+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market Report Suite - India - 2018-2024 (Includes 5 Reports)

  • ID: 4755231
  • Report
  • Region: India
  • 500 pages
  • iData Research
1 of 4

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • Adler
  • Biorad Medisys
  • Evolutis India
  • Heraeus
  • Maxx Medical
  • MicroPort
  • MORE
In 2017, the knee replacement market was the largest segment of the overall Indian orthopedic large joint device market. The knee replacement market analyzed in this report includes total knee implants, partial knee implants and knee revision implants. The largest segment of the knee replacement market in 2017 was the total knee replacement segment, followed by the knee replacement revision segment. Demand for primary knee replacement is expected to remain strong over the forecast period. The market includes the knee and hip replacement and bone cement markets. The large joint device market is expected to grow at an accelerating rate over the forecast period, recovering from the strong price cuts initiated by the Indian government in 2017, which affected the knee replacement device market.
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
2 of 4

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • Adler
  • Biorad Medisys
  • Evolutis India
  • Heraeus
  • Maxx Medical
  • MicroPort
  • MORE

1 Executive Summary

  • Indian Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market Overview
  • Competitive Analysis
  • Market Trends
  • Market Developments
  • Procedure Numbers
  • Markets Included
  • Key Report Updates
  • Version History
  • Research Methodology
  • Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
  • Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
  • Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
  • Step 4: Performing Primary Research
  • Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
  • Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
  • Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
  • Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
  • Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring

2 Disease Overview
2.1 Basic Anatomy
2.1.1 Knee
2.1.2 Hip
2.2 Disease Treatment & Diagnostics
2.2.1 Arthritis
2.2.1.1 Osteoarthritis
2.2.1.2 Inflammatory Arthritis
2.2.2 Traumatic Injuries
2.2.3 Avascular Necrosis
2.2.4 Treatment
2.2.4.1 Complications
2.3 Patient Demographics
2.3.1 General Statistics
2.3.2 Arthritis Incidence
2.3.3 Osteoporosis Incidence

3 Product Assessment
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Product Portfolios
3.2.1 Knee Arthroplasty
3.2.1.1 Total Knee Arthroplasty
3.2.1.2 Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
3.2.1.3 Knee Revision
3.2.1.4 Personalized Knee Implants
3.2.2 Hip Arthroplasty
3.2.2.1 Total Hip Arthroplasty
3.2.2.2 Hip Hemiarthroplasty
3.2.2.3 Hip Revision
3.2.3 Implant Fixation
3.2.3.1 Cemented Fixation
3.2.3.2 Cementless Fixation
3.2.3.3 Spacer Molds
3.3 Fda Recalls
3.3.1 Depuy Synthes
3.3.1.1 Knee Implant
3.3.1.2 Hip Implant
3.3.1.3 Bone Cement
3.3.2 Smith & Nephew
3.3.2.1 Knee Implant
3.3.2.2 Hip Implant
3.3.2.3 Knee & Hip Implant Accessories/Parts
3.3.3 Stryker
3.3.3.1 Knee Implant
3.3.3.2 Hip Implant
3.3.3.3 Knee & Hip Implant Accessories/Parts
3.3.3.4 Bone Cement
3.3.4 Zimmer Biomet
3.3.4.1 Knee Implant
3.3.4.2 Hip Implant
3.3.4.3 Knee & Hip Implant Accessories/Parts
3.3.4.4 Bone Cement
3.4 Clinical Trials
3.4.1 Depuy Synthes
3.4.1.1 Knee Arthroplasty
3.4.1.2 Hip Arthroplasty
3.4.1.3 Bone Cement
3.4.2 Heraeus Medical
3.4.2.1 Bone Cement
3.4.3 Smith & Nephew
3.4.3.1 Knee Arthroplasty
3.4.3.2 Hip Arthroplasty
3.4.3.3 Bone Cement
3.4.4 Stryker
3.4.4.1 Knee Arthroplasty
3.4.4.2 Hip Arthroplasty
3.4.4.3 Bone Cement
3.4.5 Zimmer Biomet
3.4.5.1 Knee Arthroplasty
3.4.5.2 Hip Arthroplasty
3.4.5.3 Bone Cement

4 Indian Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market Overview
4.1 Introduction
4.1.1 Anatomy And Pathology
4.1.2 Treatment
4.1.3 Treatment Complications
4.1.4 General Product Classifications
4.1.4.1 Total Joint Replacement
4.1.4.2 Partial Joint Replacement
4.1.4.3 Joint Resurfacing
4.1.4.4 Revision
4.1.5 Implant Wear And Durability
4.1.6 Patient-Specific Products And Consumer Awareness
4.1.7 Press-Fitted Versus Cemented Implantation
4.1.8 Simultaneous Bilateral Implantation
4.1.9 Minimally Invasive Surgery
4.1.10 New Technologies In Orthopedics
4.1.11 Emerging Non-Surgical Alternatives
4.2 Currency Exchange Rate
4.3 Market Overview
4.4 Trend Analysis By Segment
4.5 Drivers And Limiters
4.5.1 Market Drivers
4.5.2 Market Limiters
4.6 Competitive Market Share Analysis
4.7 Mergers And Acquisitions
4.8 Company Profiles
4.8.1 Depuy Synthes
4.8.2 Heraeus
4.8.3 Smith & Nephew
4.8.4 Stryker
4.8.5 Zimmer Biomet
4.9 Swot Analysis
4.9.1 Depuy Synthes
4.9.2 Heraeus
4.9.3 Smith & Nephew
4.9.4 Stryker
4.9.5 Zimmer Biomet

5 Procedure Numbers
5.1 Procedures
5.1.1 Knee Replacement Procedures
5.1.1.1 Total Knee Replacement Procedures
5.1.1.1.1 Total Knee Replacement Procedures By Cementation
5.1.1.1.2 Total Knee Replacement Procedures By Construction Type
5.1.1.1.3 Total Knee Replacement Procedures By Bearing Type
5.1.1.2 Partial Knee Replacement Procedures
5.1.1.2.1 Unicondylar Partial Knee Replacement Procedures
5.1.1.3 Knee Replacement Revision Procedures
5.1.2 Hip Replacement Procedures
5.1.2.1 Total Hip Replacement Procedures
5.1.2.1.1 Total Hip Replacement Procedures By Cementation
5.1.2.1.2 Total Hip Replacement Procedures By Bearing Type
5.1.2.2 Partial Hip Replacement Procedures
5.1.2.2.1 Partial Hip Replacement Procedures By Type
5.1.2.3 Hip Resurfacing Procedures
5.1.2.4 Hip Replacement Revision Procedures

6 Knee Replacement Device Market
6.1 Introduction
6.1.1 Anatomy
6.1.2 Pathology
6.1.3 Treatment
6.1.4 Implant Types
6.1.4.1 Total Knee Replacement
6.1.4.2 Partial Knee Replacement
6.1.4.3 Knee Revision
6.1.5 Fixation Method
6.1.6 Bearing Surface
6.1.7 Fixed Versus Mobile Bearings
6.1.8 Cruciate-Retaining Versus Posterior-Stabilized (Cruciate-Sacrificing)
6.1.9 Robotic Technology In Knee Arthroplasty
6.2 Market Overview
6.3 Market Analysis And Forecast
6.3.1 Total Knee Replacement Market
6.3.1.1 Total Knee Replacement Market By Cementation
6.3.1.1.1 Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market
6.3.1.1.2 Cementless Total Knee Replacement Market
6.3.1.2 Total Knee Replacement Market By Construction Type
6.3.1.2.1 Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacement Market
6.3.1.2.2 Cruciate-Sacrificing Total Knee Replacement Market
6.3.1.3 Total Knee Replacement Market By Bearing Type
6.3.1.3.1 Fixed Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market
6.3.1.3.2 Mobile Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market
6.3.2 Partial Knee Replacement Market
6.3.2.1 Unicondylar Partial Knee Replacement Market
6.3.3 Knee Replacement Revision Market
6.4 Drivers And Limiters
6.4.1 Market Drivers
6.4.2 Market Limiters
6.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

7 Hip Replacement Device Market
7.1 Introduction
7.1.1 Anatomy
7.1.2 Pathology
7.1.3 Treatment
7.1.4 Implant Types
7.1.4.1 Total Hip Replacement
7.1.4.2 Partial Hip Replacement
7.1.4.3 Hip Resurfacing
7.1.4.4 Hip Revision
7.1.5 Fixation Method
7.1.6 Implant Material
7.1.7 Bearing Surface Technology
7.1.7.1 Polyethylene Bearings
7.1.7.2 Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearings
7.1.7.3 Metal Bearings
7.1.7.4 Ceramic Bearings
7.1.8 Emerging Technologies
7.2 Market Overview
7.3 Market Analysis And Forecast
7.3.1 Total Hip Replacement Market
7.3.1.1 Total Hip Replacement Market By Cementation
7.3.1.1.1 Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market
7.3.1.1.2 Cementless Total Hip Replacement Market
7.3.1.1.3 Hybrid Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market
7.3.1.2 Total Hip Replacement Market By Bearing Type
7.3.1.2.1 Metal/Hcpe Total Hip Replacement Market
7.3.1.2.2 Ceramic/Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Market
7.3.1.2.3 Ceramic/Hcpe Total Hip Replacement Market
7.3.2 Partial Hip Replacement Market
7.3.2.1 Bipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market
7.3.2.2 Unipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market
7.3.3 Hip Resurfacing Market
7.3.4 Hip Replacement Revision Market
7.4 Drivers And Limiters
7.4.1 Market Drivers
7.4.2 Market Limiters
7.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

8 Bone Cement Market
8.1 Introduction
8.1.1 Antibiotic Usage
8.1.2 Increased Popularity Of Cementless Implants
8.1.3 Spacer Molds For Joint Revision
8.2 Market Overview
8.2.1 Market Overview By Product Type
8.2.2 Market Overview By Procedure Type
8.3 Market Analysis And Forecast
8.3.1 Total Bone Cement Market
8.3.2 Bone Cement Market By Product Type
8.3.2.1 Traditional Bone Cement Market
8.3.2.2 Premixed Antibiotic Bone Cement Market
8.3.3 Bone Cement Market By Procedure Type
8.3.3.1 Bone Cement For Hip Replacement Market
8.3.3.2 Bone Cement For Knee Replacement Market
8.4 Drivers And Limiters
8.4.1 Market Drivers
8.4.2 Market Limiters
8.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

9 Abbreviations

10 Appendix: Company Press Releases
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Press Releases
10.2.1 Depuy Synthes
10.2.1.1 2018 Press Releases
10.2.1.1.1 The Actis® Total Hip System From Depuy Synthes Is Designed To Improve Initial Implant Stability In Total Hip Replacement
10.2.1.1.2 New Attune® Revision Knee System From Depuy Synthes Utilizes Proprietary Technologies To Address Broad Range Of Complex Primary & Revision Procedures
10.2.1.1.3 Depuy Synthes Announces Agreement With Serf To Add Dual Mobility System To Its Leading Hip Portfolio
10.2.1.1.4 Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies Acquire Orthotaxy To Develop Next-Generation Robotic-Assisted Surgery Platform In Orthopaedics
10.2.1.1.5 New Study On Total Hip Arthroplasty (Tha) Outcomes With Anterior Approach Show Less Reported Pain, Fewer Narcotics & Better Hip Function In The First 90 Days
10.2.1.2 2017 Press Releases
10.2.1.2.1 New System Designed To Enhance Implant Fixation For Hip Fracture Patients With Poor Bone Quality Launches In The U.S.
10.2.1.2.2 Exclusive Agreement To Co-Market Proprietary Software Platform To Aid In Total Hip Replacement Announced Between Depuy Synthes And Jointpoint, Inc.
10.2.1.2.3 Exclusive Co-Marketing Agreement With Medical Enterprises Distribution, Llc To Further Transform Hip Replacement With New Automated Technology
10.2.1.2.4 Depuy Synthes Announces Acquisition Of Sentio, Llc To Enable Innovation In Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
10.2.1.2.5 Powerful Imaging Technology Generates New Evidence On Attune® Knee System
10.2.1.2.6 Attune® Knee System Four-Year Revision Rate Is Lower Than Total Knee Class, According To New & Independent Joint Registry Data
10.2.1.2.7 Depuy Synthes Awarded U.S. Department Of Defense Contract For Orthopaedic Products
10.2.1.2.8 Depuy Synthes Acquires Tissue Regeneration System's 3D Printing Technologies To Treat Bone Defects
10.2.1.2.9 Mitek Sports Medicine Introduces Comprehensive Knee Arthroscopy Platform For Acl And Meniscal Repair
10.2.1.2.10 Depuy Synthes Companies Announces New Attune® Revision Fixed Bearing Tibial Base And Cemented Stem For Primary And Revision Surgeries
10.2.1.2.11 New Report Demonstrates The Clinical And Economic Value Of The Attune® Knee System
10.2.1.2.12 Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies Introduce Orthopaedic Episode Of Care Approach
10.2.1.2.13 Depuy Synthes Acquires Interventional Spine Expandable Cage Technology To Accelerate Growth In Spine
10.2.2 Heraeus Medical
10.2.2.1 2017 Press Releases
10.2.2.1.1 Heraeus Medical And Kang Stem To Develop A New Treatment For Degenerative Arthritis
10.2.2.1.2 Heraeus Medical Components Llc Has Acquired Biotectix Llc Assets
10.2.2.1.3 New Palamix® Vacuum Mixing System For Bone Cement Optimises Organisation Of Orthopaedic Surgery
10.2.3 Smith & Nephew
10.2.3.1 2018 Press Releases
10.2.3.1.1 Smith & Nephew Launches Digital Platform To Engage Patients And Track Outcomes Following Orthopaedic Surgery
10.2.3.1.2 New Q-Fix™ Curved And Suturefix Curved All-Suture Anchor Systems Help Surgeons Access Challenging Pathology While Improving The Quality Of Shoulder And Hip Repairs
10.2.3.1.3 Smith & Nephew Announces Full Commercial Release Of Journey™ Ii Xr Total Knee Arthroplasty
10.2.3.1.4 Smith & Nephew Fourth Quarter Trading And Full Year 2017 Results
10.2.3.1.5 Smith & Nephew's Episode Of Care Assurance Program (Ecap) Reduces Hospital Readmission By 97% Following Total Joint Replacement Surgery
10.2.3.2 2017 Press Releases
10.2.3.2.1 Smith & Nephew Completes Acquisition Of Tissue Regeneration Developer Rotation Medical Inc.
10.2.3.2.2 Smith & Nephew's Navio™ Surgical System Launches The First Robotics-Assisted Bi-Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Replacement
10.2.3.2.3 Smith & Nephew And Imperial College Partner To Develop Enhanced Surgical Techniques In Sports Medicine
10.2.3.2.4 Smith & Nephew Expands Navio◊ Robotics-Assisted Surgery System Into Total Knee Replacements
10.2.3.2.5 Smith & Nephew Previews Navio™ Robotics-Assisted Total Knee Application At Aaos Ahead Of Full Market Release In Q2 2017
10.2.3.2.6 Smith & Nephew Fourth Quarter Trading And Full Year 2016 Results
10.2.4 Stryker
10.2.4.1 2018 Press Releases
10.2.4.1.1 Stryker Completes Acquisition Of Entellus Medical
10.2.4.1.2 Stryker Crosses The 95% Thresholds In Vexim And Announces Its Intention To File A Proposed Public Buy-Out Offer Followed By A Squeeze-Out For The Outstanding Shares Of Vexim
10.2.4.1.3 Stryker Reports 2017 Results And 2018 Outlook
10.2.4.2 2017 Press Releases
10.2.4.2.1 Stryker Completes Acquisition Of Novadaq Technologies Inc.
10.2.4.2.2 Stryker Orthopaedics 2016 Settlement Program Reaches Milestone
10.2.4.2.3 Stryker Enabling Surgeons To Have A More Predictable Surgical Experience With Launch Of Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Application
10.2.4.2.4 Stryker Reports 2016 Results And 2017 Outlook
10.2.5 Zimmer Biomet
10.2.5.1 2018 Press Releases
10.2.5.1.1 Zimmer Biomet Announces Fourth Quarter And Full-Year 2017 Results
10.2.5.2 2017 Press Releases
10.2.5.2.1 Zimmer Biomet Announces Global Launch Of The Persona® Partial Knee System
10.2.5.2.2 Zimmer Biomet Introduces The World's First Ce Marked, X-Ray-Based Patient Specific Instrument System For Total Knee Replacement Surgery
10.2.5.2.3 Zimmer Biomet Holdings Announces Resolution Of Fda Warning Letter Related To Its Zhejiang, China Manufacturing Facility
10.2.5.2.4 Zimmer Biomet Reports Fourth Quarter And Full-Year 2016 Financial Results
10.2.5.2.5 Zimmer Biomet Announces Resolution With Doj And Sec Regarding Previously Disclosed Legacy Biomet Fcpa Matters

List of Charts
Chart 1 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market By Segment, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 1 2: Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market Overview, India, 2017 & 2024
Chart 4 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market By Segment, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 4 2: Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market Breakdown, India, 2017
Chart 4 3: Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market Breakdown, India, 2024
Chart 4 4: Growth Rates By Segment, Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market, India, 2015 – 2024
Chart 4 5: Leading Competitors, Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market, India, 2017
Chart 5 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Replacement Procedures By Anatomy, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 5 2: Knee Replacement Procedures By Type, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 5 3: Total Knee Replacement Procedures By Cementation, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 5 4: Total Knee Replacement Procedures By Construction Type, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 5 5: Total Knee Replacement Procedures By Bearing Type, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 5 6: Unicondylar Partial Knee Replacement Procedures, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 5 7: Knee Replacement Revision Procedures, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 5 8: Hip Replacement Procedures By Type, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 5 9: Total Hip Replacement Procedures By Cementation, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 5 10: Total Hip Replacement Procedures By Bearing Type, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 5 11: Partial Hip Replacement Procedures By Type, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 5 12: Hip Resurfacing Procedures, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 5 13: Hip Replacement Revision Procedures, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 1: Knee Replacement Device Market By Segment, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 2: Knee Replacement Device Market Breakdown, India, 2017
Chart 6 3: Knee Replacement Device Market Breakdown, India, 2024
Chart 6 4: Total Knee Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 5: Total Knee Replacement Market By Cementation, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 6: Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 7: Cementless Total Knee Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 8: Total Knee Replacement Market By Construction Type, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 9: Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 10: Cruciate-Sacrificing Total Knee Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 11: Total Knee Replacement Market By Bearing Type, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 12: Fixed Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 13: Mobile Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 14: Unicondylar Partial Knee Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 15: Knee Replacement Revision Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 16: Leading Competitors, Knee Replacement Device Market, India, 2017
Chart 7 1: Hip Replacement Device Market By Segment, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 2: Hip Replacement Device Market Breakdown, India, 2017
Chart 7 3: Hip Replacement Device Market Breakdown, India, 2024
Chart 7 4: Total Hip Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 5: Total Hip Replacement Market By Cementation, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 6: Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 7: Cementless Total Hip Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 8: Hybrid Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 9: Total Hip Replacement Market By Bearing Type, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 10: Metal/Hcpe Total Hip Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 11: Ceramic/Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 12: Ceramic/Hcpe Total Hip Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 13: Partial Hip Replacement Market By Segment, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 14: Total Partial Hip Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 15: Bipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 16: Unipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 17: Hip Resurfacing Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 18: Hip Replacement Revision Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 19: Leading Competitors, Hip Replacement Device Market, India, 2017
Chart 8 1: Bone Cement Market By Product Type, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 8 2: Bone Cement Market Breakdown By Product Type, India, 2017
Chart 8 3: Bone Cement Market Breakdown By Product Type, India, 2024
Chart 8 4: Bone Cement Market By Procedure Type, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 8 5: Bone Cement Market Breakdown By Procedure Type, India, 2017
Chart 8 6: Bone Cement Market Breakdown By Procedure Type, India, 2024
Chart 8 7: Total Bone Cement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 8 8: Traditional Bone Cement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 8 9: Premixed Antibiotic Bone Cement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 8 10: Bone Cement For Hip Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 8 11: Bone Cement For Knee Replacement Market, India, 2014 – 2024
Chart 8 12: Leading Competitors, Bone Cement Market, India, 2017

List of Figures
Figure 1 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market Share Ranking By Segment, India, 2017
Figure 1 2: Companies Researched In This Report, India, 2017
Figure 1 3: Factors Impacting The Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market By Segment, India
Figure 1 4: Recent Events In The Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market, 2014 – 2017 (1 Of 3)
Figure 1 5: Recent Events In The Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market, 2014 – 2017 (2 Of 3)
Figure 1 6: Recent Events In The Orthopedic Large Joint Device Market, 2014 – 2017 (3 Of 3)
Figure 1 7: Orthopedic Large Joint Procedures Covered, India, 2017
Figure 1 8: Orthopedic Large Joint Device Markets Covered, India, 2017 (1 Of 2)
Figure 1 9: Orthopedic Large Joint Device Markets Covered, India, 2017 (2 Of 2)
Figure 1 10: Key Report Updates
Figure 1 11: Version History
Figure 3 1: Knee Replacement Device Market By Company (1 Of 4)
Figure 3 2: Knee Replacement Device Market By Company (2 Of 4)
Figure 3 3: Knee Replacement Device Market By Company (3 Of 4)
Figure 3 4: Knee Replacement Device Market By Company (4 Of 4)
Figure 3 5: Hip Replacement Device Market By Company (1 Of 7)
Figure 3 6: Hip Replacement Device Market By Company (2 Of 7)
Figure 3 7: Hip Replacement Device Market By Company (3 Of 7)
Figure 3 8: Hip Replacement Device Market By Company (4 Of 7)
Figure 3 9: Hip Replacement Device Market By Company (5 Of 7)
Figure 3 10: Hip Replacement Device Market By Company (6 Of 7)
Figure 3 11: Hip Replacement Device Market By Company (7 Of 7)
Figure 3 12: Implant Fixation Market By Company
Figure 3 13: Class 2 Device Recall Lcs Complete Knee Revision System Vvc Insert
Figure 3 14: Class 2 Device Recall Depuy Sigma Lcs
Figure 3 15: Class 2 Device Recall Specialist 2 Intermedullary (Sp2 Im) Rod
Figure 3 16: Class 2 Device Recall Attune” Articulation Surface
Figure 3 17: Class 2 Device Recall Depuy Orthopedics Lcs Complete Rps
Figure 3 18: Class 2 Device Recall Srom Noiles Rotating Hinge Femur With Pin, Right & Left, Various Sizes
Figure 3 19: Class 2 Device Recall Pfc Sigma Cruciate Retaining (Cr); Cemented Femoral Devices
Figure 3 20: Class 2 Device Recall 16Mm Chisel Blade
Figure 3 21: Class 2 Device Recall Reclaim Revision Hip System; Assembled Implant Inserter Adaptor
Figure 3 22: Class 2 Device Recall Biolox Delta Ts Ceramic Femoral Head Articul/Eze 12/14 36Mm 12
Figure 3 23-24: Device Recall Reclaim Distal Tapered
Figure 3 25: Class 2 Device Recall Smartset Ghv Gentamicin Bone Cement
Figure 3 26: Class 2 Device Recall Legion Lwedge
Figure 3 27: Class 2 Device Recall Legion(Tm) Hk Femoral Assembly, Right And Left, Various Sizes
Figure 3 28: Class 2 Device Recall Tcplus(Tm), Primary Fixed Tibial Component Vks, Right And Left, Various Sizes
Figure 3 29: Class 2 Device Recall Legion Hemi Stepped Tibial Wedge
Figure 3 30: Class 2 Device Recall Genesis Ii/Legion Resurfacing Patella With Journey Peg
Figure 3 31: Class 2 Device Recall Legion(Tm) Cocr Constrained Femoral Component, Right And Left, Various Sizes
Figure 3 32: Class 2 Device Recall Polarstem (Tm) Femoral Stems With Ti/Ha (Standard, Lateral, Valgus And Collar)
Figure 3 33: Class 2 Device Recall Modular Smf (Tm)
Figure 3 34: Class 2 Device Recall Modular Redapt(Tm) Hip Systems
Figure 3 35: Class 2 Device Recall Modular Necks
Figure 3 36: Class 2 Device Recall Exeter Rasp/Trial Introducer/Extractor Handle Part Of The Exeter Femoral Hip System
Figure 3 37: Class 2 Device Recall Reflection Spherical Head Screw
Figure 3 38: Class 2 Device Recall Smith & Nephew
Figure 3 39: Class 2 Device Recall Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Modular Head
Figure 3 40: Class 2 Device Recall Smith & Nephew Brimingham Hip (Tm) Resurfacing
Figure 3 41: Class 2 Device Recall Constrained Liner
Figure 3 42: Class 2 Device Recall Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Figure 3 43: Class 2 Device Recall Reflection Interfit Shell, 52Mm Of, 3 Hole
Figure 3 44: Class 2 Device Recall Smith & Nephew Biosure
Figure 3 45: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker
Figure 3 46: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker T2 Femoral Nail System
Figure 3 47: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker
Figure 3 48: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Orthopedics
Figure 3 49: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker
Figure 3 50: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Orthopedics Triathlon X3 Tibial Bearing Insert
Figure 3 51: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Orthopedics
Figure 3 52: Class 2 Device Recall Kinemax Stem Extenders
Figure 3 53: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Triathlon Distal Capture Assembly
Figure 3 54: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Orthopedics Triathlon Tritanium Patella Inserter
Figure 3 55: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Lfit Anatomic V40 Femoral Head
Figure 3 56: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker T2 Supracondylar Nail System
Figure 3 57: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Trident Constrained Liner Impactors
Figure 3 58: Class 2 Device Recall Pca 10 Degree Hooded Acetabular Insert Id 22Mm
Figure 3 59: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Orthopedics
Figure 3 60: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Orthopedics
Figure 3 61: Class 2 Device Recall Serfas 90-Degree Energy Probe, Part Number 279350101
Figure 3 62: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Orthopedics
Figure 3 63: Class 2 Device Recall Howmedica Osteonics Corp. Lft V40 Femoral Head
Figure 3 64: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Orthopedics
Figure 3 65: Class 2 Device Recall Sagittal Blade 18.0X0.97X90Mm
Figure 3 66: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker T2 Femoral Nail System
Figure 3 67: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Orthopedics Specialty Triathlon Tibial Alignment Handle With Secondary Lock
Figure 3 68: Class 2 Device Recall Cinchlock
Figure 3 69: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Autoplex System
Figure 3 70: Class 2 Device Recall Persona Partial Knee System
Figure 3 71: Class 2 Device Recall Custom Ti Mak Rs Oss Segmental Femoral Rotating Hinged Knee
Figure 3 72: Class 2 Device Recall Regenerex Patell
Figure 3 73: Class 2 Device Recall Various Polyethylene Implant
Figure 3 74: Class 2 Device Recall Oxford Partial Knee System Right And Left Medial Tibial Trial Tray, Various Sizes
Figure 3 75: Class 2 Device Recall Oxford Partial Knee System Phase 3 Tibial Template Right And Left Medial, Various Sizes
Figure 3 76: Class 2 Device Recall Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Phase 3 Tibial Impactor
Figure 3 77: Class 2 Device Recall Oxford Partial Knee System Femoral Slap Hammer
Figure 3 78: Class 2 Device Recall Oxford Knee System Tibial Resector Body Tube & Guides
Figure 3 79: Class 2 Device Recall Oxford Partial Knee System Femoral Slap Hammer
Figure 3 80: Class 2 Device Recall Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Phase 3 Shim, Various Sizes
Figure 3 81: Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard Knee
Figure 3 82: Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard Total Knee System
Figure 3 83: Class 2 Device Recall Orthopedic Salvage System (Oss) 9Cm
Figure 3 84: Class 2 Device Recall Oxford Fixed Lateral Partial Knee System
Figure 3 85: Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard Complete Knee System: Cruciate Retaining
Figure 3 86: Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard 360 Revision Knee System
Figure 3 87: Class 2 Device Recall Persona” Trabecular Metal” Tibia Plate Instruments And Modular Brackets
Figure 3 88: Class 2 Device Recall Persona Ps Conventional Articular Surfaces
Figure 3 89: Class 2 Device Recall Prelude Patella Femoral Resurfacing Knee System
Figure 3 90: Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard Xp Knee System
Figure 3 91-92: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer
Figure 3 93: Class 2 Device Recall Nexgen Knee Gender Solutions Female (Gsf) Femoral Components
Figure 3 94: Class 2 Device Recall Nexgen Complete Knee Solution Cruciate Retaining (Cr)Flex Femoral Components
Figure 3 95: Class 2 Device Recall Nexgen Complete Knee Solution Legacy Posterior Stabilized (Lps); Lpsflex Fixed Bearing Femoral
Figure 3 96: Class 2 Device Recall Nexgen Knee Prosthesis & Legacy Knee Prosthesis W/Conidium Surface Harderning Process
Figure 3 97: Class 2 Device Recall Nexgen Compl. Knee Sol. Legacy Posterior Stabilized/Constrained Condylar Knee Femoral Components/Art
Figure 3 98: Class 2 Device Recall Next Generation Knee System
Figure 3 99: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Unicompartmental Knee System
Figure 3 100: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Patellofemoral Joint Prosthesis
Figure 3 101: Class 2 Device Recall Gender Solutions Naturalknee Flex System; Nex Gen Complete Knee Solution Crflex Gender Solutions
Figure 3 102: Class 2 Device Recall Naturalknee Ii System
Figure 3 103: Class 2 Device Recall Nexgen Complete Knee Solution Lpsflex And Knee Gender Solutions Female (Gsf) Porous Femoral Compone
Figure 3 104: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Nexgen Lpsflex Mobile And Lps Mobile Bearing Knee System
Figure 3 105: Class 2 Device Recall Nexgen Complete Knee Solution Mis Total Knee Procedure Cruciate Retaining Cr Flex Mobile Bearing Pre
Figure 3 106: Class 2 Device Recall Nexgen Precoat Stemmed Tibial/Nexgen Nonaugmentable Tibial Component
Figure 3 107: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Nexgen Precoat Stemmed Tibia
Figure 3 108: Class 2 Device Recall Persona Em
Figure 3 109: Class 2 Device Recall Oxford Fixed Lateral
Figure 3 110: Class 2 Device Recall Natural Knee Ii Revision Femoral Stem, 125Mm
Figure 3 111: Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard M Series Unicondylar Tibial Bearings
Figure 3 112: Class 3 Device Recall Biomet Mck Maximum Congruent Knee System
Figure 3 113: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Nexgen Pri Femoral Impactor Head
Figure 3 114: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Nexgen Augment
Figure 3 115: Class 2 Device Recall Persona Anterior Referencing Sizer With Locking Boom
Figure 3 116: Class 2 Recall Nexgen
Figure 3 117: Class 2 Device Recall Persona Trabecular Metal Tibial Plate/Persona Tm Tibia
Figure 3 118: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Persona
Figure 3 119: Class 2 Device Recall Nexgen Complete Knee Solution Monoblock Tibial Provisional/Drill Guide
Figure 3 120: Class 2 Device Recall Persona Cemented Tibial Broach Inserter/Extractor
Figure 3 121: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Psi Knee Persona Jigs (Patient Specific Instrumentation)
Figure 3 122: Class 2 Device Recall Persona Stemmed 5 Degree Cemented Tibia
Figure 3 123: Class 2 Device Recall Persona The Personalized Knee System
Figure 3 124: Class 2 Device Recall Persona
Figure 3 125: Class 2 Device Recall Naturalknee System Patella Bushings
Figure 3 126: Class 2 Device Recall Persona
Figure 3 127: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Patellofemoral Joint (Pfj) Prosthesis
Figure 3 128: Class 2 Device Recall Knee Instrument Fixation Screws
Figure 3 129: Class 2 Device Recall Knee Stem Extensions & Impactor Sleeve
Figure 3 130: Class 2 Device Recall Persona Distal Valgus Alignment Guide
Figure 3 131: Class 2 Device Recall Persona Tasp Ps
Figure 3 132: Class 2 Device Recall Persona (Tm)
Figure 3 133: Class 2 Device Recall Nexgen Complete Knee Solution Mis Total Knee Procedure Stemmed Tibial Component, Precoat
Figure 3 134: Class 2 Device Recall Hinged Knee Support
Figure 3 135: Class 2 Device Recall Cartilage Knee Brace
Figure 3 136: Class 2 Device Recall Drop Lok” Knee Brace
Figure 3 137-138: Class 2 Device Recall Natural Knee
Figure 3 139: Class 2 Device Recall Naturalknee/Apollo” Knee
Figure 3 140-141: Class 2 Device Recall Gender Solutions” Naturalknee Flex System
Figure 3 142: Class 2 Device Recall Apollo
Figure 3 143: Class 2 Device Recall Insall/Burstein And Mg Ii Total Knee System
Figure 3 144: Class 2 Device Recall Nexgen Complete Knee Solution
Figure 3 145: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Segmental Systems
Figure 3 146: Class 2 Device Recall Ringloc Acetabular Shells
Figure 3 147: Class 2 Device Recall Oss Cemented Im Stem 12X150
Figure 3 148: Class 2 Device Recall Affixus Hip Fracture Nail
Figure 3 149: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Biomet
Figure 3 150: Class 2 Device Recall Various Polyethylene Implants
Figure 3 151: Class 2 Device Recall Orthosize
Figure 3 152: Class 2 Device Recall Avenir Mller Stem
Figure 3 153: Class 2 Device Recall Biomet Hip Fracture Plating Systems
Figure 3 154: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer
Figure 3 155: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis
Figure 3 156: Class 2 Device Recall Orthopedic Manual Surgical Instrument
Figure 3 157: Class 2 Device Recall Bipolar Hip Device
Figure 3 158: Class 2 Device Recall Metasul Taper Liners, Metasul Femoral Heads
Figure 3 159: Class 2 Device Recall Versys Beaded Fc, Various Sizes
Figure 3 160: Class 2 Device Recall Collarless Polished Taper Hip Prosthesis
Figure 3 161: Class 2 Device Recall Biomet Integral Centralizer Hip System
Figure 3 162: Class 2 Device Recall Vision Ringloc Acetabular System
Figure 3 163: Class 2 Device Recall Zmr Trabecular Metal
Figure 3 164: Class 3 Device Recall Biomet Mallory/Head
Figure 3 165: Class 3 Device Recall Biomet
Figure 3 166: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis With Kinectiv Technology
Figure 3 167: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer
Figure 3 168: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer
Figure 3 169: Class 2 Device Recall Ringloc Acetabular Shell Limited Hole Finned 52Mm
Figure 3 170: Class 2 Device Recall Trilogy Cups
Figure 3 171: Class 2 Device Recall Sirius Polish Cemented Stem 34B
Figure 3 172: Class 2 Device Recall Trilogy Bone Screws
Figure 3 173: Class 2 Device Recall Trabecular Metal Tibial Impactor
Figure 3 174: Class 2 Device Recall Continuum Hip Cups
Figure 3 175: Class 2 Device Recall Moore & Thompson Hip Stems
Figure 3 176: Class 2 Device Recall Moore Hip Prosthesis Long Fenestrated Stem
Figure 3 177: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Stem Standard & Extended Offset
Figure 3 178: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis with Kinectiv Technology
Figure 3 179: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer M/L Taper Reduced Neck Standard & Extended Offset
Figure 3 180: Class 2 Device Recall VerSys Hip System, Beaded Fullcoat Stems
Figure 3 181: Class 2 Device Recall G7 Positioning Guide Post
Figure 3 182: Class 2 Device Recall Trabecular Metal Modular Acetabular System
Figure 3 183: Class 2 Device Recall Versys
Figure 3 184: Class 2 Device Recall Moore
Figure 3 185: Class 2 Device Recall Xl Por St, Bowed, Sterile, Various Sizes
Figure 3 186: Class 2 Device Recall Segmental Vss Bowed 19x190mm, Sterile,
Figure 3 187: Class 2 Device Recall Segmental Fluted Stem, Sterile, Various Sizes
Figure 3 188: Class 2 Device Recall Por Fullct Fem St, Sterile, Various Sizes
Figure 3 189: Class 2 Device Recall Tibial IM Nail 15mmdx44cm, Sterile
Figure 3 190: Class 2 Device Recall Fem IM Nail, Sterile, Various Sizes
Figure 3 191: Class 2 Device Recall Segmental Male/female Taper, Various Sizes
Figure 3 192: Class 2 Device Recall Cobalt Bone Cement
Figure 3 193: Class 2 Device Recall Optigun Ratchet
Figure 3 194: Class 2 Device Recall Osteobond Copolymer Bone Cement
Figure 3 195: Class 2 Device Recall Palacos RG Radioplaque Bone Cement 1 x 40 g Single (with Gentamicin), 40.8 g Methyl Acrylate Copol
Figure 3 196: Kinematic Analysis: Posterior Stabilized, Fixed Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty with Attune Knee System - Phase 2
Figure 3 197: Kinematic Analysis: Posterior Stabilized, Fixed Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty with Attune Knee System
Figure 3 198: Stereo Radiography of TKA Patella Mechanics
Figure 3 199: Pilot Study Using Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) to Evaluate the Fixation of the Tibial Components in the DePuy M.B.T. Revision Knee System
Figure 3 200: Kinematics After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Figure 3 201: The Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating Platform (RP) TC3 Revision Knee in Revision Knee Arthroplasty
Figure 3 202: DePuy Attune Total Knee Arthroplasty RSA Study
Figure 3 203: Clinical and Economic Comparison of Robot Assisted Versus Manual Knee Replacement
Figure 3 204: PS150 Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Registry
Figure 3 205: ATTUNE Single-Use Instrumentation vs. ATTUNE Reusable Instrumentation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
Figure 3 206: A Single-Center, Epidemiological Study of the Survivorship of the DePuy Sigma HP Unicompartmental Knee Prosthesis
Figure 3 207: ATTUNE® Revision- Complex Primary in Total Knee Arthroplasty Population
Figure 3 208: ATTUNE Revision System in the Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Population
Figure 3 209: Evaluation of Post-Operative Recovery in ATTUNE® Total Knee Arthroplasty
Figure 3 210: Clinical Outcomes of Knee Replacement
Figure 3 211: Multi-center, Non-comparative Study of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Functional Performance
Figure 3 212: Prospective, Multiconfiguration Study to Assess Functional Performance of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty System
Figure 3 213: ATTUNE TM Video-fluoroscopy Study
Figure 3 214: Total Knee Arthroplasty Videofluoroscopy
Figure 3 215: Study of Knee Replacements for Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis
Figure 3 216: Kinematic Analysis of a PS, FB Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (ATTUNE Knee System) Using Dynamic RSA
Figure 3 217: A Study to Compare the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating-platform High-flexion (RP-F) Versus the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating-platform (RP) Knee Implants
Figure 3 218: Evaluation of Patellar Crepitus Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
Figure 3 219: A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Functional Outcome After Knee Replacement
Figure 3 220: In-vivo Comparison of Different Levels of Femoral Rollback in a Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (DePuyAttune)
Figure 3 221: Early Clinical Results of Mobile-Bearing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Figure 3 222: 14022 ATTUNE Cementless RP Clinical Performance Evaluation
Figure 3 223: DSJ-2016-07 ATTUNE® Cementless CR RP Japan
Figure 3 224: Kinematics Analysis of SIGMA® Partial Knee System
Figure 3 225: Sigma CR150 Versus Sigma CR Knee RCT
Figure 3 226: Evaluation of the TruMatch® System in Knee Prosthetic Surgery
Figure 3 227: Long-term Study of the DePuy Low Contact Stress (LCS) Complete Total Knee System
Figure 3 228: Postmarketing Study to Determine Performance of the SIGMA HP® PARTIAL KNEE SYSTEM
Figure 3 229: Attune with TruMatch TM Personalized Solutions Instruments
Figure 3 230: Survivorship of the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Fixed Bearing Knee with a Cobalt Chrome Tibial Tray
Figure 3 231: THA Kinematics and Sound for Subjects for Normal, Diseased and Implanted Hips
Figure 3 232: An Electronic Data Capture Study to Assess the Long-term Performance of the DePuy PROXIMA™ Hip in Primary Total Hip Replacement
Figure 3 233: ASR-XL Metal-on-Metal 522 Post-Market Surveillance Study
Figure 3 234: Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal 522 Post-Market Surveillance Study
Figure 3 235: Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling Around Uncemented Components in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Figure 3 236: Metal-Metal Articulations Versus Standard 28 mm Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
Figure 3 237: Cup Position in THA With Standard Instruments
Figure 3 238: Post-approval Study of the DURALOC® Option Ceramic-on-Ceramic Hip Prosthesis System
Figure 3 239: Dynamic ROM Via Gait Analysis and 3D Fluoroscopy in THA With Different Head Diameters
Figure 3 240: Ceramic-on-Ceramic (COC) 36mm Acetabular Bearing Insert Post Approval Study-New Subjects (COC36mmPAS)
Figure 3 241: Marathon and Enduron Polyethylene at Long-Term Follow-up
Figure 3 242: 28mm Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Study
Figure 3 243: Ceramic on Ceramic (COC) 36mm PAS IDE Rollover Subjects; Ceramic Acetabular Bearing with Ceramic Femoral Head in Total Hip Replacement
Figure 3 244: THA Kinematics and Sound for Subjects Implanted Using Various Surgical Approaches
Figure 3 245: Cemented Versus Uncemented Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures
Figure 3 246: Cemented Marathon/Corail Versus Pinnacle/Corail
Figure 3 247: A Prospective Randomized Trial of Uncemented Versus Cemented Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures (HEMI04)

Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
3 of 4

Loading
LOADING...

4 of 4
  • DePuy Synthes
  • Zimmer Biomet
  • Stryker
  • Smith & Nephew
  • B. Braun
  • Maxx Medical
  • Exactech
  • Heraeus
  • Adler
  • Biorad Medisys
  • Evolutis India
  • LINK
  • Medtronic
  • MicroPort
  • MN Solutions
  • Sharma Orthopedic
  • Uma Surgicals
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
5 of 4
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
Order Online - visit: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4755231
Adroll
adroll