Growth in Construction and Infrastructure Development

Construction activity creates demand for verification of concrete strength, steel integrity, soil bearing capacity, and asphalt performance before projects are commissioned. The Material Testing Market benefits when large transport, energy, and urban projects require these checks at several project stages. India remains an important area of demand because transport corridors, logistics facilities, smart cities, and industrial projects require third-party verification. Brazil also provides a clear example of this connection, as Intertek acquired the building-products testing company TESIS in May 2025 to expand its position in the country. The transaction shows that established providers view construction-linked testing capacity as strategically important. Digital engineering tools can add validation work when physical tests are used to calibrate project models, as engineers need observed material data to confirm assumptions on strength, deformation, durability, and response to environmental exposure before relying on a model for design or operating decisions.

High Capital and Ownership Costs of Advanced Testing Equipment

Advanced fatigue rigs, multi-axis machines, environmental chambers, and digital testing platforms require substantial initial investment. The Material Testing Market faces a slower equipment adoption cycle, in which smaller laboratories and mid-sized manufacturers cannot fund complete systems, particularly when a valid setup requires not only the main machine but also suitable grips, environmental controls, sensors, software, calibration support, and personnel who can perform and document the method correctly. ISO/IEC 17025 compliance also requires calibration of load frames and reference standards, which adds recurring costs. These costs are particularly challenging in cost-sensitive areas of South America, Southeast Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. Equipment-as-a-service arrangements and outsourced testing can reduce buyers' capital burden. They can also shift revenue toward service laboratories and away from direct equipment purchases, because a laboratory can spread the cost of a specialized machine, calibration program, software license, and qualified operator across work from many customers rather than placing the full burden on a single manufacturer.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:
  • Expansion of Automotive and Aerospace Manufacturing
  • Increasing Adoption of Advanced Materials
  • Shortage of Skilled Testing Professionals

Segment Analysis

Material Testing Services held 55.44% of the offering segment in 2025 and is projected to expand at a 7.45% CAGR through 2031. Third-party laboratories give manufacturers access to accredited methods without requiring them to own every test capability. This model is particularly relevant where organizations need to meet ISO/IEC 17025 and sector-specific documentation requirements, yet do not have enough specimen volume to justify maintaining a complete in-house laboratory with several machines, controlled environments, calibration routines, and qualified staff across every required method. Pharmaceuticals and biotechnology companies face demanding audit and supplier-qualification requirements. Aerospace and defense suppliers also need formal test records for product approval. These conditions make accredited service providers an important part of the Material Testing Market, particularly for companies that produce several product types or serve multiple regulated customers and therefore need access to diverse methods without diverting capital and technical teams from their main manufacturing activities.

Material Testing Equipment continues to serve large original equipment manufacturers, steel producers, and tier-1 automotive suppliers. These users retain routine testing in-house when they need direct control over quality decisions and turnaround times. ZwickRoell introduced its SmartLab concept in November 2025, describing a laboratory workflow with automated specimen handling, test configuration, and data validation. Instron introduced the AT1 Automation System in March 2026 for automated film and elastomer testing in quality laboratories. Such systems bring equipment, software, and standardized outputs closer together. The distinction between a purchased machine and a delivered service is therefore becoming less clear for buyers that prioritize repeatable results, since automated systems combine hardware, software, method settings, specimen handling, data review, and reporting into a single workflow that can be managed internally or obtained through a specialist provider.

Universal Testing Machines held 25.78% of the equipment segment in 2025. Their position reflects the ability to perform tensile, compression, bending, and shear tests on metals, polymers, composites, and ceramics. Original equipment manufacturers, contract manufacturers, and research institutions use these instruments as general-purpose quality control systems. Hardness, impact, compression and flexural, and tensile equipment address specific material properties and support a broad installed base. Nondestructive testing equipment also supports energy, infrastructure, and aerospace operators that need digital radiography and phased-array ultrasonic inspection. This base keeps universal testing systems relevant across the Material Testing Market, because laboratories and factories can adapt a core instrument through grips, fixtures, sensors, and software rather than purchase separate machines for every routine material property, supporting flexible use across changing product portfolios, routine quality work, supplier comparisons, development projects, and investigations of unexpected material behavior.

Fatigue and Durability Testing Equipment is projected to expand at an 8.13% CAGR through 2031. The category is important because cyclic loading tests simulate the stresses that materials face during normal use. This need has increased as automotive structures use ultra-high-strength steel and aerospace platforms use advanced composites. Element Materials Technology expanded its Cincinnati facility in February 2026 with a USD 20 million investment and new MTS Landmark fatigue testing frames. Fatigue tests usually take longer than static tests and produce more complex datasets. Equipment suppliers can use analysis software and maintenance services to build recurring revenue around these systems, particularly where customers need reliable test execution over long periods, secure handling of high-frequency load data, and support for method updates as materials, designs, and customer specifications change.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Offering
    • Material Testing Equipment
    • Material Testing Services
  • By Equipment Type
    • Universal Testing Machines (UTM)
    • Hardness Testing Equipment
    • Impact Testing Equipment
    • Fatigue and Durability Testing Equipment
    • Compression and Flexural Testing Equipment
    • Tensile Testing Equipment
    • NDT Equipment
    • Other Material Testing Equipment
  • By Service Type
    • Laboratory Testing
    • On-Site Testing
  • By Accreditation
    • Accredited Testing
    • Non-Accredited Testing
  • By End-use Industry
    • Industrial Manufacturing
    • Aerospace and Defense
    • Automotive and Transportation
    • Construction and Infrastructure
    • Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
    • Chemicals and Materials
    • Electronics and Semiconductor
    • Energy and Power
    • Food and Beverage
    • Oil and Gas
    • Other End-Use Industries
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • ASEAN
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Middle East
        • Saudi Arabia
        • United Arab Emirates
        • Turkey
        • Rest of the Middle East
      • Africa
        • South Africa
        • Nigeria
        • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific held 34.65% of the Material Testing Market share in 2025 and is projected to expand at an 8.11% CAGR through 2031. China supports this position through automotive production, steel manufacturing, and electronics assembly. ZwickRoell installed multi-station systems at the JITRI Materials Academy in Jiangsu Province, covering nearly CNY 300 million, or USD 41 million, of installed testing infrastructure. India is increasing demand through highway corridors, logistics facilities, and semiconductor and electronics manufacturing parks. Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia are also attracting automotive and electronics suppliers. These investments drive testing demand beyond established hubs in China, Japan, and South Korea, as new supplier plants need access to local testing for incoming materials, product development, process control, construction, and certification, broadening the Material Testing Market's regional footprint.

North America and Europe are mature regions with high accreditation penetration and strong demand from aerospace, automotive, and pharmaceutical customers. North America relies on ASTM standards, Federal Aviation Administration requirements, safety rules, and calibration traceability. SGS closed its acquisition of Applied Technical Services in January 2026, adding 2,100 employees and taking North American annual sales beyond USD 1.5 billion. Europe has strict product requirements and established laboratory networks. Germany remains an important center for testing equipment manufacturing, including ZwickRoell. These regions give providers a reliable base for accredited and specialist services, as well-developed regulatory systems and mature customers value documented results, technical depth, and consistent methods, while consolidation encourages providers to build wider laboratory networks that can serve complex programs across multiple locations.

South America and the Middle East and Africa remain growth-stage areas for the Material Testing Market, where the practical availability of local accredited laboratories and trained on-site teams can influence how quickly infrastructure owners and manufacturers can complete verification work and move projects into their next development or operating stage. Brazil is the largest South American testing location and has attracted investment in building-products testing capacity. Intertek's May 2025 acquisition of TESIS strengthened its direct presence in Brazil. Oil refinery modernization, LNG terminal expansion, and renewable energy projects create demand for on-site nondestructive testing in the Middle East. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are important locations because industrial diversification programs require local quality-assurance capacity. SGS's Qatar laboratory accreditation shows continued investment in credentialed testing capability in the region, while infrastructure owners and industrial operators increasingly need locally available laboratories and on-site teams that can produce results aligned with international requirements during construction, maintenance, and commissioning work.


List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • Instron (Illinois Tool Works Inc.)
  • ZwickRoell
  • MTS Systems Corporation
  • Shimadzu Corporation
  • AMETEK, Inc.
  • Tinius Olsen
  • SGS SA
  • Intertek Group plc
  • Bureau Veritas SA
  • Eurofins Scientific SE
  • Bruker Corporation
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • Evident Corporation
  • Qness GmbH
  • Element Materials Technology Group
  • Applus+ Laboratories
  • TÜV SÜD AG
  • TÜV Rheinland AG
  • Galdabini S.p.A.
  • ADMET, Inc.

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Stringent Quality, Safety, and Regulatory Standards
4.2.2 Growth in Construction and Infrastructure Development
4.2.3 Expansion of Automotive and Aerospace Manufacturing
4.2.4 Increasing Adoption of Advanced Materials
4.2.5 Rising Adoption of Non-Destructive Testing (NDT)
4.2.6 Automation and Digitalization of Material Testing
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 High Capital and Ownership Costs of Advanced Testing Equipment
4.3.2 Shortage of Skilled Testing Professionals
4.3.3 High Complexity and Frequent Technology Upgrades
4.3.4 Cyclicality of Major End-Use Industries
4.4 Industry Value-Chain Analysis
4.5 Regulatory Landscape
4.6 Technological Outlook
4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
4.8 Assessment of Macroeconomic Trends on the Market
5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)
5.1 By Offering
5.1.1 Material Testing Equipment
5.1.2 Material Testing Services
5.2 By Equipment Type
5.2.1 Universal Testing Machines (UTM)
5.2.2 Hardness Testing Equipment
5.2.3 Impact Testing Equipment
5.2.4 Fatigue and Durability Testing Equipment
5.2.5 Compression and Flexural Testing Equipment
5.2.6 Tensile Testing Equipment
5.2.7 NDT Equipment
5.2.8 Other Material Testing Equipment
5.3 By Service Type
5.3.1 Laboratory Testing
5.3.2 On-Site Testing
5.4 By Accreditation
5.4.1 Accredited Testing
5.4.2 Non-Accredited Testing
5.5 By End-use Industry
5.5.1 Industrial Manufacturing
5.5.2 Aerospace and Defense
5.5.3 Automotive and Transportation
5.5.4 Construction and Infrastructure
5.5.5 Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
5.5.6 Chemicals and Materials
5.5.7 Electronics and Semiconductor
5.5.8 Energy and Power
5.5.9 Food and Beverage
5.5.10 Oil and Gas
5.5.11 Other End-Use Industries
5.6 By Geography
5.6.1 North America
5.6.1.1 United States
5.6.1.2 Canada
5.6.1.3 Mexico
5.6.2 South America
5.6.2.1 Brazil
5.6.2.2 Argentina
5.6.2.3 Rest of South America
5.6.3 Europe
5.6.3.1 Germany
5.6.3.2 United Kingdom
5.6.3.3 France
5.6.3.4 Italy
5.6.3.5 Spain
5.6.3.6 Rest of Europe
5.6.4 Asia-Pacific
5.6.4.1 China
5.6.4.2 Japan
5.6.4.3 India
5.6.4.4 South Korea
5.6.4.5 ASEAN
5.6.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.6.5 Middle East and Africa
5.6.5.1 Middle East
5.6.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
5.6.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
5.6.5.1.3 Turkey
5.6.5.1.4 Rest of the Middle East
5.6.5.2 Africa
5.6.5.2.1 South Africa
5.6.5.2.2 Nigeria
5.6.5.2.3 Rest of Africa
6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
6.4.1 Instron (Illinois Tool Works Inc.)
6.4.2 ZwickRoell
6.4.3 MTS Systems Corporation
6.4.4 Shimadzu Corporation
6.4.5 AMETEK, Inc.
6.4.6 Tinius Olsen
6.4.7 SGS SA
6.4.8 Intertek Group plc
6.4.9 Bureau Veritas SA
6.4.10 Eurofins Scientific SE
6.4.11 Bruker Corporation
6.4.12 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
6.4.13 Evident Corporation
6.4.14 Qness GmbH
6.4.15 Element Materials Technology Group
6.4.16 Applus+ Laboratories
6.4.17 TÜV SÜD AG
6.4.18 TÜV Rheinland AG
6.4.19 Galdabini S.p.A.
6.4.20 ADMET, Inc.
7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Instron (Illinois Tool Works Inc.)
  • ZwickRoell
  • MTS Systems Corporation
  • Shimadzu Corporation
  • AMETEK, Inc.
  • Tinius Olsen
  • SGS SA
  • Intertek Group plc
  • Bureau Veritas SA
  • Eurofins Scientific SE
  • Bruker Corporation
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • Evident Corporation
  • Qness GmbH
  • Element Materials Technology Group
  • Applus+ Laboratories
  • TÜV SÜD AG
  • TÜV Rheinland AG
  • Galdabini S.p.A.
  • ADMET, Inc.