+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

PRINTER FRIENDLY

Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market - A Global and Regional Analysis: Focus on Service Type, Technology, Application (Yield Mapping, Soil Management, Pricing Models, Break-Even Analysis - Analysis and Forecast, 2020-2025

  • ID: 5313524
  • Report
  • April 2021
  • Region: Global
  • 255 pages
  • BIS Research
Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market to Reach $3,089.8 Million by 2025

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • 365FarmNet GmbH
  • AT&T Inc.
  • Fujitsu Limited
  • Kubota Corporation
  • Pixhawk
  • Small Robot Company
Market Segmentation
  • Service Type- Software-as-a-Service, Equipment-as-a-Service
  • Technology- Data Analytics and Intelligence, Guidance Technology, Sensing Technology, and Variable Rate Application Technology, and Others
  • Applications- Yield Mapping and Monitoring, Soil Management, Crop Health Management, Navigation and Positioning, and Others
  • Farm Produce- Cereals, Fiber Crops, Oil Crops, Pulses, Vegetables, Fruits, Roots and Tubers, and Tree Nuts
  • Region - North America, South America, Europe, U.K., China, Asia-Pacific and Japan, and Middle East and Africa
Regional Segmentation
  • North America - U.S., Canada, and Mexico
  • South America - Brazil, Argentina, and Rest-of-South America
  • Europe - Germany, France, Italy, and Rest-of-Europe
  • U.K.
  • China
  • Asia-Pacific and Japan - Australia, Japan, India, and Rest-of-Asia-Pacific and Japan
  • Middle East and Africa - Israel, Saudi Arabia, South Africa
Business Drivers
  • Increasing Demand for Global Food Production
  • Economic Need for Precision Agriculture
  • Low Capital Investment for Customers
Business Challenges
  • Price Inflation of Agricultural Produce
  • Lack of Technical Awareness Amongst Farmers
Business Opportunities
  • Growth of Agriculture Service Economy
  • Increasing Investments for Agriculture Technology
  • Rising Trend of Farming-as-a-Service in India
Key Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Companies Profiled

AGCO Corporation, CLAAS Group, CNH Industrial N.V., Deere & Company, Kubota Corporation, Yanmar Co. Ltd., 365FarmNet GmbH, Agrivi, CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Fujitsu Limited, IBM Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Robert Bosch GmbH, Trimble Inc., Parrot SA, Pixhawk, Precision Hawk Inc., SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd., Harvest Automation Inc., Naio Technologies, Small Robot Company, Syngenta AG, Accenture plc, Airbus S.A.S, AT&T Inc., Ceres Imaging Inc., Hexagon Agriculture, Intertek Group plc, Nutrien AgSolutions Inc., Raven Industries Inc., SGS S.A., Taranis, Teejet Technologies, Topcon Corporation

Key Questions Answered in this Report:
  • What is the expected global agriculture technology-as-a-service market size in terms of value during the period 2020-2025?
  • What is the expected future scenario and revenue generation by the different types of service, including software-as-a-service (SaaS) and equipment-as-a-service (EaaS)?
  • What is the expected future scenario and revenue generation by different types of agriculture technologies offered as services, including data analytics and intelligence, guidance technology, sensing technology, and variable rate application technology, among others?
  • What is the expected future scenario and revenue generation by the application segments for which agriculture technologies are offered as services, including yield mapping and monitoring, soil management, crop health management, and navigation and positioning, among others?
  • Which region is the largest market for global agriculture technology-as-a-service market?
  • What is the expected future scenario and the revenue generation by different regions and countries in the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Rest-of-the-World?
  • What is the competitive strength of the key players in the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market on the basis of the analysis of their recent developments, product offerings, and regional presence?
  • What are the different pricing models available in the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market?
  • How are the adoption scenario, related opportunities, and challenges associated with agriculture technology-as-a-service?
  • What are the market dynamics of the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market, including market drivers, restraints, and opportunities?
Market Overview

The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market is projected to grow from $1,101.6 million in 2020 to $3,089.8 million by 2025, at a CAGR of 22.91% from 2020 to 2025. High growth in the market is expected to be driven by the growing need to adopt agriculture technologies across the industry, conversion of capital expenditure into operational expenditure for customers, and greater customer retention for service providers. The added benefits of lower costs, scalability, integration, and accessibility associated with ATaaS are also expected to be responsible for the reported growth of the business model.

Agriculture is the source of livelihood and sustenance of the economy in several regions of the world. Hence, the need to adopt advanced technologies in the agriculture industry has driven favorable initiatives, policies, and support shown by governments in countries such as the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany, France, Australia, India, and China. In emerging countries, the growth of the market is expected to be driven by rising awareness among governments and manufacturers-turned-service providers about the need to elevate farm produce while evaluating the farm expenditure of their growers. Furthermore, rising concerns over global food security and sustainability have led to extensive investments by governments across the world.

Competitive Landscape

The competitive landscape for the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market demonstrates an inclination toward companies adopting strategies such as product launch and development and partnerships, collaborations, and joint ventures. The major established players in the market are focusing on product launches and developments to introduce new technologies or developing further on the existing service portfolio. Deere and Co., Trimble Inc., AGCO Corporation, 365FarmNet, Agrivi, PrecisionHawk., Accenture plc, SGS SA, Intertek plc, Small Robot Company, Ceres Imaging Inc., Naio Technologies, and Airbus S.A.S among others, are some of the prominent players in the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market. The market is highly fragmented with the presence of a large number of small- to medium-sized companies that compete with each other and the large enterprises.

Regional Market Dynamics

North America is expected to generate the largest market share of the region during the forecast period due to the increased application of automation and control systems in most of the countries and the rising adoption rate of smart farming practices leading to increased adoption of agriculture technology-as-a-service. Constantly increasing farm sizes and the rise in global food demand from limited arable land shall ensure future market growth.

Asia-Pacific and Japan, in 2020, are expected to hold a smaller market share as compared to that of North America and Europe due to a late introduction of agriculture technologies and practices. However, Asia-Pacific and Japan are expected to have the fastest market growth with a CAGR of 28.20% during 2020 to 2025, owing to the amount of arable land available, dependence of agriculture on the countries for their economic and social growth along with the support by the government in terms of subsidy, regulations, or research. Smaller farm size in the larger part of the region is also expected to be a major driving force for exceeding the wide adoption of agriculture technology-as-a-service.
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • 365FarmNet GmbH
  • AT&T Inc.
  • Fujitsu Limited
  • Kubota Corporation
  • Pixhawk
  • Small Robot Company
Scope of the Study
1 Markets
1.1 Industry Outlook
1.1.1 Pricing Models
1.1.1.1 Bundled Per Acre
1.1.1.2 Per Pass/Service
1.1.1.3 Percentage of Yield Bump/Gain
1.1.1.4 Per Unit of Product Sold
1.1.2 Break-Even Analysis
1.1.2.1 Introduction
1.1.2.2 Components of Break-Even Analysis
1.1.2.3 Calculation of Break-Even Analysis
1.1.2.4 Case Studies
1.1.3 Advanced Solutions
1.1.3.1 Agriculture Robot-as-a-Service (ARaaS)
1.1.3.2 Agriculture Drone-as-a-Service (ADaaS)
1.1.4 Government Initiatives Landscape
1.1.4.1 North America
1.1.4.2 Europe
1.1.4.3 U.K.
1.1.4.4 Asia-Pacific and Japan
1.1.4.5 China
1.1.4.6 Rest-of-the-World
1.2 Business Dynamics
1.2.1 Business Drivers
1.2.1.1 Increasing Demand for Global Food Production
1.2.1.2 Economic Need for Precision Agriculture
1.2.1.3 Low Capital Investment for Customers
1.2.2 Business Challenges
1.2.2.1 Price Inflation of Agricultural Produce
1.2.2.2 Lack of Technical Awareness Amongst Farmers
1.2.3 Business Strategies
1.2.3.1 Product Developments
1.2.3.2 Market Developments
1.2.4 Corporate Strategies
1.2.4.1 Mergers & Acquisitions
1.2.4.2 Partnerships, Collaboration, and Joint Ventures
1.2.5 Business Opportunities
1.2.5.1 Growth of Agriculture Service Economy
1.2.5.2 Increasing Investments for Agriculture Technology
1.2.5.3 Rising Trend of Farming-as-a-Service in India

2 Application
2.1 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million
2.1.1 Market Overview
2.1.2 Yield Mapping and Monitoring
2.1.3 Soil Management
2.1.4 Crop Health Management
2.1.5 Navigation and Positioning
2.1.6 Others
2.2 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million
2.2.1 Market Overview
2.2.2 Cereals
2.2.3 Oil Crops
2.2.4 Fiber Crops
2.2.5 Pulses
2.2.6 Fruits
2.2.7 Vegetables
2.2.8 Tree Nuts
2.2.9 Roots and Tubers

3 Products
3.1 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type), $Million
3.1.1 Assumptions and Limitations for Analysis and Forecast of the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
3.1.2 Market Overview
3.1.3 Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)
3.1.4 Equipment-as-a-Service (EaaS)
3.2 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million
3.2.1 Market Overview
3.2.2 Data Analytics and Intelligence
3.2.3 Guidance Technology
3.2.4 Sensing Technology
3.2.5 Variable Rate Application Technology
3.2.6 Others

4 Region
4.1 North America
4.1.1 Markets
4.1.1.1 Business Drivers
4.1.1.2 Business Challenges
4.1.2 North America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country)
4.1.2.1 U.S.
4.1.2.1.1 Markets
4.1.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.1.2.1.1.2 Business Challenges
4.1.2.1.1.3 Business Drivers
4.1.2.2 Canada
4.1.2.2.1 Markets
4.1.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.1.2.2.1.2 Business Challenges
4.1.2.2.1.3 Business Drivers
4.1.2.3 Mexico
4.1.2.3.1 Markets
4.1.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.1.2.3.1.2 Business Challenges
4.1.2.3.1.3 Business Drivers
4.2 South America
4.2.1 Markets
4.2.1.1 Business Drivers
4.2.1.2 Business Challenges
4.2.2 South America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country)
4.2.2.1 Brazil
4.2.2.1.1 Markets
4.2.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.2.2.1.1.2 Business Challenges
4.2.2.1.1.3 Business Drivers
4.2.2.2 Argentina
4.2.2.2.1 Markets
4.2.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.2.2.2.1.2 Business Challenges
4.2.2.2.1.3 Business Drivers
4.2.2.3 Rest-of-South America
4.2.2.3.1 Markets
4.2.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.2.2.3.1.2 Business Challenges
4.2.2.3.1.3 Business Drivers
4.3 Europe
4.3.1 Markets
4.3.1.1 Business Drivers
4.3.1.2 Business Challenges
4.3.2 Europe Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country)
4.3.2.1 Germany
4.3.2.1.1 Markets
4.3.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.3.2.1.1.2 Business Challenges
4.3.2.1.1.3 Business Drivers
4.3.2.2 France
4.3.2.2.1 Markets
4.3.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.3.2.2.1.2 Business Challenges
4.3.2.2.1.3 Business Drivers
4.3.2.3 Italy
4.3.2.3.1 Markets
4.3.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.3.2.3.1.2 Business Challenges
4.3.2.3.1.3 Business Drivers
4.3.2.4 Rest-of-Europe
4.3.2.4.1 Markets
4.3.2.4.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.3.2.4.1.2 Business Challenges
4.3.2.4.1.3 Business Drivers
4.4 U.K.
4.4.1 Markets
4.4.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.4.1.2 Business Challenges
4.4.1.3 Business Drivers
4.5 Middle East and Africa
4.5.1 Markets
4.5.1.1 Business Drivers
4.5.1.2 Business Challenges
4.5.2 Middle East and Africa Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country)
4.5.2.1 Israel
4.5.2.1.1 Markets
4.5.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.5.2.1.1.2 Business Challenges
4.5.2.1.1.3 Business Drivers
4.5.2.2 Saudi Arabia
4.5.2.2.1 Markets
4.5.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.5.2.2.1.2 Business Challenges
4.5.2.2.1.3 Business Drivers
4.5.2.3 South Africa
4.5.2.3.1 Markets
4.5.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.5.2.3.1.2 Business Challenges
4.5.2.3.1.3 Business Drivers
4.6 China
4.6.1 Markets
4.6.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.6.1.2 Business Challenges
4.6.1.3 Business Drivers
4.7 Asia-Pacific and Japan
4.7.1 Markets
4.7.1.1 Business Drivers
4.7.1.2 Business Challenges
4.7.2 Asia-Pacific and Japan Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country)
4.7.2.1 Australia
4.7.2.1.1 Markets
4.7.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.7.2.1.1.2 Business Challenges
4.7.2.1.1.3 Business Drivers
4.7.2.2 Japan
4.7.2.2.1 Markets
4.7.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.7.2.2.1.2 Business Challenges
4.7.2.2.1.3 Business Drivers
4.7.2.3 India
4.7.2.3.1 Markets
4.7.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.7.2.3.1.2 Business Challenges
4.7.2.3.1.3 Business Drivers
4.7.2.4 Rest-of-Asia-Pacific and Japan
4.7.2.4.1 Markets
4.7.2.4.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.7.2.4.1.2 Business Challenges
4.7.2.4.1.3 Business Drivers

5 Markets - Competitive Benchmarking & Company Profiles
5.1 Competitive Benchmarking
5.2 Company Profiles
5.2.1 Overview
5.2.2 AGCO Corporation
5.2.2.1 Company Overview
5.2.2.1.1 Role of AGCO Corporation in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.2.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.2.1.3 Production Sites and R&D Analysis
5.2.2.2 Business Strategies
5.2.2.2.1 Product Development
5.2.2.2.2 Market Developments
5.2.2.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.2.3.1 Mergers and Acquisitions
5.2.2.3.2 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.2.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of AGCO Corporation
5.2.3 CLAAS Group
5.2.3.1 Company Overview
5.2.3.1.1 Role of CLAAS Group in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.3.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.3.1.3 Production Sites and R&D Analysis
5.2.3.2 Business Strategies
5.2.3.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.3.2.2 Market Developments
5.2.3.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.3.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.3.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of CLAAS Group
5.2.4 CNH Industrial N.V.
5.2.4.1 Company Overview
5.2.4.1.1 Role of CNH Industrial N.V. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.4.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.4.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.4.2 Business Strategies
5.2.4.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.4.2.2 Market Developments
5.2.4.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.4.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.4.3.2 Mergers and Acquisitions
5.2.4.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of CNH Industrial N.V.
5.2.5 Deere & Company
5.2.5.1 Company Overview
5.2.5.1.1 Role of Deere & Company in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.5.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.5.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.5.2 Business Strategies
5.2.5.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.5.2.2 Market Developments
5.2.5.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.5.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.5.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Deere & Company
5.2.6 Kubota Corporation
5.2.6.1 Company Overview
5.2.6.2 Role of Kubota Corporation in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.6.2.1 Service portfolio
5.2.6.2.2 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.6.3 Business Strategies
5.2.6.3.1 Market Developments
5.2.6.4 Corporate Strategies
5.2.6.4.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.6.5 Strengths and Weaknesses of Kubota Corporation
5.2.7 Yanmar Co. Ltd.
5.2.7.1 Company Overview
5.2.7.1.1 Role of Yanmar Co. Ltd in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.7.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.7.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.7.2 Business Strategies
5.2.7.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.7.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Yanmar Co. Ltd.
5.2.8 365FarmNet GmbH
5.2.8.1 Company Overview
5.2.8.1.1 Role of 365FarmNet GmbH in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.8.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.8.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.8.2 Corporate Strategies
5.2.8.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.8.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of 365FarmNet GmbH
5.2.9 Agrivi
5.2.9.1 Company Overview
5.2.9.1.1 Role of Agrivi in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.9.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.9.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.9.2 Business Strategies
5.2.9.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.9.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.9.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.9.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Agrivi
5.2.10 CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd.
5.2.10.1 Company Overview
5.2.10.1.1 Role of CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd. in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.10.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.10.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.10.2 Corporate Strategies
5.2.10.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.10.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd
5.2.11 Fujitsu Limited
5.2.11.1 Company Overview
5.2.11.1.1 Role of Fujitsu Limited in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.11.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.11.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.11.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Fujitsu Limited
5.2.12 IBM Corporation
5.2.12.1 Company Overview
5.2.12.1.1 Role of IBM Corporation in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.12.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.12.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.12.2 Business Strategies
5.2.12.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.12.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.12.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.12.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of IBM Corporation
5.2.13 Microsoft Corporation
5.2.13.1 Company Overview
5.2.13.1.1 Role of Microsoft Corporation in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.13.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.13.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.13.2 Business Strategies
5.2.13.2.1 Market Developments
5.2.13.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.13.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.13.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Microsoft Corporation
5.2.14 Robert Bosch GmbH
5.2.14.1 Company Overview
5.2.14.1.1 Role of Robert Bosch GmbH in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.14.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.14.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.14.2 Business Strategies
5.2.14.2.1 Market Developments
5.2.14.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Robert Bosch GmbH
5.2.15 Trimble Inc.
5.2.15.1 Company Overview
5.2.15.1.1 Role of Trimble Inc. in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.15.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.15.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.15.2 Business Strategies
5.2.15.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.15.2.2 Market Developments
5.2.15.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.15.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.15.3.2 Mergers and Acquisitions
5.2.15.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Trimble Inc.
5.2.16 Parrot SA
5.2.16.1 Company Overview
5.2.16.1.1 Role of Parrot SA in the Global Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.16.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.16.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.16.2 Corporate Strategies
5.2.16.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.16.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Parrot SA
5.2.17 Pixhawk
5.2.17.1 Company Overview
5.2.17.1.1 Role of Pixhawk in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.17.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.17.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.17.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Pixhawk
5.2.18 Precision Hawk Inc.
5.2.18.1 Company Overview
5.2.18.1.1 Role of PrecisionHawk Inc. in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.18.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.18.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.18.2 Corporate Strategies
5.2.18.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.18.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of PrecisionHawk Inc.
5.2.19 SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd
5.2.19.1 Company Overview
5.2.19.1.1 Role of SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.19.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.19.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.19.2 Business Strategies
5.2.19.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.19.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.19.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.19.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd
5.2.20 Harvest Automation Inc.
5.2.20.1 Company Overview
5.2.20.1.1 Role of Harvest Automation Inc. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.20.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.20.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.20.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Harvest Automation Inc.
5.2.21 Naio Technologies
5.2.21.1 Company Overview
5.2.21.1.1 Role of Naio Technologies in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.21.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.21.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.21.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Naio Technologies
5.2.22 Small Robot Company
5.2.22.1 Company Overview
5.2.22.1.1 Role of Small Robot Company in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.22.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.22.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.22.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Small Robot Company
5.2.23 Syngenta AG
5.2.23.1 Company Overview
5.2.23.1.1 Role of Syngenta AG in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.23.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.23.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.23.2 Corporate Strategies
5.2.23.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.24 Business Strategies
5.2.24.1 Market Developments
5.2.24.2 Strength and Weakness of Syngenta AG
5.2.25 Accenture plc
5.2.25.1 Company Overview
5.2.25.1.1 Role of Accenture plc in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.25.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.25.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.25.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Accenture plc
5.2.26 Airbus S.A.S
5.2.26.1 Company Overview
5.2.26.1.1 Role of Airbus S.A.S in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.26.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.26.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.26.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Airbus S.A.S
5.2.27 AT&T Inc.
5.2.27.1 Company Overview
5.2.27.1.1 Role of AT&T Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.27.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.27.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of AT&T Inc. Corporation
5.2.28 Ceres Imaging Inc.
5.2.28.1 Company Overview
5.2.28.1.1 Role of Ceres Imaging Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.28.1.2 Service Portfolio
5.2.28.2 Business Strategies
5.2.28.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.28.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Ceres Imaging Inc.
5.2.29 Hexagon Agriculture
5.2.29.1 Company Overview
5.2.29.1.1 Role of Hexagon Agriculture in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.29.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.29.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.29.2 Business Strategies
5.2.29.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.29.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.29.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.29.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Hexagon Agriculture
5.2.30 Intertek Group plc
5.2.30.1 Company Overview
5.2.30.1.1 Role of Intertek Group plc in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.30.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.30.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Intertek Group plc
5.2.31 Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.
5.2.31.1 Company Overview
5.2.31.1.1 Role of Nutrien AgSolution, Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.31.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.31.2 Business Strategies
5.2.31.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.31.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.31.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.31.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.
5.2.32 Raven Industries Inc.
5.2.32.1 Company Overview
5.2.32.1.1 Role of Raven Industries Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.32.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.32.2 Business Strategies
5.2.32.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.32.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.32.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.32.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Raven Industries Inc.
5.2.33 SGS S.A.
5.2.33.1 Company Overview
5.2.33.1.1 Role of SGS S.A. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.33.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.33.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of SGS S.A.
5.2.34 Taranis
5.2.34.1 Company Overview
5.2.34.1.1 Role of Taranis in Agriculture Technology-as-a-service market
5.2.34.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.34.2 Corporate Strategies
5.2.34.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.34.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Taranis
5.2.35 Teejet Technologies
5.2.35.1 Company Overview
5.2.35.1.1 Role of Teejet Technologies in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.35.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.35.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Teejet Technologies
5.2.36 Topcon Corporation
5.2.36.1 Company Overview
5.2.36.1.1 Role of Topcon Corporation in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.36.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.36.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.36.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Topcon Corporation

6 Research Methodology
6.1 Data Sources
6.1.1 Primary Data Sources
6.1.2 Secondary Data Sources
6.2 Market Research Methodology
6.2.1 Data Triangulation
6.2.1.1 Market Estimation and Forecast
6.2.2 Assumptions
6.2.3 Limitations

List of Figures
Figure 1: Macroeconomic Trends Impacting the Farming Industry Growth
Figure 2: Future Agriculture Field Scenario with Smart Farm Technologies
Figure 3: Drivers and Restraints: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Figure 4: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 5: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service, by Service Type, 2020 and 2025
Figure 6: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million 2020 and 2025
Figure 7: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million 2020 and 2025
Figure 8: Regional Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, Market Share & CAGR, $Million
Figure 9: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market Coverage
Figure 10: Advantages-Disadvantages of Bundled Per Acre Model
Figure 11: Advantages-Disadvantages of Per Pass/Service Model
Figure 12: Advantages-Disadvantages of Percentage of Yield Bump/Gain Model
Figure 13: Advantages-Disadvantages of Per Unit of Product Sold Model
Figure 14: Graphical Representation of Break-Even Analysis
Figure 15: Mathematical Representation of Break-Even Analysis
Figure 16: Break-Even Point of Satellite Images (ha)
Figure 17: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, Business Dynamics
Figure 18: Global Agricultural Productivity Index, 2004-2050
Figure 19: U.S. Farm Expenditure Vs. Income Statistics, 2011-2017
Figure 20: Key Business Strategies
Figure 21: Product Developments (by Company)
Figure 22: Market Developments (by Company)
Figure 23: Key Corporate Strategies
Figure 24: Mergers & Acquisitions (by Company)
Figure 25: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures (by Company)
Figure 26: Applications in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Figure 27: Yield Mapping and Monitoring in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 28: Soil Management in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 29: Crop Health Management in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 30: Navigation and Positioning in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 31: Other Applications in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 32: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce)
Figure 33: Cereals in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 34: Oil Crops Applications in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 35: Fiber Crops in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 36: Pulses in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 37: Fruits in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 38: Vegetables in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 39: Tree Nuts in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 40: Roots and Tubers in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 41: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type)
Figure 42: Advantages of Agriculture Software-as-a-Service (by Service Type)
Figure 43: Software-as-a-Service in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 44: Key Applications of AI & ML in Agriculture
Figure 45: Growth of Equipment-as-a-Service with Agriculture Technology
Figure 46: Equipment-as-a-Service in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 47: Advantages of Equipment-as-a-Service
Figure 48: Applications in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Figure 49: Advantages of Data Analytics for Agriculture Industry
Figure 50: Data Analytics & Intelligence in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 51: Guidance Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 52: Sensing Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 53: Variable Rate Application Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 54: Other Technologies in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2019-2025
Figure 55: Use of Guidance Technologies by Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Retailers in the U.S., $ Million, 2005-2020
Figure 56: Use of Sensing Technologies by Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Retailers in the U.S., $ Million, 2005-2020
Figure 57: Competitive Benchmarking Matrix
Figure 58: Share of Key Companies
Figure 59: Primary Interviews’ Breakdown, by Company, Designation, and Region
Figure 60: Sources of Secondary Research
Figure 61: Report Methodology
Figure 62: Data Triangulation
Figure 63: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approach for Market Estimation

List of Tables
Table 1: Summary Table of Satellite Sensor Features
Table 2: Cost Features of Satellite Sensors
Table 3: Key Players with ARaaS Business Model and their Products
Table 4: Key Players with ARaaS Business Model and their Products
Table 5: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2019-2025
Table 6: Key Yield Mapping and Monitoring Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 7: Key Soil Management Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 8: Key Crop Health Management Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 9: Key Navigation and Positioning Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 10: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Farm Produce), $Million, 2019-2025
Table 11: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type), $Million, 2019-2025
Table 12: Key Players with Software-as-a-Service Service Type
Table 13: Key Players with Equipment-as-a-Service Service Type
Table 14: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2019-2025
Table 15: Key Data Analytics & Intelligence Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 16: Key Guidance Technology Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 17: Key Sensing Technology Services in Global ATaaS Market
Table 18: Key Variable Rate Application Technology Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 19: Global Agriculture Technology as a Service Market (by Region), $Million, 2019-2025
Table 20: North America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2019-2025
Table 21: South America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2019-2025
Table 22: Europe Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2019-2025
Table 23: U.K. Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2019-2025
Table 24: Middle East and Africa Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Countries), $Million, 2019-2025
Table 25: China Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2019-2025
Table 26: Asia-Pacific and Japan Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2019-2025
Table 27: AGCO Corporation: Solution Service Portfolio
Table 28: Product Development
Table 29: Market Developments
Table 30: Mergers and Acquisitions
Table 31: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 32: CLAAS Group: Service Portfolio
Table 33: Product Developments
Table 34: Market Developments
Table 35: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 36: CNH Industrial N.V.: Service Portfolio
Table 37: Product Developments
Table 38: Market Developments
Table 39: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 40: Mergers and Acquisitions
Table 41: Deere & Company: Service Portfolio
Table 42: Product Developments
Table 43: Market Developments
Table 44: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 45: Kubota Corporation: Service portfolio
Table 46: Market Developments
Table 47: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 48: Yanmar Co. Ltd.: Service portfolio
Table 49: Product Developments
Table 50: 365FarmNet GmbH: Service portfolio
Table 51: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 52: Agrivi: Service portfolio
Table 53: Product Developments
Table 54: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 55: CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd.: Service Portfolio
Table 56: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 57: Fujitsu Limited: Service Portfolio
Table 58: IBM Corporation: Service Portfolio
Table 59: Product Developments
Table 60: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 61: Microsoft Corporation: Service portfolio
Table 62: Market Developments
Table 63: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 64: Robert Bosch GmbH: Service portfolio
Table 65: Market Developments
Table 66: Trimble Inc: Service portfolio
Table 67: Product Developments
Table 68: Market Developments
Table 69: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 70: Mergers and Acquisitions
Table 71: Parrot SA: Service portfolio
Table 72: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 73: Pixhawk: Service portfolio
Table 74: PrecisionHawk Inc.: Service portfolio
Table 75: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 76: SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd: Service portfolio
Table 77: Product Developments
Table 78: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 79: Harvest Automation Inc.: Service portfolio
Table 80: Naio Technologies: Service portfolio
Table 81: Small Robot Company: Service portfolio
Table 82: Syngenta AG: Service Portfolio
Table 83: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 84: Market Developments
Table 85: Accenture plc: Service portfolio
Table 86: Airbus S.A.S: Service portfolio
Table 87: AT&T Inc.: Service portfolio
Table 88: Ceres Imaging Inc.: Service portfolio
Table 89: Product Developments
Table 90: Hexagon Agriculture: Service portfolio
Table 91: Product Developments
Table 92: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 93: Intertek Group plc: Service portfolio
Table 94: Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.: Service portfolio
Table 95: Product Developments
Table 96: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 97: Raven Industries Inc.: Service portfolio
Table 98: Product Developments
Table 99: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 100: SGS S.A.: Service portfolio
Table 101: Taranis: Service portfolio
Table 102: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 103: Teejet Technologies: Service portfolio
Table 104: Topcon Corporation: Service portfolio
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
  • AGCO Corporation
  • CLAAS Group
  • CNH Industrial N.V.
  • Deere & Company
  • Kubota Corporation
  • Yanmar Co. Ltd.
  • 365FarmNet GmbH
  • Agrivi
  • CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd.
  • Fujitsu Limited
  • IBM Corporation
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Robert Bosch GmbH
  • Trimble Inc.
  • Parrot SA
  • Pixhawk
  • Precision Hawk Inc.
  • SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd
  • Harvest Automation Inc.
  • Naio Technologies
  • Small Robot Company
  • Syngenta AG
  • Accenture plc
  • Airbus S.A.S
  • AT&T Inc.
  • Ceres Imaging Inc.
  • Hexagon Agriculture
  • Intertek Group plc
  • Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.
  • Raven Industries Inc.
  • SGS S.A.
  • Taranis
  • Teejet Technologies
  • Topcon Corporation
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
Adroll
adroll