+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Neutropenia Treatment Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 182 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5674204
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The neutropenia treatment market is undergoing rapid change as healthcare systems demand more adaptive, patient-focused solutions to address the risks and treatment challenges facing oncology patients. This report equips senior decision-makers with data-driven insights to navigate evolving clinical pathways, pricing pressures, and strategic partnerships across the global landscape.

Market Snapshot: Neutropenia Treatment Market Size and Growth Outlook

The neutropenia treatment market grew from USD 15.08 billion in 2024 to USD 15.85 billion in 2025. It is expected to maintain strong momentum, projected to reach USD 22.54 billion by 2032, supported by a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.14%.

Scope & Segmentation

  • Treatment Type: Filgrastim (300 mcg, 480 mcg, 600 mcg), Lenograstim (3 mg, 5 mg), Pegfilgrastim (6 mg)
  • Therapy Class: Biosimilar, Originator
  • Route of Administration: Intravenous Injection, Subcutaneous Injection
  • Distribution Channel: Hospital Pharmacy (Inpatient, Outpatient), Online Pharmacy, Retail Pharmacy (Chain, Independent)
  • End User: Ambulatory Care Centers, Clinics, Home Care, Hospitals (Private, Public)
  • Patient Age Group: Adult, Geriatric, Pediatric
  • Severity: Mild, Moderate, Severe
  • Geographic Focus: Americas (North America: United States, Canada, Mexico; Latin America: Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Peru), Europe, Middle East & Africa (e.g., United Kingdom, Germany, France, Middle East countries, Sub-Saharan Africa), Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Southeast Asian countries)
  • Featured Companies: Amgen Inc., Sandoz International GmbH, Pfizer Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Viatris Inc., Coherus BioSciences, Inc., Fresenius Kabi AG, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Biocon Limited, Celltrion, Inc.

Key Takeaways for Senior Decision-Makers

  • Advances in biologics, biosimilars, and administration techniques are reshaping the clinical landscape and shifting market preferences, with clear implications for procurement and lifecycle management strategies.
  • Personalized neutropenia management is gaining traction, balancing patient safety and convenience while prompting a reevaluation of standardized dosing and care protocols.
  • Increasing adoption of digital health tools is enabling real-time monitoring, driving proactive interventions, and supporting value-based care initiatives.
  • The competitive environment is defined by strategic alliances, technology transfer, and shared distribution networks that broaden product reach in both established and emerging markets.
  • End-user diversity—from hospitals to ambulatory and home care—demands targeted solutions and flexible supply models to address unique tolerability and care delivery needs.

Tariff Impact: Navigating Supply Chain and Pricing Volatility

Tariff adjustments in the United States for 2025 are set to create ripple effects throughout the neutropenia treatment supply chain. As levies on biologic intermediates increase, pharmaceutical manufacturers may revisit sourcing and localization strategies to contain rising costs. Downstream, hospitals and specialty pharmacies are likely to experience budget pressures, leading to renewed interest in supply chain optimization, alternate sourcing, and collaborative purchasing frameworks. Proactive scenario planning and agile risk management will be critical to maintaining patient access to essential therapies.

Methodology & Data Sources

This report employs a dual approach—conducting expert interviews with hematologists, oncologists, and clinical pharmacists, combined with targeted surveys to hospital pharmacy directors and specialty pharmacy managers. Secondary sources include regulatory filings, industry presentations, and peer-reviewed literature, with triangulation and regular audits to ensure insight reliability and market credibility.

Why This Report Matters: Strategic Value for Decision-Makers

  • Enables informed planning by clarifying differentiation opportunities across patient segments, care settings, and geographies.
  • Equips stakeholders to anticipate and adapt to supply chain and regulatory disruptions in an increasingly complex environment.
  • Supports effective alignment between clinical, operational, and procurement priorities to sustain competitive advantage.

Conclusion

With new therapies, digital solutions, and evolving care models converging, the neutropenia treatment segment offers dynamic growth opportunities. Strategic adaptation—rooted in data and collaborative innovation—will be essential for leaders seeking to advance patient outcomes and operational efficiency.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Market entry of pegfilgrastim on-body injector devices improving patient adherence
5.2. Rising adoption of biosimilar filgrastim products driving cost competitive dynamics
5.3. Development of oral granulocyte colony-stimulating factor analogs for outpatient use
5.4. Integration of pharmacogenomics for personalized neutropenia prophylaxis dosing strategies
5.5. Pipeline focus on CXCR4 antagonists for accelerated neutrophil recovery in transplant patients
5.6. Expansion of digital monitoring tools to track neutrophil counts and treatment compliance
5.7. Increased supportive care reimbursement policies boosting adoption of G-CSF therapies
5.8. Growth of emerging markets with rising chemotherapy-induced neutropenia incidence rates
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Treatment Type
8.1. Filgrastim
8.1.1. 300 mcg
8.1.2. 480 mcg
8.1.3. 600 mcg
8.2. Lenograstim
8.2.1. 3 mg
8.2.2. 5 mg
8.3. Pegfilgrastim
8.3.1. 6 mg
9. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Therapy Class
9.1. Biosimilar
9.2. Originator
10. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Route Of Administration
10.1. Intravenous Injection
10.2. Subcutaneous Injection
11. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Distribution Channel
11.1. Hospital Pharmacy
11.1.1. Inpatient Pharmacy
11.1.2. Outpatient Pharmacy
11.2. Online Pharmacy
11.3. Retail Pharmacy
11.3.1. Chain Pharmacy
11.3.2. Independent Pharmacy
12. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by End User
12.1. Ambulatory Care Centers
12.2. Clinics
12.3. Home Care
12.4. Hospitals
12.4.1. Private
12.4.2. Public
13. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Patient Age Group
13.1. Adult
13.2. Geriatric
13.3. Pediatric
14. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Severity
14.1. Mild
14.2. Moderate
14.3. Severe
15. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Region
15.1. Americas
15.1.1. North America
15.1.2. Latin America
15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
15.2.1. Europe
15.2.2. Middle East
15.2.3. Africa
15.3. Asia-Pacific
16. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Group
16.1. ASEAN
16.2. GCC
16.3. European Union
16.4. BRICS
16.5. G7
16.6. NATO
17. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Country
17.1. United States
17.2. Canada
17.3. Mexico
17.4. Brazil
17.5. United Kingdom
17.6. Germany
17.7. France
17.8. Russia
17.9. Italy
17.10. Spain
17.11. China
17.12. India
17.13. Japan
17.14. Australia
17.15. South Korea
18. Competitive Landscape
18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
18.3. Competitive Analysis
18.3.1. Amgen Inc.
18.3.2. Sandoz International GmbH
18.3.3. Pfizer Inc.
18.3.4. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
18.3.5. Viatris Inc.
18.3.6. Coherus BioSciences, Inc.
18.3.7. Fresenius Kabi AG
18.3.8. Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
18.3.9. Biocon Limited
18.3.10. Celltrion, Inc.
List of Tables
List of Figures

Samples

Loading
LOADING...

Companies Mentioned

The key companies profiled in this Neutropenia Treatment market report include:
  • Amgen Inc.
  • Sandoz International GmbH
  • Pfizer Inc.
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Viatris Inc.
  • Coherus BioSciences, Inc.
  • Fresenius Kabi AG
  • Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
  • Biocon Limited
  • Celltrion, Inc.

Table Information