+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Nanopore Single Molecule Sequencer Market - Global Forecast 2026-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 191 Pages
  • January 2026
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 6126705
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The Nanopore Single Molecule Sequencer Market grew from USD 812.94 million in 2025 to USD 879.92 million in 2026. It is expected to continue growing at a CAGR of 6.32%, reaching USD 1.24 billion by 2032.

Why nanopore single molecule sequencing is redefining real-time genomics - from long-read insight to operational agility across diverse lab settings

Nanopore single molecule sequencing has shifted from a compelling proof-of-concept to a versatile platform category that can be deployed across research, translational programs, and select clinical contexts. By reading nucleic acids directly as they traverse nanoscale pores, the approach enables long reads, real-time data generation, and the potential to detect base modifications without the same dependence on amplification-heavy workflows. These attributes are not merely incremental; they reshape how teams think about study design, sample logistics, and the balance between speed and depth.

What has made nanopore sequencing especially relevant now is the convergence of improved pore chemistry, more capable basecalling models, and a growing ecosystem of library preparation and analysis tools. As performance becomes more predictable across a wider range of sample types, nanopore platforms are increasingly considered alongside established short-read systems for use cases where structural variation, haplotype phasing, metagenomics, and rapid pathogen characterization are decisive.

At the same time, the market conversation has matured beyond raw accuracy debates into a broader operational narrative. Laboratories are weighing throughput scalability, instrument footprint, field deployability, and total workflow complexity, while product teams emphasize software, consumables reliability, and automation compatibility. This executive summary frames the current state of nanopore single molecule sequencing through the lens of the most consequential shifts, policy-driven headwinds, segmentation-driven demand patterns, and strategic actions that can help organizations compete effectively.

How AI-driven basecalling, workflow integration, decentralization, and ecosystem partnerships are reshaping competition in nanopore sequencing

The nanopore sequencing landscape is being transformed by a series of reinforcing shifts that extend well beyond incremental chemistry updates. First, the center of value is moving from the instrument to the end-to-end workflow. Competitive differentiation increasingly depends on how well platform providers orchestrate sample preparation, run management, basecalling, quality control, and downstream interpretation as a cohesive experience, particularly for labs without deep bioinformatics staffing.

In parallel, artificial intelligence has become a primary lever for improving performance and usability. More sophisticated basecalling and variant calling models are narrowing historical gaps while also enabling capabilities that are difficult to replicate with other sequencing modalities, such as richer signal-level analytics and improved detection of epigenetic modifications. As these models improve, customers are placing greater emphasis on software update cadence, validation transparency, and the ability to reproduce results across versions.

Another notable shift is the expansion of nanopore sequencing into time-sensitive and decentralized environments. Real-time analysis supports rapid decision-making in infectious disease surveillance and outbreak response, and portable form factors can bring sequencing closer to the sample. This trend is reinforced by rising interest in resilient testing infrastructures and by the practical advantages of reducing sample transport time, which can degrade nucleic acids and delay action.

Additionally, the competitive landscape is becoming more ecosystem-driven. Partnerships between platform vendors, reagent suppliers, automation providers, and cloud or on-premises informatics teams are increasingly central to adoption. Customers want validated combinations rather than assembling workflows from disparate components, especially in regulated or quality-managed settings. Consequently, interoperability, documented performance across sample types, and integration into laboratory information management systems are becoming deciding factors.

Finally, procurement and governance expectations are changing. Organizations are looking for stronger cybersecurity postures, clearer data governance options, and sustainable supply chains. As sequencing expands into clinical-adjacent applications, buyers also demand more rigorous evidence packages, robust service and training models, and a clearer pathway to compliance. These shifts collectively favor providers and labs that treat nanopore sequencing as an integrated operational capability rather than a standalone instrument purchase.

Why United States tariffs in 2025 may reshape nanopore sequencing procurement, supply resilience, and workflow economics beyond sticker price

The cumulative impact of United States tariffs anticipated in 2025 introduces a set of practical considerations that can affect the nanopore single molecule sequencing ecosystem across instruments, consumables, and supporting infrastructure. Even when tariffs do not directly target sequencing devices, they can influence upstream components such as precision electronics, sensors, specialized polymers, microfabrication inputs, and packaging materials. For buyers, the most immediate effect is often felt through changes in landed costs, longer lead times, and increased variability in quotation validity.

Instrument providers may respond by reassessing manufacturing footprints, qualifying alternate suppliers, or increasing domestic assembly to reduce exposure. While such steps can improve resilience, the transition itself can create temporary friction-engineering change orders, dual sourcing qualification, and expanded incoming quality control. For laboratories, especially those operating under strict quality systems, any change in consumable lots, packaging, or component sources can require additional verification, documentation, and staff time.

Consumables and flow cell supply dynamics deserve special attention because recurring reagent demand anchors long-term platform economics. Tariff-driven cost increases can push vendors to modify pricing structures, introduce new bundling models, or adjust service terms. In response, labs may change ordering patterns, increasing safety stock for critical consumables or consolidating purchasing to negotiate stability. However, higher inventory levels can create their own risks, including shelf-life management and cold-chain constraints.

There is also a secondary effect on the informatics and compute layer. If tariffs affect servers, GPUs, storage systems, or networking gear, the total cost of on-premises analysis can rise, nudging some organizations toward cloud adoption. Yet cloud decisions bring governance questions about protected health information, cross-border data transfer, and reproducibility under evolving software stacks. As a result, many organizations will pursue hybrid strategies-local basecalling for speed and control, with scalable downstream analysis in secure cloud environments.

Overall, the 2025 tariff environment is likely to reward organizations that can quantify supply-chain exposure at the bill-of-materials level and translate it into procurement and risk strategies. Those that treat tariffs as a one-time pricing event may be caught off guard by ripple effects across validation, service parts availability, and the cadence of product updates.

Segmentation signals reveal where nanopore platforms win - linking offerings, workflow stages, applications, end users, and channels to real adoption behavior

Demand patterns in nanopore single molecule sequencing become clearer when viewed through the lens of offering, workflow, application, end user, and channel dynamics. From an offering perspective, customers typically evaluate instruments and devices alongside consumables and reagents, software and informatics, and services and support as a combined operating system. As laboratories gain experience, the buying conversation often shifts from initial instrument selection to the reliability and availability of consumables, the consistency of flow cell performance, and the ongoing value delivered through software improvements.

Workflow expectations vary materially by segmentation. Sample preparation and library preparation choices are shaped by whether the priority is maximum read length, speed to result, or robustness across challenging matrices. Sequencing and basecalling are increasingly considered inseparable, with labs assessing whether compute requirements, model update frequency, and version control will fit their quality and audit needs. Downstream analysis and interpretation then becomes the differentiator for teams pursuing complex variant detection, metagenomic classification, or epigenetic signal extraction, especially when internal bioinformatics capacity is constrained.

Application segmentation highlights where nanopore’s unique attributes matter most. Whole genome sequencing and de novo assembly benefit from long reads that resolve repetitive regions and enable structural variant discovery. Targeted sequencing supports faster turnaround and focused evidence generation when panels are well designed. RNA sequencing and transcriptomics use cases are expanding as direct RNA approaches and improved calling models make isoform-level insights more practical, while metagenomics and pathogen sequencing continue to leverage real-time analysis for actionable detection. Epigenetics and methylation analysis remain strategically important, particularly where direct detection can streamline workflows compared with conversion-based methods.

End-user behavior introduces additional nuance. Academic and research institutes often prioritize flexibility, exploratory method development, and grant-aligned use cases, while pharmaceutical and biotechnology organizations emphasize reproducibility, scalability, and integration with discovery pipelines. Clinical laboratories and hospital systems, when adopting nanopore workflows, tend to focus on validation, documentation, and turnaround time advantages in defined applications. Government and public health entities prioritize portability, surge capacity, and standardized protocols that can be deployed across networks.

Channel and commercialization segmentation further shapes adoption. Direct sales models support complex solution selling and workflow design, whereas distributor networks can expand reach into emerging geographies and smaller labs that need localized service. Online procurement plays a role for smaller consumable orders and rapid replenishment, but it typically complements, rather than replaces, structured account management where technical support and training are critical. Across these segmentation dimensions, winners will be those that align product roadmaps with the operational realities of distinct customer archetypes rather than assuming a single, uniform sequencing buyer.

Regional realities across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific are steering nanopore adoption through regulation, infrastructure, and resilience priorities

Regional dynamics in nanopore single molecule sequencing are shaped by infrastructure maturity, regulatory expectations, funding patterns, and the urgency of public health and biodiversity initiatives. In the Americas, demand is influenced by strong genomics research capacity, active biotechnology and pharmaceutical pipelines, and a growing emphasis on scalable infectious disease surveillance. Buyers often scrutinize end-to-end workflow validation, data governance, and service responsiveness, while also seeking clear integration paths with existing short-read ecosystems.

Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, adoption reflects a blend of well-established genomics centers and fast-developing capabilities in surveillance and precision medicine. In Europe, harmonization pressures around data protection and clinical quality systems influence purchasing criteria, elevating requirements for documentation, software transparency, and secure analytics options. In parts of the Middle East, investments in national genomics programs and advanced healthcare infrastructure can accelerate platform deployment, while many African settings emphasize portability, robustness, and training models that support distributed networks.

In Asia-Pacific, growth in sequencing capacity is driven by expanding national research programs, a large clinical testing base in select markets, and heightened interest in food safety, agriculture, and environmental monitoring. The region’s diversity means procurement can range from premium, high-throughput deployments in major urban hubs to pragmatic implementations that value ease of use and local service availability. Competitive positioning often depends on distributor strength, localized training, and the ability to adapt workflows to region-specific sample types and regulatory pathways.

Across all regions, supply-chain resilience and compute infrastructure availability are increasingly strategic. Laboratories in regions with constrained cold-chain logistics or longer import cycles may prioritize consumable stability and inventory planning. Meanwhile, the choice between cloud and on-premises analysis is shaped by regional data residency rules, institutional cybersecurity requirements, and the availability of cost-effective compute. Vendors and labs that design region-appropriate deployment models-rather than exporting a single operating template-are better positioned to convert interest into sustained utilization.

Company strategies are converging on workflow ownership - platform leaders, long-read rivals, sample-prep giants, and compute partners shaping buyer choice

Competition in nanopore single molecule sequencing is defined by a mix of established platform leaders and adjacent technology providers that influence the workflow stack. Oxford Nanopore Technologies remains central to the category’s identity, with a broad device portfolio and a strong emphasis on real-time sequencing, rapid library options, and an evolving software ecosystem. Its strategy highlights how continuous chemistry and basecalling improvements can expand addressable use cases, particularly where long reads and speed are decisive.

Illumina plays a different but important role in the competitive narrative as the benchmark short-read ecosystem that many laboratories already operate at scale. While not a nanopore provider, its installed base and informatics expectations shape how buyers evaluate complementary long-read adoption, integration, and total lab throughput planning. This dynamic often positions nanopore workflows as additive, filling gaps in structural variation, assembly, and rapid field sequencing rather than replacing short-read pipelines outright.

Pacific Biosciences similarly influences customer expectations for long-read performance and application fit, especially in high-accuracy long-read contexts. The presence of multiple long-read modalities encourages more segmented purchasing decisions, where teams choose technologies by application rather than committing to a single platform philosophy. As a result, nanopore vendors and solution partners increasingly compete on workflow flexibility, speed to insight, and operational simplicity.

Thermo Fisher Scientific and QIAGEN have outsized impact through sample preparation, extraction, and broader laboratory workflow ecosystems. Their kits, automation compatibility, and quality-managed processes can either accelerate nanopore adoption through validated integrations or slow adoption when workflows are perceived as fragmented. Agilent Technologies and Bio-Rad Laboratories further contribute through quality control tools, sample processing solutions, and adjacent instrumentation that supports consistent library preparation and verification.

Informatics and compute-aligned companies also shape adoption outcomes. NVIDIA’s acceleration ecosystem affects the practicality of high-throughput basecalling and rapid analysis, while cloud and software partners influence governance and scalability. Across the company landscape, the most durable advantage is increasingly built on the ability to deliver reproducible, well-supported workflows that convert raw signal into trusted biological conclusions with minimal operational friction.

What industry leaders should do now to win in nanopore sequencing: reproducible software, solution bundles, resilient supply, and hybrid informatics

Industry leaders can strengthen their position in nanopore single molecule sequencing by treating it as a capability system-chemistry, devices, software, and services-rather than a product line. A first priority is to harden workflow reproducibility through version-controlled software releases, clearly documented model changes, and customer-facing validation guidance. When basecalling and variant calling performance depends on fast-evolving models, buyers need transparent guardrails that help them maintain comparability across studies and regulated environments.

Next, organizations should invest in application-specific solution packaging. Rather than marketing a generalized long-read promise, the most effective go-to-market approach is to deliver validated bundles for defined outcomes such as rapid pathogen characterization, structural variant analysis, metagenomic surveillance, or methylation profiling. This includes optimized sample-to-answer protocols, recommended compute configurations, and reporting templates that shorten time to value.

Supply-chain resilience should be elevated from operations to strategy, particularly in light of tariff uncertainty and component dependency. Leaders should map bill-of-materials exposure, qualify alternate suppliers for critical inputs, and develop inventory strategies that balance continuity with shelf-life constraints. Where feasible, regional staging of consumables and service parts can reduce downtime risk for customers who cannot tolerate interruptions.

Informatics strategy is another decisive lever. Offering hybrid deployment options-local basecalling with secure, scalable downstream analytics-helps organizations address data residency concerns while maintaining performance. Interoperability with laboratory information systems, standardized file formats, and auditable pipelines will differentiate vendors and solution providers aiming for clinical-adjacent adoption.

Finally, talent and enablement are critical. Training programs should be designed for real lab workflows, not just product features, and should include troubleshooting playbooks that reduce run failure rates. For end users, building cross-functional teams that span wet lab, bioinformatics, IT security, and quality management will accelerate responsible adoption and reduce hidden implementation costs.

A rigorous methodology combining technical literature, stakeholder interviews, and triangulated validation to map nanopore adoption and competition clearly

This research methodology is structured to deliver a practical, decision-oriented view of nanopore single molecule sequencing across technology, workflow adoption, and competitive positioning. The work begins with comprehensive secondary research, reviewing peer-reviewed literature, regulatory and standards guidance where applicable, patent activity patterns, product documentation, and public technical disclosures from relevant ecosystem participants. This step establishes a grounded understanding of technology trajectories, validated use cases, and workflow constraints.

Primary research is then used to test assumptions and capture real-world adoption drivers. Insights are gathered through structured conversations with stakeholders spanning platform and consumables providers, laboratory directors, principal investigators, bioinformatics leads, procurement and sourcing professionals, and quality or regulatory specialists. These discussions focus on decision criteria, pain points in sample preparation and analysis, service expectations, and how organizations manage software and chemistry change over time.

To ensure consistency, findings are triangulated across multiple perspectives and validated against observable signals such as product release cadence, stated roadmap themes, partnership activity, and workflow integration patterns. Segmentation is applied to organize insights by offering, workflow stage, application, end user, and channel, while regional analysis is anchored in infrastructure and governance realities that influence deployment models.

Quality assurance is maintained through internal review, cross-checking of technical claims, and careful separation of verified facts from interpretive analysis. The resulting output is designed to support strategic planning, product positioning, partnership prioritization, procurement risk management, and go-to-market execution without relying on speculative numerical projections.

Nanopore sequencing is shifting from breakthrough tech to operational standard, rewarding reproducibility, resilience, and application-specific execution

Nanopore single molecule sequencing is entering a phase where its defining advantages-long reads, real-time output, and flexible deployment-are being translated into more standardized workflows and clearer purchasing criteria. As software and chemistry continue to improve, decision-makers are placing greater weight on reproducibility, integration, and the operational maturity of the full solution stack.

At the same time, external pressures such as tariff-driven cost variability and supply-chain fragility are pushing both vendors and laboratories to plan more deliberately. The winners in this environment will be those who reduce uncertainty for customers: uncertainty in results through transparent, version-controlled analytics; uncertainty in uptime through resilient consumable and service models; and uncertainty in implementation through validated, application-specific packages.

Ultimately, nanopore sequencing’s trajectory will be shaped not only by technical performance but also by how effectively the ecosystem turns that performance into reliable, auditable, and scalable outcomes. Organizations that align their strategies with segmentation-driven needs and region-specific realities will be best positioned to convert scientific promise into sustained operational value.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.4. Years Considered for the Study
1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
1.6. Language Considered for the Study
1.7. Key Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Research Design
2.2.1. Primary Research
2.2.2. Secondary Research
2.3. Research Framework
2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
2.4. Market Size Estimation
2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
2.5. Data Triangulation
2.6. Research Outcomes
2.7. Research Assumptions
2.8. Research Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Introduction
3.2. CXO Perspective
3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
3.8. Industry Roadmap
4. Market Overview
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.4. PESTLE Analysis
4.5. Market Outlook
4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
5. Market Insights
5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
5.3. Opportunity Mapping
5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Nanopore Single Molecule Sequencer Market, by Product Type
8.1. Consumable
8.1.1. Flow Cells
8.1.2. Kits
8.2. Instrument
8.2.1. Gridion
8.2.2. Minion
8.2.3. Promethion
8.3. Software
8.3.1. Analysis Software
8.3.2. Cloud Solutions
9. Nanopore Single Molecule Sequencer Market, by Business Model
9.1. Product Sales
9.2. Service Contracts
10. Nanopore Single Molecule Sequencer Market, by Application
10.1. Clinical Diagnostics
10.2. Epigenomics
10.3. Genomics
10.4. Metagenomics
10.5. Transcriptomics
11. Nanopore Single Molecule Sequencer Market, by End User
11.1. Academic Government
11.2. Biopharma Pharma
11.3. Clinical Laboratories
11.4. Contract Research Organizations
12. Nanopore Single Molecule Sequencer Market, by Region
12.1. Americas
12.1.1. North America
12.1.2. Latin America
12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
12.2.1. Europe
12.2.2. Middle East
12.2.3. Africa
12.3. Asia-Pacific
13. Nanopore Single Molecule Sequencer Market, by Group
13.1. ASEAN
13.2. GCC
13.3. European Union
13.4. BRICS
13.5. G7
13.6. NATO
14. Nanopore Single Molecule Sequencer Market, by Country
14.1. United States
14.2. Canada
14.3. Mexico
14.4. Brazil
14.5. United Kingdom
14.6. Germany
14.7. France
14.8. Russia
14.9. Italy
14.10. Spain
14.11. China
14.12. India
14.13. Japan
14.14. Australia
14.15. South Korea
15. United States Nanopore Single Molecule Sequencer Market
16. China Nanopore Single Molecule Sequencer Market
17. Competitive Landscape
17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
17.5. 10x Genomics, Inc.
17.6. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
17.7. BGI Genomics Co., Ltd.
17.8. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
17.9. Direct Genomics Co., Ltd.
17.10. Eurofins Scientific SE
17.11. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
17.12. Genapsys, Inc.
17.13. Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation
17.14. Illumina, Inc.
17.15. Microsynth AG
17.16. Nabsys, Inc.
17.17. Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc
17.18. Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
17.19. PerkinElmer, Inc.
17.20. QIAGEN N.V.
17.21. Quantum Biosystems Inc.
17.22. SeqLL Inc.
17.23. Stratos Genomics, Inc.
17.24. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
17.25. Zymo Research Corporation
List of Figures
FIGURE 1. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 2. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
FIGURE 3. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
FIGURE 4. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 5. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 6. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 7. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 8. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 9. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 10. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 12. CHINA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
List of Tables
TABLE 1. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 2. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 3. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 4. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 5. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 6. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 7. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW CELLS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 8. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW CELLS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 9. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW CELLS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 10. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY KITS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 11. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY KITS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 12. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY KITS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 13. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 14. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 15. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 16. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 17. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY GRIDION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 18. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY GRIDION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 19. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY GRIDION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 20. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY MINION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 21. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY MINION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 22. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY MINION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 23. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PROMETHION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 24. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PROMETHION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 25. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PROMETHION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 26. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 27. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 28. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 29. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 30. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY ANALYSIS SOFTWARE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 31. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY ANALYSIS SOFTWARE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 32. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY ANALYSIS SOFTWARE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 33. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD SOLUTIONS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 34. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD SOLUTIONS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 35. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD SOLUTIONS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 36. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 37. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT SALES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 38. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT SALES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 39. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT SALES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 40. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE CONTRACTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 41. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE CONTRACTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 42. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE CONTRACTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 43. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 44. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 45. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 46. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 47. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY EPIGENOMICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 48. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY EPIGENOMICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 49. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY EPIGENOMICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 50. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY GENOMICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 51. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY GENOMICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 52. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY GENOMICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 53. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY METAGENOMICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 54. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY METAGENOMICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 55. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY METAGENOMICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 56. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSCRIPTOMICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 57. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSCRIPTOMICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 58. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSCRIPTOMICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 59. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 60. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY ACADEMIC GOVERNMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 61. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY ACADEMIC GOVERNMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 62. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY ACADEMIC GOVERNMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 63. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BIOPHARMA PHARMA, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 64. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BIOPHARMA PHARMA, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 65. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BIOPHARMA PHARMA, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 66. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CLINICAL LABORATORIES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 67. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CLINICAL LABORATORIES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 68. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CLINICAL LABORATORIES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 69. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONTRACT RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 70. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONTRACT RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 71. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONTRACT RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 72. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 73. AMERICAS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 74. AMERICAS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 75. AMERICAS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 76. AMERICAS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 77. AMERICAS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 78. AMERICAS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 79. AMERICAS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 80. AMERICAS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 81. NORTH AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 82. NORTH AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 83. NORTH AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 84. NORTH AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 85. NORTH AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 86. NORTH AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 87. NORTH AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 88. NORTH AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 89. LATIN AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 90. LATIN AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 91. LATIN AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 92. LATIN AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 93. LATIN AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 94. LATIN AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 95. LATIN AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 96. LATIN AMERICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 97. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 98. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 99. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 100. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 101. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 102. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 103. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 104. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 105. EUROPE NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 106. EUROPE NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 107. EUROPE NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 108. EUROPE NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 109. EUROPE NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 110. EUROPE NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 111. EUROPE NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 112. EUROPE NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 113. MIDDLE EAST NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 114. MIDDLE EAST NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 115. MIDDLE EAST NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 116. MIDDLE EAST NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 117. MIDDLE EAST NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 118. MIDDLE EAST NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 119. MIDDLE EAST NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 120. MIDDLE EAST NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 121. AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 122. AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 123. AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 124. AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 125. AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 126. AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 127. AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 128. AFRICA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 129. ASIA-PACIFIC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 130. ASIA-PACIFIC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 131. ASIA-PACIFIC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 132. ASIA-PACIFIC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 133. ASIA-PACIFIC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 134. ASIA-PACIFIC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 135. ASIA-PACIFIC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 136. ASIA-PACIFIC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 137. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 138. ASEAN NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 139. ASEAN NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 140. ASEAN NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 141. ASEAN NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 142. ASEAN NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 143. ASEAN NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 144. ASEAN NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 145. ASEAN NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 146. GCC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 147. GCC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 148. GCC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 149. GCC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 150. GCC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 151. GCC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 152. GCC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 153. GCC NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 154. EUROPEAN UNION NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 155. EUROPEAN UNION NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 156. EUROPEAN UNION NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 157. EUROPEAN UNION NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 158. EUROPEAN UNION NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 159. EUROPEAN UNION NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 160. EUROPEAN UNION NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 161. EUROPEAN UNION NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 162. BRICS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 163. BRICS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 164. BRICS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 165. BRICS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 166. BRICS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 167. BRICS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 168. BRICS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 169. BRICS NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 170. G7 NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 171. G7 NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 172. G7 NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 173. G7 NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 174. G7 NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 175. G7 NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 176. G7 NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 177. G7 NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 178. NATO NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 179. NATO NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 180. NATO NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 181. NATO NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 182. NATO NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 183. NATO NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 184. NATO NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 185. NATO NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 186. GLOBAL NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 187. UNITED STATES NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 188. UNITED STATES NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 189. UNITED STATES NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 190. UNITED STATES NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 191. UNITED STATES NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 192. UNITED STATES NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 193. UNITED STATES NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 194. UNITED STATES NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 195. CHINA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 196. CHINA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 197. CHINA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMABLE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 198. CHINA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY INSTRUMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 199. CHINA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY SOFTWARE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 200. CHINA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY BUSINESS MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 201. CHINA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 202. CHINA NANOPORE SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCER MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

Companies Mentioned

The key companies profiled in this Nanopore Single Molecule Sequencer market report include:
  • 10x Genomics, Inc.
  • Agilent Technologies, Inc.
  • BGI Genomics Co., Ltd.
  • Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
  • Direct Genomics Co., Ltd.
  • Eurofins Scientific SE
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
  • Genapsys, Inc.
  • Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation
  • Illumina, Inc.
  • Microsynth AG
  • Nabsys, Inc.
  • Oxford Nanopore Technologies plc
  • Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
  • PerkinElmer, Inc.
  • QIAGEN N.V.
  • Quantum Biosystems Inc.
  • SeqLL Inc.
  • Stratos Genomics, Inc.
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • Zymo Research Corporation

Table Information