+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market - A Global and Regional Analysis: Focus on Product, Application, and Country Analysis and Forecast, 2020-2026

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 254 Pages
  • December 2021
  • Region: Global
  • BIS Research
  • ID: 5518070
10% Free customization
10% Free customization

This report comes with 10% free customization, enabling you to add data that meets your specific business needs.

The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market is expected to reach $3,031.1 million by 2026, with a CAGR of 24.42% during the forecast period 2021-2026. The growth rate in the market is because of the increased push by governing bodies toward agricultural automation and digitization.









Market Report Coverage - Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service


Market Segmentation

  • Application: Yield Mapping and Monitoring, Soil Management, Crop Health Monitoring, Navigation and Positioning, Others
  • Service Type: Software-as-a-Service, Equipment-as-a-Service
  • Technology: Data Analytics and Intelligence, Guidance Technology, Sensing Technology, Variable Rate Application Technology, Others

Regional Segmentation

  • North America: U.S., Canada, and Mexico
  • Europe: Germany, France, Italy, and Rest-of-Europe
  • U.K.
  • Middle East and Africa: South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Israel
  • China
  • Asia-Pacific: India, Japan, Australia, and Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
  • South America: Brazil, Argentina, Rest-of-South America

Market Growth Drivers

  • Increasing Demand for Global Food Production
  • Increase in Yields Drives Food Production Growth
  • Economic Need for Precision Agriculture
  • Surging Use of Modern Technologies in Agriculture
  • Decreasing Workforce in Agriculture Sector

Market Challenges

  • Lack of Proper Infrastructure such as Roads, Internet, and Network Connectivity
  • Cyber and Online Data Security
  • Huge Subscription Costs Act as a Challenge
  • Reluctance to Adopt and Lack of Technical Awareness Among Farmers

Market Opportunities

  • Growth in Agriculture Service Economy
  • Increasing Investments in Agriculture Technology Sector
  • Rising Trend of Farming-as-a-Service in India
  • Increasing Market Opportunities in Developing Countries
  • Increased Cloud Security

Key Companies Profiled


365FarmNet GmbH, Accenture plc, AGCO Corporation, Agrellus, Inc., Agrivi, Airbus S.A.S, AT&T Inc., Ceres Imaging Inc., CLAAS Group, CNH Industrial N.V., Cropln Technology Solutions Pvt.Ltd., Deere & Company, DeHaat, Fujitsu Limited, Harvest Automation Inc., Hexagon Agriculture, IBM Corporation, Intertek Group plc, Kubota Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Naio Technologies, Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc., Parrot SA, Pixhawk, Precision Hawk Inc., Raven Industries Inc., Robert Bosch GmbH, SGS S.A., Small Robot Company, Syngenta AG, SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd, Taranis, Teejet Technologies, Topcon Corporation, Trimble Inc., Yanmar Co. Ltd.



How This Report Can Add Value


This extensive report can help with:

  • This report covers major regions with established agriculture technology-as-a-service market.
  • Extensive competitive benchmarking of the top 36 players (including OEMs and equipment providers) has been done to offer a holistic view of the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market landscape.

Product/Innovation Strategy: The product segment helps the reader in understanding the different types of agriculture technology-as-a-service for the agriculture industry and their potential globally. Moreover, the study provides the reader a detailed understanding of the operation of different agriculture technology-as-a-service products by service type and by technology.



Recent Developments in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market

  • In March 2021, Syngenta announced that it would redevelop its North American Crop Protection headquarters in Greensboro, North Carolina.
  • In July 2020, DeHaat launched the franchise model in order to expand its business in Eastern India. In this model, the company ties up with small enterprises in rural areas to procure agricultural inputs from companies such as Bayer Crop Sciences and sell it to farmers, plus procure farmer’s produce from within a range of 3-6 kilometers.
  • In November 2019, AGCO Corporation expanded its Edgewood, Md assembly and distribution facility for Fendt high horsepower tractors and Massey Ferguson compact and utility tractors and equipment.
  • In April 2019, CLAAS KGaA mbH opened its new validation center for the development of new agricultural machinery at the Harsewinkel site.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

  • What is the estimated global agriculture technology-as-a-service market size in terms of revenue for the forecast period 2021-2026, and what is the expected compound annual growth rate (CAGR) during the forecast period 2021-2026?
  • What are the key trends, market drivers, and opportunities in the market pertaining to agriculture technology-as-a-service?
  • What are the major restraints inhibiting the growth of the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market?
  • What kinds of new strategies are being adopted by the existing market players to strengthen their market position in the industry?
  • What is the competitive strength of the key players in the agriculture technology-as-a-service market based on an analysis of their recent developments, product offerings, and regional presence?
  • How is the competitive benchmarking of the key agriculture technology-as-a-service companies in the agriculture market based on the analysis of their market coverage and market potential?
  • How much revenue is each segment expected to record during the forecast period, along with the growth percentage?
  • What is the type of players and stakeholders operating in the market ecosystem of agriculture technology-as-a-service, and what is their significance in the global market?

Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service


Agriculture technology-as-a-service is a business model that allows the customers to procure their desired agriculture technology (equipment or software) as a service under different affordable pricing models rather than acquiring them as a one-time purchase. Two of the most popular pricing models under agriculture technology-as-a-service include the pay-per-use (PPU) and subscription models. Agriculture technology-as-a-service business models provide the growers with certain features such as easy scalability and upgradation, convenient accessibility, quick deployment, and reliable data backups.



Impact of COVID-19


The supply chain for the majority of the industries across the globe got impacted due to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the agriculture technology-as-a-service industry. During the COVID-19 outbreak, the supply chain of the agriculture industry was disrupted. During the COVID-19 pandemic, agricultural production was hindered for farmers, which led to a decrease in their revenue generation. This has left the farmers in no position to invest in modern agricultural equipment.



Market Segmentation


Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market by Service Type


The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market in the service type product segment is expected to be dominated by software-as-a-service. The high market share and growth potential associated with software-as-a-service technologies in the agriculture industry is expected to drive the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market.



Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market by Technology


The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market in the technology product segment is expected to be dominated by data analytics and intelligence solutions. Data analytic solutions have the ability to increase agricultural production and are expected to drive the agriculture technology-as-a-service market.



Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market by Application


The global agriculture technology-as-a-service market in the application segment is expected to be dominated by yield monitoring and mapping. The high market share and growth potential associated with yield mapping and mapping is expected to drive the global agriculture technology-as-a-service market.



Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market by Region


North America is expected to generate the highest revenue in 2020. The large market share of the region has been attributed to the increased application of automation and control systems in most of the countries and the rising adoption rate of smart farming practices leading to increased adoption of agriculture technology-as-a-service. The North America market for agriculture technology-as-a-service is expected to witness a moderate growth as of CAGR 21.93% in the forecast period.



Key Market Players and Competition Synopsis


365FarmNet GmbH, Accenture plc, AGCO Corporation, Agrellus, Inc., Agrivi, Airbus S.A.S, AT&T Inc., Ceres Imaging Inc., CLAAS Group, CNH Industrial N.V., Cropln Technology Solutions Pvt.Ltd., Deere & Company, DeHaat, Fujitsu Limited, Harvest Automation Inc., Hexagon Agriculture, IBM Corporation, Intertek Group plc, Kubota Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Naio Technologies, Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc., Parrot SA, Pixhawk, Precision Hawk Inc., Raven Industries Inc., Robert Bosch GmbH, SGS S.A., Small Robot Company, Syngenta AG, SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd, Taranis, Teejet Technologies, Topcon Corporation, Trimble Inc., Yanmar Co. Ltd.



The companies that are profiled in the report have been selected based on the selective pool of players, primarily Tier-1 (holding 50-60% of the market), mid-segment players (comprising 30-40% share), and small and emerging companies (holding the balance 10-20% share), based on various factors such as product portfolio, annual revenues, market penetration, research, and development initiatives, along with a domestic and international presence in the agriculture technology-as-a-service industry.


Frequently Asked Questions about the Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market

What is the estimated value of the Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market?

The Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market was estimated to be valued at $1016.7 Million in 2021.

What is the growth rate of the Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market?

The growth rate of the Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market is 24.4%, with an estimated value of $3031.1 Million by 2026.

What is the forecasted size of the Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market?

The Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market is estimated to be worth $3031.1 Million by 2026.

Who are the key companies in the Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market?

Key companies in the Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market include 365FarmNet GmbH, Accenture plc, AGCO Corporation, Agrellus, Inc., Agrivi, Airbus S.A.S, AT&T Inc., Ceres Imaging Inc. and CNH Industrial N.V..

Table of Contents

1 Markets
1.1 Industry Outlook
1.1.1 Pricing Models
1.1.1.1 Bundled Per Acre
1.1.1.2 Per Pass/Service
1.1.1.3 Percentage of Yield Bump/Gain
1.1.1.4 Per Unit of Product Sold
1.1.2 Break-Even Analysis
1.1.2.1 Introduction
1.1.2.2 Components of Break-Even Analysis
1.1.2.3 Calculation of Break-Even Analysis
1.1.2.4 Case Studies
1.1.3 Advanced Solutions
1.1.3.1 Agriculture Robot-as-a-Service (ARaaS)
1.1.3.2 Agriculture Drone-as-a-Service (ADaaS)
1.1.4 Government Initiatives Landscape
1.1.4.1 North America
1.1.4.2 Europe
1.1.4.3 U.K.
1.1.4.4 Asia-Pacific
1.1.4.5 China
1.1.4.6 Rest-of-the-World
1.2 Business Dynamics
1.2.1 Business Drivers
1.2.1.1 Increasing Demand for Global Food Production
1.2.1.2 Increase in Yields Drives Food Production Growth
1.2.1.3 Economic Need for Precision Agriculture
1.2.1.4 Surging Use of Modern Technologies in Agriculture
1.2.1.5 Decreasing Workforce in Agriculture Sector
1.2.2 Business Challenges
1.2.2.1 Lack of Proper Infrastructure such as Roads, Internet, and Network Connectivity
1.2.2.2 Cyber and Online Data Security
1.2.2.3 Huge Subscription Costs Act as a Challenge
1.2.2.4 Reluctance to Adopt and Lack of Technical Awareness Among Farmers
1.2.3 Business Strategies
1.2.3.1 Product Development
1.2.3.2 Market Development
1.2.3.3 Others
1.2.4 Corporate Strategies
1.2.4.1 Mergers and Acquisitions
1.2.4.2 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
1.2.5 Business Opportunities
1.2.5.1 Growth in Agriculture Service Economy
1.2.5.2 Increasing Investments in Agriculture Technology Sector
1.2.5.3 Rising Trend of Farming-as-a-Service in India
1.2.5.4 Increasing Market Opportunities in Developing Countries
1.2.5.5 Increased Cloud Security


2 Application
2.1 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application)
2.1.1 Yield Mapping and Monitoring
2.1.2 Soil Management
2.1.3 Crop Health Monitoring
2.1.4 Navigation and Positioning
2.1.5 Others
2.2 Demand Analysis of Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application)


3 Products
3.1 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Product)
3.1.1 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type)
3.1.1.1 Software-as-a-Service
3.1.1.2 Equipment-as-a-Service
3.1.2 Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology)
3.1.2.1 Data Analytics and Intelligence
3.1.2.2 Guidance Technology
3.1.2.3 Sensing Technology
3.1.2.4 Variable Rate Application Technology
3.1.2.5 Others
3.2 Demand Analysis of Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Product)
3.2.1 Demand Analysis of Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type)
3.2.2 Demand Analysis of Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology)


4 Regions
4.1 North America
4.1.1 Market
4.1.1.1 Key Providers in North America
4.1.1.2 Business Drivers
4.1.1.3 Business Challenges
4.1.2 North America (by Country)
4.1.2.1 U.S.
4.1.2.1.1 Market
4.1.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.1.2.1.1.2 Key Providers Operating in the U.S.
4.1.2.1.1.3 Business Challenges
4.1.2.1.1.4 Business Drivers
4.1.2.2 Canada
4.1.2.2.1 Market
4.1.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.1.2.2.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Canada
4.1.2.2.1.3 Business Challenges
4.1.2.2.1.4 Business Drivers
4.1.2.3 Mexico
4.1.2.3.1 Market
4.1.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.1.2.3.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Mexico
4.1.2.3.1.3 Business Challenges
4.1.2.3.1.4 Business Drivers
4.2 South America
4.2.1 Market
4.2.1.1 Key Providers in South America
4.2.1.2 Business Drivers
4.2.1.3 Business Challenges
4.2.2 South America (by Country)
4.2.2.1 Brazil
4.2.2.1.1 Market
4.2.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.2.2.1.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Brazil
4.2.2.1.1.3 Business Challenges
4.2.2.1.1.4 Business Drivers
4.2.2.2 Argentina
4.2.2.2.1 Market
4.2.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.2.2.2.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Argentina
4.2.2.2.1.3 Business Challenges
4.2.2.2.1.4 Business Drivers
4.2.2.3 Rest-of-South America
4.2.2.3.1 Market
4.2.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.2.2.3.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Rest-of-South America
4.2.2.3.1.3 Business Challenges
4.2.2.3.1.4 Business Drivers
4.3 Europe
4.3.1 Market
4.3.1.1 Key Providers in Europe
4.3.1.2 Business Drivers
4.3.1.3 Business Challenges
4.3.2 Europe (by Country)
4.3.2.1 Germany
4.3.2.1.1 Market
4.3.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.3.2.1.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Germany
4.3.2.1.1.3 Business Challenges
4.3.2.1.1.4 Business Drivers
4.3.2.2 France
4.3.2.2.1 Market
4.3.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.3.2.2.1.2 Key Providers Operating in France
4.3.2.2.1.3 Business Challenges
4.3.2.2.1.4 Business Drivers
4.3.2.3 Italy
4.3.2.3.1 Market
4.3.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.3.2.3.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Italy
4.3.2.3.1.3 Business Challenges
4.3.2.3.1.4 Business Drivers
4.3.2.4 Rest-of-Europe
4.3.2.4.1 Market
4.3.2.4.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.3.2.4.1.2 Key Providers Operating in the Rest-of-Europe
4.3.2.4.1.3 Business Challenges
4.3.2.4.1.4 Business Drivers
4.4 The U.K.
4.4.1 Markets
4.4.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.4.1.2 Key Providers in the U.K.
4.4.1.3 Business Challenges
4.4.1.4 Business Drivers
4.5 Middle East and Africa
4.5.1 Market
4.5.1.1 Key Providers in Middle East and Africa
4.5.1.2 Business Drivers
4.5.1.3 Business Challenges
4.5.2 Middle East and Africa (by Country)
4.5.2.1 South Africa
4.5.2.1.1 Market
4.5.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.5.2.1.1.2 Key Providers Operating in the South Africa
4.5.2.1.1.3 Business Challenges
4.5.2.1.1.4 Business Drivers
4.5.2.2 Saudi Arabia
4.5.2.2.1 Market
4.5.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.5.2.2.1.2 Key Providers Operating in the Saudi Arabia
4.5.2.2.1.3 Business Challenges
4.5.2.2.1.4 Business Drivers
4.5.2.3 Israel
4.5.2.3.1 Market
4.5.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.5.2.3.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Israel
4.5.2.3.1.3 Business Challenges
4.5.2.3.1.4 Business Drivers
4.6 China
4.6.1 Markets
4.6.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.6.1.2 Key Providers in China
4.6.1.3 Business Challenges
4.6.1.4 Business Drivers
4.7 Asia-Pacific
4.7.1 Market
4.7.1.1 Key Providers in Asia-Pacific
4.7.1.2 Business Drivers
4.7.1.3 Business Challenges
4.7.2 Asia-Pacific (by Country)
4.7.2.1 Japan
4.7.2.1.1 Market
4.7.2.1.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.7.2.1.1.2 Key Providers in Japan
4.7.2.1.1.3 Business Challenges
4.7.2.1.1.4 Business Drivers
4.7.2.2 India
4.7.2.2.1 Market
4.7.2.2.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.7.2.2.1.2 Key Providers in India
4.7.2.2.1.3 Business Challenges
4.7.2.2.1.4 Business Drivers
4.7.2.3 Australia
4.7.2.3.1 Market
4.7.2.3.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.7.2.3.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Australia
4.7.2.3.1.3 Business Challenges
4.7.2.3.1.4 Business Drivers
4.7.2.4 Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
4.7.2.4.1 Market
4.7.2.4.1.1 Buyer Attributes
4.7.2.4.1.2 Key Providers Operating in Rest-of-Asia Pacific
4.7.2.4.1.3 Business Challenges
4.7.2.4.1.4 Business Drivers


5 Markets - Competitive Benchmarking & Company Profiles
5.1 Competitive Benchmarking
5.2 Company Profiles
5.2.1 365FarmNet GmbH
5.2.1.1 Company Overview
5.2.1.1.1 Role of 365FarmNet GmbH in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.1.1.2 Service Portfolio
5.2.1.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.1.2 Corporate Strategies
5.2.1.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.1.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of 365FarmNet GmbH
5.2.2 Accenture plc
5.2.2.1 Company Overview
5.2.2.1.1 Role of Accenture plc in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.2.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.2.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.2.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Accenture plc
5.2.3 AGCO Corporation
5.2.3.1 Company Overview
5.2.3.1.1 Role of AGCO Corporation in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.3.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.3.1.3 Production Sites and R&D Analysis
5.2.3.2 Business Strategies
5.2.3.2.1 Product Development
5.2.3.2.2 Market Developments
5.2.3.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.3.3.1 Mergers and Acquisitions
5.2.3.3.2 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.3.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of AGCO Corporation
5.2.4 Agrellus, Inc.
5.2.4.1 Company Overview
5.2.4.1.1 Role of Agrellus Inc in Digital Agriculture Marketplace Market
5.2.4.1.2 Product Portfolio
5.2.4.2 Business Strategies
5.2.4.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.4.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.4.3.1 Partnerships, Joint Ventures, Collaborations, and Alliances
5.2.4.4 Strength and Weakness Agrellus, inc.
5.2.5 Agrivi
5.2.5.1 Company Overview
5.2.5.1.1 Role of Agrivi in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.5.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.5.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.5.2 Business Strategies
5.2.5.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.5.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.5.3.1 Mergers and Acquisitions
5.2.5.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Agrivi
5.2.6 Airbus S.A.S
5.2.6.1 Company Overview
5.2.6.1.1 Role of Airbus S.A.S in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.6.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.6.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.6.2 Corporate Strategies
5.2.6.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Airbus S.A.S
5.2.7 AT&T Inc.
5.2.7.1 Company Overview
5.2.7.1.1 Role of AT&T Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.7.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.7.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of AT&T Inc. Corporation
5.2.8 Ceres Imaging Inc.
5.2.8.1 Company Overview
5.2.8.1.1 Role of Ceres Imaging Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.8.1.2 Service Portfolio
5.2.8.2 Business Strategies
5.2.8.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.8.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Ceres Imaging Inc.
5.2.9 CLAAS Group
5.2.9.1 Company Overview
5.2.9.1.1 Role of CLAAS Group in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.9.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.9.1.3 Production Sites and R&D Analysis
5.2.9.2 Business Strategies
5.2.9.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.9.2.2 Market Developments
5.2.9.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.9.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.9.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of CLAAS Group
5.2.10 CNH Industrial NV
5.2.10.1 Company Overview
5.2.10.1.1 Role of CNH Industrial N.V. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.10.1.2 Service Portfolio
5.2.10.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.10.2 Business Strategies
5.2.10.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.10.2.2 Market Developments
5.2.10.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.10.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.10.3.2 Mergers and Acquisitions
5.2.10.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of CNH Industrial N.V.
5.2.11 Cropln Technology Solutions Pvt.Ltd.
5.2.11.1 Company Overview
5.2.11.2 Role of CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd. in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.11.3 Service portfolio
5.2.11.3.1 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.11.4 Business Strategies
5.2.11.4.1 Product Developments
5.2.11.5 Corporate Strategies
5.2.11.5.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.11.6 Strengths and Weaknesses of CropIn Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd
5.2.12 Deere & Company
5.2.12.1 Company Overview
5.2.12.2 Role of Deere & Company in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.12.2.1 Service portfolio
5.2.12.2.2 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.12.3 Business Strategies
5.2.12.3.1 Product Developments
5.2.12.3.2 Market Developments
5.2.12.4 Corporate Strategies
5.2.12.4.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.12.4.2 Mergers and Acquisitions
5.2.12.5 Strengths and Weaknesses of Deere & Company
5.2.13 DeHaat
5.2.13.1 Company Overview
5.2.13.2 Role of DeHaat in Digital Agricultural Marketplace Market:
5.2.13.3 Product Portfolio
5.2.13.4 Business Strategies
5.2.13.5 Corporate Strategies
5.2.13.5.1 Merger and Acquisitions
5.2.13.6 Strength and Weakness of DeHaat
5.2.14 Fujitsu Limited
5.2.14.1 Company Overview
5.2.14.1.1 Role of Fujitsu Limited in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.14.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.14.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.14.2 Business Strategies
5.2.14.2.1 Market Developments
5.2.14.2.2 Product Developments
5.2.14.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.14.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Fujitsu Limited
5.2.15 Harvest Automation Inc.
5.2.15.1 Company Overview
5.2.15.1.1 Role of Harvest Automation Inc. in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.15.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.15.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.15.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Harvest Automation Inc.
5.2.16 Hexagon Agriculture
5.2.16.1 Company Overview
5.2.16.2 Role of Hexagon Agriculture in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.16.3 Service portfolio
5.2.16.3.1 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.16.4 Business Strategies
5.2.16.4.1 Product Developments
5.2.16.4.2 Market Developments
5.2.16.5 Corporate Strategies
5.2.16.5.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.16.6 Strengths and Weaknesses of Hexagon Agriculture
5.2.17 IBM Corporation
5.2.17.1 Company Overview
5.2.17.1.1 Role of IBM Corporation in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.17.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.17.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.17.2 Business Strategies
5.2.17.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.17.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.17.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.17.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of IBM Corporation
5.2.18 Intertek Group plc
5.2.18.1 Company Overview
5.2.18.1.1 Role of Intertek Group plc in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.18.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.18.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Intertek Group plc
5.2.19 Kubota Corporation
5.2.19.1 Company Overview
5.2.19.2 Role of Kubota Corporation in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a- Service Market
5.2.19.2.1 Service portfolio
5.2.19.2.2 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.19.3 Business Strategies
5.2.19.3.1 Market Developments
5.2.19.3.2 Product Developments
5.2.19.4 Corporate Strategies
5.2.19.4.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.19.5 Strengths and Weaknesses of Kubota Corporation
5.2.20 Microsoft Corporation
5.2.20.1 Company Overview
5.2.20.1.1 Role of Microsoft Corporation in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a- Service Market
5.2.20.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.20.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.20.2 Business Strategies
5.2.20.2.1 Market Developments
5.2.20.2.2 Product Developments
5.2.20.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.20.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.20.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Microsoft Corporation
5.2.21 Naio Technologies
5.2.21.1 Company Overview
5.2.21.1.1 Role of Naio Technologies in Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.21.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.21.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.21.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Naio Technologies
5.2.22 Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.
5.2.22.1 Company Overview
5.2.22.1.1 Role of Nutrien AgSolution, Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.22.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.22.2 Business Strategies
5.2.22.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.22.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.22.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.22.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.
5.2.23 Parrot SA
5.2.23.1 Company Overview
5.2.23.1.1 Role of Parrot SA in the Global Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.23.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.23.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.23.2 Business Strategies
5.2.23.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.23.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.23.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.23.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Parrot SA
5.2.24 Pixhawk
5.2.24.1 Company Overview
5.2.24.1.1 Role of Pixhawk in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.24.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.24.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Pixhawk
5.2.25 Precision Hawk Inc.
5.2.25.1 Company Overview
5.2.25.1.1 Role of PrecisionHawk Inc. in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.25.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.25.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.25.2 Corporate Strategies
5.2.25.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.25.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of PrecisionHawk Inc.
5.2.26 Raven Industries Inc.
5.2.26.1 Company Overview
5.2.26.1.1 Role of Raven Industries Inc. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.26.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.26.2 Business Strategies
5.2.26.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.26.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.26.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.26.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Raven Industries Inc.
5.2.27 Robert Bosch GmbH
5.2.27.1 Company Overview
5.2.27.1.1 Role of Robert Bosch GmbH in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.27.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.27.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.27.2 Business Strategies
5.2.27.2.1 Market Developments
5.2.27.2.2 Product Developments
5.2.27.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.27.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Robert Bosch GmbH
5.2.28 SGS S.A.
5.2.28.1 Company Overview
5.2.28.1.1 Role of SGS S.A. in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.28.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.28.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of SGS S.A.
5.2.29 Small Robot Company
5.2.29.1 Company Overview
5.2.29.1.1 Role of Small Robot Company in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.29.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.29.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.29.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Small Robot Company
5.2.30 Syngenta AG
5.2.30.1 Company Overview
5.2.30.2 Role of Syngenta AG in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.30.2.1 Service portfolio
5.2.30.2.2 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.30.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.30.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.30.4 Business Strategies
5.2.30.4.1 Market Developments
5.2.30.5 Strength and Weakness of Syngenta AG
5.2.31 SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd
5.2.31.1 Company Overview
5.2.31.1.1 Role of SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.31.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.31.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.31.2 Business Strategies
5.2.31.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.31.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.31.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.31.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd
5.2.32 Taranis
5.2.32.1 Company Overview
5.2.32.1.1 Role of Taranis in Agriculture Technology-as-a-service market
5.2.32.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.32.2 Corporate Strategies
5.2.32.2.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.32.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Taranis
5.2.33 Teejet Technologies
5.2.33.1 Company Overview
5.2.33.1.1 Role of Teejet Technologies in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.33.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.33.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Teejet Technologies
5.2.34 Topcon Corporation
5.2.34.1 Company Overview
5.2.34.1.1 Role of Topcon Corporation in Agriculture technology-as-a-service market
5.2.34.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.34.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.34.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Topcon Corporation
5.2.35 Trimble Inc.
5.2.35.1 Company Overview
5.2.35.1.1 Role of Trimble Inc. in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.35.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.35.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.35.2 Business Strategies
5.2.35.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.35.2.2 Market Developments
5.2.35.3 Corporate Strategies
5.2.35.3.1 Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
5.2.35.3.2 Mergers and Acquisitions
5.2.35.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Trimble Inc.
5.2.36 Yanmar Co. Ltd.
5.2.36.1 Company Overview
5.2.36.1.1 Role of Yanmar Co. Ltd in the Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
5.2.36.1.2 Service portfolio
5.2.36.1.3 Production Site and R&D Analysis
5.2.36.2 Business Strategies
5.2.36.2.1 Product Developments
5.2.36.3 Strengths and Weaknesses of Yanmar Co. Ltd.


6 Research Methodology
6.1 Data Sources
6.1.1 Primary Data Sources
6.1.2 Secondary Data Sources
6.2 Market Research Methodology
6.2.1 Data Triangulation
6.2.1.1 Market Estimation and Forecast
6.2.2 Assumptions
6.2.3 Limitations


List of Figures
Figure 1: Macroeconomic Trends Impacting the Farming Industry Growth
Figure 2: Future Agriculture Field Scenario with Smart Farm Technologies
Figure 3: Drivers and Restraints: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Figure 4: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2020-2026
Figure 5: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service (by Service Type), $Million, 2021 and 2026
Figure 6: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2021 and 2026
Figure 7: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2021 and 2026
Figure 8: Regional Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market, $Million, 2020
Figure 9: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market Coverage
Figure 10: Advantages-Disadvantages of Bundled Per Acre Model
Figure 11: Advantages-Disadvantages of Per Pass/Service Model
Figure 12: Advantages-Disadvantages of Percentage of Yield Bump/Gain Model
Figure 13: Advantages-Disadvantages of Per Unit of Product Sold Model
Figure 14: Graphical Representation of Break-Even Analysis
Figure 15: Mathematical Representation of Break-Even Analysis
Figure 16: Break-Even Point of Satellite Images (ha)
Figure 17: Global Agricultural Productivity Index, 2005-2050
Figure 18: Sources of Growth in Food Production
Figure 19: Long-Term Evolution of Commodity Prices
Figure 20: FAO Food Price Index Number of People Living in Urban and Rural Areas of the World (2000-2020)
Figure 21: USDA Investments in Agricultural Research Centres
Figure 22: Number of People Employed in Agriculture (2000-2015)
Figure 23: Share of Agriculture in Total Employment in Various Countries (2000-2015)
Figure 24: Percentage of Population in Various Countries Affected by Cyber Crime and Data Breach (2020-2021)
Figure 25: Share of Key Market Strategies and Developments, 2017-2021
Figure 26: Product Development and Innovation (by Company), March 2018 – April 2021
Figure 27: Market Development (by Company), June 2017- October 2021
Figure 28: Mergers and Acquisitions (by Company), May 2017 - August 2021
Figure 29: Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures (by Company), April 2017 – November 2021
Figure 30: Investments Raised by Various Agri-Tech Start-Ups in India (2010-2019)
Figure 31: Amount in Investments Raised by Agri-Tech Start-Ups in India (2014-2019)
Figure 32: Global Farm Management Software and Data Analytics Market (by Application)
Figure 33: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type)
Figure 34: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology)
Figure 35: Competitive Market High & Low Matrix
Figure 36: Sources of Secondary Research
Figure 37: Report Methodology
Figure 38: Data Triangulation
Figure 39: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approach for Market Estimation


List of Tables
Table 1: Summary Table of Satellite Sensor Features
Table 2: Cost Features of Satellite Sensors
Table 3: Key Players with ARaaS Business Model and their Products
Table 4: Key Players with ARaaS Business Model and their Products
Table 5: Rural Infrastructure in Various Countries
Table 6: Key Yield Mapping and Monitoring Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 7: Key Soil Management Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 8: Key Crop Health Management Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 9: Key Navigation and Positioning Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 10: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Application), $Million, 2020-2026
Table 11: Key Players with Software-as-a-Service Service Type
Table 12: Key Players with Equipment-as-a-Service Service Type
Table 13: Key Data Analytics & Intelligence Services in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 14: Key Guidance Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 15: Key Sensing Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 16: Key Variable Rate Application Technology in Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market
Table 17: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Service Type), $Million, 2020-2026
Table 18: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Technology), $Million, 2020-2026
Table 19: Global Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Region), $Million, 2020-2026
Table 20: North America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2020-2026
Table 21: South America Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2020-2026
Table 22: Europe Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2020-2026
Table 23: U.K. Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2020-2026
Table 24: Middle East and Africa Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2020-2026
Table 25: China Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2020-2026
Table 26: Asia-Pacific Agriculture Technology-as-a-Service Market (by Country), $Million, 2020-2026
Table 27: 365FarmNet GmbH: Service portfolio
Table 28: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 29: Accenture plc: Service portfolio
Table 30: AGCO Corporation: Solution Service Portfolio
Table 31: Product Development
Table 32: Market Developments
Table 33: Mergers and Acquisitions
Table 34: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 35: Agrellus, Inc: Product Portfolio
Table 36: Product Developments
Table 37: Agrellus, Inc.: Partnerships, Joint Ventures, Collaborations, and Alliances
Table 38: Agrivi: Service portfolio
Table 39: Product Developments
Table 40: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 41: Mergers and Acquisitions
Table 42: Airbus S. A. S: Service portfolio
Table 43: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 44: AT&T Inc.: Service portfolio
Table 45: Ceres Imaging Inc.: Service portfolio
Table 46: Product Developments
Table 47: CLAAS Group: Service Portfolio
Table 48: Product Developments
Table 49: Market Developments
Table 50: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 51: CNH Industrial N. V.: Service Portfolio
Table 52: Product Developments
Table 53: Market Developments
Table 54: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 55: Mergers and Acquisitions
Table 56: Crop In Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd.: Service Portfolio
Table 57: Poduct Developments
Table 58: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 59: Deere & Company: Service Portfolio
Table 60: Product Developments
Table 61: Market Developments
Table 62: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 63: Mergers and Acquisitions
Table 64: Product Portfolio
Table 65: DeHaat: Business Expansion
Table 66: DeHaat: Merger and Acquisitions
Table 67: Fujitsu Limited Service Portfolio
Table 68: Market Developments
Table 69: Product Developments
Table 70: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 71: Harvest Automation Inc.: Service portfolio
Table 72: Hexagon Agriculture: Service portfolio
Table 73: Product Developments
Table 74: Market Developments
Table 75: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 76: IBM Corporation: Service Portfolio
Table 77: Product Developments
Table 78: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 79: Intertek Group plc: Service portfolio
Table 80: Kubota Corporation: Service portfolio
Table 81: Market Developments
Table 82: Product Developments
Table 83: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 84: Microsoft Corporation: Service portfolio
Table 85: Market Developments
Table 86: Product Developments
Table 87: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 88: Naio Technologies: Service portfolio
Table 89: Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.: Service portfolio
Table 90: Product Developments
Table 91: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 92: Parrot SA: Service portfolio
Table 93: Product Developments
Table 94: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 95: Pixhawk: Service portfolio
Table 96: PrecisionHawk Inc.: Service portfolio
Table 97: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 98: Raven Industries Inc.: Service portfolio
Table 99: Product Developments
Table 100: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 101: Robert Bosch GmbH: Service portfolio
Table 102: Market Developments
Table 103: Product Developments
Table 104: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 105: SGS S.A.: Service portfolio
Table 106: Small Robot Company: Service portfolio
Table 107: Syngenta AG: Service Portfolio
Table 108: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 109: Market Developments
Table 110: SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd: Service portfolio
Table 111: Product Developments
Table 112: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 113: Taranis: Service portfolio
Table 114: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 115: Teejet Technologies: Service portfolio
Table 116: Topcon Corporation: Service portfolio
Table 117: Trimble Inc: Service portfolio
Table 118: Product Developments
Table 119: Market Developments
Table 120: Partnerships, Collaborations, and Joint Ventures
Table 121: Mergers and Acquisitions
Table 122: Yanmar Co. Ltd.: Service portfolio
Table 123: Product Developments

Companies Mentioned

  • 365FarmNet GmbH
  • Accenture plc
  • AGCO Corporation
  • Agrellus, Inc.
  • Agrivi
  • Airbus S.A.S
  • AT&T Inc.
  • Ceres Imaging Inc.
  • CLAAS Group
  • CNH Industrial N.V.
  • Cropln Technology Solutions Pvt.Ltd.
  • Deere & Company
  • DeHaat
  • Fujitsu Limited
  • Harvest Automation Inc.
  • Hexagon Agriculture
  • IBM Corporation
  • Intertek Group plc
  • Kubota Corporation
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Naio Technologies
  • Nutrien AgSolutions, Inc.
  • Parrot SA
  • Pixhawk
  • Precision Hawk Inc.
  • Raven Industries Inc.
  • Robert Bosch GmbH
  • SGS S.A.
  • Small Robot Company
  • Syngenta AG
  • SZ DJI Technology Co. Ltd
  • Taranis
  • Teejet Technologies
  • Topcon Corporation
  • Trimble Inc.
  • Yanmar Co. Ltd.