+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 195 Pages
  • November 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 6011313
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Market presents strategic opportunities for healthcare executives seeking to improve oncology patient safety and operational resilience. This comprehensive analysis outlines evolving management strategies, regulatory dynamics, and key developments shaping global neutropenia therapeutics.

Market Snapshot: Growth and Dynamics in Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia

The global Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Market grew from USD 7.77 billion in 2024 to USD 8.10 billion in 2025. It is projected to continue expanding at a CAGR of 4.16%, achieving USD 10.78 billion by 2032. This growth is fueled by increased adoption of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, emergence of biosimilar alternatives, and rising incidences of chemotherapy across oncology care pathways. Tariff policies in key markets and advanced monitoring technologies underscore the market’s dynamic competitive and regulatory landscape.

Scope & Segmentation: In-Depth Analysis of Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Therapeutics

This report offers a detailed breakdown of the market by product, therapy, delivery setting, patient groups, and more. Rigorous analysis across all major global regions supports strategic decision-making.

  • Product Type: Eflapegrastim, Filgrastim, Lipegfilgrastim, Pegfilgrastim
  • Therapy: Prophylaxis, Treatment
  • Route of Administration: Intravenous Injection, Subcutaneous Injection
  • End User: Clinic, Home Care, Hospital
  • Distribution Channel: Hospital Pharmacy, Online Pharmacy, Retail Pharmacy
  • Treatment Setting: Inpatient, Outpatient
  • Patient Group: Adult, Geriatric, Pediatric
  • Dosage Strength: 5 Mcg/Kg, 6 Mg
  • Regions Covered: Americas (North America, Latin America), Europe, Middle East & Africa (Europe, Middle East, Africa), Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan)
  • Key Companies: Amgen Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Sandoz International GmbH, Pfizer Inc., Viatris Inc., Biocon Ltd., Fresenius Kabi AG, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Cipla Ltd., Lupin Ltd.

Key Takeaways: Strategic Insights for Senior Decision-Makers

  • Protecting patient safety and ensuring treatment continuity remains a priority as neutropenia continues to drive hospitalizations and care interventions across oncology practices.
  • Long-acting and biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factors are reshaping clinical pathways through improved convenience, competitiveness, and alignment with outpatient models.
  • Next-generation digital monitoring and individualized dosing are powering more patient-centric and data-driven management strategies for healthcare providers and payers.
  • Regulatory alignment on biosimilar approvals and integration of real-world evidence are accelerating product availability and fueling innovation in both developed and emerging markets.
  • Adaptive market approaches, including patient support programs and localization of manufacturing, enhance access and resilience amid regional variations in reimbursement and policy enforcement.

Tariff Impact: Navigating Policy and Supply Chain Shifts

Revised U.S. tariffs on pharmaceutical imports have introduced cost pressures and prompted manufacturers to reconsider sourcing strategies. Onshore manufacturing, dual sourcing, and regional inventory management are strengthening supply chain continuity and mitigating potential disruptions. Collaboration with trade entities and dynamic pricing frameworks help maintain market access while safeguarding affordability in the evolving regulatory climate.

Methodology & Data Sources: Ensuring Rigorous, Actionable Research

The report integrates mixed-methods research, combining interviews with oncologists, nurses, payers, and procurement leaders with secondary analyses from journals, registries, and company disclosures. All quantitative findings are standardized and cross-verified. Peer and external expert review processes uphold methodological rigor, with data privacy and compliance assured throughout.

Why This Report Matters: Value for Strategic Stakeholders

  • Enables targeted decision-making through comprehensive trend analysis and actionable segmentation insights.
  • Supports robust scenario planning and risk management by tracking regulatory and tariff influences on global distribution.
  • Empowers commercial strategists by detailing innovation trajectories, competitive positioning, and regional adoption drivers.

Conclusion

Optimizing neutropenia management remains central to oncology excellence. This report delivers deep strategic context to support investments in therapeutic innovation, patient access, and policy adaptation, equipping leaders to champion effective, resilient care strategies.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Expansion of long-acting pegfilgrastim biosimilars improving prophylaxis access and affordability for diverse oncology populations
5.2. Integration of AI-driven risk stratification tools for personalized neutropenia prevention and treatment planning in clinical settings
5.3. Adoption of oral myeloid growth factors to enhance patient convenience and adherence in community oncology practices
5.4. Rising emphasis on real-world evidence generation to demonstrate cost-effectiveness and outcomes of neutropenia interventions
5.5. Growth of telehealth-supported neutropenia management programs for remote monitoring and early intervention in rural patient cohorts
5.6. Emergence of value-based reimbursement models linking neutropenia treatment outcomes to payer contracting and pricing strategies
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Market, by Product Type
8.1. Eflapegrastim
8.2. Filgrastim
8.3. Lipegfilgrastim
8.4. Pegfilgrastim
9. Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Market, by Therapy
9.1. Prophylaxis
9.2. Treatment
10. Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Market, by Route Of Administration
10.1. Intravenous Injection
10.2. Subcutaneous Injection
11. Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Market, by End User
11.1. Clinic
11.2. Home Care
11.3. Hospital
12. Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Market, by Distribution Channel
12.1. Hospital Pharmacy
12.2. Online Pharmacy
12.3. Retail Pharmacy
13. Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Market, by Treatment Setting
13.1. Inpatient
13.2. Outpatient
14. Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Market, by Patient Group
14.1. Adult
14.2. Geriatric
14.3. Pediatric
15. Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Market, by Dosage Strength
15.1. 5 Mcg/Kg
15.2. 6 Mg
16. Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Market, by Region
16.1. Americas
16.1.1. North America
16.1.2. Latin America
16.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
16.2.1. Europe
16.2.2. Middle East
16.2.3. Africa
16.3. Asia-Pacific
17. Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Market, by Group
17.1. ASEAN
17.2. GCC
17.3. European Union
17.4. BRICS
17.5. G7
17.6. NATO
18. Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia Market, by Country
18.1. United States
18.2. Canada
18.3. Mexico
18.4. Brazil
18.5. United Kingdom
18.6. Germany
18.7. France
18.8. Russia
18.9. Italy
18.10. Spain
18.11. China
18.12. India
18.13. Japan
18.14. Australia
18.15. South Korea
19. Competitive Landscape
19.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
19.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
19.3. Competitive Analysis
19.3.1. Amgen Inc.
19.3.2. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
19.3.3. Sandoz International GmbH
19.3.4. Pfizer Inc.
19.3.5. Viatris Inc.
19.3.6. Biocon Ltd.
19.3.7. Fresenius Kabi AG
19.3.8. Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
19.3.9. Cipla Ltd.
19.3.10. Lupin Ltd.

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia market report include:
  • Amgen Inc.
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Sandoz International GmbH
  • Pfizer Inc.
  • Viatris Inc.
  • Biocon Ltd.
  • Fresenius Kabi AG
  • Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
  • Cipla Ltd.
  • Lupin Ltd.

Table Information